Quote:
Posted By AnneB4 on 04/29/2018 6:20 PM
Some of the homeowners believe the president was given a large number of proxies under questionable circumstances. If she changes the day herself, then presumably the proxies would be invalid and she wouldn't have enough to control the vote.
I did a little searching online but couldn't find any examples of DBPR arbitration rulings that fit your scenario. There may have been court cases about it, but online information about court cases is sparse compared to DBPR rulings.
If she forged a signature that would be unlawful. If she altered the name of the proxy holder then that would also be unlawful. If she altered some other material aspect it might also be unlawful but the day-of-week isn't one of the statutory requirements for a valid proxy. If the date is correct then the day-of-week mistake might not matter whether it was "corrected" or not by the proxy holder.
I just found a DBPR ruling that cited a 1960 appellate court case. It says if a proxy was improperly voted or the proxy-holder exceeded his authority, the proper parties to complain are those who gave the proxies themselves. If Bob gave a proxy and the proxy-holder altered it then only Bob could complain about it. Another petitioner would not have standing.
You may have valid concerns about whether or not your president is being honest, truthful and acting in good faith, but in my opinion (not a legal one since I'm not an attorney) the proxies would be ruled valid.