💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Homeowner currently using their townhome as an "Air BNB" use thought prohibited in the Declaration. Does County or City law trump Association's right to prohibit this use? Would appreciate hearing from anyone currently dealing with this. I suspect there are many Associations struggling with this very issue.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
No direct experience ... but ...

You're talking about an unauthorized commercial use in a residential setting. Your docs are about what's allowed in your residential community. I doubt that the county or city laws have any ability to override your restrictions against commercial use. In my community, our local township regs would actually support our rejection of airbnb.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
I believe Airbnb has only been around since 2008-are you sure your documents specifically mention this, or does the language say something about prohibiting short term rentals (which may be most likely). You'll have to check with an attorney to see if there's any local law relating to short term rentals (or anything else - most of us aren't lawyers).

If your declarations prohibit short term rentals, I would think this would extend to an Airbnb rental, so this homeowner may need to be reminded of what the declaration says - he/she might not like it, but compliance is mandatory because that's part of one's legal obligations as a HOA member. The Board (I assume you're a member) will also need to decide what to do next if the homeowner tells the association to naff off.

Thinking long term, when you speak to the association attorney, ask if if he/she has heard of problems with these rentals - or Google the subject yourself and see what comes up (have you tried that?) I'm sure they're the usual with rentals - noise, trash and other bad behavior, not to mention even more people moving in and out all the time, so you don't know who's in the house at any given time, and landlords who only care about the rent fees. A tweak or two on rules enforcement may be in order - there may be some the Board can enact on its own (check your documents first), but if you want to ban these type of rentals altogether or come up with stronger language in the documents, that will probably require a homeowner vote.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SheliaH on 07/22/2016 9:34 AM
I believe Airbnb has only been around since 2008-are you sure your documents specifically mention this, or does the language say something about prohibiting short term rentals (which may be most likely).

We don't have a restriction on short-term rentals. We do have a restriction on commercial activity. IMO that should be enough to restrict non-residential use.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Fortunately, our Declaration has a use restriction on rentals - has to be 30 days or more, so this basically does away with short term rentals (30 days or less). I know that Air BnB rentals can exceed 30 days, but we're looking more at very short term - as in 1-3 nights +-.

We've had a measure in our last election in the next town over about this - it was very volatile. Didn't pass. I was concerned that City or County laws would trump Association documents.
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
I've reviewed our Declaration (AGAIN ha ha - lost count of how many times I've read that thing!) and in order to change the official docs on this topic would take 100% ownership agreeing to do so. And ... that's after the Board puts it out to a Homeowner vote. Won't happen here.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Linda

This may help you

http://www.davis-stirling.com/MainIndex/ShortTermRentals/tabid/1836/Default.aspx#axzz3WNNhJ9Z8
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Thanks, Richard - you're awesome! Didn't think to check Davis-Stirling! Argghh! I'm in vacation mode already. Ha ha.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
If your docs say rental terms must be a minimum of 30 days, that's it! Doesn't matter if it's AirB&B, VRBO, etc. No county or city laws will trump your HOA docs on this topic.

The struggle is enforcement. We have an Owner coming to hearing Tues. night for renting their condo for 7 nights, when our rules say 30-day minimum term.

Our twin high rises are in an urban area with many attractions & specula events, so some Owners do try to rent short term and some probably succeed.

The fine for a first offense is $1,000 with the possibility of doubling with future violations.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 07/22/2016 11:18 AM
The fine for a first offense is $1,000 with the possibility of doubling with future violations.

Has anyone ever paid it?

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 07/22/2016 11:18 AM
No county or city laws will trump your HOA docs on this topic.

That is not true, case law could trump (hate that word) what your governing docs or rules currently state. I have a feeling it could be sooner than later.
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Kerry ... what do you base the $1,000 fine on? That seems steep!

These fines ... wondered if they ever get paid before a unit sells and you've placed a line on it.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Linda

A fine does not become a lien against one's property and the state does not allow fines to recorded against one's property. In escrow, an assessment must be paid, as it is automatically a lien once it is billed. To make it enforceable, it must be properly voted on by the Board and recorded with the county. A fine may or may not get paid. We will always include the amount on the demand letter.
DanaT (Tennessee)
Posts: 214
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LindaK5 on 07/22/2016 9:13 AM
Homeowner currently using their townhome as an "Air BNB" use thought prohibited in the Declaration. Does County or City law trump Association's right to prohibit this use? Would appreciate hearing from anyone currently dealing with this. I suspect there are many Associations struggling with this very issue.

We went through something very similar. The Unit Owner had a Tenant with a 1 year lease. Our docs require a 6 month lease min. His Tenant was sub-letting one bedroom and the living room out to Grad Students. They would come and go on a monthly basis, and you never seen the same face twice, after 30 days. Our BOD also has the right to force eviction of Tenets.

Long story short, everyone was booted and the Unit Owner was told his next tenants, would be put under the thumb. I really don't agree with that, as far as the next lessor goes, but, as a Unit Owner who leases out, you really need to know what is going on with your property.

I really can not see or think of any law, that would prohibit your HOA, from enforcing your stance on this, "Revolving Door" issue, if it is worded into your Docs.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Yes, Nps, someone paid earlier this year and I suspect that the Owner Tues. night will pay. Ironically, a man was on the elevator with me a few days ago wearing attire that identified him to me as a visitor, I asked, "Where are you staying?" He replied, after hesitating and looking uncomfortable, with the unit # that's been called to hearing.

We enacted this rule, Linda, in late '11 with a fine of $250 for the first incident. We had a couple of violations the following year. In '13, the Board voted to raise the fine to $1,000 for the first violation since depending on the condo's size, views, etc., Owners easily can get $1,000 per weekend. A high rise about 1/2 mi. from us has a fine of $5,000 due to its very special location & views.

A friend who lives there said one Owner was caught when his "guests" asked the front desk attendant how to order room service.

Richard, can you be more specific? what case law are you referring to? So far as we and our GC know, there's no existing or pending anything that prevents us form this policy.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
No room service. Harumph. What kind of dive are you running there. Next you'll tell me that you don't have a heliport on your roof. What's the world coming to.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Funny, NpS!
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 07/22/2016 12:54 PM
Richard, can you be more specific? what case law are you referring to? So far as we and our GC know, there's no existing or pending anything that prevents us form this policy.

Air BnB is too large a business with too much money. It is only a matter of time before there is a court case involving a prime client, the condos.

If cities can find a find to tap into this revenue stream, they will go against the condos or HOA's for that matter.
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
I believe there has already been a court case - I saw it cited on Davis Stirling. The Homeowner's Association prevailed.

Kerry - isn't there some definitely to limits on fines in the State of California?
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LindaK5 on 07/22/2016 8:31 PM
I believe there has already been a court case - I saw it cited on Davis Stirling. The Homeowner's Association prevailed.

The court did not involve Air BnB.
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Ruling. In a lengthy trial with a great deal of testimony, including numerous experts, the association prevailed. Mr. Watts appealed and lost. The court's rulings are significant: (i) associations have the right to restrict short-term rentals, (ii) boards can impose a reasonable fee to offset expenses associated with renters, and (iii) courts should defer to boards on decisions related to the maintenance, control and management of common areas. To read the court's decision, see Watts v. Oak Shores. (Also see Almanor Lakeside Villas v. Carson.)
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Linda

Your topic was Air BnB. The court case, while dealing with short-term rentals, was not about Air BnB which is a $20 Billion business and booming. I don't think an association can afford to go up against with the possibility of losing. They could bankrupt an association.

I am not a fan of the company, but having worked in a HOA law firm, I understand reality in going up against someone like that.
KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
Couldn't a homeowner draft a rental agreement for the amount of days required in the restriction and just specify days of occupancy by the individual?

So if short term rentals are anything under 30 days, rent the property out to an individual for 31 days, in which x of those days the tenant would be occupying the property.

Could work...
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
We have limited parking. If we had many homeowners doing air bnb we would have some serious parking issues .
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KevinK7 on 07/23/2016 7:32 AM
Couldn't a homeowner draft a rental agreement for the amount of days required in the restriction and just specify days of occupancy by the individual?

So if short term rentals are anything under 30 days, rent the property out to an individual for 31 days, in which x of those days the tenant would be occupying the property.

Could work...

1. Deceptive practices not likely to succeed long term.

2. Whole nother set of problems if you want to rent it out more than once a month.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LindaK5 on 07/23/2016 7:40 AM
We have limited parking. If we had many homeowners doing air bnb we would have some serious parking issues .

Could discourage by issuing parking tags and registering license plates.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Keep in mind that short term rentals would likely be the underlying argument and basis for any legal action brought against a member who chose to utilize the AirBnB service when renting a room or their entire property. See:

Legal Restrictions to Renting Your Home on Airbnb or Other Rental Services from Nolo

How should I talk to my neighbors, homeowners association, or landlord about Airbnb? From AirBnB

The Impact of Short-Term Rentals on Condominium and Homeowner Associations: To Airbnb or Not to Airbnb? from a Michigan Attorney

Realistically, the main attempt in enforcing covenants violations of short term rentals would likely be monetary penalties. See:

Condo boards slap hefty fines on neighbors for Airbnb rentals From the Boston Globe

Man who rented out condo fined $106K 2014 article from the SanDiego Tribune

Then there is the general stuff on short term rentals:

Court cases on short term rentals

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
While Linda does have Airbnb in her subject, it appears that her HOA's real topic is short-term rentals. And I hope you're reassured, Linda, that there's nothing out there at present to prevent your board form fining Owners who violate your CC&Rs on that topic.

Richard only is speculating that Airbnb itself maybe, might, etc., come after, for instance, my HOA because we fine violators of our 30-day minimum rule.

Good question about the size of our fine being questionable, Linda. A $250 fine is not a disincentive given how much rent can 't be had for a weekend in our HOA. We have a few other fines that are quite high. The point of fines is to deter conduct that violates the rules. A $1,000 can be such a deterrent here. If a weekend rental would fetch $300 in a different HOA, then that would be a reasonable fine.

Our rule, Kevin, specifically says that no rental can be for a term less than 30 days. This should deter a rental of a few days to a different individual every month or 12 times a year. I won't go into the problems caused by short term renters in a secure-access urban residential HOA, or any residential HOA. That's not the subject. If someone would like to start that subject, OK by me.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
A CA HOA attorney write a syndicated newspaper column about HOAs & CA law. His topic today was short-term rentals. His last sentence helps me understand how a higher fine can be assessed for this type of violation.

He wrote that the HOA, "...can consider adopting a higher (but not punitive) fine for this violation because the violation is motivated by profit."
SharonW3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 30
Posted:
Our community has and is experiencing great difficulty with one owner who rents her unit out for weekend/short-term. We've (the board) brought her to a hearing (she didn't show)and started fining her for every verifiable short term guest. She pays the fines without question. She's making money and the maximum fine of $100 is not enough to deter the activity. She lives outside our community and as long as she makes enough to pay the mortgage and hoa assessments, she's whole and a few dollars ahead. She used to go thru airbnb to find people, but has since resorted to other methods to secure her guests. It's frustrating when owners contact the board and say "DO SOMETHING".

In the state of NC we do have a Vacation Rental Act that requires folks to keep an escrow account. We are hoping that we might gain some "teeth" by reporting her to the State of NC. I don't hold out much hope, tho. Our attorneys advised us to tell the neighbors to report any suspicious persons or activities to the police. Seems like a burden on law enforcement when we know what's going on and are using them to be our junk yard dog.

There has to be a way to make things so uncomfortable for this owner that she'll stop, but I don't see that happening anytime soon. When the bottom line is $$$$$ people will always find a way to circumvent the system.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Sharon

Raise the fine.
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Sharon, that's I fear is going to happen here. She will just snub us. Had a guest the other night despite the letter and email telling her to cease. Time to review the fine policy .
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Yes, Sharon, unless there's some legal reason why you may not; have have the board meet, vote and raise the fine via a change in your Rules.

Alos, do you have a clause, perhaps in your rules & Regs where fines can be doubled for repeat violations of the same rule? If so, and following the correct procedures per your documents, start doubling the fines.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 07/24/2016 8:50 AM
Yes, Sharon, unless there's some legal reason why you may not; have have the board meet, vote and raise the fine via a change in your Rules.

Alos, do you have a clause, perhaps in your rules & Regs where fines can be doubled for repeat violations of the same rule? If so, and following the correct procedures per your documents, start doubling the fines.

Sorry, doesn't work that way.

Any change to the Rules and Regulations MUST have a 30 day period in which the homeowners can comment and before the Board can vote. The schedule of fines also must be sent to homeowners annual basis.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Of course, Richard, in CA. (We have such a notice out to Owners right now on a different sort of change.) Sharon is in NC and needs to find out how to change rules in her state...
DanaT (Tennessee)
Posts: 214
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SharonW3 on 07/24/2016 6:47 AM

In the state of NC we do have a Vacation Rental Act that requires folks to keep an escrow account. We are hoping that we might gain some "teeth" by reporting her to the State of NC. I don't hold out much hope, tho. Our attorneys advised us to tell the neighbors to report any suspicious persons or activities to the police. Seems like a burden on law enforcement when we know what's going on and are using them to be our junk yard dog.

I was looking through your state law concerning short term rentals . It seems that they may trump your docs, if I am reading it correctly. "The following definitions apply in this Chapter:

(1) Real estate broker. - A real estate broker as defined in G.S. 93A-2(a).

(2) Residential property. - An apartment, condominium, single-family home, townhouse, cottage, or other property that is devoted to residential use or occupancy by one or more persons for a definite or indefinite period.

(3) Vacation rental. - The rental of residential property for vacation, leisure, or recreation purposes for fewer than 90 days by a person who has a place of permanent residence to which he or she intends to return.

(4) Vacation rental agreement. - A written agreement between a landlord or his or her real estate broker and a tenant in which the tenant agrees to rent residential property belonging to the landlord for a vacation rental".

I guess it really does depend on what your docs say, concerning this issue, as well as any clause that states something to the effect of, "unless conflicting with state law", bla, bla, bla.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
So, Linda, I'm puzzled. Why isn't your board calling this violator of your CC&Rs to haring and fining her? Merely telling her to cease & desist won't help you & your neighbors in your community.

Or don't you have a fining policy? OR????
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Yes, we have a fine policy. $25 first offense, then doubling for each offense thereafter. I'm not concerned as she is using her townhouse for commercial use and that is prohibited as well. She wants to get on the agenda to discuss out antiquated bylaws and declaration. So, she will get her 5 minutes.
LetA (Nevada)
Posts: 2,679
Posted:
Check with your city or county ordnances.. I know that the city of Las Vegas tackled what the city council calls "party houses" to aid residents both in and outside of an HOA.
The party house ordnance says that a house, apartment. condo or other residential type dwelling cannot be rented for any less that 30 days.
This ordnances exempts realtors or established businesses that find short term or temporary housing.

Clark county has not passed similar ordnance, AirBnb's are treated the same as a party houses because they do not meet the criteria for a licensed broker with a real estate license to rent out properties..
Good Luck, I hope this helps.

LetA (Nevada)
Posts: 2,679
Posted:
Check with your city or county ordnances.. I know that the city of Las Vegas tackled what the city council calls "party houses" to aid residents both in and outside of an HOA.
The party house ordnance says that a house, apartment. condo or other residential type dwelling cannot be rented for any less that 30 days.
This ordnances exempts realtors or established businesses that find short term or temporary housing.

Clark county has not passed similar ordnance, AirBnb's are treated the same as a party houses because they do not meet the criteria for a licensed broker with a real estate license to rent out properties..
Good Luck, I hope this helps.

RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LetA on 07/25/2016 9:34 PM
Check with your city or county ordnances.. I know that the city of Las Vegas tackled what the city council calls "party houses" to aid residents both in and outside of an HOA.
The party house ordnance says that a house, apartment. condo or other residential type dwelling cannot be rented for any less that 30 days.
This ordnances exempts realtors or established businesses that find short term or temporary housing.

Clark county has not passed similar ordnance, AirBnb's are treated the same as a party houses because they do not meet the criteria for a licensed broker with a real estate license to rent out properties..
Good Luck, I hope this helps.


As the saying goes, WHAT HAPPENS IN VEGAS, STAYS IN VEGAS.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Haha, Richard. But it's true that in our CA city, we have no such statutes.

Linda, why not have your board vote to increase the fine dramatically for short term rentals that violate your CC&Rs??? It'll take a long time of doubling her $25 fine for fines to be a deterrent.

Yes, you need to send it out for 30-day owner comments, but, at least in our HOA, the vast majority of owners don't want short term rentals.

You also may have something in your docs that you can remove common area amities for those who refuse to correct violations. It's pretty effective if you have amenity worth withholding.
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Thanks for the good advice. We have a clubhouse that very few use. The overcooked next door (first phase of development) has a pool. They are separate from us. Funny thing is this lady somehow got hold of a key to the pool and was using it until she got caught.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Linda, I'll try again: why hasn't your Board raised the fines on shorter term rentals.??????
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Sorry, Kerry. Never had this come up. I'm going to propose raising fines for this specific use at our next Board meeting. Are there statutory provisions for determining fines for uses like this?
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
No statutory limits. But your board needs to vote on a proposed rule change. Then you must send the proposed rule change to Owners for a 30-day comment period. If you have a way to send the opposed change via email as we do to most Owners, that is legal. For those who can't be reached via email, send US mail. If you have a property mgr., they'll know the wording for the rule change.

See Davis-stirling.com for more. If you have a property mgr.,

Meantime keep calling her to hearings and doubling the fine for each new violation.
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Yes, I'm familiar with the 30 day comment period. Didn't realize you could do that by email though. Where is this cited?
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I don't have time to look for the list of materials that can be sent to Owners via email if they've provided a signed Consent Form to your HOA. Basically it's almost everything except ballots. See (2) below. So, at davis-stirling.com the Rules Section should say the 30-day notice period & say the opposed change is sent by “individual delivery” or “individual notice.” Your PM should have a sample Consent Form.

I can save clerical time & $ for postage, envelopes, etc. especially for all the required materials that you send with your annual budget. And also the mailer of the annual audit.

Civil Code §4040. Providing Notice or Delivery to Individuals.
[Old: Civ. Code §1350.7]

(a) If a provision of this act requires that an association deliver a document by the document shall be delivered by one of the following methods:

(1) First-class mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified mail, express mail, or overnight delivery by an express service carrier. The document shall be addressed to the recipient at the address last shown on the books of the association.

(2) E-mail, facsimile, or other electronic means, if the recipient has consented, in writing, to that method of delivery. The consent may be revoked, in writing, by the recipient.

(b) Upon receipt of a request by a member, pursuant to Section 5260, identifying a secondary address for delivery of notices of the following types, the association shall deliver an additional copy of those notices to the secondary address identified in the request: [Old: Civ. Code §1365.1(c), §1367.1(k)
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Sorry, should be "proposed" change
LindaK5 (California)
Posts: 242
Posted:
Awesome, thanks! Wish we had you on the Board!

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here