💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

AdrienneP (Washington)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Hi, I am a member of a HOA in WA that is currently gearing up to hold a vote on a Special Assessment. The possible problem is that the SA is for the ongoing, routine maintenance of our recreational facilities and parks and trails for a five-year period (with no plans for funding thereafter). There are no improvements or extraordinary (capital) repairs involved.

My understanding - from online research and also past experience in our community - is that special assessments are intended to support one-off capital improvements or repairs. Or even one-off costs such as legal cases. That's fine. What I and many other residents find inappropriate is that this SA is not for one-off costs typically funded from our capital accounts. It will fund items in our operational budget.

Some have questioned whether this is allowable under state law (RCW). I personally am not sure about that. But I would like to get feedback on the relevant section of our bylaws, which I have included below. The key question is, does the phrase "*other* Association purposes" open the door to the use of special assessments (rather than annual dues increases) for any possible purpose? Or should "other" also be interpreted in the context of subsection (ii) that refers to maintenance?

It is possibly of note that the language of this section was changed from "proper purposes" to "Association purposes" in an AGM a few years ago. I don't think anyone (apart from possibly the author) realized at the time what this might open the door to.

Thank you for your help!

Section 19. Annual Dues and Assessments, and Special Assessments.
(a) Assessments.
(i) [...].
(ii) Annual dues and assessments shall be used for the general purposes of promoting the
recreation, health, safety, welfare, common benefit and enjoyment of the owners,
including maintenance of the Association's real and personal property, all of which may
be more specifically authorized from time to time by the Board.
(iii) Special assessments shall be for the purpose of paying the costs of, and any loans related
to, capital improvements and repair and other Association purposes.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Adrienne,

From the statute you cited, I would say that SA can be used for the maintenance, repair and replacement of capital components. Typically, this money would come from the Reserves. However, if the reserves are under funded, then SA will be used to address this shortage when the time comes for the maintenance, repair or replacement of capital components.
AdrienneP (Washington)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Thanks TimB4!

To clarify further, is it your opinion, then, that the SA is consistent with the section of the bylaws that I included?
In other words, do you think that use of the SA for routine, annual operation and maintenance of our recreational facilities and parks (rather than their infrequent, periodic maintenance) is not in violation of that section?

This may also help -- the current proposed wording of the SGM:
"This Special Assessment will be used for the sole purposes of funding the maintenance, operations and Member enjoyment of the Community Center, main pool, adult pool, and gym as well as parks and trails*. [...] *Funds collected will be placed into its own department in the operations fund and tracked separately."
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Yes.

Per your citation [emphasis added]:

(iii) Special assessments shall be for the purpose of paying the costs of, and any loans related
to, capital improvements and repair and other Association purposes.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
The apparant issue is that your annual assessments are not enough to properly fund your Reserves and pay normal operating costs. Until that changes, expect to see special assessments.

What does your Reserve Study say should be contributed to the Reserves and is that being done?

For more info on Reserve studies see the following thread:

Subject: Reserve Studies/Funds 101
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
AdrienneP, by any chance do your governing documents prohibit a mid-year regular assessment increase? If so, this would possibly be because the annual budget was approved some months ago, and changing the budget, and so the regular assessment, would require an expensive special vote of the members. This could explain why the Board chose to impose a Special Assessment to help pay for operational expenses.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Adr

The answer is here:

(iii) Special assessments shall be for the purpose of paying the costs of, and any loans related
to, capital improvements and repair and other Association purposes.


According to the above, what they are doing is proper.

BenA2 (Texas)
Posts: 1,273
Posted:
I think your bylaws clearly allow it as long as it does not conflict with your CC&Rs. If they conflict, you would have to follow the CC&Rs because they are superior in the hierarchy of documents.

Even though it may be allowed, special assessments should be used for unforseen costs and not as a funding tool for routine maintenance, which should be in the budget.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I agree with the others and their interpretations. And your own governing documents or WA state law probably require a SA vote by Owners if the amount of the SA would cause assessments to go up $xx more than they currently are. An important reason it's so important to fund reserves adequately is to avoid special assessments.

Does your HOA have a reserves account where $$ is deposited monthly to pay for the eventual repair or replacement of common area comments your HOA is obligated to maintain? If so, it sounds like the Board has been underfunding it.

I see you cited your Bylaws, but you also may want to read WA statutes on the topic of reserves (If there are any).
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 03/11/2018 9:43 AM

If so, it sounds like the Board has been underfunding it [Reserves].

To be fair, it may be the membership that is underfunding the Reserves.

For example: after our reserve study was completed, we needed to raise assessments by 20% to fully fund the Reserves. That amount was beyond the amount the Board had authority to raise assessments by. Had our membership not supported the increase, our Reserves would be underfunded as inflation (for our area) runs about 4% and the Board can only increase by 5%. Hence, my Association would be facing the same need for special assessments as the OP's Association is facing.

Translation: It might not be the Boards fault.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
IF the current and previous boards had been funding reserves properly, there'd be no sudden need for a PA requiring the Owners to decide with their votes.

But I'm only speculating as the OP hasn't told us why a SA is needed, i.e., is the problem underfunded reserves such that reprise & replacements of existing comments cannot be paid for without a big increase.

A second source of underfunded reserves, especially in newer communities, is that developers often set up an unrealistic funding level to keep dues down in order to sell their product. It can take a few years before one or future Boards can see that the reserves are underfunded UNLESS they get reserve studies done by certified professionals. At least, the board should have a complete study early on to establish a realistic baseline.

Adrienne's HOA sounds complex enough that that board should not try it on their own, which can work in HOAs with few common area obligations.
AdrienneP (Washington)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Thank you all for your feedback!

Yes, our reserves are definitely extremely underfunded, there is no doubt about that. We are a large, aging HOA; we have reserve studies and they do not make for encouraging reading.

Just to clarify also, there is no restriction on submitting a dues increase for a vote of the membership between AGMs. What is more, the membership approval process is identical for increases in regular assessments (annual dues) and special assessments.

The proponents of the 5-year special assessment have decided to do it this way because they believe that only special assessment revenues can be placed in a separate account and tracked - ie. used for no other purpose than the one on the ballot. This is a very fair concern. The results of past dues increases and special assessments have been mixed, to say the least.

However, given that the plan is to fund basic operations for the recreational amenities in our communities, it would seem far more reasonable to me (and others) to propose a permanent dues increase rather than just five years of funding that will then leave the community scrabbling for a plan in the sixth year. (Unsurprisingly there are other points of discord, but this is the one I am focused on.) I am wondering if perhaps the same restrictions (separate account, tracked) could be placed on an annual dues increase.

That said, it seems from your responses that you all understand "other Association purposes" to relate to any purpose at all, including operations. I thought it needed to be interpreted in the context of capital spending. It was always so in the past in our community, but the wording of the bylaw was changed a couple of years ago (from "proper" purposes to "Association" purposes). This would be the first time a time-bound special assessment has been used for ongoing operations.

Any further discussion welcome, thank you!
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Thanks for clarification, Adrienne.

Since you have a reserve study, I assume you have a reserves account, right? It's underfunded. The proposed SA could be earmarked to be solely used for the major repair or replacement of the components listed in your reserves study.

Sure, there are repairs made out of your operations budget, but they should only be routine repairs, let's say, annual tree trimming. Reserves would contain the estimated life of the trees, the remaining estimated life, and the estimated cost to replace all of them. So....reserves contain a lot more that just one-off expenses.

To buy something entirely new that your HOA doesn't have-that's major-- is a capital expenditure. Those funds cannot come from reserves (in CA). But once purchased, the component is put in your reserves study for future major repairs or replacement of it.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
If you are an HOA as you stated your state statute (http://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=64.38) notes:

RCW 64.38.025
Board of directors—Standard of care—Restrictions—Budget—Removal from board.
(1) Except as provided in the association's governing documents or this chapter, the board of directors shall act in all instances on behalf of the association. In the performance of their duties, the officers and members of the board of directors shall exercise the degree of care and loyalty required of an officer or director of a corporation organized under chapter 24.03 RCW.
(2) The board of directors shall not act on behalf of the association to amend the articles of incorporation, to take any action that requires the vote or approval of the owners, to terminate the association, to elect members of the board of directors, or to determine the qualifications, powers, and duties, or terms of office of members of the board of directors; but the board of directors may fill vacancies in its membership of the unexpired portion of any term.
(3) Within thirty days after adoption by the board of directors of any proposed regular or special budget of the association, the board shall set a date for a meeting of the owners to consider ratification of the budget not less than fourteen nor more than sixty days after mailing of the summary. Unless at that meeting the owners of a majority of the votes in the association are allocated or any larger percentage specified in the governing documents reject the budget, in person or by proxy, the budget is ratified, whether or not a quorum is present. In the event the proposed budget is rejected or the required notice is not given, the periodic budget last ratified by the owners shall be continued until such time as the owners ratify a subsequent budget proposed by the board of directors.
(4) As part of the summary of the budget provided to all owners, the board of directors shall disclose to the owners:
(a) The current amount of regular assessments budgeted for contribution to the reserve account, the recommended contribution rate from the reserve study, and the funding plan upon which the recommended contribution rate is based;
(b) If additional regular or special assessments are scheduled to be imposed, the date the assessments are due, the amount of the assessments per each owner per month or year, and the purpose of the assessments;
(c) Based upon the most recent reserve study and other information, whether currently projected reserve account balances will be sufficient at the end of each year to meet the association's obligation for major maintenance, repair, or replacement of reserve components during the next thirty years;
(d) If reserve account balances are not projected to be sufficient, what additional assessments may be necessary to ensure that sufficient reserve account funds will be available each year during the next thirty years, the approximate dates assessments may be due, and the amount of the assessments per owner per month or year;
(e) The estimated amount recommended in the reserve account at the end of the current fiscal year based on the most recent reserve study, the projected reserve account cash balance at the end of the current fiscal year, and the percent funded at the date of the latest reserve study;
(f) The estimated amount recommended in the reserve account based upon the most recent reserve study at the end of each of the next five budget years, the projected reserve account cash balance in each of those years, and the projected percent funded for each of those years; and
(g) If the funding plan approved by the association is implemented, the projected reserve account cash balance in each of the next five budget years and the percent funded for each of those years.
(5) The owners by a majority vote of the voting power in the association present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote at any meeting of the owners at which a quorum is present, may remove any member of the board of directors with or without cause.
[ 2011 c 189 § 8; 1995 c 283 § 5.]

Note what is needed to be provided as stated above under section (4)(d) in answer to some of your other concerns. Sounds almost like your HOA is not addressing the real problem of proper reserve account and proper dues to cover current expenses and fund the reserve.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here