Quote:
Posted By DanN3 on 04/09/2017 4:45 AM
Although I agree that in many cases state, County and Federal law trumps the governing documents. when it is discovered that a trumping law nullifies or eliminates a provision of the governing documents, that provision should be made in compliance or eliminated. In our case, being a resort, 80% of the units are not owner occupied. There is a high threshold that has to be met to change the governing docs. In our case there is an added feature. Although the Association has been turned over to the owners in 2004 the docs say that no Doc change can be made without the expressed written consent of the developer. Also the developer has title to more than 20% of the units. The developer's absence makes it thus impossible for the docs to ever change. So the hope is that the Board alone could change the docs.
If there is no other avenue by which we can change our docs then we must change from saying to owners, prospective buyers and renters that the governing documents, Rules & Regulations, Community Standards are to be followed by adding, as the last word,............. 'maybe'.
Thanks for you input.
I contend above bold statement is incorrect:
720.3075âProhibited clauses in association documents.â
(1)âIt is declared that the public policy of this state prohibits the inclusion or enforcement of certain types of clauses in homeownersâ association documents, including declaration of covenants, articles of incorporation, bylaws, or any other document of the association which binds members of the association, which either have the effect of or provide that:
(a)â
A developer has the unilateral ability and right to make changes to the homeownersâ association documents after the transition of homeownersâ association control in a community from the developer to the nondeveloper members, as set forth in s. 720.307, has occurred. (b)âA homeownersâ association is prohibited or restricted from filing a lawsuit against the developer, or the homeownersâ association is otherwise effectively prohibited or restricted from bringing a lawsuit against the developer.
(c)âAfter the transition of homeownersâ association control in a community from the developer to the nondeveloper members, as set forth in s. 720.307, has occurred, a developer is entitled to cast votes in an amount that exceeds one vote per residential lot.
Such clauses are declared null and void as against the public policy of this state.
Also, according to Section (c) above after turnover the Developer would have only One (1) vote per residential lot or in essence only 20% of the votes. If the other owners carry a larger percentage then they win

.
The BOD alone cannot change the CCR's. Those are documents attached to everyone's Property Titles and therefore requires majority as stated in your CCR's or State Law to change.