๐Ÿ’ฌ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
What do you folks do in regards to recording minutes for Executive sessions?

My understanding is that Executive session minutes are to include the topic or infraction, but no mention of member names? Also, it needs to be "general" in nature?

We had a very volatile and difficult Executive session last night regarding a major Declaration violation. Since I'm the secretary, I will be recording the minutes in regards to this meeting, but I also have many very important notes in regards to what the accused member stated, as well as their witness, that is pretty crucial to our case (we're most likely going to court).
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
In CA, the executive session (ES) agenda, which must be posted 2 days prior to ES, and must be vague. See Davis-stirling.com for an example.

Since ES minutes are completely confidential you do write the name(s) of the alleged violator, the alleged violation, i.e, the CC&R article & section. I assume you sent the alleged violator proper notice of the hearing, and why they were called to hearing??

Also see davis-stirling.com re: what should go in minutes. In a nutshell, only what was done NOT what was said is in any kind of meeting minutes. You do not put in all of the alleged violators' claims or those of her/his witness. Btw, why was there a "witness"? The board obviously confirmed the violation with photos and directors saw the violations with their own eyes.

Something else about this type of ES is that the Board members should never argue with the alleged violator. That person presents their case. The Board might ask very brief questions for clarification. The violator is dismissed and told they'll receive the Board's decision in the mail within x days. The board deliberates and votes on a decision. That is what the Board DOES and the motion and vote go in the minutes. All of the he said/she said do not.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Linda,

I always refer to any violations by Lot number vs. name of the owner.
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Tim - I like that idea!

Kerry - yes, notice was sent to homeowners and the accused member and posted appropriately. We're following the letter of the law. Member is allowed to bring in a witness, which they did. It was a family member who helped the member set up a website in regards to her Declaration violation.

My main concern is that since the meeting was not recorded, much of what was said by the accused member will be lost. I can guarantee that the other four Board members won't remember much of what happened at the meeting. I feel I need to note statements down, if only for my own use later on (court, etc.).
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Linda

Minutes are not word for word, blow for blow description. They are more an overview and if heading for a legal battle than the less said in the minutes the better. It is best you do not try and summarize as you could do more harm than good. If the session was recorded than let that be introduced in court.

Legally all Minutes have to contain is motions and votes. They do not have to contain the discussions held prior to the motions and voting.

An example:

The BOD heard from the owner and their witness concerning the issued fine. The BOD discussed the fine and a Motion was made to uphold the fine by Harry Smith, it was Seconded by Mary Jones, the BOD voted unanimously to uphold the fine.

That is all you need, especially if headed to court. Let the chips fall where they fall in court.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
John summarizes this well. Except in CA, anyway, no fine or other disciplinary action had yet been taken by the Board. Ao it hadn't been "issued" yet. what the alleged violator was trying to do was r argue that they shouldn't be g fined or disciplined in some other way.

Please, please see davis-stirling.com on the topic of minutes, Linda.

What I'm wondering now is why did your board send a notice of the violation to all owners???? And where in your governing docs does it say alleged violators can bring a witness?

If you do have to go to court, your pictures of the violation or copies of it or whatever is what you need. You need a copy of the violation letter you sent to the Owner. You need a copy of the minutes. You need a copy of the Board's decision which you sent the violator, and whatever else your HOA attorney advises, You do not need a written record of what the alleged violator SAID.
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Thanks, John. I understand that.

Kerry - I read Davis-Stirling alot, probably too much. I need to find something else to read!

From Davis Stirling: Who May Attend. As noted above, members do not have a right to attend executive session meetings. However, that does not mean the meetings are limited to directors only. Directors, managers, recording secretaries, the association's attorney, members subject to disciplinary action as well as witnesses (but only for that portion of the meeting involving the disciplinary hearing), and others invited by the board (such as vendors bidding on a project) may attend an executive session meeting.

Meeting Notice: Notice to Members. Starting January 1, 2012, members must be given notice of executive session meetings of the board. This is required regardless of anything to the contrary in an association's governing documents.
1. With an Open Meeting. If executive session is held with a scheduled open meeting of the board, it must be included in the open meeting's four-day notice and generally noted in the open meeting agenda.

2. Between Open Meetings. If a nonemergency meeting is to be held solely in executive session, members must be given notice of the time and place of the meeting at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. (Civ. Code ยง4920(b)(2).) If an association's governing documents require a longer notice, they must be followed. (Civ. Code ยง4920(b)(3).)

Notice must be posted in a prominent place or places in the common areas and by mail to any owner who had requested notice by mail (at the address requested by the owner). In addition, notice may be given by mail, by delivery of the notice to each unit in the development, by newsletter or similar means of communication, or, with the consent of the member, by electronic means. (See Notice of Meetings.)

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Yes, I stated way above that notices of ESs must be posted. A notice is basically an announcement that there'll be a meeting, where, what time and the agenda. If your HOA doesn't have a place to post the notice/agenda, I guess you must mail it to Owners. The notice must include the agenda of the ES, which should be vague, i.e., not identify the alleged violator, their lot #, etc. Are you saying you sent to homeowners the alleged violation? Or violator? That's what I asked.

But your subject line is about meeting minutes--an entirely different document. ES minutes are kept confidential forever unless a Board votes to waive that confidentiality. They are indeed the official record of the Board actions.

Re: who may attend ES: note that a witness or others may attend only if invited by the Board.

I know how hard your work and that you have very little help from other directors. It looks like, however, that there's some uncertainty about the terms that CA HOAs use. Davis-stirling.com has a very useful vocabulary list & definitions that might help a lot!
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Kerry, sorry, I must have misunderstoo you. The answer is NO. Vague agenda for meeting. No mention of violator, etc.

But your subject line is about meeting minutes--an entirely different document. ES minutes are kept confidential forever unless a Board votes to waive that confidentiality. They are indeed the official record of the Board actions.

Correct - I undestand that. But, if meeting minutes are confidential and without detail, how does that work "down the road" when the violator tries to pull something else in the same manner? You have a new Board that may know nothing about priors. Does that make sense?
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
You must put the name (or lot # if you prefer) of the violator, address, etc. in the minutes.

As I wrote above, you do want in the letter calling the alleged violator to a hearing the document that was violated, the article and section or page number, dates of violations (if applicable), date of hearing.

Your minutes will say pretty much what John C wrote with the usual date of ES, who attended, etc. (see Davis-stirling.com on Executive Session MINUTES.) You simply write that Ms Z, HOA address, was called to hearing for violations of xxxx on yyy date(s) [if applies-use text form violations latter) ], by [fill in the behavior.] Ms. Z attend the hearing and denied the charges.

The board excused her, deliberated and because they had irrefutable proof of the violation in the form of qq & rr , voted 3-1 to [name the disciplinary action.]

Those are the only details you need that I can think of. The original letter, letter telling the violator what the discipline is will go into her unit file for future boards to see along, I'd think with the meeting minutes.

If I have time, I'll copy our ES minutes on a recent hearing. The Owners did disagree with a fine and came to hearing to dispute it.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Sorry, Linda, I can't copy portions of ES minutes. But it said names, address requested a meeting to dispute the fine they were assessed because their employee spilled liquid off of their balcony onto windows below. XX made a motion, yy seconded it to enforce the fine. In favor, 3; opposed -1 (diretor name) to enforce the fine. Motion carried.

I now don't know what details you're referring to????
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 01/03/2017 2:33 PM
That is all you need, especially if headed to court. Let the chips fall where they fall in court.

I do not know how universal this practice is but in my state a court would hear the case de novo (from the beginning). The court would hear all the evidence and reach its own conclusion without regard to what the HOA found. The ES minutes would be irrelevant.
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Thanks, Larry - this is what I'm hoping for in a way, just so all the evidence can be brought forward. The person we're dealing with has a habit of not telling the truth.

Thanks, Kerry - you have answered my questions! Appreciate it!
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Larry does know about such things, Linda.

๐ŸŽฏ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • โœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • โœ“ Share your experience
  • โœ“ Get expert advice
  • โœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here