💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

CarolynM3 (Georgia)
Posts: 63
Posted:
I have a question that our board will be putting forth to our attorney. We need to raise the HOA fee by $30 - 50 in 2017. Some board members seem to think that the board has the power to do that without a majority vote from the homeowners. After I read the excerpt from our Declarations, I think we do need a majority vote. One of the board members has said that if we do need a majority vote, we do not have to tell the homeowners that they can dissent.

Personally, I think his approach is very cold. (he's an accountant by trade).

Here's the excerpt: (your views would be much appreciated).

"..If the estimated budget proves inadequate for any reason, the Board of Directors may levy at
any time a further assessment against the Unit Owners and notify the Unit Owners accordingly.
If for any reason an annual budget is not made as required hereby, a payment in the amount
required by the last prior assessment shall be due on the first day of each month until changed
by a new assessment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, except for the first year after the
relinquishment of control of the Association by the Declarant pursuant to Section 9 hereof, any
increase in the annual assessment in excess of a percentage equal to the annual rate of inflation
as measured by the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers for the immediately
preceding twelve (12) month period may be disapproved by the Unit Owners holding a majority
of the Association vote...."

Regards,

Carolyn
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
In our documentation the board can approve an increase of dues by only 5%. If it is more than that, then the majority of owners must approve. That is typical for many HOA's. You may want to read to see what percentage the board has right to approve and then what the owner's have to approve.

May I ask why such an increase is necessary? Your HOA is a non-profit? That's a pretty high increase. Once you get over 5% it basically works like a special assessment.

Former HOA President
PitA
Posts: 1,416
Posted:
IMO: your 'docs' permit only a raise in assessments up to the 'inflation rate' UNLESS a greater increase is voted AYE by the membership
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Carolyn,

That passage is saying a lot.

First, it appears that the Board has the authority to levy a special assessment for shortages within the budget without membership approval:

"If the estimated budget proves inadequate for any reason, the Board of Directors may levy at
any time a further assessment against the Unit Owners and notify the Unit Owners accordingly.
If for any reason an annual budget is not made as required hereby, a payment in the amount
required by the last prior assessment shall be due on the first day of each month until changed
by a new assessment. . .


Second, it appears that the membership may overturn a proposed increase that exceeds the CPI:

pursuant to Section 9 hereof, any increase in the annual assessment in excess of a percentage equal to the annual rate of inflation
as measured by the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers for the immediately
preceding twelve (12) month period may be disapproved by the Unit Owners holding a majority
of the Association vote....


Now, the authority to disapprove is not, I repeat NOT, the same as a requirement for approval. This is akin to the Board appointing an individual to serve as Director. The membership may recall that individual but does not approve the appointment of.

Therefore, the Board has options:

1) Seek membership approval, which isn't required and (in my opinion) should not be done.
2) Provide the membership an opportunity to reject the increase (not required but a nicety)
3) Adopt the increase and inform the membership that, if desired, they may petition the Board for a special meeting of the membership to reject the increase.
3) Adopt the increase and let the membership figure it out for themselves.

Personally, I don't think you need to spend $300 for a legal opinion on what that passage says.
The Board simple needs to decide how they want to proceed.

As always, this advice is provided on what is known. The unknown, the rest of the section regarding assessments in your Governing documents and any applicable statutes, may have me alter this advice.

Hope this helps,

Tim
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Carolyn,

My reading of the quoted passage is that your board has all the authority it needs to raise assessments whenever the board deems it necessary. The unit owners may veto the increase only if a majority of them vote to do so.

The part about the CPI is interesting because it seems to provide a trigger for when a vote may be taken but I think it is not realistic. For example, the costs for water or taxes for your project may rise drastically while the CPI remains unchanged.

I am one who favors giving the board full authority to set assessments based on its knowledge of current costs and future needs. In my association the board has the duty to base the budget on expected costs. Despite that duty, the board fears increasing assessments and tends to write next year's budget based on last year's expenses. While I understand that no one wants to be the one who tells the members to dig deeper, associations are limited to raising funds by levying assessments. Your investment will be lost if assessments are not adequate to cover current costs and reserve requirements.

I normally oppose any scheme that requires members to approve a budget. There is no point in electing a board if their actions are subject to the whims of the members, who retain the ultimate power over the board by way of elections. In the real world, my home is subject to many different taxes levied by several different bodies and not once have I been asked to vote on those rates. I see no reason why a condo should be run differently.

DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
My interpretation is the same as Tim's. Unless some owners mount a campaign to overturn the increase and get 50% of owners to vote against, the board's budget increase is valid. It would seem pointless for owners to do this since the board apparently has the power to make special assessments without owner approval to make up any shortfall.

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
I read it that the BOD has the ability to raise the dues without the owner's voting on/approving it. The owners do have the right to overturn the amount by calling a Special Meeting and rejecting the increase which then defaults to an increase equal to the CPI (about 2-3% I believe)..

Personally I would raise the dues and show the owners why such was needed. I would not call for a vote on it. If the owner's want to call a Special Meeting and vote on it, so be it but I would not enable such.

Our Covenants are similar. They allow the BOD to raise due as they see fit but they must notify the owner's on or before 12/01 and unless the owners call for a Special Meeting and rejects it, it goes into effect on 01/01. I have recommended my BOD do such. In our case from $600 per year to $720 per year. A 20% increase.

SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
What Larry said. Our documents are the same as Melissa's - the board can raise assessments up to 5% over the current year without homeowner approval. Anything higher or special assessments require homeowner approval (75%)

I don't know why some HOA documents limit increased to the CPI - generally that runs between 2.5% and 3.5% and the cost of living on, say, the East Coast could be higher than what it would be in the Midwest or another part of the country. It can even vary a bit between cities in the same geographical region. Another problem is that the fees were usually set too low at the start and homeowners want to keep it that way, forgetting the older things get, the more they cost to maintain. That applies to homes as well as - people (the older I get, the more money I seem to be spending on healthcare!)

Instead, I say Boards need to be honest with the homeowners and explain exactly what's going on with the budget. You do that year round, not just at annual budget preparation time. People need to understand there is no bottomless pit of money and the cost of everything is going up, so if they want the same level of services, they have to be willing to pay for it. It's a good idea to review the budget carefully and cut wherever and whenever you can, but it has to be done with precision.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
ChrisP5 (Missouri)
Posts: 165
Posted:
Our documents require 60% of members to vote against a budget otherwise what the board develops goes into effect. We have been raising dues about 10% per year for several years trying to get somewhere close to what our reserve study recommends and still barely manage to make quorum at our annual meetings. For $30-50 per year you will probably have some people irritated but I doubt you will have a group successfully mount opposition and get 50% to overturn it.

We do send out a pretty detailed narrative of any major changes with the annual meeting materials so most people have a pretty good understanding of why their dues are increasing.

SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
In that case, you may as well wait to see if enough people are honked off to go through the effort of rallying other homeowners to defeat the budget - if you're having trouble making quorum at an annual meeting, this may show you where most people's heads are at, so you may not have an issue anyway.

You're doing the right thing by sending out the details of the proposed budget - if people don't like it, they can always say so and offer suggestions. In the meantime, the board could also state what could happen if the budget is rejected. For instance, if you fund 2017 with 2016 dollars, you may run into serious budget shortfalls and instead of a 10% increase for 2018, people may have to brace themselves for a higher percentage. The choice them becomes whether they want to make an adjustment now or face an even bigger hit to the wallet later (which could have been prevented).

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here