Five directors per By-Laws. I need to check about H/O's right to fill vacancies.
Inappropriate, but no grounds for termination. I see....You now have inspired me to re-think what I believe is evidence.
I apologize that my writing has been unclear in these HOA related matters.
Yes, I will have other people read anything that I send to the H/O's. I appreciate your honesty.
I realize that I need to study more about the prez's role as a liaison to understand what the prez cannot do.
There are other activites that involve a possible collusion which occurred last year...
Board director (A) was not allowed by PM and the prez tell the board something to an HOA meeting by speakerphone. As a board director, I was asked by (A) to use my phone at the meeting to call (A) in. When I attempted to do so, I was told by PM and prez that this was not allowed. They were adamant about it, so I believed them. The PM writes our Minutes and posts them for the Membership to view online (I do not know whether we receive them by mail). Months later, I discovered in our Minutes that speakerphone usage were allowed, including for (A). (A) was upset about not being able to participate at this meeting. However (A) did not contact MC about this. The PM and/or the board said nothing regarding this incident thereafter.
I thought the Open Act Meeting allows for board directors to use speakerphones during executive session and I think maybe for the entire HOA meeting?
There is an article written by an HOA attorney. Something about denying a board director from participating the meeting.
I am not sure if I should consider the above as evidence?
I am not sure if I should just let this one go?
My gut is says not to let it go...because other questionable actions from PM occurred prior to the speakerphone incident. The other questionable issue I have involves the PM and MC, too. I am not sure if I should let that go, too. My gut again says no. Sigh.
Many thanks for your help, Kerry!