KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
In looking over some papers for my neighbor I had come across another question:
The covenants and restrictions make no mention to special assessments. There is a reference in an amendment to levy and enforce a monthly assessment.
Now reading the By-Laws there is a section regarding Special Assessments and it states that the board may issue a special assessment to tackle "unusual, unexpected, budgeted, or not-recurring expenses" with the approval of all lot owners, but later amended to only require the approval of all members who were voting in person or by proxy at a meeting.
While this does not affect me because I am not a member, so any special assessment would be approved and levied by and for members (although I am sure they would insist I pay), I was curious if this would even be enforceable since there is nothing in the declaration authorizing the use of special assessments.
I could see that it is possibly enforceable because it only deals with the membership only BUT I could also see an issue since their amendment forces homeowners into membership upon transfer of ownership.
The covenants and restrictions make no mention to special assessments. There is a reference in an amendment to levy and enforce a monthly assessment.
Now reading the By-Laws there is a section regarding Special Assessments and it states that the board may issue a special assessment to tackle "unusual, unexpected, budgeted, or not-recurring expenses" with the approval of all lot owners, but later amended to only require the approval of all members who were voting in person or by proxy at a meeting.
While this does not affect me because I am not a member, so any special assessment would be approved and levied by and for members (although I am sure they would insist I pay), I was curious if this would even be enforceable since there is nothing in the declaration authorizing the use of special assessments.
I could see that it is possibly enforceable because it only deals with the membership only BUT I could also see an issue since their amendment forces homeowners into membership upon transfer of ownership.