💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

ArjunS (Illinois)
Posts: 45
Posted:
Hello Everyone!

Our neighborhood has covenants that MAY be invalid because it states that the builder, 40 years ago, was meant to appoint appoint an Architectural Board which he did not do. Furthermore, the covenants have been violated with no enforcement thus far. It states that homeowners individually or collectively may sue for damages if there is a violation, it also says that there must a 2/3 vote to change the rules. NO Architectural board, Board of Directors or HOA was formed by the builder 40 years ago. He simply recorded the covenants and then sold off his lots.

My question is as follows:

1) While there can be a vote to change rules, can the vote also Add rules specifically one that requires home owners to pay a fee or dues?

2) If the neighborhood decides in majority to form an HOA, given that there are covenants recorded against the land - can ALL homeowners be forced to join the HOA regardless of it they want to?

3) Can the covenants be modified to force people to join the HOA?

The covenant documents are 3 pages and written in simple english. I have attached a copy as a PDF for your reference, please feel free to take a look Any advice will be GREATLY appreciated.

THANK YOU!!!
📎 Attachments (1):

⏸ Downloads temporarily unavailable

📄135163482854.pdf(138 KB)
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Arjun,

I read the document you provided.
In my laypersons opinion, they are valid.

There is nothing preventing you if you want to activate the Association created by the documents.
You need to seek and obtain actual legal advice to do so, as many of the questions you ask are legal in nature and requires a legal opinion.
ArjunS (Illinois)
Posts: 45
Posted:
Thank you for sharing your thoughts Tim! Have you seen a case were someone was forced to join an HOA after they bought their home because CCR's existed?

Best,
Arjun
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
I've seen cases where the HOA was inactive and someone activated it.

Regardless if membership in the Association is mandatory or voluntary, the restrictions would still exist and must be complied with.
ArjunS (Illinois)
Posts: 45
Posted:
Thanks for sharing your opinion! I am under the impression that they are invalid because of selective enforcement, no valid BOD, HOA or Architectural Committee being appointed.

Regardless, I wonder if a homeowner can be forced to join a new HOA that was formed after they bought their home.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Selective enforcement is a defense that the court may or may not consider. It would only be valid if the Association (not an individual member) was bringing enforcement action against you.

If there is no active Association there is simply no enforcement. However, that does not automatically make the restrictions unenforceable.

Have you talked to those with fences? Perhaps they requested permission and obtained it.

Associations, if the enforce, must enforce equally. However, there is typically no requirement to enforce. They have the option just as each member has the option to enforce.
Individual members enforcing do so through the courts.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here