Quote:
Posted By DonnaR5 . . . I know this is not a responsibility of a homeowner's association. Nevertheless, I am interested in any advice for us or information that can be passed on to the
victims. . . . . I'm not looking for a "not your business" reply because I already know that. Just wondering if there is anything I'm not thinking of yet. I'm sure everyone who reads the papers knows that we don't have good ways of dealing with mental illness in society. . . . . I will explore mediation services, although this is likely not something the HOA can spend money on. Perhaps the county has something of that nature.
DonnaR5 VA Good suggestions above.
1- The bigger picture for the targetted 'victims', respectfully, might include that it would be of dubious legal basis & potentially expensive legal penalty - for there to occur some sort of attempted HOA intervention beyond behaviour or disturbance clearly in contravention of covenants/state duties on associations.
2 - Even if all the Directors were accredited psychiatrists and/or psychologists, what grounds would the Board have to intervene other than directly to uphold covenant/statutory duty anyway ? If the door poundings & shrieking were instead about plagiarism or artistic merit etc , would it be any different ?
3 - The remedy with least danger to property & civil rights, respectfully might be the targetted victims' own pursuit of restraining orders followed by contempt of court applications, howsoever expensive or uncertain.
4 - Mediation/ some sort of ADR is usually worth consideration.
But I wonder how many professional mediators want to immerse in lowprice, disorderly conduct scenarios, even mental capacity issues ? There are safety & liability aspects of overseeing such too.
5 - Finally the victims may have to recognize that for an association to open the door to being mental health police, could be a slippery slope for society.
My own jurisdiction & another have accumulated a dozen judicial orders for unit sale issued over 10 years. Only one clearly was an unambiguous danger to the community ( periodic strait-jacketd removals by police amidst recurrent hygienic dangers & fires barely avoided. A number were pro se/SRL self represented dlitigants badly imbalanced in judicial consideration of orders to force their unit's sale. Several judicial sale orders hit parents unable to control autistic children. One unit was ordered sold for a disruptive caregiver, one for vexatious litigation. One was not clearly more than just a hate-filled boozer.
Condo law reform here has now opened the door to personal removal orders as a judicial recourse for condo associations. ( "personal unsuitability for living in a condo community" ). This may not be a good idea at all for property & c9vl rights.
Good luck with addressing the victim's concerns.