💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KayeO (North Carolina)
Posts: 1
Posted:
Our community is a 200 home development in North Carolina. The development was built in the early 1970's and still has a very active Board of Directors and neighborhood committees.

As the Chairman of our Community Relations Committee, I have been asked by our Board to address the following issue. Our homeowners assocation was formed under North Carolina General Statute Chapter 55A which does NOT allow the imposition of fines for bylaw violations or the ability to recoup any legal expenses if the Board chooses to prosecute homeowners for violations.

The current North Carolina statute for planned developments built after January 1999 is chapter 47F.

Our Board of Directors would like to the community to adopt this new statute which WOULD give the Board more authority for imposing and collecting fines. Adoption of the statute would require 2/3 approval of the membership.

Problem: How in the world do we sell our homeowners on approving this when on the surface all it appears to do is give the Board more control. For those willing to think this through, hopefully they will understand the approval would allow us to better protect our property values and the assets of the assocation.

Does anyone have any experience in having pursued this or any suggestions on how to move forward.
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
KayeO - Since your community was built prior to Jan. 1999 and chapter 47F, I would either ONLY pursue this on a non-Board level, or at the MOST I would place the discussion of adopting 47F on the agenda of the next open meeting, talk about 47F, your perspective on how you feel it would benefit the community, and ask the residents for their input. I think the best method to "sell" the owners is for you and those who agree with you to go door to door and solicit the input of your neighbors on a non-Board level.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Kaye, this will take an amendment to your Declaration of CC&Rs. This is what I presume you mean by requiring 2/3 approval of the members (actually it should require 2/3 of the unit OWNERS OF RECORD). We find the most effective means of amending the Declaration is to provide a mail in ballot which states the amendment, vote to approve or disapprove, address, signature, and date. Include a carefully drafted letter explaining the pros and cons of the amendment. Provide a self addressed stamped envelope to encourage return plus phone number to call if they have questions. A special meeting could also be called to explain the proposed amendment IF you think enough owners would attend. Finally, be prepared to go door to door for signatures of those who do not respond, if necessary.
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
RogerB - Here is where your and my philosophy diverge. Prior to a BOD deciding amongst themselves the Declaration is worthy of amending and sending out a mail in ballot, why not put the cart behind the horse and float the idea amongst the community first? Why not send out a letter to explain 47F and the amendment and hold an open for the purpose of the BOD learning what the community feels would be the pros and cons? Is that so hard or expensive?
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
JoeW, I think your idea of a special meeting is good but would have the proposed amendment drafted and sent to the owners with the notice of meeting and include the proposed pros and cons. That way the owners would come prepared. My only concern is whether or not you will get sufficient attendance to warrant a meeting to finalize the amendment. I have done this and when there is a MAJOR amendment proposed there usually is at best fair attendance.
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RogerB on 08/01/2007 10:34 AM
JoeW, I think your idea of a special meeting is good but would have the proposed amendment drafted and sent to the owners with the notice of meeting and include the proposed pros and cons. That way the owners would come prepared. My only concern is whether or not you will get sufficient attendance to warrant a meeting to finalize the amendment. I have done this and when there is a MAJOR amendment proposed there usually is at best fair attendance.

Hi RogerB - Only good intention in my response. If there is, historically, usually at best, fair attendance doesn't that say something to the importance of the issue to the community? I really think that given that kind of lackluster response a BOD should let the topic die on the grapevine. That is my point and for advising caution when the source of a proposal for an amendment speaks to less a quorum of the community, and when the source of a proposal to amend comes from a BOD that has the power to advise the PM to get out a ballot by mail.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JoeW1 on 08/01/2007 10:53 AM
...
If there is, historically, usually at best, fair attendance doesn't that say something to the importance of the issue to the community?

Nope. Based on my experience it is simply apathy. That is why a carefully crafted letter is needed; not just to explain the issues but to stir up enough interest to try to get an owner to even return their vote. Many owners will not even return a vote when a stamped self addressed envelope is provided
GloriaM (North Carolina)
Posts: 829
Posted:
Kaye:

General Statues Chapter 55A only states the powers and duties of the Board. I believe you may be misunderstanding your situation. You may call me my number is on this site and hopefully I can steer you and the board in the right direction.

I would need to see your governing documents in order to give you the right opinion. Once you call me we can discuss what I would need.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here