Quote:
Posted By ElenaB . . . the same documents do not describe what a Single Family is.
We understand that it may be 2 or more people related by marriage or blood. Non-related individuals unless by adoption can't reside at the home. Please explain.
ElenaB FLA The excellent Florida commenters can help you here. But with your asking for 'Please explain', this may help you open the analytical door to helpful questions when you hire competent legal advice. This ain't such legal advice.
Depending on how well & actionably your governance documents define 'single family' and on what your jurisdiction's statute & judicial caselaw can do with all such, one approach includes to ask whether a SEQUENCE of 'single family' full unit usages technically contravenes lawful unit uses ?
1- For example, does an hotel-keeping/Innkeepers Act type SEQUENCING with marketing to get short term visitors or partiers, frequent check-ins/check-outs, etc constitute a contravention ?
After all it superficially looks like 'one single family at a time'.
2- Or instead of frequent turnover, hotel-like sequencing of what looks like a short term single family, would a DORM STYLE group of unrelated university students under a single lease without bedroom locks but lacking any family connection/ blood line nor adoptive connection, ( would such ) be a violation of docs/law/caselaw ?
3 - ( A no-nonsense judge in my own jurisdiction ruled that the hotel-like sequencing of short term single families was a commercial contravention of judicially-treated 'single family' within my own jurisdiction. The precedent would be useless to you, but not its demonstration of judicial analysis/ the judicial mind at work if the raw material allows it :
http://ontario.cafcor.org/index.php?option=com_fireboard&Itemid=46&func=view&catid=9&id=18644#18644