MalcolmM1 (Colorado)
Posts: 9
Posts: 9
Posted:
Hello. Our HOA is responsible for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of roofs in our 60-unit SFR community. Homeowners are required to carry insurance on those roofs.
The question is, how do we reasonably determine when a repair is an insurable event (and responsibility of a homeowner) or a maintenance/end-of-life repair (responsibility of the HOA)?
Example: these are 20-year-old roofs with "25-year" shingles. One unit lost a section of shingles this summer, likely in a wind event. Repair is $2,000. The roof has some life left in it otherwise, unknown, but let's say 5 years. Full replacement will probably be $7,000 to $9,000 assuming no underlying issues.
Who pays?
One argument would be: this is an insurable event, so it's the homeowner's problem. The other argument is: these are old roofs, it's time for the HOA to repair/replace them. The homeowner's insurer is likely to argue the latter, and besides, due to deductible, the owner probably wont claim anyway.
"Repair and replace" seems pretty straightforward, right, this is a repair, so the HOA pays, right? Except then I wonder why owners even bother insuring the roofs.
So, next I say: if these were new two-year-old roofs, and a major windstorm came through and completely shredded the roof, we would not be talking about this, it would be a claim for the homeowner to deal with their insurance. On the other end of the spectrum, if the roof was in really bad shape from age right now, the HOA would probably use this event as the opportunity to step in and replace the entire roof.
So, our problem is: between these two extremes, we need a policy to decide who pays for the repair, when it might be insurable damage and might be age, and there's probably no concrete way to decide which.
Thanks.
[here's excerpts from the declarations]
Under Section 2.12, the final sentence of that section states “although they are maintained by the Association, the front yards and residence exteriors and roofs in Thompson Corner are not Common Areas.” Section 2.13 discusses expenses in the community that may be charged as common expenses – in subsection (h) of that section, it includes the cost of “repairing and replacing the roofs on such residences, and reasonable reserves for such repainting or residing and for such roof repair and replacement.”
Finally, Section 3.3(b) states that the Association “shall be responsible for…(iv) repairing when necessary and periodically replacing the roofs on such residences.”
Regarding insurance, the Owners are responsible for carrying hazard insurance on the roofs. Under Section 9.16(m) of the Declaration, Owners are required to insure “furnishings and other items of personal property belonging to a Lot Owner or Occupant, public liability insurance upon each Lot, and hazard insurance coverage on the Improvements constructed on Lots...”
The question is, how do we reasonably determine when a repair is an insurable event (and responsibility of a homeowner) or a maintenance/end-of-life repair (responsibility of the HOA)?
Example: these are 20-year-old roofs with "25-year" shingles. One unit lost a section of shingles this summer, likely in a wind event. Repair is $2,000. The roof has some life left in it otherwise, unknown, but let's say 5 years. Full replacement will probably be $7,000 to $9,000 assuming no underlying issues.
Who pays?
One argument would be: this is an insurable event, so it's the homeowner's problem. The other argument is: these are old roofs, it's time for the HOA to repair/replace them. The homeowner's insurer is likely to argue the latter, and besides, due to deductible, the owner probably wont claim anyway.
"Repair and replace" seems pretty straightforward, right, this is a repair, so the HOA pays, right? Except then I wonder why owners even bother insuring the roofs.
So, next I say: if these were new two-year-old roofs, and a major windstorm came through and completely shredded the roof, we would not be talking about this, it would be a claim for the homeowner to deal with their insurance. On the other end of the spectrum, if the roof was in really bad shape from age right now, the HOA would probably use this event as the opportunity to step in and replace the entire roof.
So, our problem is: between these two extremes, we need a policy to decide who pays for the repair, when it might be insurable damage and might be age, and there's probably no concrete way to decide which.
Thanks.
[here's excerpts from the declarations]
Under Section 2.12, the final sentence of that section states “although they are maintained by the Association, the front yards and residence exteriors and roofs in Thompson Corner are not Common Areas.” Section 2.13 discusses expenses in the community that may be charged as common expenses – in subsection (h) of that section, it includes the cost of “repairing and replacing the roofs on such residences, and reasonable reserves for such repainting or residing and for such roof repair and replacement.”
Finally, Section 3.3(b) states that the Association “shall be responsible for…(iv) repairing when necessary and periodically replacing the roofs on such residences.”
Regarding insurance, the Owners are responsible for carrying hazard insurance on the roofs. Under Section 9.16(m) of the Declaration, Owners are required to insure “furnishings and other items of personal property belonging to a Lot Owner or Occupant, public liability insurance upon each Lot, and hazard insurance coverage on the Improvements constructed on Lots...”