💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MiguelR (Florida)
Posts: 1
Posted:
I live in Mirabay in Apollo Beach, Florida and have lived in my home since 2011. When I moved into my home there was a relatively small oak tree planted in front of the house in the area between the sidewalk and street. I assume the tree was planted by the developers of the community. The roots of the tree are now causing some uplifting of the sidewalk in front of my house (this was not a problem when I moved in five years ago). Of note, the tree is also located about a foot away from two telecommunication utility boxes. I just received a letter from my HOA which states that I need to repair or replace that area of the uplifted sidewalk. From what I have read and understand, the HOA Declaration of Covenants does not specifically mention sidewalks with regards to lot and structure maintenance. Can the HOA force me to pay for the sidewalk repair? Do I have any legal recourse? Thank you.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Miguel,

I would first ask who owns the tree and who owns the sidewalk? That may not be as easy to answer as you would think. When I bought my home I assumed that the property line was in the middle of the street, but the plat told a different story. So then I assumed that I owned up to the sidewalk. I was wrong about that, too; my property stops about two feet shy of the sidewalk. The city owns the street, the sidewalk, and a strip of grass along side the sidewalk.

Planting an oak tree in the grass strip between the street and the sidewalk is a recipe for disaster. Some cities, counties, and townships have ordinances prohibiting that practice. Yes, the tree looks so nice for a few years and then its roots destroys everything when it matures.

Start by getting a copy of the plat that shows where the property lines are. It may not be easy to determine where your property lines are if the location or dimensions for the sidewalks are not shown. You may need a surveyor to figure out what you do and do not own and the cost of the survey may exceed the cost of the sidewalk repair.

Repairing the sidewalk without removing the tree will be an exercise in futility. Leave the tree where it is and in a few years you will be right back where you are now with a broken sidewalk.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Determine who owns the tree first. The city could be involved. Which means a whole other list of red tape... Larry gave good advice.

My question to you is: Is it more expensive to seek legal action just to find out in the end your responsible for the repairs? Or better yet, what if the HOA is responsible? Are you ready to pay a special assessment or increase in your dues to cover the expense?

I find your option is best to determine who is responsible for the tree causing the damage. Is it HOA? Is it City? Is it you? Find the costs, pay it, and comply... Suing your HOA is suing yourself and your neighbors. So you will find "fighting" may be a worst scenario in the long run...

Former HOA President
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Regardless of who repairs the sidewalk, if the tree is not removed, the sidewalk will need repaired again.
DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
I've done some research on this issue and will share some of what I've found out. For background, my association owns the roads and a right of way 25 feet each side from the road centerline. The "as designed" plan has the sidewalks being on the right of way, along with the strip of land between the sidewalk and the road. Generally the edge of the sidewalk away from the street should be along the property boundary but it often varies by a few inches.

On the face of it, it should seem that the association should maintain the sidewalks because they are on association property. In our case the association does, but passing responsibility to the owners is not unknown. In my area, and generally in the Eastern part of the US, local governments maintain sidewalks on public right of way, so it seems natural that HOAs should do the same. Also in our case the documents are silent on the issue.

On the other hand, in California, and somewhat in the West generally, adjoining property owners are responsible for sidewalk maintenance (http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=shc&group=05001-06000&file=5610-5618 and http://homeguides.sfgate.com/sidewalks-considered-homeowners-property-56365.html) even if those sidewalks are on public property.

Barring state or local law saying otherwise, I am not aware of anything that would prevent an association from making adjoining property owners responsible for sidewalk maintenance.

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here