💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:

Our high rise twin towers has a commercial element, "Biz," which should pay 5% of everything it uses. (Biz does not use any of the res. recreational amenities.) There are about 200 residential condos.

In 2012, I discovered that Biz wasn’t contributing anything to reserves for those items that it uses. A few of these are listed on the original DRE Budget filed with the State by the developer before the project is completed. The CC&Rs tell us nothing except to adhere to the DRE Budget. The MC’s accountant and our PM agreed to a small contribution/mo. for the items on the DRE list, eff. 1/13.

I mistakenly thought I needed Board approval to get Biz to contribute more and sought it. The Biz Owner has a permanent seat on our board of 7 per our bylaws. He is a developer, very charismatic, and he persuaded a majority on the Board to vote no on adding any additional contributions for ’14. He said further study was needed.

I next realized that I did NOT need Board approval to get these billing errors corrected. I nagged our PM & the CEO of our MC once budget season arrived in ’14. The CEO wrote that I interpreted the DRE Budget differently than the corporate staff. But, unexpectedly, the PM called me & the Board president into her office and gave us a list of further items Biz would contribute to in ’15. I asked the PM for an explanation, but her reply was incomprehensible. Hmmmmm....had they seen that I was right after all and wanted to quietly make corrections?

In mid ’15, we got a new PM, who’s very knowledgeable about high rise mechanical systems. I met with her & our engineer to double check on all such items that I suspected served the Biz lots too. No resistance. They quickly cooperated and even added more to my list for 2016.

The Biz Owner now contributes $1,200/mo. to the repair & replacement of the reserves items that it uses. Res. Owners were overbilled $14,400/ann. for 7 years--from at least '06-12. That’s nearly $100,800. (Check my math!) The total started dwindling as errors were incrementally corrected in ’13 & ’15. I was simply happy that the errors were corrected.

But now, after thinking about what I chronicled on a different thread here, I’m considering asking the MC CEO for some kind of restitution. Does it seem warranted? What $$ would make sense? Where would it go? How do I start? I’m thinking I’d meet first with our VP & treasurer, who are the only other Owners with much understanding of these things.

(Please do NOT ask where the treasurer was all this time, or the Board, or the Finance Committee. That would be unhelpful. Our budgets are almost impossible to comprehend and 4 MC’s including the original budget preparer in 2001 have made mistakes; ditto 3 HOA law firms, and three reserves specialists. Revision of our CC&Rs will not happened this year)
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Kerry,

I expect that there were individuals who sold and moved from your development since 2001.
How do you expect to make restitution to them (if you were able to recoup the money)?

The issue wouldn't be going after the MC.
The issue would be going after the "Biz" as they were the ones who would owe the money.

My suggestion, move forward.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Thanks, Tim. No intention of trying to get restitution for individual Owners as it's obvious what a mess that would be.

I might add, though, that the MC did provide "refunds" to any owners who were billed too much on a different matter. The period in question was '06-'09. Owners who lived here in '10 received refunds for all of the months they lived here during that 06-09 period. Owners who'd sold during that period were not sought, but the MC wrote that if any heard of the program and could prove ownership, they'd receive refunds. Those of us who underpaid were not asked to "give back" our shortfalls.

The MC in our contract with them is responsible for collecting assessments. They base the amounts on their interpretation of our governing docs, but, as noted, they must review the original DRE Budgets to bill the various entities here. I'm not so sure that Biz even realized till '13 that they were being underbilled. And they never were billed for these reserves components.

I'm feeling that it's not right to turn our backs on a $100,000+ error. It would seem to be part of my duty of loyalty and duty of care as a director.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 08/19/2016 2:17 PM
Thanks, Tim. No intention of trying to get restitution for individual Owners as it's obvious what a mess that would be.

I might add, though, that the MC did provide "refunds" to any owners who were billed too much on a different matter. The period in question was '06-'09. Owners who lived here in '10 received refunds for all of the months they lived here during that 06-09 period. Owners who'd sold during that period were not sought, but the MC wrote that if any heard of the program and could prove ownership, they'd receive refunds. Those of us who underpaid were not asked to "give back" our shortfalls.

The MC in our contract with them is responsible for collecting assessments. They base the amounts on their interpretation of our governing docs, but, as noted, they must review the original DRE Budgets to bill the various entities here. I'm not so sure that Biz even realized till '13 that they were being underbilled. And they never were billed for these reserves components.

I'm feeling that it's not right to turn our backs on a $100,000+ error. It would seem to be part of my duty of loyalty and duty of care as a director.

As Tim suggested, Move forward.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Is your reasoning, Tim & Richard, that our HOA did receive the correct amount of assessments so there's no need to compensate 200+ residential Owners for this expensive error?

In other words, my duty is to the the HOA, not 95% of the Owners?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Kerry

An evaluation of how much would it cost, especially legal cost, to collect. It might be time to leave the sleeping dog alone.

This you must decide.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 08/19/2016 2:17 PM

I might add, though, that the MC did provide "refunds" to any owners who were billed too much on a different matter. The period in question was '06-'09. Owners who lived here in '10 received refunds for all of the months they lived here during that 06-09 period. Owners who'd sold during that period were not sought, but the MC wrote that if any heard of the program and could prove ownership, they'd receive refunds. Those of us who underpaid were not asked to "give back" our shortfalls.

Did you declare the refunds that would have gone to previous owners as income for tax purposes?
Why didn't you collect from those who had underpaid as they owed the money?

Both of those would also be a "part of [your] duty of loyalty and duty of care as a director. "

Once started, if the business owner wants to fight the issue, as Richard pointed out, you are now in a court case that can cost far more then your looking at collecting.

A consequence of this action might be that the business owner closes it's doors and moves.

As I understand the issue (which is not a good understanding) you attempted this several times and the boards decision was contrary to what you were trying. That too would be a defense argument if this issue went to court.

As I said, Move forward.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Kerry

IT IS important to ask where the treasurer, the Board and/or the Finance Committee were. Someone at your complex has to know exactly how the CCRs are interpreted in creating a budget and exactly what each outlined entity is responsible for.

I have never read a governing document that I couldn't make heads or tails of. If, you budget is as difficult and complicated as you have lead us to believe, then someone needs to have in their possession a outline of what the responsibilities are for each of the entities and the exact percentage owned per unit.

Did the HOA, and its Board of Directors have some shared responsibility for not having the correct amounts collected, or is the answer, we did what the "experts" suggested was right at the time?

We had a similar situation in my former HOA. We were in charge of billing for 317 homes and one convent, which, back in 1938, was the West Coast residence of the Al Capone crime family. 317 of the units had meters that read in hundreds, while the convent's meter was to be read in tenths. Over 10 years, the Association under-billed the convent by $100K. We were billing them only 1/10th of their actual usage. It was our bad and it was chalked up as a $100K donation to the Roman Catholic Church.

Unlike yours, this had a direct effect on our bottomline.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I wrote nothing, John & Tim, about a lawsuit against anyone. I have NO intention of going that route. Certainly not against Biz since (to repeat my above) I don't think they knew they were underbilled. (The developers' firm is exceptionally wealthily in any case-- no reason it would "close it's [sic] doors..."

I related that our MC had refunded $$ to Owners who'd been overbilled in the past so I could show there is a precedent. The total amount they'd collected was accurate for my HOA, so our HOA received all $$ it should have. The MC paid the refunds themselves and did not think it reasonable or fair to bill Owners who'd been underbilled.

(I don't remember the exact content of the letter from the MC to Owners who rec'd refunds 6-1/2 years ago, Tim, so I don't recall if they advised Owners they'd owe taxes on the income.)

I sought Board approval exactly once (please see above again, Tim) to try to get yet more contributions from Biz. Then I realized our DRE Budget for Biz (to which our CC&Rs refers us) is quite clear. Biz must contribute to what they use (or might use, e.g., the Building's ceiling sprinklers system).

We did not, Richard, hire any "experts" until late '15. I don't know why you think we did long ago. This recent activity was from our HOA attorney, who advised that we needed a certified budget specialist (CCIM--look it up) to disentangle our budgets. The budget guy, in turn wrote we needed confirmation of certain operating expense splits from those who know the work processes. One example: there are three areas that are billed for our $200k/ann. custodial service. We needed to have a time study done to see how much time was spent in Biz & the other two op. budget areas. (but none of this expert stuff had anything to do with what components Biz uses that we reserve for.)

I definitely am NOT the only one involved in our HOA, Richard, who finally began to see how crazy our budgets are. I just was the first. Our current GC has recently told our board that of the 1,000 or so sets of CC&Rs he's reviewed, rewritten, etc., ours are among the 10 most complicated. Our 1st treasurer--for five years-- was a CPA; of our 4 MCs, 3 are highly reputable; one was a start-up, that did no harm. Our Finance Committees and treasurers' backgrounds are in purchasing & contracts for a large school district; securities analysts (2); community college math profs (2); CEO of one of CA's largest housing developers; realtor/mortgage broker specializing in condos; administrator in a large school district and an MC owner/architect. The latter was so wrapped up in making sure we pursued construction defect litigation (and rightly so!) that she never had a chance to get into our "books" before she sold.

I think the reason none picked up this particular $100,000+ error, and the others I've discussed elsewhere--related but not the same-- is that financials presented to them weren't laid out in a way that the errors were obvious or that prompted anyone to ask: "Hey, how do we arrive at the monthly dues Biz should pay anyway?" and I think the reason I discovered the (really) three kinds of errors is because I was so ignorant of any of our or any other budgets, finances, etc. My background is completely unrelated. I presumed, at first, that my questions were stupid or irrelevant, but my own strength is inquisitiveness... so I kept asking.

What I AM thinking about, after having thought just getting it all "repaired" was enough, is a friendly sit down with our PM, MC CEO & their corp accountant with a couple if our officers (a just-retired univ, econ prof, and former stock broker), very briefly summarizing the chronicle of events, and asking, perhaps, for a nice discount for a couple of years on our (very pricey) mgmt. fee or some other "compensation" that would be beneficial to my community.

I am still hoping for strategy and/or tactics. I appreciate any ideas. I still don't see any compelling reasons on this thread why we should not proceed.

RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Kerry

I guess if you had all these "professionally" qualified people in your HOA, how did things get screwed up and why are you now placing the blame on a management company?

I do know what a CCIM is. I hope that got your ship back on the right track.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Kerry

My suggestion to evaluate the situation would be after the "friendly sit down" you are told to go pound sand. Then a decision needs to made how to proceed.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
John, Our MC's CEO is way too polite to tell us to "pound sand." No advice on actually how to approach the MC from you or Richard?

As I recall, Richard has been an PM for about seven years. So the below only may interest him. My advice to any directors on boards of really complicated HOAs is: make sure you have a strong Finance Committee. within this committee, I suggest that each member have a specific area assigned to them. Ours meets and everyone kind of does everything.

Indeed, Richard, the CCIM (budget specialist) did confirm every one of my suspicions that several budget splits were wrong. Two line items privileged the few Minority Area Owners (who own 15%) heavily, and dinged the Majority Area Owners (who own 80%) severely. This, however, is not the Biz Owner (5%) scenario on this thread, which didn't require the CCIM's expertise.

The main thing the CCIM noted about the Biz Owner is that they never had paid for gas. I noticed long ago that they are not billed for a portion of gas and assumed they had their own water heaters & meter vs. using the boilers of the roofs, reheaters, etc., that the res. Owners use. Biz will start paying for a portion of gas in '17, but that is not the MC's billing error, apparently they also assumed Biz has its own source of hot water (2 of the 5 Biz tenants use a lot of hot water) The DRE Budget does not say Biz should pay for gas based on the preparer's own assumptions before the project was built.

I can't answer why the earliest Board(s) did not catch these errors except to repeat that with 3 reserves accounts (containing 150 components), an operating budget of 140 line items ($2.5mil) that's contributed to by three entities with uneven splits, and a sq. ft. variable that applies to about 15 condo configurations, the whole thing is murkey. My point in bringing up the various Finance Comm. (FC) members and treasurers’ skill sets is that many were/are experienced with large budgets and/or calculations & math.

The first MC prepared the DRE Budgets and worked for the developer and then the Board for its first year after takeover. I can only assume that this MC passed its budget splits on to our 2nd MC and so on.

We have 120 pages of July ’16 financials. Until about ’11, the different entities were not presented to the Board & FC. So far as I know, the “consolidated” amounts were presented with year to date expenditures, year to date budget #s, etc. Previous FC’s, beginning in ’07, were good at finding certain kinds of errors, e.g., they noticed a spike in our water bill and learned that suddenly the City was including one of their meter’s readings in our bills.

They also were very good at encouraging the MC to seek new proposals on our 20 or so contracts and saving money that way. Our construction defect litigation, early ’08- late ’10 took a lot of time as did the huge & expensive proposals & then repairs from ’11 to ’13. One alone was $1mil.

So the FC & treasurer, and indeed the whole board(s) weren’t and aren’t slackers. But I am, of course, aware that Boards are ultimately responsible for what goes on in HOAs the buck stops with us!

Still, given the MC’s willingness to correct a past billing error via refunds from their own resources, maybe they will again. I know with certainly that they value us as a client. I'll next consult with my two board colleagues who do comprehend all of this now, and see what their inclinations are.

RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Kerry

First, not sure what advice you want John or I to pass onto the MC. If you had this many eyes on this, you would think someone would have caught it.

I have done budgets and assessments for 4 multi use developments. I also worked on a proposed budget of $3.8B for a proposed City of San Fernando Valley back in 2002. At the end of the day it's just numbers. The key to success is a clear understanding of all the facts.

For clarification, the DRE budgets are prepared by the builders or developers, not the MC. After a few changeovers of management, obtaining a DRE budget is a challenge as it goes into storage or is lost.

IF, the Biz owners were incorrectly billed BASED on factual data from the DRE budget, then bring them all into a meeting, with your legal counsel and present them with a corrected billed for the years you suggest are in question. Obviously, you need Board approval to do this.

The last paragraph of the first post states a number of people/companies made mistakes, why are you singling out the MC? Why not goes after the people who approved the budget(s)?

Just saying
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Richard: "...the DRE budgets are prepared by the builders or developers, not the MC. ."
KL: Our DRE budgets were prepared by our 1st MC's (as I've written more than once) Mgmt. & Budget Consultant. She and her Exec. VP & Budget Consultant both signed all three DRE Budget Worksheets. I assume the developer gave her the info. I assume the 1st HOA attorney also was involved.

Richard: "After a few changeovers of management, obtaining a DRE budget is a challenge as it goes into storage or is lost."
KL: Incorrect, Richard. These are recorded instruments just like our Condominium Plan is. I had some since '12, but had our PM check with the state and we received a few more versions. Easy peasy. Just sayin'.

Richard: "I have done budgets and assessments for 4 multi use developments."
KL: Good. There are many multi-use high rises in my 'hood; they're commonplace, Our three Budgets are different than theirs because we have "special areas" whereby the billing is different among two kinds of resident units (which I've termed Major & Minor elsewhere). Indeed, one of our Budgets, Biz, states Biz must contribute to everything it uses AND contribute solely to the (handful of) reserves components that ONLY it uses.

I won't explain again the nature of the errors that the MC made re: billing Biz or how it probably happened.

IF my director colleagues see merit in meeting with our MC, we'll do it. The MC HQ is not in our county so they'd have to get here, but some come regularly to visit their other accounts here. I strongly stated previously, Richard, (1) I have no interest in a lawsuit; (2) my issue is with the MC here, not Biz.

The numerous other errors I've l cleaned up are NOT related to the current thread were scattered all over the place and over 15 years. Im not gonna pursue them further; they've been fixed.

Once we get the last few odds & ends straightened out this year, We will ask our PM to make a matrix clearly showing WHO pays for what and THE % in each line item of our operating budget and three reserves accounts.

RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Kerry

KL: Incorrect, Richard. These are recorded instruments just like our Condominium Plan is. I had some since '12, but had our PM check with the state and we received a few more versions. Easy peasy. Just sayin'.

You may have been recorded, good for you, but are they required to be recorded and if so, please cite your statue.

Richard: "...the DRE budgets are prepared by the builders or developers, not the MC. ."
KL: Our DRE budgets were prepared by our 1st MC's (as I've written more than once) Mgmt. & Budget Consultant. She and her Exec. VP & Budget Consultant both signed all three DRE Budget Worksheets. I assume the developer gave her the info. I assume the 1st HOA attorney also was involved.

I believe I have worked on a few more HOA's and DRE budgets than you. Everyone that I have seen were signed by the developer and their office. Sorry. You're might be different and I am sure than there are others. Again the information is from who?

Once we get the last few odds & ends straightened out this year, We will ask our PM to make a matrix clearly showing WHO pays for what and THE % in each line item of our operating budget and three reserves accounts.

This should have been done years ago. Why are you still waiting. What if a new Board take over?

This is your association's mess. Without seeing any documents, have to say you need to bill back the Biz. It's one thing if the $100K was an expense item that monies HAD already been spent, but you are talking reserve funds, or future funds, expenses that haven't come up. There is a way to fix the issue without making enemies.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
KL: Incorrect, Richard. These {DRE BUDGETS] are recorded instruments just like our Condominium Plan is. I had some since '12, but had our PM check with the state and we received a few more versions. Easy peasy. Just sayin'.

R: You may have been recorded, good for you, but are they required to be recorded and if so, please cite your statue.
K: Why should I look up a statute; I have the docs right in front of me. What are you insinuating?

R: "I believe I have worked on a few more HOA's and DRE budgets than you. Everyone that I have seen were signed by the developer and their office. Sorry. You're might be different and I am sure than there are others. Again the information is from who?"
K: Again, I'm looking right at these Budgets. I guess I'm an eyewitness. Typical or not; they're our Budgets and we must use them. Are you again suggesting that I'm making this up? I don't see how your experience at reviewing DRE Budgets more than I matters. This is about my HOA not your MC business. Hey, wait, are you sort of advertising?

R: "This should have been done years ago. Why are you still waiting." What if a new Board take over?"
K: Again, to repeat: many of the corrections only occurred early this year as confirmed by the experts recommended by our Budget Specialist. If you are trying to advertise, Richard, your increasingly snarky attitude and accusatory digs on this thread won't help you.

I think we're done here...
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Kerry

You posted a question. Everyone else said to move on. If someone else has more experience on some of these matters, please ask them to step forward. This has nothing to do promoting any business. This is from experience and not all for this industry.

DRE budgets do not have to be recorded. If I had a board resolution that was recorded, are you saying all should be?

As I mentioned, I have experience in multi-use HOA's that have variable assessment based on what is outlined in the CCRs. First thing I would have done is enter all owner information and second is setup the assessment spreadsheet after thoroughly reviewing the CCRs, DRE budget and previous annual budgets.

But you're right, I think we're done here.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Not quite done. I never said DRE Budgets must be recorded.

Richard: "Everyone else said to move on."

K: All two of you: you & Tim. John was wise, but didn't say move on, Neither you nor Tim gave me any reason, so I must say, I'm disregarding your advice and with no expense or worries to others will meet soon with the VP & treasurer to see what they think.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 08/22/2016 7:27 PM
Not quite done. I never said DRE Budgets must be recorded.

Richard: "Everyone else said to move on."

K: All two of you: you & Tim. John was wise, but didn't say move on, Neither you nor Tim gave me any reason, so I must say, I'm disregarding your advice and with no expense or worries to others will meet soon with the VP & treasurer to see what they think.

John, said: It might be time to leave the sleeping dog alone. I won't speak for John, but that almost sounds like time to move along.

As far as the advice comment, not surprised in the least.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here