MaryC31 (Ohio)
Posts: 6
Posts: 6
Posted:
We have an Architectural Review Committee(ARC)as part of our development. These are single homes- not condos. The rules are very vague and say the Architectural Review Committee can deny any improvement on aesthetics, alone. The board is made up of 3 members, two of them are husband and wife and the developers. The issue is we want to put in an inground pool (no rules against it). My yard is very sloped, they ask for elevations, but there are no written rules on what elevation has to be. It will be even with house base level. Retaining walls will be toward the back wooded lot. Previously, I submitted a pool plan and the elevations were even higher than the ones we are proposing now (it was approved), but it was in the back of the house. Our house is on a wooded lot, no one would even see the pool, regardless of where we put it in the backyard.
We also said, we'd put in any landscape they want. There are several pools in the neighborhood. One neighbor has her pool on the side of her backyard. We are proposing the same (our pools are very similar, she has retaining walls too, only difference is our elevation). Another person, did not get approval and put their pool on the side of their yard (not even the back yard-it appears the plan was to ask for forgiveness, rather than permission). ARC was angry but did not make them tear it down. They are making them put landscape around it and retroactively approved it.
We are trying to do everything the right way, but they are giving us tons of push back, when others have been allowed. There are specific rules set forth in the ARC that have been broken-nothing is done. There are no specific guidelines for what we want to do (other than it has to be inground) and ARC can deny it on aesthetics alone. People have hot tubs and playsets on the side of their backyards, that they were supposed to get approval for, they did not-nothing done.
This seems very arbitrary and capricious to us. An abuse of power. They are not being consistent or reasonable. Again, no one will even be able to see the pool, so not sure how the aesthetics are an issue? You can see all the other people's pools Not to mention, the pool will be beautiful. Any thoughts?
We also said, we'd put in any landscape they want. There are several pools in the neighborhood. One neighbor has her pool on the side of her backyard. We are proposing the same (our pools are very similar, she has retaining walls too, only difference is our elevation). Another person, did not get approval and put their pool on the side of their yard (not even the back yard-it appears the plan was to ask for forgiveness, rather than permission). ARC was angry but did not make them tear it down. They are making them put landscape around it and retroactively approved it.
We are trying to do everything the right way, but they are giving us tons of push back, when others have been allowed. There are specific rules set forth in the ARC that have been broken-nothing is done. There are no specific guidelines for what we want to do (other than it has to be inground) and ARC can deny it on aesthetics alone. People have hot tubs and playsets on the side of their backyards, that they were supposed to get approval for, they did not-nothing done.
This seems very arbitrary and capricious to us. An abuse of power. They are not being consistent or reasonable. Again, no one will even be able to see the pool, so not sure how the aesthetics are an issue? You can see all the other people's pools Not to mention, the pool will be beautiful. Any thoughts?