LindaA1 (New Hampshire)
Posts: 25
Posts: 25
Posted:
I just came from yearly Association Meeting and have a question. We have a new development owner who bought our remaining lots at auction due to original developer going bankrupt.
It seems that the existing Board has given the new owners a grace period of one year for dues on lots purchased. Along with this, the new developer has been given voting rights by the existing Board. At this point, at least one Board Member states that he is unaware if this has even been voted on by the Board and was not even aware of it being discussed. No meeting minutes have been distributed to Homeowners that mention this.
In the past, the Developer was only given voting rights to lots that dues had been paid. Our covenents state that a due paying member is entitled to a vote.
This is of utmost importance to ALL Association members, as a vote may be required to allow existing road and lots being moved which will encroach existing common areas. Our town Engineer has stated that moving lots and roads can be done as long as Association members are in agreement. Otherwise, developer will have to go before planning boards again.
Thank you for any comments!
It seems that the existing Board has given the new owners a grace period of one year for dues on lots purchased. Along with this, the new developer has been given voting rights by the existing Board. At this point, at least one Board Member states that he is unaware if this has even been voted on by the Board and was not even aware of it being discussed. No meeting minutes have been distributed to Homeowners that mention this.
In the past, the Developer was only given voting rights to lots that dues had been paid. Our covenents state that a due paying member is entitled to a vote.
This is of utmost importance to ALL Association members, as a vote may be required to allow existing road and lots being moved which will encroach existing common areas. Our town Engineer has stated that moving lots and roads can be done as long as Association members are in agreement. Otherwise, developer will have to go before planning boards again.
Thank you for any comments!