💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KathyS15 (Ohio)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Received this from our Board the other day. "Based on our Declarations of Restrictions, Covenants, Easements, and Conditions dated 1/6/99, Article VI-Section 6.2-page 9, it was discovered that every homeowner has exclusive rights to use their driveway, sidewalks, exterior post lamp, pad mounted air condition units, privacy fence and front step and patio. Based on this exclusive use, it is the homeowner's responsibility to maintain, repair and replace these areas as needed. This includes repairing or replacing any concrete that poses a fall/risk hazard or have defective concrete....Again at the homeowner's expense."

Here's the kicker....."In addition, end units that use a shared access roadway, between their two homes, to access their driveway are also responsible for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of concrete on that shared roadway. Because the shared roadway is for the exclusive use of the two homeowners, it is not HOA responsibility.
Please Note: Exclusive use of these areas does NOT mean resident's OWN that land. It is still considered common ground.....".

The section of the covenants they are referring to is two sentences long - DRIVEWAY/LOT EASEMENTS There shall be easements, with respect to each residential Unit, for the placement of a driveway, sidewalks, an exterior post lamp, pad mounted air conditioning units, and privacy fences (the "Driveway/Lot Easements"). Each residential Unit's driveway shall be for the exclusive use of the Owner of such Unit."

How can the shared roadway (extension of the street to get to my driveway in front of my garage) be my responsibility now? There is no mention of shared roadway in the above CCR section they are referring to that I can see. I see the word "exclusive" only pertaining to the driveway.

So after 17 years, the residents now have to fix the part of the street (common area) that is in front of their home that leads to their garage. This new "discovery" cannot be correct, can it? Two neighbors received notices (along with the new discovery letter) to fix concrete cracks on their "shared roadway" and were given 30 days to do it or pay attorney fees, etc.!?!?

I live in a planned community in Ohio - 28 townhomes (four connected in a section - two in the middle, two on the ends).
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
I suspect this may have come up because the board wants to save money, but have you looked at that section of the documents to see exactly what it says on exclusive use and what areas are covered? I would think the shared access roadway should be the HOA's responsibility and from doing a little digging, something that's exclusive use may still be the HOA's responsibility, especially if it's considered part of the common area.

In addition to reviewing that section, you may want to ask the board how it came to this conclusion - did they review it with the association attorney? More importantly, WHY is this an issue after 17 years (listen out for anything indicating there's a money issue) If the driveway is now homeowner responsibility, will the board step in if problems develop (like concrete cracks) and one homeowner balks at splitting the costs?

After listening to what they have to say, you may also want to take this to a private attorney for his/her interpretation. Even then, it may take someone going to court and having a judge decide. If no one wants to pay for the driveway, sidewalks, etc., you will need to work with the association attorney to propose amending the documents so there's no ambiguity as to who's responsible for what (the homeowners would have to vote to approve those amendments).

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
KathyS15 (Ohio)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Thank you very much for your input! Sure they want to save money. The concrete is getting older and needs attention.

The only time exclusive is mentioned in the CC&R is in the part I mentioned regarding each residential Unit's driveway. There is no general, limited or exclusive anything in our CC&R definition of "Common Areas". It says Common Areas shall mean and refer to all areas of land designated on any recorded subdivision plat, OTHER THAN THE LOTS, which are intended to be devoted to the common use and enjoyment of all the Owners. "Lot" definition is any sub lot shown upon any recorded subdivision plat. In real estate law, common area is the area which is available for use by more than ONE person......

At the annual meeting in March, it was disclosed that the HOA attorney is the one who has made this determination (we just now have received "official" notification by mail).

Yes the Board will step in if one homeowner balks. They say if not fixed, the HOA will do it and the homeowner will have to pay such special assessment or be deemed in default, bear interest, possible notice of lien and all legal fees.

I have talked to a private attorney. He thinks they are wrong but we would have to sue them and have a judge interpret and determine the CC&R language $$$$$$$.

The majority of the residents here are extremely apathetic. I guess to prove the Board wrong, I'd have to knock on doors and try to wake these people up and get them involved.

Unfortunately, the State of Ohio's revised code doesn't help much and Ohio doesn't enforce anything.

Hope to get more feedback and comments to help guide me through my protest and objection!
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
The last part of your comment says it all - it'll cost money to take this to court and it sounds like you don't want to or can't afford it. The easier and cheaper way would be to get the homeowners to look at the documents and consider if they need to be amended to clarify who's responsible for what, but if they're apathetic, you won't get anything done.

Since this makes you the lone ranger on this issue, you'll have to decide what to do next and how far you're willing to take this. Maybe people will wake up as soon as they find they have to fix their driveways and fork over a few hundred dollars or more to get it done, but it may take time before that happens. Go ahead and knock on the doors, but brace yourself for people who won't listen or care (change doesn't always happen overnight, especially in an HOA.)

The money issue can be the hook - using your own driveway, consider getting an estimate on how much this may cost and what will be involved (where will you park while the concrete's curing?) Provide that information to the neighbors, noting some may be facing this issue sooner rather than later? If homeowners want the HOA to do the work, they need to understand assessments will have to increase to pay for it - maintenance isn't cheap and the only way the HOA does anything is through homeowner assessment. Pay for this on your own or pool your resources together and get the work done at once and at a lower cost per homeowner.

In the meantime....could you suggest that the HOA attorney attend the next board meeting to provide an explanation and encourage your neighbors to attend so they can hear it for themselves, or get him/her to prepare some sort of letter that can be placed in the next newsletter or posted on your website? Once again, it may or may not work (the attorney probably won't show up for free and the board might not want to pay for that either).

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
Where the documents aren't clear, I try to follow the lead of local municipalities and counties. I don't know about the rest of the country, but, as an example, driveway aprons that are on public right of way are just about universally the responsibility of the property owner that benefits from them. This suggests that improvements benefit one or two owners can be their responsibility even if not on their land.

From what I have read, in California and some other western areas it is common for owners to be responsible for sidewalks adjacent to their property, even if on public right of way. There certainly is no argument that those are exclusive use.

So there is public precedent for the board's action. Since getting a definitive answer from a judge would be so expensive, it probably doesn't make sense to do it proactively, but wait until expensive repairs are needed, and band together with other owners to bring the suit.

One other thing to keep in mind is the owners pay for the work one way or the other, either directly or through dues and possibly special assessments, so this really might not cost you more over the long run. It somewhat depends on whether you think the association could do the work cheaper than you could.

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.
KathyS15 (Ohio)
Posts: 28
Posted:
I'm sure amending the declaration is on the Board's mind. They seem to always have a quorum and supposedly pass things via "yes" proxy votes and would totally make this go in their favor. No one sees the votes.....

They have the extra money to start doing repairs. They've allocated $3250 in this years budget for the sidewalk that runs along the west side of the street to fix expansion joint voids (apparently part of common ground they are responsible for). And $3000 into savings for "going forward" with the concrete/expansion joint program.

The actual expenditures for 2016 was $18,471.20. They are budgeting $28,008.08 for 2017. At the end of December 2016 they had $16,416.47 in savings/$26,038.38 in checking and $97.49 in petty cash.

They're also raising our dues July 1st (even though we saved $6000 on snow plowing the last two years). We were paying $236 a quarter. Will now be $259. $27,720 anticipated revenue from dues for 2017. No pool, no park bench, no playground. 28 townhouses on a quiet street with a cul-de-sac.

The Board doesn't meet every month and I imagine it would be like pulling teeth for any of us to be able to attend. Maybe if I find enough interested, we could petition for another meeting and come "armed and prepared". The Board pretty much has pinpointed what they are stating their claim upon even though they're twisting it into a new interpretation.

We rarely get a newsletter - maybe twice a year and we do not have a website. Any request has to be in writing via e-mail or postal mail. Unless an issue is a real emergency, they don't have to address it until their next Board meeting.
JamesG (Connecticut)
Posts: 83
Posted:
Keep in mind that what ever policy/decision the Board makes, it also applies to them as well. They may feel that since the attorney told them what needed to be done, that it must be correct. However, in my experience not all attorneys are well versed in common interest community law and occasionally they are wrong in the interpretation of the Declaration language.

Having said that, below are the sections from my Declaration that apply to your situation. A close reading will indicate that the only Limited Common Element that the owner must maintain, is their exterior HVAC unit.

Perhaps they will point you towards similar verbiage in your documents:

ARTICLE V
Limited Common Elements.

The following portions of the Common Elements are Limited Common Elements assigned to the Units as stated:
(a) If any chute, chimney, flue, pipe, duct, wire, conduit, or any other fixture lies outside the designated boundaries of a Unit, any portion thereof serving only that Unit is a Limited Common Element, the use of which is limited to that Unit, and any portion thereof serving more than one (1) Unit or any portion of the Common Elements is a part of the Common Elements.
(b) Any shutters, awnings, window boxes, doorsteps, stoops, porches, patios and all exterior doors and windows or other fixtures designed to serve a single Unit, but located outside the Unit's boundaries, are Limited Common Elements allocated exclusively to that Unit and their use is limited to that Unit,
(c) Stoops, and steps at the entrances to the front and rear of each building, which provide access to less than all Units, the use of which is limited to the Units to which they provide access.
(d) The Driveway located in front of the garage portion of each Unit is a limited common element servicing that Unit.
(e) Any space heating, water heating and air conditioning apparatus and all electrical switches, television, telephone, and electrical receptacles and light switches serving one Unit exclusively, are Limited Common Elements allocated exclusively to that Unit and their use is limited to that Unit.

As to each of the foregoing, a right of use is reserved as an appurtenance to the particular Unit or Units as described above. The fee ownership of the Limited Common Elements, however, is vested in all of the Unit Owners.

ARTICLE VI
Maintenance, Repair and Replacement

Section 6.1 - Common Elements. The Association shall maintain, repair and replace all of the Common Elements, except the portions of the Limited Common Elements which are required by this Declaration to be maintained, repaired or replaced by the Unit Owners.
Section 6.2 - Units. Each Unit Owner shall maintain, repair and replace at his or her own expense, all portions of his or her Unit, except the portions thereof to be maintained, repaired or replaced by the Association.
Section 6.3 - Limited Common Elements. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6.1 and Section 6.2, each Unit Owner shall be responsible for removing all snow, leaves and debris from the patio which is a Limited Common Element appurtenant to his or her Unit.

Furthermore, each Unit Owner shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair and replacement of those Limited Common Elements described in Article V Subsection (e) of this Declaration. Furthermore, if a Unit Owner fails to keep a Limited Common Element for which he is responsible in a sightly and safe condition and in good repair, the Association may perform the necessary maintenance and repair and charge the cost thereof to such Unit Owner as if it were a common expense.
KathyS15 (Ohio)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Thank you very much. However, our declaration only states "common areas" (no limited, exclusive, etc.) except for the one reference to our driveway listed as the only "exclusive use". We have extensions off the main street to get to our driveway in front of our garage which is county recorded as the Associations plat of common area.
AloceJ (California)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Thanks for your nice post to teach us more in this field. After reading on here, we can learn more in this topic.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KathyS15 on 05/09/2017 6:45 AM
Received this from our Board the other day. "Based on our Declarations of Restrictions, Covenants, Easements, and Conditions dated 1/6/99, Article VI-Section 6.2-page 9, it was discovered that every homeowner has exclusive rights to use their driveway, sidewalks, exterior post lamp, pad mounted air condition units, privacy fence and front step and patio. Based on this exclusive use, it is the homeowner's responsibility to maintain, repair and replace these areas as needed. This includes repairing or replacing any concrete that poses a fall/risk hazard or have defective concrete....Again at the homeowner's expense."

Here's the kicker....."In addition, end units that use a shared access roadway, between their two homes, to access their driveway are also responsible for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of concrete on that shared roadway. Because the shared roadway is for the exclusive use of the two homeowners, it is not HOA responsibility.
Please Note: Exclusive use of these areas does NOT mean resident's OWN that land. It is still considered common ground.....".

The section of the covenants they are referring to is two sentences long - DRIVEWAY/LOT EASEMENTS There shall be easements, with respect to each residential Unit, for the placement of a driveway, sidewalks, an exterior post lamp, pad mounted air conditioning units, and privacy fences (the "Driveway/Lot Easements"). Each residential Unit's driveway shall be for the exclusive use of the Owner of such Unit."

How can the shared roadway (extension of the street to get to my driveway in front of my garage) be my responsibility now? There is no mention of shared roadway in the above CCR section they are referring to that I can see. I see the word "exclusive" only pertaining to the driveway.

So after 17 years, the residents now have to fix the part of the street (common area) that is in front of their home that leads to their garage. This new "discovery" cannot be correct, can it? Two neighbors received notices (along with the new discovery letter) to fix concrete cracks on their "shared roadway" and were given 30 days to do it or pay attorney fees, etc.!?!?

I live in a planned community in Ohio - 28 townhomes (four connected in a section - two in the middle, two on the ends).

The potential problem if what you stated is directly from documents is the above section noted in bold discusses "easements". The question is who owns the easements in question the Owner or the HOA??? Essentially if your pull up your property on your local County Records what is shown as what you physically own? If the sidewalks and driveway are not shown ... then potentially they are HOA property.

In my last HOA which was single family homes the sidewalks and driveways were the owner's responsibility to maintain. However, those items were also on the property plats shown as owned by the homeowners.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here