Quote:
Posted By SheliaH on 06/15/2017 10:36 AM
It's true that board members are elected by the homeowners, but personally, I like to know something about the people who say they want to serve. As you know, there are far too many homeowners who either don't know what the hell they're doing and refuse to learn, while others have their own agenda and as long as board membership achieves that, they don't care about anything else.
In my 10 years on the board, I learned there were some people who meant well, but really didn't have the time to devote to the board. It's not that you have to spend all your free time on HOA business, but you should at least read the management and financial reports, participate in the discussions (asking lots of questions may take some time, but it's a good thing to understand what and why you're voting). Instead we had people who would miss nearly every other meeting and when they did show up, they usually sat there and voted yes on EVERYTHING, whether it made sense or not.
The association needs people who are willing to take the job seriously - otherwise, get a blow up doll and stick it in a chair with its hand raised so you have a "yes" vote to everything.
The way I see it is that it is up to the membership to determine who should serve on a board through voting. When it comes to filling a position due to a resignation or other vacancy, I am personally opposed to any kind of test other than what the governing documents require for eligibility.
In my State (Texas), the legislature seems to agree as they changed the law regarding the election of board members. Previously our associations governing documents required that a "nominating committee" review applicants for the position of director and based on that review the names of the selectees were placed on the ballot. Write ins were also allowed but basically the board selected the committee which selected the selectees.
A couple of years ago the legislature changed the law to require that all members of the association be provided an opportunity to have their names included on the ballots that were mailed out prior to an election. This did away with the nominating committee process. For vacancies between election cycles, the board can still appoint a replacement for a vacancy, but the only qualification should be as stated in the governing docs (an owner of property in the subdivision).
If people who have their own agendas get on the board so be it - the process to remove them is in the governing docs and also when it comes time for re-election. The same holds true of folks who are not willing to take the job seriously or refuse to learn.