HaleyH (Illinois)
Posts: 67
Posts: 67
Posted:
The prior Board had assessed two large dog fines against an owner-- A Board Meeting was held and requested that the dog owner attend to discuss the 'charges' in a closed session. The member didn't attend but her attorney sent an email a few days later stating the HOA had no proof of her dog going in another member's yard. A new Board is now in place and feels the way the fines were determined and assessed were out of line:
1. The president of the prior Board was not notified of the fines assessed to the member. (this action of fining the member was the work of the treasurer)
2. There is no proof of the dogs pooping in the yard (but there are emails and letters in this members file of notification of older complaints regarding her dogs)
3. 1st fine was $100, 2nd fine was $250 (Dog owner had received a certified letter prior to this that the next time the dogs pooped in the neighbor's yard these fines would be assessed)
4. After the certified letter was sent to the dog owner; it was soon after a monthly charge was made for the $100, next month $250, and 3rd month; their was a 3rd fine $400. The 3rd fine was waived after considerable discussion with the one last remaining Board member from the 'old regime'.
5. The treasurer charged her monthly without notifying any members of the Board (it his yard that the dog is charged with going in.)
This dog owner has access to an attorney at no expense we think - but more importantly the new Board feels why Risk paying legal fees for a situation that the HOA would lose. The new Board wants to hold another closed session and have the dog owner come to discuss - and the new Board wants to waive all fees due to all outlined above.
Question -- can the new Board reverse the 'settled matter' of the prior Board?
We have an irate prior Board member who is insisting the dog fines remain....and he is ok if we need to pay legal fees if she takes us to court.
1. The president of the prior Board was not notified of the fines assessed to the member. (this action of fining the member was the work of the treasurer)
2. There is no proof of the dogs pooping in the yard (but there are emails and letters in this members file of notification of older complaints regarding her dogs)
3. 1st fine was $100, 2nd fine was $250 (Dog owner had received a certified letter prior to this that the next time the dogs pooped in the neighbor's yard these fines would be assessed)
4. After the certified letter was sent to the dog owner; it was soon after a monthly charge was made for the $100, next month $250, and 3rd month; their was a 3rd fine $400. The 3rd fine was waived after considerable discussion with the one last remaining Board member from the 'old regime'.
5. The treasurer charged her monthly without notifying any members of the Board (it his yard that the dog is charged with going in.)
This dog owner has access to an attorney at no expense we think - but more importantly the new Board feels why Risk paying legal fees for a situation that the HOA would lose. The new Board wants to hold another closed session and have the dog owner come to discuss - and the new Board wants to waive all fees due to all outlined above.
Question -- can the new Board reverse the 'settled matter' of the prior Board?
We have an irate prior Board member who is insisting the dog fines remain....and he is ok if we need to pay legal fees if she takes us to court.