NoahA (Florida)
Posts: 212
Posts: 212
Posted:
When a couple moved into the community they asked if their "pet chickens" could be made a exception for. The president said "We dont allow chickens" but said that he would ask the neighbor and if the neighbor did not mind well awe shucks we'll just break the rules"
That same president who has now stepped down says "We cant make people get rid of their pets"
The new president says "the county calls chickens pets"
The rules say you can have only normal household pets and lists which ones your limited to having.
now that is said.
They want to NOW consider what was always called "pets" , "livestock".......the person who has these chickens is NOW on the board....and I feel they are trying to play gymnasitics with verbiage to cherry pick enforcing the rules.
8.01 PETS
No pets shall he maintained or-kept on any portion of the
property. Including within any dualling unit, other-than common,
household pets such as cats, dogs, goldfish, tropical fish and
the like, and such birds as canaries and parakeets. Ho animals;'
including any of the above, may be kept, bred, w maintained for
any commercial use upon the property or within a building or
structure. In any event, no more than two (2) pets shall be main-
tained within the boundaries of any lot.
My take is the phrase "other than"
Since this is a DEED RESTRICTION, it just be talking about restricting something.
If I said "you cannot pick a number OTHER THAN 4, 5, 6, 7 , than that by default should meant, that every other than is not 4 , 5 , 6 or 7 is ineligble to be picked?
Can anyone tell me if this logic is wrong?
I can't imagine how anyone can say their pets are "now livestock".....and I can't imagine anyone saying chickens are "household pets" either.
That same president who has now stepped down says "We cant make people get rid of their pets"
The new president says "the county calls chickens pets"
The rules say you can have only normal household pets and lists which ones your limited to having.
now that is said.
They want to NOW consider what was always called "pets" , "livestock".......the person who has these chickens is NOW on the board....and I feel they are trying to play gymnasitics with verbiage to cherry pick enforcing the rules.
8.01 PETS
No pets shall he maintained or-kept on any portion of the
property. Including within any dualling unit, other-than common,
household pets such as cats, dogs, goldfish, tropical fish and
the like, and such birds as canaries and parakeets. Ho animals;'
including any of the above, may be kept, bred, w maintained for
any commercial use upon the property or within a building or
structure. In any event, no more than two (2) pets shall be main-
tained within the boundaries of any lot.
My take is the phrase "other than"
Since this is a DEED RESTRICTION, it just be talking about restricting something.
If I said "you cannot pick a number OTHER THAN 4, 5, 6, 7 , than that by default should meant, that every other than is not 4 , 5 , 6 or 7 is ineligble to be picked?
Can anyone tell me if this logic is wrong?
I can't imagine how anyone can say their pets are "now livestock".....and I can't imagine anyone saying chickens are "household pets" either.