IndieS (Colorado)
Posts: 79
Posts: 79
Posted:
One of five board members behaves in the following manner:
1) Insists on reviewing, before release, every form of communication prepared by the secretary (emails sent to homeowners, letters of introduction to new homeowners, covenant violation letters, responses to real estate agents).
2) Provides useless, pedantic corrections to all correspondence. ("You have used the wording, "Hi neighbors" which is too informal. Unless and until you change that wording to "Dear Community Members" I will not sign off on this email." "You must capitalize the "M" in "meeting" or I will not sign off on the minutes".
3) Appears infuriated when any other board member answers a question from a community member without involving him. (I.e., "When are the dues payable?" -- Nope, can't answer this unless an email is sent to all board members, indicating the question was asked and everyone agrees with the answer, which, by the way, is in the bylaws.)
4) Sends weekly, semi-threatening emails to other board members, keeping track of every perceived slight or violation of his personal code of conduct.
5) Makes "mountains out of molehills", especially if that means he can demean another board member. The other board members are easy going, take complaints from neighbors seriously, prefer to work things out as a community and in a transparent manner, while the problem member prefers an autocratic, governing-type relationship with the community, and appears to take particular glee in going after any hint of a problem involving his perceived "enemies" in the neighborhood. He wants to use the HOA's small budget to pay for legal advice, when none is needed.
The HOA has great difficulty filling board positions in this extremely small community with an equally small budget and few responsibilities. The majority of the community members just want to be left alone. I can't recall the last time there were more names on the ballot for officer openings than the number of openings.
He can be removed as an officer (he's not the president) but he will remain on the board as he was elected (no one else wants to run). There are some board members who are concerned he will become litigious, which will cause even more difficulties with future openings.
The president has slapped him down a couple of times, but is tired of the game. Other board members have told him that he is being rude and controlling. The four other board members have stopped responding to his email requests and have cut him out of the loop when he is not directly involved. Politically, he is in a minority position and knows it. He does not appear to have anything else to do with his time.
This board member used to be the secretary, but was replaced amidst a growing concern regarding the tone of his minutes and other communications with the neighborhood. He revealed information in the minutes and at open board meetings which could easily expose the HOA to, at a minimum, D&O insurance claims, if not suits for libel/slander.
I'm venting. I'd actually like to hear about worse problems between board members, as that might help put this issue in its proper context.
1) Insists on reviewing, before release, every form of communication prepared by the secretary (emails sent to homeowners, letters of introduction to new homeowners, covenant violation letters, responses to real estate agents).
2) Provides useless, pedantic corrections to all correspondence. ("You have used the wording, "Hi neighbors" which is too informal. Unless and until you change that wording to "Dear Community Members" I will not sign off on this email." "You must capitalize the "M" in "meeting" or I will not sign off on the minutes".
3) Appears infuriated when any other board member answers a question from a community member without involving him. (I.e., "When are the dues payable?" -- Nope, can't answer this unless an email is sent to all board members, indicating the question was asked and everyone agrees with the answer, which, by the way, is in the bylaws.)
4) Sends weekly, semi-threatening emails to other board members, keeping track of every perceived slight or violation of his personal code of conduct.
5) Makes "mountains out of molehills", especially if that means he can demean another board member. The other board members are easy going, take complaints from neighbors seriously, prefer to work things out as a community and in a transparent manner, while the problem member prefers an autocratic, governing-type relationship with the community, and appears to take particular glee in going after any hint of a problem involving his perceived "enemies" in the neighborhood. He wants to use the HOA's small budget to pay for legal advice, when none is needed.
The HOA has great difficulty filling board positions in this extremely small community with an equally small budget and few responsibilities. The majority of the community members just want to be left alone. I can't recall the last time there were more names on the ballot for officer openings than the number of openings.
He can be removed as an officer (he's not the president) but he will remain on the board as he was elected (no one else wants to run). There are some board members who are concerned he will become litigious, which will cause even more difficulties with future openings.
The president has slapped him down a couple of times, but is tired of the game. Other board members have told him that he is being rude and controlling. The four other board members have stopped responding to his email requests and have cut him out of the loop when he is not directly involved. Politically, he is in a minority position and knows it. He does not appear to have anything else to do with his time.
This board member used to be the secretary, but was replaced amidst a growing concern regarding the tone of his minutes and other communications with the neighborhood. He revealed information in the minutes and at open board meetings which could easily expose the HOA to, at a minimum, D&O insurance claims, if not suits for libel/slander.
I'm venting. I'd actually like to hear about worse problems between board members, as that might help put this issue in its proper context.