💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

TracyeH (North Carolina)
Posts: 58
Posted:
we have a treasurer who wants the administrator privileges to be assigned to him as opposed to the President. It's concerning that one person would have that access to the account locked up to where the board could not check the account. Any thoughts on this?
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
You have two posts on treasurer issues, so I'll address both of them here. In your other post, you asked about using an outside accountant since the last board didn't keep accurate records and the treasurer isn't returning calls or emails. You also said "this is concerning" - ya think????

What administrator privileges are you talking about - the bank account, website account, what? If it's the bank account, you never have just one person in charge. Apparently you don't have any internal controls to prevent waste and fraud, so until that happens, this treasurer absolutely shouldn't have access to it - you need two people to sign off on checks.

I will assume you're self managed, so the board needs to get this treasure in check right now. If your documents state that board members choose officers from among themselves (the homeowners pick the board members), you need to remove this person as treasurer - immediately. Have your association attorney send a letter demanding all records immediately (give him/her a deadline) and if it's not met, legal action will commence.

I would also get an outside accountant to audit your books to the greatest extent he/she can, since you said the records weren't accurate. However, you need to know where you stand with your accounts and vendors. From there, you'll have to move forward, and getting an outside accountant or bookkeeper might be a good idea.

You will also need to sit down with your bank and attorney to come up with some internal controls to ensure this doesn't happen again, such as removing the current (former?) treasurer from the account and requiring two signatures for checks over a certain amount.

If your audit finds someone got money he/she isn't entitled to, your attorney should fire off another letter demanding repayment - and if necessary, go after THEM in court if they can't/refuse to comply. Theft or embezzlement is a real possibility here, so be prepared to file a police report. Financial transparency is vital to any organization, and people have to understand there are severe penalties if they behave otherwise.

Finally the entire board should keep the homeowners informed as to what's going on and how these problems are being addressed. Good luck to you because it sounds like you'll need it


If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
PitA
Posts: 1,416
Posted:
if you are asking regarding 'QuickBooks':

The president should maintain 'administrator' privilege

the treasurer should be granted 'full access'

the remaining directors should have 'read only'.

in QuickBooks each user must log in SEPERATELY (only one user may be logged in at a time) and EVERY KEYSTROKE is logged and recorded by user account

ps. the administrator account should NOT know any other password, nor should any other user know any password but its own
TracyeH (North Carolina)
Posts: 58
Posted:
Thanks everyone for the responses. The treasurer finally responded today. I'm sorry I wasn't clear on what I was saying about the administrator. It's the administrator on the bank account. He has the checkbook and pays the bills. But I'm just not comfortable with giving him the administrator options would be a good thing.
The board before didn't use Quickbooks, she said she would do it her way. We finally got her out because she was about to break us. Good gosh it's so hard to get someone out of a position as a home owner.
Honestly this is too much work for a volunteer board. We may have to look into a management company.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Possibly, but a few of them have also been known to dip into the association's account, so if you decide to go that route, you may want to Google "choosing an HOA management company" for tips on what to look for. Be sure to get several quotes and check references before making a decision. Paying a management company will also have to be incorporated in the assessments and will probably raise them, so you might want to poll the homeowners to see if they're willing to pay the expense. If not, you'll still need to come up with internal controls on protecting association resources, so it's back to my earlier suggestions - talking to the association bank and attorney, and perhaps looking for an accountant (you'll still have to get bids and check references there)

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
TracyeH (North Carolina)
Posts: 58
Posted:
Well I'm thinking we would still need a board to watch the management company. But at least it would take some pressure off the board. I was called a "bitch" for putting out the state mandated rules and community rules. What's wrong with people.
Our Predsident is resigning and we are going to have to have a realigning of the board or start looking for options and have an Emergency HOA meeting.
I told the treasurer about not feeling comfortable with signing him over as the administrator and he seemed okay with that.
Thanks for all your advice and help.
DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TracyeH on 08/09/2017 12:52 PM
Well I'm thinking we would still need a board to watch the management company. But at least it would take some pressure off the board.

Yes, you absolutely need a board whether you have an MC or not. The role of an MC is to assist the board with the day to day operations of the HOA, not the decision making. Your docs will spell out the duties of the board, those don't change if you have an MC. The board is still responsible for the operation of the association whether they do everything themselves or get assistance.

The only way to get away from having a board is to get a court to appoint a receiver. That is a person, often a lawyer, who becomes responsible for the association. That person charges their going rate for their time, plus they will hire an MC to handle the operations.

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.
TracyeH (North Carolina)
Posts: 58
Posted:
Good grief. I will never live in another HOA. Or be on the board again. It's a full time job with no pay.
Thanks for the info.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here