💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

BuddyJ (Maryland)
Posts: 37
Posted:
Can the HOA BOD/Officers meet in a closed session to make a decision after the homeowner was given a hearing? The homeowner was to supply new landscape plans for review after their hearing but it was decided it wouldn't satisfy the original ACC request. This is a new resident who's driveway does not meet the ACC original request when the home plans were first approved.
This homeowner is requesting another hearing with all the BOD, Officers & ACC members to see first hand each individual decision, however, intimidation from the homeowner is a big concern since their last hearing was hostile at times. They believe our decision was biased from 1 member.
This is a single family development in Maryland which is 80% built out.
Thank you
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
So you want to hold a secret meeting because your board lacks the stones to face the owner?
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
The case law says that discretionary covenants must be exercised "reasonably" and "in good faith." A HOA ACC or HOA Board may deny an application as long as it has a good reason and has acted similarly with truly similar other applications. Did the HOA Board/Officers give any reason for denial? If it approves truly similar applications while denying yours, this is unreasonable. The homeowner is right to seek the decisions for other applications that are similar.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BuddyJ on 08/21/2016 5:18 AM

Can the HOA BOD/Officers meet in a closed session to make a decision after the homeowner was given a hearing?

Perhaps, the Board may meet in executive session to deliberate the issue, as any enforcement issue can become potential litigation.
However, they must return to an open session to vote on the decision. However, that is a stretch.

The governing statute, 11B-111, is pretty clear.

Quote:
Posted By BuddyJ on 08/21/2016 5:18 AM

This homeowner is requesting another hearing with all the BOD, Officers & ACC members to see first hand each individual decision, however, intimidation from the homeowner is a big concern since their last hearing was hostile at times. They believe our decision was biased from 1 member.

If a hearing has already been held, there is zero requirement to give another hearing unless there is new information.

If prior approval was not sought and given, that is the issue.

You don't say if you are on the Board or not.

If you are on the Board, and meet in someones home, if the individual becomes hostile, give a warning. If it continues, suspend the meeting. The owner of the property then asks the individual to leave. If the individual refuses, call the police and file a trespassing charge. Then resume the meeting.

If you are not on the Board and are the individual in violation, you catch more flies with honey. Admit you made a mistake and work to a compromise. Otherwise, you may end up owing monetary penalties and (worst) defending yourself in court over the issue.
BuddyJ (Maryland)
Posts: 37
Posted:
Thank you AugustineD & TimB4
Our decision was reasonable & based on good faith as we as provided specific reason for denial in writing. We also, included a compromise based on their new information.
Yes, I am on the board.
The was at the homeowner’s home since we were discussing their driveway. The hostility came from the homeowner when we made negative statements against their driveway.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Buddy

Reread what Larry said. Yo had the hearing now have the stones to publically vote on it. The owner has you running scared.

BuddyJ (Maryland)
Posts: 37
Posted:
Thank you for everyone's feedback but I did find this summary from Roberts Rules of Order that I believe are very applicable in our situation.
“The short answer is that Robert’s doesn't care whether your meetings are open or closed. In fact, there are no general parliamentary prohibitions on closed meetings or rules for what can happen during the closed portion. Robert's allows both discussion and voting during an executive session. In fact, decisions made during a closed meeting don't even have to be revealed to non-board members until the board chooses.”
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Buddy,

Roberts rules are suggestive.

Statutes are a requirement.

Suggest you read MD § 11B-111.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here