💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

StephenF1 (Florida)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Hello all.
If a condo (in Florida) in a multi unit building is placed in default of the dues, then legal process takes it to the courts to be sold as a foreclosure.
We have one that is in that position. The sale is due in around three weeks.
Due to the amount owed against the relative value of the property then it is possible no one will buy it and it will become the associations asset.
There is no mortgage or loan on it.
My question is this. Two days later there is a tax deed auction on this same property.
If the association becomes the new owner or if a third party buys it and they do not pay the back taxes in a quick manner, will that tax deed sale go ahead?
Would the tax deed sale be valid even if it did?
Thank you

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
If the unit has no mortgage, it's more possible that the unit will sell.

If it does sell, it's also possible that the Association will not see a penny of the proceeds (as taxes and other higher liens will get the money first).

If it doesn't sell, the Association owns it but not with a clear title (as any higher lien still has precedence).

StephenF1 (Florida)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Does that mean the none paid property taxes will be cleared by virtue of the foreclosure?
That in turn will cancel the tax deed auction?
Thank you for replying this Memorial weekend
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
It depends what it sells for.
If there is enough money, then the taxes will be paid.
If there isn't enough money, then the taxes won't be paid.

Also, if there isn't enough money to go around, the lenders can still come after the owner with court orders to pay what is owed (garnish wages, seize accounts, etc.)

Keep in mind that I am not an attorney and I don't live in FL. What I'm providing is based on my experiences being on a Board that took foreclosure action on a property in VA. Consultation with an attorney (or legal aid) in your area would likely provide better answers.

Here is some more info:

What happens to my mortgages if the HOA forecloses on its lien? from NOLO

Florida Foreclosure Laws and Procedures from NOLO

The Timeline for Foreclosure in Florida from an attorney blog

Florida HOA and COA Foreclosures from NOLO

Is a New Owner Responsible for Condo or HOA Liens After Buying a Foreclosure in Miami or Broward County? From an Attorney's site

StephenF1 (Florida)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Thank you for the information and the links. It does make interesting reading.
I know there is no other lien, so once property taxes are paid off after the auction then the association will receive something back.
May not be as much as the outstanding debt but something is better than nothing and a new owner.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Just make sure the HOA does NOT end up owning the property. The first bid goes to the HOA $1 over what the HOA is owed (Foreclosing for). Which is a bit confusing. You want to encourage someone to outbid. The highest bidder who then wins gets the home but responsible for all repairs, mortgage (if there was one), and all future HOA dues. There is a period of "Redemption" which can last up to 1 year is SOME states. Meaning the previous owner can get the home back by paying what was owed plus any expenses the new owner invested in that year's time. So even the "new owner" may not be able to touch the property to do repairs for up to a year. Their hands are tied.

You also have the issue with this being a HUD foreclosure as well. The process to me has been the bank forecloses and then HUD if the new owner doesn't pay off the taxes. Once that tax bill is paid, then the new owner can avoid the Tax auction. Something that may throw a wrench in the process of the new owner who may bulk. Starting the process all over again.

The money collected at the foreclosure sale most likely will go to the Bank. This is why I advise if the bank is already foreclosing then the HOA should never foreclose. Just keep the lien. The bank will always get paid first and foremost (unless super-lien involved which puts HOA/Bank SAME level). A HOA foreclosure basically pays for the bank foreclosure. If the owner did not owe anything to the bank the good news is the HOA can recoup some money. Legal expenses/fees may be subtracted. The bad news is the money just stops the bleeding. It's NOT going to make a profit. The HOA is only owed as much as it was owed.

Now in Florida there is an exception. Which I would consult an attorney about. New owners may indeed have to pay the HOA back dues from previous owner. It's the only state I know that allows this. It's a bit complicated and do not know if it applies to foreclosure situations. I am not a Florida expert in their laws.

Overall the HOA does NOT repeat does NOT want to own this property!!! Can NOT impress this enough. The HOA would then act as the "new owner". Which you already see puts them on the hook for paying the owed taxes, repairs, legal expenses, and HOA dues. Still have to wait the redemption period to be able to rent/sale. If the HOA made a profit, then it owes taxes on said profit from the sale. So this is why HOA's should stay out of the home buying/renting business.

Former HOA President
StephenF1 (Florida)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Thank you for this.
There is no mortgage, there are just two liens, the HOA and the property tax.
If I read your post correctly, you argue against the previous comments in that the back property taxes are not paid out of the sale of this HOA foreclosure?
What if the amount was higher than the HOA and taxes combined. Surely that would wipe both out?
Or is the property tax treated different and if not settled separately the tax deed auction still goes ahead?
If it does who is the rightful 'owner' if there are two separate buyers.
Thank you
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By StephenF1 on 05/28/2017 2:27 PM
What if the amount was higher than the HOA and taxes combined.

If the amount paid is higher then all the liens combined, the excess funds are given to the owner.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Tim is right. Your HOA is ONLY entitled to what it is owed. That is the back dues (with late fees), legal fees/expenses and interest. Whatever the amount of the lien is. The house sells for more at the auction or doesn't have a mortgage means all that extra money goes to the owner once debts are paid. The HOA's concern when foreclosing is to stop the bleeding.

The situation with the taxes... Adds a bit of a complication. The new owner will be liable to pay off that tax lien as part of the purchase process. If the new owner does not settle the tax bill then the auction will go off with HUD foreclosure. Again this is outside of the HOA's scope/reach. It's a separate process.

I did a HOA foreclosure. The person who did bid and win the house backed out afterwards down the line. That is when it became a HUD foreclosure for the back taxes. It was then sold off as a HUD Tax foreclosure. Which means the new owner pays off the tax lien to get the home. A little different process than a bank/HOA. Right of redemption may or may apply. BTW: These type of foreclosures are the ones you see on TV that those "House Flippers" advertise. These houses are usually really gutted out and real eyesores by this point.

There are different foreclosures. HOA, Bank, and HUD (Taxes). A HOA is usually foreclosing on the lien. That is to get their money back and the house should NOT be in process of being foreclosed by the bank. Otherwise it's doing the work of the bank. Bank foreclosures are for unpaid mortgage payments. Again they will get paid first and foremost if the HOA (or others) are owed money. If there is extra money, then the HOA gets the money owed. HUD (Tax liens) are typically the last frontier in foreclosures. One thing is assured... Death and Taxes. Don't pay your property taxes then your in a world of hurt. Tax foreclosures is like the tablecloth being pulled. HOA and Bank best hope they get paid.

Just keep in mind that your HOA foreclosing is never for profit. It's ONLY to stop the bleeding. The HOA does not own the property nor does it want to. Let it go once the foreclosure happens. The owner can stop the whole process by paying back what they owe. Just be patient as the old owner may be out but it will take time for the dust to settle before the new owner moves in.


Former HOA President
StephenF1 (Florida)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Thank you that actually clarifies it.
My concern is that we end up with something we do not want. If the taxes are not part of the sale price at foreclosure auction then the numbers make it difficult to sell. At least to someone who has done their research.
I forget the exact numbers but the HOA are owed around $20000, and the property in reasonable condition is worth around $30000
However the back tax is around $5000
The unit is in poor shape and it will cost more than the $5000 to make it better.

So it could even end up the owner getting money back if it did sell for say $25000 as that is over what the HOA needs and the new buyer with a $5000 tax bill.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Doesn't work that way.

HOA lien 20,000
Tax Lien 5,000

Unit worth $25,000

Purchase price at Foreclosure: $15,000

Tax lien is satisfied (they get $5,000)
HOA gets $10,000 (HOA has to go back to court to get the rest from the owner OR with FL laws, perhaps the new owner pick up the tab. Check with an attorney).

Purchase price at Foreclosure: $25,000

Tax Lien is satisfied (they get $5,000)
HOA lien is satisfied (HOA gets $20,000)
Owner is out of debt and receives nothing.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
I am sorry, but none of you understand how this process works.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Richard,

As I said, I'm basing it on what I know how it works in Virginia.
This is also why I provided links to info applicable to FL.

If you can clarify, please do.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Again Richard points out how wrong everyone else is... Do we expect anything different at this point? I did a foreclosure. Saw the whole process. Stood on the steps. Think I may actually know a bit about how foreclosures work atleast in my town before I go off and call others wrong.

Foreclosures STOP the bleeding. NOTHING ELSE or your digging your HOA a hole...

Former HOA President
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 05/29/2017 8:43 AM
Again Richard points out how wrong everyone else is... Do we expect anything different at this point? I did a foreclosure. Saw the whole process. Stood on the steps. Think I may actually know a bit about how foreclosures work atleast in my town before I go off and call others wrong.

Foreclosures STOP the bleeding. NOTHING ELSE or your digging your HOA a hole...

I have seen Associations do six of them, all disasters. All an HOA is doing is foreclosing on the lien they placed on the property. I find it very hard to believe that a property has NO mortgage, yet may have a tax lien and HOA lien.

In this scenario, IF the HOA doesn't pay off the tax lien, the tax lien will file foreclosure proceedings against the HOA. You do not want to mess with the tax man.

Stephen, instead of asking for advise here, I would invest time and money in a Florida attorney that does this for a living.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Because you don't believe it, then everyone else is wrong? It is possible the house does not have a mortgage on it. Why would the HOA be on the hook for an unpaid tax bill? The HOA does NOT own that property! The Tax bill is in the owner's name. The HOA is foreclosing on their lien but NOT purchasing the property. It would go to the Tax man anyways after that if someone doesn't bid on it.

It is best to get advice from a lawyer as Florida is a bit squirrely. They are one of the few states that may have the new owner responsible for old dues. Most states that's not the situation. Although the foreclosure is paying the old dues owed. A bit of confusion that needs cleared up for those more familiar with how Florida law works.

I can believe the house has no mortgage. A reason why I've always said never pay cash for a house. This is the EXACT situation that can happen if you do. Someone pays cash for a house then there is no mortgage. However, they still owe the HOA dues and they still owe the Tax man. The house isn't safe against foreclosure because one paid cash.

Did that ever enter your mind Richard? A paid for cash house? This is why I would never hire your company to handle my finances...

Former HOA President
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
I understand people have paid off their homes or people might have paid cash for the home. A proper title (which should have been done) would show that.

They are one of the few states that may have the new owner responsible for old dues. Make not sense!

Exactly, HOW is the foreclosure paying the HOA dues????

I can believe the house has no mortgage. A reason why I've always said never pay cash for a house. This is the EXACT situation that can happen if you do. Someone pays cash for a house then there is no mortgage. However, they still owe the HOA dues and they still owe the Tax man. The house isn't safe against foreclosure because one paid cash. What a genius!

You would never be allowed to sit on my Board either!

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Wow... Can't argue with stupid but going to give it a try...

Florida DOES have a law on the books (We discussed this to length in another post) that new owners can be responsible for the previous owner's dues IF owed. Florida also has a law that the Tenant/Renter can pay the back dues from preventing a foreclosure. I do NOT make the rules. I just read them.

NOTE: I do NOT agree with this law but it is the state of Florida. The OP is from Florida. Must go with what is known to be a law in that state.

Again... The HOA foreclosure amount IS the back dues owed by the current owner. The new owner once they win the bid for the Foreclosure is essentially paying off the debt of the current owner. It should clean slate the property. However, it could be during the process unpaid dues occur. New owner may be on the hook of that time period. I can't speak for every HOA and how they handle their books. Not going to rule it out though.

Overall the HOA foreclosure is an opportunity for the HOA to clean slate and move on with a new owner. I still encourage the HOA to pursue the process. It's NOT the right process for every situation. This situation it seems right. Although won't give any false hope either.

Former HOA President
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Stephen

You say the unit in foreclosure is in a condo building so can we assume it is not a blight on the other units/building? If so, then the only thing the HOA is out are the dues. If the new owner will be responsible for 6 month back dues this raises the question of why would the HOA want to get involved?

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Good question JohnC. It sounds like they got advice from one them there lawyers that say "We will do whatever you tell us to do" without discussing other options. Which doesn't sound like there were known other options.

They are in it now. It wasn't the best optimal solution for them once the property was in any kind of other foreclosure. I would have kept the lien and not foreclosed. However, them foreclosing was an option they took in hopes to recover money. It's a bit of a gamble. One I can't argue with.

We have a policy of 6 months behind we lien, and 1 year we CONSIDER foreclosure. We weigh the factors if we pursue due to multiple circumstances. (Military duty status, bank/tax foreclosure, or other factors). Once we decide to pursue foreclosure we have to realize the ramifications. Which is not a guarantee to get the money and right of redemption period. The positives is that we got rid of a property owner who doesn't pay and sends a message to others we are serious about collecting.

Foreclosures are never easy and usually a bloody mess. The end result is the bleeding stops.

Former HOA President
GwenG (Florida)
Posts: 669
Posted:
In My FL HOA, the County Tax Collector is selling a Tax Certificate for unpaid taxes. Subject home has NO mortgage and there are NO liens against the property. In fact, most homes in my HOA do not have any mortgage at all, since they are seasonal "vacation cottages" and not on par with most primary single family homes in terms of construction.

According to the Tax Collector, whoever purchases the Tax Certificate can apply for a courthouse foreclosure at public auction. Potential buyers register with the county, place a deposit and must pay all associated hard costs of title search, auction commission fees etc. The Auction opens with a minimum bid of the TAX DUE. Anything over that goes to the next Claim of Lien Holder(s) and old Owner gets whatever may be left over after the dust settles.

In this instance, HOA has no Claim of Lien because it does not have lien and foreclosure authority in its Covenants. If it DID have lien authority, it would have to file a lien in the manner required by statute to be valid. The valid HOA lien would be subservient to the Tax lien. An involved mortgagee would be next in line to be paid from proceeds.

Tax Lien $2,000
HOA LIEN (if valid) $25,000
Auction Sale $25,000

After satisfaction of the Tax Lien, the HOA gets the remainder $23,000 and the defaulting owner gets nothing. The HOA can still "go after" the deficit from the old owner, but this is not a fruitful path. The new owner must pay current HOA taxes and is NOT personally responsible for the HOA deficiency.

The new owner has a year to redeem the property from the new owner.

Fl HOA Statute is 720.3085 for particulars.

It is a perilous area for HOA's to initiate foreclosures and whenever possible, HOA's should sit it out and wait for the mortgagee to foreclose a loan. Unfortunately, this is around 2 years in Florida--about double the national average. In HOA's such as mine, there are virtually NO bank loans on any parcels and the HOA has no lien and foreclosure authority. Rock and a Hard Place. That is why the HOA is buying the Tax Certificate so it can apply for a courthouse foreclosure.
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
Gwen, is your HOA properly a FS 720 HOA? If your covenants don't provide the association with the power to lien then I would question whether it's really an FS 720 Homeowners Association at all.
GwenG (Florida)
Posts: 669
Posted:
@Geno Interesting question. And the subject of an Appeal at this moment within the context of a complaint about Covenant Revitalization. Petitioner states that HOA is not a statutory HOA and does not meet the legislative criteria, among other things. Petitioner asks that Covenant Revitalization be reversed.

I also believe my HOA is not a true HOA and was not eligible to revitalize covenants as a true HOA.

I will be posting the outcome of the Appeal when it is rendered on the Revitalization thread.

Regarding the lien authority, HOA has lien authority in its Articles; however, they must be in the Covenants to be enforceable. Notwithstanding the lack of authority, our HOA has foreclosed on several homes in the past. Finally, they stopped filing liens and foreclosing when the "Collections Lawyer" was challenged.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Because home prices have appreciated the last two years or so, the days of HOA's foreclosing on property is pretty much over. As long as the HOA has a lien on the property and it doesn't go into bank foreclosure, the HOA should be in a position to recoup their monies. I am suspicious of a property with no mortgage having a tax lien and HOA lien. It happens, but rare.

IF, the HOA foreclosed and had a Trustee Sale, what price do you put on the property. If the purchaser does a cash sale, they may not use escrow, NOR will they purchase title insurance, which could still leave the tax lien. Any excess proceeds goes to the owner.

My former HOA has over $300K in delinquencies and is involved in a $20M lawsuit. In 2011, when the real estate market still was in the toilet, I put together a plan to wipe out the dollar amount of the delinquencies over a two year period. We had 4 properties that had delinquencies totaling $60K and were way upside down on their mortgage, meaning no bank was going to foreclose. The plan was to foreclose on the four properties, hire a property management company, at a 6% commission, specializing in rentals, and evict the owners once the proper time periods had passed. Each unit could be rented for $2500 per month. Over two years we would have income of $260K, with commission expense of $15,600 and HOA dues of $13,440. There had to be special leases drawn up because the tenants were renting foreclosed property and could be asked to leave on a moment's notice.

I was able to do this with a former client on a smaller scale in 2012, wiping out $100K in delinquencies. banks were doing it, why couldn't a HOA do it in the right circumstances.
GwenG (Florida)
Posts: 669
Posted:
I probably should clarify that my HOA is a rare bird. It was and still is platted as a recreational campground, and its covenants prohibit permanent structures. Despite that, only a handful of lots are not improved with homes of some kind ranging from new doublewides to old 1980's trailer roofovers. It is not approved for government financing and the only a few recent mortgages have been taken out to finance the new doublewides. Most of the "cottages" range from $15,000-30,000 and northerners buy for cash, usually by word of mouth from other owners. It is rare to have a real estate company or lawyers involved in sales. Prices are not rising-just staying even with CPI and without mortgages, it does not matter what happens to prices. Few people get title searches or surveys and many transactions are done by quitclaims, which bypasses the tax collector. Our county is trying to crack down on this.

As a campground where lots were sold fee simple, there was no need for an ARC, there was never authority to levy fines and no authority to lien and foreclose since most sites were used as transient RV spots for trailers.

So the HOA decided to hide the original covenants from owners and instead, published an "Amendment" with selected provisions-"restated". Until it was discovered that the Covenants were expired by MRTA, very few owners even knew what the Covenants were and had never seen or read them. Covenants (7 pages) are quite sketchy and written with a campground in mind. Before I bought, I thought the governing documents were very weak and that would be to my advantage and I would be spared HOA Hell. But, it turned out to be the opposite.

So, without the ability to lien and foreclose, the only liens that can be placed on the homes are tax liens and contractor liens. The HOA must find another way--either sue the individual or their estate as any other creditor would which is rarely successful--or hope the home is foreclosed by the County for non payment of taxes and it can successfully bid, get title and resell and recoup the unpaid assessment fees. The main problem with bidding is that the owners must vote on any asset valued at $25,000 or more and it is unlikely that owners will want to throw good money after bad and take on a declining asset. Trailer homes do not appreciate.

In theory, owners could stop paying assessments altogether and continue to pay the tax collector and the HOA would soon become overburdened with the cost of trying to pursue owners personally for unpaid assessments that are unlikely to be collected. As the economy declines, fewer inheritors of Mom ' Pops vacation cottage have the ability or want to pay assessments, property tax, insurance and routine home maintenance cost. So the property is abandoned. The center cannot hold!

This is not a usual situation for HOA, but mine is not alone and there are variations on the theme, especially with "affordable" condos with small budgets/no reserves.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Gwen

Are you saying you live in what might be called a mobile home park? Are all the units mobile?

Thanks
StephenF1 (Florida)
Posts: 9
Posted:
What an interesting discussion this has been.
I came into this situation late in the game, so everything was already rolling.
Attorney is unfortunately one who does as told and I am not thrilled with that.
The advice from there is we will recover our funds provided someone bids over the amount due.
There seems to be a sense of let us send a warning to others about this particular property.
The no mortgage is correct.

I was just curious if we could end up owning this if no one bids and what the ramifications were.
I would like to thank you all for your views.
When it all has played out, I will place the details here.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
The HOA does NOT want to own this property if at all possible. Basically you ALL become the homeowner of this property. That means you have to pay to purchase, pay taxes, insurance, repairs, HOA dues, and any expenses of renting/selling. Plus the right of redemption exists up to a year in some states. Meaning you can't really touch the property for a year because the original owner can purchase it all back.

So unless your HOA can afford all these expenses plus maybe have to take out a loan to cover the expenses, it's best to advertise to someone to buy it ASAP. It is a PUBLIC auction so anyone is open to bid on the home if they want. You can all drop the "conflict of interest" line if a board member buys it. What does that really matter as long as they take up the HOA dues payments?

Former HOA President
GwenG (Florida)
Posts: 669
Posted:
Agreeing here with Melissa: the HOA has enough to worry about it does not need to own an unknown dubious asset to manage even if your laws permit it. Further to the hard costs of all owners owning the property is the liability that comes along with owning a property. What will your commercial insurer say about insuring an unoccupied home under its policy? What if someone is injured on the property or it attracts squatters? What if it burns down and the Owner still has redemption option? It is a bad idea.

As a side note to Melissa's global assertion to just toss aside conflict of interest, Florida (which we all know is a different species of association law) will forbid board directors and Management companies to own foreclosed property:

"However, except for a timeshare condominium, a board member,manager, or management company may not purchase a unit at a foreclosure sale
resulting from the association's foreclosure of its lien for unpaid assessments or take title by deed in lieu of foreclosure."

The above is from FL HB1237 which becomes effective July 1, 2017 for CONDOS only. It is expected that a similar companion provision will be introduced next legislative session for HOA. It is such a conflict of interest for associations to buy foreclosed properties that it is now prohibited by statute.

This bill was a major reform bill and also forbids Associations from hiring Management Company attorneys to represent the Condo, immediate recall of board members by members, and criminal penalties for routine stuff that Boards do.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 05/31/2017 4:26 AM
The HOA does NOT want to own this property if at all possible. Basically you ALL become the homeowner of this property. That means you have to pay to purchase, pay taxes, insurance, repairs, HOA dues, and any expenses of renting/selling. Plus the right of redemption exists up to a year in some states. Meaning you can't really touch the property for a year because the original owner can purchase it all back.

So unless your HOA can afford all these expenses plus maybe have to take out a loan to cover the expenses, it's best to advertise to someone to buy it ASAP. It is a PUBLIC auction so anyone is open to bid on the home if they want. You can all drop the "conflict of interest" line if a board member buys it. What does that really matter as long as they take up the HOA dues payments?

Melissa,

Before you speak, PLEASE do some research.

When an HOA forecloses on a property, they take title, NOT ownership. A Note is ownership, which the bank holds. Title is what the HOA has. In the RIGHT circumstances, an HOA can benefit from renting property they have foreclosed upon, BUT they need to know what they are doing. Unfortunately, most don't and in those cases, don't even think about.

In California, right of redemption is 90 days, not a year. The HOA only has to pay HOA dues and management fees, nothing more, no property taxes, insurance, etc.

"Conflict of Interest" if a Board member buys it? Damn right its a conflict. It would equal insider trading unless you gave the entire membership the same opportunity.

Again, in the RIGHT circumstance, this has worked.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
So what is the purpose of a NON-PROFIT HOA in having Rental property? More holes to dig? What is working for them? Having a HOA own rental property is like owning a boat. A sinking investment...

If a HOA could afford to have the home, then what benefit is there? It's NOT the profit because the HOA would face taxes on that. So the HOA could only charge rent for the amount they spend each month. The HOA enforcement of their rules on a tenant? They are NOT HOA members. So not subject to HOA rules unless written in the lease agreement. Renters have rights too. Can't just kick them out overnight or fine them. Fines go to the owner...(The HOA). Renters not responsible for HOA dues. Can't lien or foreclose them for not paying the dues.

Considering that EVERY member in the HOA is part of the ownership/renting out of this home, who is all going to agree on who to rent to? How much money to spend on repairs? Who will do the repairs? What should be in the lease agreement? Can your HOA even make decisions like that just in operating itself?

Again, a HOA should avoid owning or being responsible for renting out property. It's just a bad added complication that in the long run just leads to more mess.

Former HOA President
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 05/31/2017 5:38 PM
So what is the purpose of a NON-PROFIT HOA in having Rental property? More holes to dig? What is working for them? Having a HOA own rental property is like owning a boat. A sinking investment...

If a HOA could afford to have the home, then what benefit is there? It's NOT the profit because the HOA would face taxes on that. So the HOA could only charge rent for the amount they spend each month. The HOA enforcement of their rules on a tenant? They are NOT HOA members. So not subject to HOA rules unless written in the lease agreement. Renters have rights too. Can't just kick them out overnight or fine them. Fines go to the owner...(The HOA). Renters not responsible for HOA dues. Can't lien or foreclose them for not paying the dues.

Considering that EVERY member in the HOA is part of the ownership/renting out of this home, who is all going to agree on who to rent to? How much money to spend on repairs? Who will do the repairs? What should be in the lease agreement? Can your HOA even make decisions like that just in operating itself?

Again, a HOA should avoid owning or being responsible for renting out property. It's just a bad added complication that in the long run just leads to more mess.

There is a saying Melissa, IF you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen. You're clueless, and you were a Board president, unbelievable!

Is is so easy, even a caveman could do it.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
HOA's are not classified as "NON-PROFIT, but "NOT FOR PROFIT". HOA's do make money or a profit and will pay taxes in excess of their expenses. The HOA doesn't have rental property, but renting a property that currently have title to, and does so until the mortgage company forecloses on the property. Lenders rent units they have taken back and they aren't in the rental business. They have an obligation to provide income to the investor for whom they have a servicing contract with.

As I said, the HOA doesn't pay the insurance, the mortgage or the taxes. The property management is separate from the HOA and handles everything, renting, cleaning collecting rent and pays the HOA a set amount. This wasn't my idea, I didn't dream this. I actually heard about from the same company that everyone here refers to for legal advice. A few of us did our investigations and worked out a plan before presenting to the Board of the HOA we were trying to help.

Your advise that an HOA shouldn't own or rent property is as much BS as "if you sue your HOA, you are suing yourself". If YOU can't think outside the box, that's OK, others can and do.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
So prove my "Suing your HOA is suing yourself and your neighbors" wrong... Since you like to talk in circles already.

Plus who hires a management company to handle this rental stuff? No one said the HOA to hire those services out when renting out property...

Oh and if it's just the HOA owning the title till the mortgage forecloses... Uhm then most likely the bank is owed ALL the money the HOA collected on the property while they rented it out. The bank would owe the HOA all the HOA dues while they owned it to as well.

Richard sometimes you need to listen to yourself...and maybe stuff it in a box....

Former HOA President
LetA (Nevada)
Posts: 2,679
Posted:
Pay your HOA dues in Nevada first, HOA's here have a supper priority over the banks.
HOA foreclosures have dwindled down since the legislative session 4 years ago. The legislation handed the HOAs
some paper work hurdles, but there was still some hiccups when after the auction, there were title issues with winning bidder.
People were losing $200,000.00 homes and condos over 90 day past due assessments. Simple $500-$1000 in past due assessments
morphed into $15,000.00 in legal fees followed by foreclosure.
These HOA's dug their heels in and did not want to work with the owners.
The Last legislative session calmed that, thankfully.

Is it really worth foreclosing on an owner when they owe such a small amount in past due assessments? In some cases the HOA never recovers the past assessments, they get another new owner and hope they pay.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 05/31/2017 9:34 PM
So prove my "Suing your HOA is suing yourself and your neighbors" wrong... Since you like to talk in circles already.

Plus who hires a management company to handle this rental stuff? No one said the HOA to hire those services out when renting out property...

Oh and if it's just the HOA owning the title till the mortgage forecloses... Uhm then most likely the bank is owed ALL the money the HOA collected on the property while they rented it out. The bank would owe the HOA all the HOA dues while they owned it to as well.

Richard sometimes you need to listen to yourself...and maybe stuff it in a box....

The problem Melissa, is I can prove it.

I know you will find this hard to believe, but there are companies that all they do is manage rental properties, NOTHING more.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 05/31/2017 9:34 PM
Oh and if it's just the HOA owning the title till the mortgage forecloses... Uhm then most likely the bank is owed ALL the money the HOA collected on the property while they rented it out. The bank would owe the HOA all the HOA dues while they owned it to as well.

You need to quit. The bank ONLY pays the dues once they foreclose. When the HOA forecloses and holds title, they are liable for the dues.

Because Melissa says something, that doesn't make it true. If you have a better solution when HOA's are seriously in the red on delinquencies and collection and attorney actions have done nothing, please share. In my case, they had $40K in delinquencies with 4 owners. If the bank forecloses, they lose all $40K. Through rentals, we received $100K, in essence, allowing the HOA to retire the $60K of debt. Sorry, yes they had to pay income tax on the extra income. So tax on $40K was $6K.

The HOA had to thank the good folks at davis-stirling.com for their help. Sometimes it pays to listen at seminars. Just saying.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Wow a seminar told you this? Much better resource than reality huh? Give it a rest Richard and STOP picking apart someone else's FREE advice. I trust whoever reads my posts to have a brain. They have the ability to THINK. I am not here to force feed anyone the one and only answer. I am here to give FREE advice and hope makes them have another point of view/idea to deal with their OWN situation as an INDIVIDUAL.

No HOA is alike so no one solution will work. The best one can do is give ideas, experience, opinion, or information to help guide someone to their own self discovery...

Former HOA President
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 06/01/2017 4:26 AM
Wow a seminar told you this? Much better resource than reality huh?

Actually, the seminar was put on as part of CAI and the attorney was Adrian Adams, whose firm is one of, if not the largest, HOA firms in California. He also is responsible for www.davis-stirling.com from which many people here cite for opinions.

Then we put it into practice, thus REALITY.

No HOA is alike so no one solution will work.

You would probably think it unwise to sue your HOA, but sometimes you have to stand up to major abuses by a Board, Attorney or MC. Many of the contributors on this site have taken steps over the years to stand up to their Boards when things got out of hand. Sometimes court action is all they understand. Again, as you state, each HOA is not alike.
GwenG (Florida)
Posts: 669
Posted:
In the overall scheme of things, I believe the Melissa has a point that all HOA's are different and, in general, are not equipped to handle rental of foreclosure units. Mine is a good example in that there is NO bank involved in the foreclosure and NO HOA assessment lien. And the rental incomes are only realistic during the snowbird season of 3-4 months and it would not be beneficial to hire a property manager to handle a rental for couple thousand bucks of rental income.

Also, if HOA is paying the dues while holding title, it reduces the membership budget by one assessment and the remaining parcels must pay the missing assessment for the time it takes to sell probably as an "As is" sale. Or, as Melissa might say "Assessing HOA in a foreclosure (and taking title) is assessing yourself!" For my HOA, it would be a non-starter.

The reality is that many condos and foreclosure homes require a great deal of rehab to be habitable, much less rentable. This can only be discovered after a title is issued. The HOA who takes title is taking a chance that the home is habitable and rentable, that it can find a competent property rental agent that will want to handle the property, and the owners want to finance an undertaking with unknown costs and questionable success. Perhaps such a scheme is most relevant to an extreme case of mass foreclosures and the critical need to capture "some" money as Richard did so successfully. It was a clever solution for HIS HOA.

Where I entirely agree with Richard is the advisability to Melissa to do more research before offering free "factual" advice. People come on here seeking information and direction that they rely on as generally true and lawful. Opinion offerers typically include citations to back up advice if it is statutory. They will disclaim advice that is bordering on legal. It has been my experience, after reading many, many posts here, that Melissa signs her posts as a Past President and the confused, troubled new visitor is apt to put more credibility in her replies than is warranted.

I have found this advice to be generally unsupported with facts other than experience and un-nuanced, as evidenced by the constant cry of "Suing your HOA is suing yourself!" However financially true that might be, it is a superficial reply and ignores the reality that there may be good reasons for a Complainant to suffer the contribution they are making to the HOA kitty for HOA to defend itself! (In my own experience, it was a drop in the bucket compared with my own legal fees and not a consideration. It certainly would NOT have been helpful or realistic input had I sought some advice and direction with my issue.)

The repetitive protestation that "the HOA is YOU", again, is true but fails to recognize that people who come on here seeking advice and direction are obviously at odds with a hostile or intransigent Board and it certainly does not feel like they are reading from the same Playbook. Insistence that the reader has reasonable input into the board, or has not already attempted to clarify with the board in some way, is not helpful.

This not a Bash Melissa-Fest. I know Melissa has good, solid experiences to share with readers. I simply wish Melissa would take more time and care with advice-giving and hold the tired platitudes.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Every corporation, such as an HOA are different. No two are alike and the skill sets of the volunteers who have stepped up are different. My expertise is in legal affairs, technology and finance. Not many would take the initiative I did for one HOA. It took work, it took planning and it took understanding the legal requirements our decisions would have.

I will only offer opinions on this site on topics I believe I have an expertise in. Many questions come in that I feel are pure nonsense. Many come in that I don't have experience in, not to say that if I had to know that for the clients I represent I would take the time to become well versed. Many times I wouldn't comment, even if I did have some expertise if it involved other state's statues and didn't have time to research.

I represent my clients to the best of my ability and making absolutely sure they have been given all relevant facts to make informed decisions and are within state statues. That is the oath I agreed to abide by.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
AGAIN I repeat these things "Suing your HOA is suing yourself and your neighbors" as a CONSEQUENCE to your actions when you want to sue your HOA. I have NEVER EVER said one does NOT have a "Just Cause" in pursuing a lawsuit. I myself have engaged in a possible lawsuit against my own HOA. (Shocker huh?). I state this over and over again because it is TRUE. It is up to you to decide if your willing to accept this CONSEQUENCE or not. Just factor it into your decision whether you like it or not.


Former HOA President
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
This thread has nothing to do with suing one's HOA. The trouble is, Melissa, that you so often insert that mantra when it has nothing to do with the poster's question or situation.

I join Gwen in the following: "Where I entirely agree with Richard is the advisability to Melissa to do more research before offering free "factual" advice. People come on here seeking information and direction that they rely on as generally true and lawful. Opinion offerers typically include citations to back up advice if it is statutory. They will disclaim advice that is bordering on legal. It has been my experience, after reading many, many posts here, that Melissa signs her posts as a Past President and the confused, troubled new visitor is apt to put more credibility in her replies than is warranted."

I also agree with Gwen that some of Melissa's observations are down-to-earth and useful.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I was just using the "Suing HOA" as an example of my repetitive statements...

Let's get back on subject of Foreclosure fallout. My overall point is that it is a misconception that HOA foreclose/lien for making money opportunity. I hear that all the time. The reality is that it's NOT a money maker but a money making BACK situation. It's filling up a hole of money owed.

I don't want to give advice to someone that there is money making opportunity and eyeing a prize at the end. The reality is that MOST HOA's are NOT equipped to handle owning a foreclosed property they foreclosed on. Many are NOT managed by Management companies. Most people don't need to hire a MC to handle rental property. Ultimately, the property is owned by ALL the members. You now have a group decision issues involved. If your HOA can't even manage or afford it's own bills, owning rental property is not a good idea.

It's good for someone to ask what the consequences are for a situation and not always the opportunities of one. Foreclosures are really tough to go through. Never put the goal as "We can make money off of this..." The goal is and should be "We can get our money back and hope for the best from the new owner". Otherwise we further the misconception that HOA's are money grabbing jerks instead of people just trying to get their money back from people not paying their fair share...


Former HOA President
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Melissa

I would have NEVER suggested to you personally how a HOA can use something to help their receivable/delinquencies dilemma as I feel you have a very limited grasp of how things really work.

You have a limited concept that when an HOA forecloses on a property, they own it. They don't, they only hold title to the property. A few years back, banks were holding mortgages of $600K, when the market had the property valued at $300K. THIS IS WHERE THE OPPORTUNITY WAS!

There are at least three type of residential property management companies, one that manages HOA's ONLY, one that manages BOTH HOA's and rental property and one that handles rental property ONLY. Because you have only involved yourself in self managed HOA's, you may not know the different. I only manage HOA's and do not involve my company in rentals as I believe it could be a potential conflict of interest.

The HOA involved used an outside vendor, a property management company that ONLY did rental (potential conflict of interest avoided, They handled everything, with the HOA only collecting a dollar amount after expenses.

This same concept also is used in the mortgage industry. You get a loan from your local lender. The loan is underwritten for the guidelines of the investor ultimately holding the Note for the property. The lender sells the loan to a servicing company, who collects the all the payments, principal, interest, taxes, insurance. They do ALL the work and the investor receives monthly interest checks. All the loan that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac hold are servicing by an outside company. Guess what, I came from the mortgage industry, so this was a perfect fit.

FYI, I ONLY used this as getting money back, not as a money making opportunity.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here