💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

CD3 (Idaho)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Good afternoon,

I am a renter and have ran into an issue with our community HOA and would like some feedback on how to handle this situation. I apologize if I am in the wrong place but I could not find another website as active as this to discuss this problem. I understand it is a lot to read so please bear with me.

We are about to renew our 3rd year lease in this great little community and wish to continue living here however our HOA does not seem to care much for us. We have gained quite a few neighbor friends and I would like to say they enjoy having us here as we are always friendly and help in any way we can. Examples being getting the mail and taking out the trash for our elderly neighbors for the last year and helping families move in/out.

Friday is when this issue started and I will post the emails between the HOA and I showing how the action started. The HOA pays a lawn service company to maintain every yard in the community and this Friday when the lawn service was here they unreeled my hose and placed it on a tree that my neighbor and I share. I was understanding that the tree must need water so I allowed it as it was not a big deal. However 6 hours later I had to question why so much water was being used and if they are going to turn it off as the lawn service had left. I was a little annoyed on the wasteful usage of water.

_______Me to HOA_________

Good afternoon,

I was wondering if you could let me know about the lawn service company and how River Run works together and how the water usage is billed out.

I am asking this because today around 8 am I noticed my outdoor water faucet was on and they are running a hose to a tree that my neighbor and I share in the front yard. It is currently 12:30 and they still have not turned off the water. I understand the tree needs water however I was not aware that every Friday I have had a hose running for at least 5 hours. Currently the lawn is flooded and the water is running down the street and I am paying for it every month. May I put a lock on my faucet if this is how they are going to waste water and raise my bill? Just today this hose has used more water than we do in a month.

Please have a great weekend and looking forward to the community garage sale.
(my name)

______HOA to Me____________

Hello (Me),

We are having an issue with all of the oak trees in the community at the present time. We've consulted an arborist and learned that the weed and feed applied by our lawn care contractor on 5/5 has leached into the soil and has adversely effected these trees which is why you are seeing a hose and sprinkler being used not only on that tree but all others. The arborist recommended flushing the trees 24/7 for 2-3 days to prevent total loss of the tree. While we understand your concerns about the water usage, there is no other viable solution to preserving these trees as the irrigation system is not adequate enough.

As a renter, perhaps you can work something out with your landlord to cover this cost as it is do this or loose these trees. As you will note, they are very large, beautiful and mature trees so that would be a shame so again this is our only advisable course of action thus the constant hose/sprinkler you are seeing. You should've had a visit by the Garden's representative or received a letter on your door detailing this out, did you not receive either?

Thank you,
(HOA Representative)

_______Me to HOA____________

I did not receive a letter or visit about this but this is sufficient. Now knowing the reason behind the water usage makes me feel better, we want to keep our tree healthy. Thank you for letting me know about the situation and the fast response.

Have a great weekend!
(Me)

___________HOA to Me__________
Thanks (Me)! I'm sorry (community representative) didn't connect with you. I had (lawn service company) mark all effected trees with an orange ribbon in hopes that it would be helpful for her and residents to easily identify who needs to know and who needs to water. Sorry you were missed in the communications campaign but appreciate your cooperation and understanding. After a good flushing over 2-3 days, you can cease the watering.

Enjoy the weekend as well!

______________________________
At this time I believed that my owner must have been notified and a deal would be worked out between the owners and HOA and I would be able to work out the extra expense with my owner. The next day we visited some neighbors we don't know that had a hose on one of the trees that were marked. They came home to find that the hoses on each side of the house were ran to separate trees, one on their front lawn, one to the neighbors. They reeled up the hose going to the neighbors but left the one going to the tree on their property. This tells me that the HOA decided to use whoever had hoses outside to be generous water donors. The neighbor said they were not informed of the tree poisoning and were not told how they would be reimbursed for the extra water usage, they did note that our water is very expensive. When looking further I found most marked trees did not have hoses running to them which makes me believe that they did not have a hose outside, or they too were not informed and decided they would put the hose away. At this time I sent my HOA a response email saying I will not water the tree until a discussion is held on how this situation is handled:
_____________________________

________Me to HOA________

After walking around River Run today for the garage sale day I noticed maybe 1/10 marked trees had a hose running to them and after a closer look most of them were not even on.
I stopped and talked to a couple people that were running water still and they too were not informed of the situation, they were told that the tree was not watered enough. They found their hose running over to the neighbors tree and they were supplying water for a tree that was not on their property. They removed the hose and left the one for their tree.

I feel the situation we are in is unfair and unorganized, I have turned off my hose and locked it in the garage until a meeting is held. My normal bill is $60 a month and this will raise it to 300-400 for the lawn service mix up and we still don't know if this will actually save the tree. I do not want the lawn service using my facet anymore or my external power outlets without first consulting me personally.

Have a great weekend,
(Me)

_______HOA to Me__________

(Me),

We are all volunteers and do our VERY best to manage this entire community,which consists of 80 properties. The landscape contractor who used the weed and feed around the bases of these trees will inform people that the trees are "dry" his words, however, an arborist with 30 years experience and a 12 page resume with his many qualifications, will tell you otherwise.

Again, it was recommended that these trees be flushed 24/7 for 2-3 days and if residents "choose" to forgo this recommendation and are not willing to "help" their neighbor's tree that they too benefit from, there is nothing more that the board can do to help in this matter. If the trees are lost, it will fall on lack of action from those who are either trying to remedy it or people with the your mindset who are concerned only with water usage. If these trees are lost, they will not be replaced as you cannot plant any tree in the remaining small yards with the lost root system tangled within the ground.

If you would prefer to not have your bushes trimmed, by all means, lock up your electricity and such, but these emails from you are getting very ridiculous and are time consuming antics that are very unappreciated. The lawn service can and will NOT go door to door to ask each resident if they can use electricity to do their jobs in maintaining the 45 properties they are tasked with and it is extremely petty of you to complain about this as it is how we have managed the Garden's for nearly 20 years. In the future if you have complaints, contact your property management company and/or the homeowner directly as we will no longer dialog with you as it seems impossible. I've cc'd both (my home owner) and (my property managers) so they are aware of this very important issue and your lack of cooperation to ensure the long-term health of the tree located on the property in which you reside as well as that you are unwilling to cooperate with occasional electricity use in maintaining the yard and landscaping at the property.

Regards,
The Board of Directors at (our community)
________________________________

At this time I am not replying and will let my property managers handle the situation. However I would like some input on what other community members on this site thing of my situation. Is it right for the HOA to decide to use tens of thousands of gallons of water without consent of the owner (or renter) that is paying the bill?
Should the HOA be allowed to use someones utility to water a neighboring tree like the people I talked to? Am I being "ridiculous, petty, impossible, poor mindsetted"? Or is the HOA out of line to use the community in this way without permission? I am happy to help the community and try to keep it nice but I feel something like this needs to be discussed. Why would the community have to pay for the lawn service mistake?

Thank you and I appreciate all the input.

CD3 (Idaho)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Also if there was a clause or contract in place giving the HOA permission to do so, I would think this is the email they would have told me so.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
ID,

Simply turn the hose bib off from inside your home and move on.

Yes, the Board should have informed the membership. Yes, there should be some financial compensation (but don't hold your breath).

The easiest thing to do is, as stated earlier, turn the hose bib off from inside your home.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
I agree the HOA didn't handle this as well as it could have, but where is the landlord/homeowner in all this? I think he/she is a putz for letting you handle all this by yourself. Anytime you have a dustup with the HOA, you need to contact him/her and let them intercede on your behalf - and if they can't/won't, you might want to consider if you still want to rent from this person. The neighborhood may be nice, but what if something more serious happens in the future?

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
CD3 (Idaho)
Posts: 10
Posted:
I contacted the property managers that my homeowner hired to inform them of the situation before this all turned south. He emailed me back quickly saying he supports me on pursuing reimbursement for the cost. That was before the final email the HOA sent me however the HOA said the email has also been sent to the manager and the homeowner. I feel the property manager will contact me soon to let me know how the situation has been handled.

The main problem I am having with all of this is the disrespect they have shown us and how they insult me because im not allowing them to take what they want. I have actually looked into buying a home in this community but the HOA board has really shown they don't care for the community residents as they claim.
MarkM31 (Washington)
Posts: 351
Posted:
I would make a claim against the HOA (or home owner) for any increase in your water bill that you can reasonably attribute to this flushing. They can (should) then go after the lawn care company.
MarkM31 (Washington)
Posts: 351
Posted:
An arborist doesn't necessarily know anything about how to handle an oak drenched in herbicide. You could also kill it by drowning it.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
.CD3

I have to wonder who actually is billed and pays the water bill for YOUR property?

Sounds to me like this should have been handled between the HOA and the owner of the property or their representation.

I would rather cover the cost of watering these trees for a few days versus losing the trees and then being forced to cover the costs of removing them.
The cost of seeking damages from the company that applied the treatment. And the loss of the trees as they add to the appearance of the property.

Not sure where else the water might have been taken from versus individual homes. Have you received your water bill yet? Would interest me to see the exact number of additional charges.

If I were the OWNER, I would pursue reimbursement for any added water charges from the HOA who should then recoup that cost from the contractor who applied the treatment.

My guess the HOA made the best decisions necessary to begin watering these trees ASAP to give them the best chance possible to survive.

In my view this is a rather simple matter that unfortunately took place and with some cooperation can be made harmless to the trees and property.
I would suggest you tap your brakes about respect and the lack there of.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I'm with Jon: "If I were the OWNER, I would pursue reimbursement for any added water charges from the HOA who should then recoup that cost from the contractor who applied the treatment."

This seems sensible, logical, and fair.

It's similar to the following: An HOA common area pipe leaks and causes a lot of moisture in a condo unit in our high rise. Dryers are placed in the unit for a few days and run 24/7. The Owner's electric bill spikes and, sending the proper records, he seeks reimbursement for the difference between his normal bill and the leak-caused one. We reimbursed the Owner.
MarkM31 (Washington)
Posts: 351
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 06/20/2016 10:37 AM
I'm with Jon: "If I were the OWNER, I would pursue reimbursement for any added water charges from the HOA who should then recoup that cost from the contractor who applied the treatment."

This seems sensible, logical, and fair.

It's similar to the following: An HOA common area pipe leaks and causes a lot of moisture in a condo unit in our high rise. Dryers are placed in the unit for a few days and run 24/7. The Owner's electric bill spikes and, sending the proper records, he seeks reimbursement for the difference between his normal bill and the leak-caused one. We reimbursed the Owner.

The PERSON WHO BUYS THE WATER should seek reimbursement, whoever that person is.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkM31 on 06/20/2016 10:48 AM
Posted By KerryL1 on 06/20/2016 10:37 AM
I'm with Jon: "If I were the OWNER, I would pursue reimbursement for any added water charges from the HOA who should then recoup that cost from the contractor who applied the treatment."

This seems sensible, logical, and fair.

It's similar to the following: An HOA common area pipe leaks and causes a lot of moisture in a condo unit in our high rise. Dryers are placed in the unit for a few days and run 24/7. The Owner's electric bill spikes and, sending the proper records, he seeks reimbursement for the difference between his normal bill and the leak-caused one. We reimbursed the Owner.


The PERSON WHO BUYS THE WATER should seek reimbursement, whoever that person is.

The tenant in this case has no contractual relationship with the HOA. The OWNER in my view would have more juice and pull to seek reimbursement.
Simple provide a letter of explanation along with the current and past Bill and hope the board handles this in a fair minded way.Or the tenant can make a mountain out of an ant hill and write a few dozen more e-mails making demands upon a board with which they have no business relationship.

Look around folks if this is your biggest problem you are leading a damn blessed life. Take a breath and chill.....
CD3 (Idaho)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Thank you everyone for the input. To answer a few questions, yes, I (the renter) is billed for the water and have to pay it every month. This directly does affect me. The only email I have received at that time from my property managers was that they support me in perusing reimbursement. Since then today I received a text message saying they don't want the tree to die so I said I will be happy to keep watering. The tree is clearly dying as are the rest of the trees in the community, I have documented all tree progress the last few days. After discussion with another neighbor they said that the tree was going to die anyways from either drowning or herbicide. She called her realtor and owner asking if they wanted her to water the tree, she said they did not tell her to do anything so she let it go.

Obviously I want to save the tree and do what I can for the community. I will not receive the bill until next month so we will see how it is. The money is not my main concern, I am not petty. My argument is where to draw the line of what the HOA should and should not be allowed to do. The HOA never mentioned a clause or contract saying they can freely take what they need. Are there procedures in which they are supposed to follow? I did stand up for myself as I felt like without permission this is stealing, taking money out of my wallet (no matter the amount) without consent, and the response I get is that it is for the community and you are pathetic to not do it. In the end turns out very few people complied with it.

I would have been perfectly content to find a note on my door stating:
Dear resident of (Community), due to an unfortunate use of herbicide we are now in danger of loosing our oak trees throughout the community. We have consulted an arborist and the recommended treatment to save the trees is to water them for the next 48-72 hours. The board of directors are currently discussing the best way to handle the added costs to the community and will let you know when a solution has been found. Thank you for your cooperation and have a great weekend."

Is that too much to do? They have stated the problem, explained the solution, and are working to find a way to make things right with the community. I would think this is the normal procedure in any HOA. I understand I am a renter but as long as they keep me in the loop and tell me what the plan is I have no problem complying. If I was at my other home during this time I would have had no notice of the high water usage. If you work with me I will work with you.

JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CD3 on 06/20/2016 1:26 PM
Thank you everyone for the input. To answer a few questions, yes, I (the renter) is billed for the water and have to pay it every month. This directly does affect me. The only email I have received at that time from my property managers was that they support me in perusing reimbursement. Since then today I received a text message saying they don't want the tree to die so I said I will be happy to keep watering. The tree is clearly dying as are the rest of the trees in the community, I have documented all tree progress the last few days. After discussion with another neighbor they said that the tree was going to die anyways from either drowning or herbicide. She called her realtor and owner asking if they wanted her to water the tree, she said they did not tell her to do anything so she let it go.

Obviously I want to save the tree and do what I can for the community. I will not receive the bill until next month so we will see how it is. The money is not my main concern, I am not petty. My argument is where to draw the line of what the HOA should and should not be allowed to do. The HOA never mentioned a clause or contract saying they can freely take what they need. Are there procedures in which they are supposed to follow? I did stand up for myself as I felt like without permission this is stealing, taking money out of my wallet (no matter the amount) without consent, and the response I get is that it is for the community and you are pathetic to not do it. In the end turns out very few people complied with it.

I would have been perfectly content to find a note on my door stating:
Dear resident of (Community), due to an unfortunate use of herbicide we are now in danger of loosing our oak trees throughout the community. We have consulted an arborist and the recommended treatment to save the trees is to water them for the next 48-72 hours. The board of directors are currently discussing the best way to handle the added costs to the community and will let you know when a solution has been found. Thank you for your cooperation and have a great weekend."

Is that too much to do? They have stated the problem, explained the solution, and are working to find a way to make things right with the community. I would think this is the normal procedure in any HOA. I understand I am a renter but as long as they keep me in the loop and tell me what the plan is I have no problem complying. If I was at my other home during this time I would have had no notice of the high water usage. If you work with me I will work with you.


It would seem you fail to understand your relationship with the HOA. why not wait till you receive your bill and then you can determine just how much money this is really all about.

The HOA had an unfortunate situation, they were told heavy watering might save these trees. They took action by watering these trees best they could with the easiest available source of water. And here we are not having been billed demanding reimbursement for theft.

First you felt disrespected now you claim some increased cost all the while presenting what a fine community minded neighbor you are.

Here's a thought waitvforvthe bill, deduct that amount of increase from your next rental check with a brief letter of explanation and have the property manager or the owner pursue payment. This will end any further need on your part to contact the HOA and express how you feel they mishandled this rather minor matter.

And let's hope the trees survive. But with the difficulties you and some neighbors have shown over a water supply maybe that might be wishful thinking.
CD3 (Idaho)
Posts: 10
Posted:
I am sorry if some of you think that I am not a good community member. If you met me you would not think this is the case. I help my neighbors in any way I can. An example of this is my 92 year old neighbor slipped on the ice and broke his hip last December, I waited 45 minutes with him in shorts and T-shirt in the snow until the ambulance arrived. He told me many cars passed until we found him. So for the last 8 months I have volunteered to get their mail Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays and put out the garbage Monday night. I have not asked for anything in return and am happy to help them. I also have helped an elderly neighbor on my other side move out of her house when she left and offered my help and my truck for anything she needed. I would help the community if they asked me for something, however I am just a renter so all I can do is offer help to those I have met. Im not looking for kudo points but want to explain I am not a Grinch.

The issue was resolved late this afternoon. My managers got back to me and said they will want this months bill and last years months bill and the lawn service will reimburse me the difference. I will note that they said they had to get upset with the HOA representative to get that much information out of them.
I find it interesting that the managers had to get upset with the HOA to get the information out of them, makes me wonder if the HOA was trying to avoid it. If they had the intentions of reimbursing then I would think they could have made it well known.

I thanked them and asked them to send my apologies to the homeowner. They responded that the homeowner is not at all upset with us and wants to renew our lease as she knows she has good tenants.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
CD,

I'm glad things worked out.

I understand the issue was more principal then cost of water. I agree that sometimes you have to fight for principal alone.
CD3 (Idaho)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 06/20/2016 6:44 PM
CD,

I'm glad things worked out.

I understand the issue was more principal then cost of water. I agree that sometimes you have to fight for principal alone.

EXACTLY! Thank you!
MarkM31 (Washington)
Posts: 351
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JonD1 on 06/20/2016 12:19 PM
Posted By MarkM31 on 06/20/2016 10:48 AM
Posted By KerryL1 on 06/20/2016 10:37 AM
I'm with Jon: "If I were the OWNER, I would pursue reimbursement for any added water charges from the HOA who should then recoup that cost from the contractor who applied the treatment."

This seems sensible, logical, and fair.

It's similar to the following: An HOA common area pipe leaks and causes a lot of moisture in a condo unit in our high rise. Dryers are placed in the unit for a few days and run 24/7. The Owner's electric bill spikes and, sending the proper records, he seeks reimbursement for the difference between his normal bill and the leak-caused one. We reimbursed the Owner.


The PERSON WHO BUYS THE WATER should seek reimbursement, whoever that person is.


The tenant in this case has no contractual relationship with the HOA. The OWNER in my view would have more juice and pull to seek reimbursement

It doesn't matter who has a contractural relationship with who. If the tennat is paying the water, then the units owner has no claim for damages, because they didn't take his water. If somebody stole your car, I can't sue that person, can I?

In this case, the lawn care company, as an agent of the HOA and following the advice of an independent consultant hired by the HOA is stealing water from by direction of the HOA. If the tennent pays the water bill, it is he who is suffering damages, not the unit owner. It is all very easy to understand. If you don't suffer a loss, you have no claim.
DoryR1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7
Posted:
I'm glad to know that the issue has been sorted out between you and the HOA so you can move on from all of this. I'm with taking care of the trees in the community but things like this should have been laid out from the get go to avoid confusion among the involved parties.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkM31 on 06/20/2016 8:01 PM
Posted By JonD1 on 06/20/2016 12:19 PM
Posted By MarkM31 on 06/20/2016 10:48 AM
Posted By KerryL1 on 06/20/2016 10:37 AM
I'm with Jon: "If I were the OWNER, I would pursue reimbursement for any added water charges from the HOA who should then recoup that cost from the contractor who applied the treatment."

This seems sensible, logical, and fair.

It's similar to the following: An HOA common area pipe leaks and causes a lot of moisture in a condo unit in our high rise. Dryers are placed in the unit for a few days and run 24/7. The Owner's electric bill spikes and, sending the proper records, he seeks reimbursement for the difference between his normal bill and the leak-caused one. We reimbursed the Owner.


The PERSON WHO BUYS THE WATER should seek reimbursement, whoever that person is.


The tenant in this case has no contractual relationship with the HOA. The OWNER in my view would have more juice and pull to seek reimbursement


It doesn't matter who has a contractural relationship with who. If the tennat is paying the water, then the units owner has no claim for damages, because they didn't take his water. If somebody stole your car, I can't sue that person, can I?

In this case, the lawn care company, as an agent of the HOA and following the advice of an independent consultant hired by the HOA is stealing water from by direction of the HOA. If the tennent pays the water bill, it is he who is suffering damages, not the unit owner. It is all very easy to understand. If you don't suffer a loss, you have no claim.

So evidently the property management company ( who does not pay the water bill) simply contacted the HOA and were able to arrange reimbursement
for this water theft. Just as I had suggested. The world is once again at peace. Respect has been restored, the OP has been made whole and a great wrong has been righted.

The great water caper of 2016 has been resolved and proved less complicated than represented.

What a relief.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
This response to the OP sums up what now turns out to be not some great conspiracy but rather a case of making a mountain out of an ant hill.
Serving as a volunteer has its rewards.....

"We are all volunteers and do our VERY best to manage this entire community,which consists of 80 properties. The landscape contractor who used the weed and feed around the bases of these trees will inform people that the trees are "dry" his words, however, an arborist with 30 years experience and a 12 page resume with his many qualifications, will tell you otherwise.

Again, it was recommended that these trees be flushed 24/7 for 2-3 days and if residents "choose" to forgo this recommendation and are not willing to "help" their neighbor's tree that they too benefit from, there is nothing more that the board can do to help in this matter. If the trees are lost, it will fall on lack of action from those who are either trying to remedy it or people with the your mindset who are concerned only with water usage. If these trees are lost, they will not be replaced as you cannot plant any tree in the remaining small yards with the lost root system tangled within the ground.

If you would prefer to not have your bushes trimmed, by all means, lock up your electricity and such, but these emails from you are getting very ridiculous and are time consuming antics that are very unappreciated. The lawn service can and will NOT go door to door to ask each resident if they can use electricity to do their jobs in maintaining the 45 properties they are tasked with and it is extremely petty of you to complain about this as it is how we have managed the Garden's for nearly 20 years. In the future if you have complaints, contact your property management company and/or the homeowner directly as we will no longer dialog with you as it seems impossible. I've cc'd both (my home owner) and (my property managers) so they are aware of this very important issue and your lack of cooperation to ensure the long-term health of the tree located on the property in which you reside as well as that you are unwilling to cooperate with occasional electricity use in maintaining the yard and landscaping at the property."
CD3 (Idaho)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JonD1 on 06/20/2016 8:51 PM
This response to the OP sums up what now turns out to be not some great conspiracy but rather a case of making a mountain out of an ant hill.
Serving as a volunteer has its rewards.....

"We are all volunteers and do our VERY best to manage this entire community,which consists of 80 properties. The landscape contractor who used the weed and feed around the bases of these trees will inform people that the trees are "dry" his words, however, an arborist with 30 years experience and a 12 page resume with his many qualifications, will tell you otherwise.

Again, it was recommended that these trees be flushed 24/7 for 2-3 days and if residents "choose" to forgo this recommendation and are not willing to "help" their neighbor's tree that they too benefit from, there is nothing more that the board can do to help in this matter. If the trees are lost, it will fall on lack of action from those who are either trying to remedy it or people with the your mindset who are concerned only with water usage. If these trees are lost, they will not be replaced as you cannot plant any tree in the remaining small yards with the lost root system tangled within the ground.

If you would prefer to not have your bushes trimmed, by all means, lock up your electricity and such, but these emails from you are getting very ridiculous and are time consuming antics that are very unappreciated. The lawn service can and will NOT go door to door to ask each resident if they can use electricity to do their jobs in maintaining the 45 properties they are tasked with and it is extremely petty of you to complain about this as it is how we have managed the Garden's for nearly 20 years. In the future if you have complaints, contact your property management company and/or the homeowner directly as we will no longer dialog with you as it seems impossible. I've cc'd both (my home owner) and (my property managers) so they are aware of this very important issue and your lack of cooperation to ensure the long-term health of the tree located on the property in which you reside as well as that you are unwilling to cooperate with occasional electricity use in maintaining the yard and landscaping at the property."

I am sorry you are so annoyed with this post. I have never been in an HOA before and do not now how they operate. I simply asked a question on this forum to learn from another point of view, sorry for seeking knowledge.

Like others have said I pay the bill and not my owner. When my management said they support me in perusing reimbursement this is because the water is in my name. When I asked the HOA about a meeting to discuss reimbursement they cut me off and said they will only talk to management from now on. My management did not "simply" call the HOA and they told them the plan. The manager told me he had to get very upset with the HOA before they gave him any information. I don't believe there was ever a conspiracy, but if you TAKE something I pay for you better ask me first, no matter the value or the reason. I really could care less about the money, like others have said it is the principal.

I don't care if its a mountain or a molehill, I am a citizen with rights and no HOA will be above that, you will ask me to use my personal property. At the first sign that someone forgets that I will be sure to let them know.

Thank you everyone else for the input, I know I have learned a lot from this encounter and there seemed to be many different opinions listed so maybe others can use this information in the future.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Jon,

I don't think it was making a mountain out of a molehill.

The issue isn't the water usage.
The issue was the lack of information from the Association prior to the water issue.
The issue was someone entering private property and using personal property without permission.
The issue was failure of the Board to even consider paying individuals for the use of their utilities (and I suspect, again without prior permission).

The Board could have done better and should have done better.
The response you cited from the OP's board demonstrates to me that they are not even trying to learn from their mistake and will likely repeat it.

Had the Board simply said that they will cover the cost of the water in the initial response (vs. saying try to work something out with the owner for reimbursement), the issue would have likely been resolved. They did indicate that a letter or a visit from the Gardner should have been received. However, I suspect that the Board left it in the hands of the contractor vs. making a letter themselves and making sure it was taped to each and every door and the contractor simply used what was available.

The response you cited also indicates another issue.
Why isn't the landscape company using gas or battery powered tools vs. having to utilize a their customers utilities?
Why would the Association enter into contract with such a company?
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 06/20/2016 9:18 PM
Jon,

I don't think it was making a mountain out of a molehill.

The issue isn't the water usage.
The issue was the lack of information from the Association prior to the water issue.
The issue was someone entering private property and using personal property without permission.
The issue was failure of the Board to even consider paying individuals for the use of their utilities (and I suspect, again without prior permission).

The Board could have done better and should have done better.
The response you cited from the OP's board demonstrates to me that they are not even trying to learn from their mistake and will likely repeat it.

Had the Board simply said that they will cover the cost of the water in the initial response (vs. saying try to work something out with the owner for reimbursement), the issue would have likely been resolved. They did indicate that a letter or a visit from the Gardner should have been received. However, I suspect that the Board left it in the hands of the contractor vs. making a letter themselves and making sure it was taped to each and every door and the contractor simply used what was available.

The response you cited also indicates another issue.
Why isn't the landscape company using gas or battery powered tools vs. having to utilize a their customers utilities?
Why would the Association enter into contract with such a company?

Tim

Sorry but I see this as not an issue. The watering was supposed to take place over just three days. The board had a duty in my view to make every effort to give these trees as good a chance of survival as possible. In my world you do what needs to be done and after the dust settles you figure out who owes what to whom and why.

The easiest source of water was in fact from the homes nearest these trees. Was a notice put up? Don't know. Were any notices put up? Don't know.
Was the property manager notified? Don't know. Are all the residents home during the day? And if not should this result in a tree dying off because proper channels and all due respect was not provided? In my view no.

Now according to the OP this occurred on Friday. And they expected a settlement of some kind to be provided to their satisfaction on that day. As most boards meet once per month how would that even be possible? How about we take a deep breath before we claim to be disrespected and the victim of theft? Or that this is now some defense of their Constututional Rights. This is about water use. No one broke into anyone's how.

As you know I have lived in my community for 30+ years. During that time routinely contractors or our maintenance people use electricity, water, sometimes the easiest source for electric is from the individuals units. Saws, air compressors, lights, and other power tools in many cases need a source of electric.
Not once have we had an owner or resident question the cost. As in most cases it is minimal and not worth the effort versus the benefit they are receiving by having the work done. And while there are many tools today that operate on batteries and gas powered many still operate quite well on good old electric power. And in most cases I am aware of produce less noise gas versus electric.

So in the end this particular OP will receive their due reimbursement. I would have thought any fair minded board would have made the same arrangement given the time. My guess the overcharge amount will be far less than represented. And rather than dealing with this themselves the OP should have turned this over to the property manager as that is why they are paid to manage the affairs of the property the OP is renting. The OP is NOT a member of the HOA, they have a contractual relationship with the property owner not the HOA. In my view, they have no place making demands or setting policy as to how things should be done or why. Hell, if the neighbor's house caught on fire do you put the fire out with your hose or debate who will pay for the water cost first? Myself I put the fire out.

So in the end this matter of life, death and LIBERTY which all came to a head on Friday is now resolved on the following Tuesday. I have to agree with the board's response actually quite ridiculous. So in the end was this about money, respect or a violation of the right to control your garden hose. I doubt any monuments will be erected to honor this great battle over personal liberties.

Ask not what you HOA should do for you but rather what you can do for your HOA. Allowing for the use of a garden hose to protect property assets is to much effort. A hollow suggestion to me this was in any way about principle.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Jon,

I agree that it certainly isn't a big issue, more of a minor issue.

All I know is when our Association needs to utilize utilities (typically water for power washing) from a lot, we make arrangements with the resident ahead of time and pay them $10-$15 for the water usage. To me, doing this is simply common courtesy.

JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 06/21/2016 7:05 AM
Jon,

I agree that it certainly isn't a big issue, more of a minor issue.

All I know is when our Association needs to utilize utilities (typically water for power washing) from a lot, we make arrangements with the resident ahead of time and pay them $10-$15 for the water usage. To me, doing this is simply common courtesy.


Tim

In your case I agree 1000%. But this was not power washing. But rather an attempt to save some trees. The HOA was not trying to beat the owners out of some cost for this water. Rather they took what action was suggested by an arborist to give the trees a chance.

In my world once we determine whether the trees survive, THEN we would assign liability as to the cost of the water, the cost to remove the tress if they were to die. Here we would collect those costs from the responsible parties after the outcome was known.

So the cost of the OP's excessive water bill would be paid in the end by the party that applied the treatment. The HOA should not absorb that.

And here is a quote to the HOA provided by the OP. The OP who represents themselves as Good Neighbor Sam. Clearly, failing to understand the members of the Board are their neighbors too.

"I feel the situation we are in is unfair and unorganized, I have turned off my hose and locked it in the garage until a meeting is held. My normal bill is $60 a month and this will raise it to 300-400 for the lawn service mix up and we still don't know if this will actually save the tree. I do not want the lawn service using my facet anymore or my external power outlets without first consulting me personally."

So over an issue regarding water hoses we demand a meeting, (a tenant) and we have locked our hose away willing to risk the loss of a property asset (an oak tree) because our water bill will be raised to an amount we have no way of knowing at this point AND without first consulting us on every occasion no one will be permitted to use external power outlets without my permission. Even if this is to trim the bushes and hedges in front of the home I am renting.
And the fact this has been done without any issue for 20 years does not matter to me. Because after all I am a good neighbor and community member.

In the OP's first post they hinted the HOA disliked them for some reason. I have to wonder if this less than cooperative, demanding, never satisfied attitude might be part of it.

Hopefully,mthentrees survive. Unfortunate this treatment was applied incorrectly. And unfortunate some can't seem to make any effort to cooperate in the attempts made to save them but rather make this about themselves and how they have been slighted. Doesn't matter if the trees die as long as my hose is locked up. Petty, childish, are some of the words that come to mind
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CD3 : .. . .CD3 to HOA " I understand the tree needs water however I was not aware that every Friday I have had a hose running for at least 5 hours. Currently the lawn is flooded and the water is running down the street and I am paying for it every month. May I put a lock on my faucet if this is how they are going to waste water and raise my bill ? Just today this hose has used more water than we do in a month."

HOA to CD3
"We've consulted an arborist and learned that the weed and feed applied by our lawn care contractor on 5/5 has leached into the soil and has adversely effected these trees which is why you are seeing a hose and sprinkler being used not only on that tree but all others. The arborist recommended flushing the trees 24/7 for 2-3 days to prevent total loss of the tree. . . there is no other viable solution to preserving these trees as the irrigation system is not adequate enough."

CD 3 Idaho will hopefully get fair rent offset or compensation from somebody.

But otherwise CD3 - without equity at all - might unfortunately have NO easy time getting reimbursed for someone's professional misjudgement if such endangered these trees instead of drought or whatever. To tenant CD3 the costs of hours of watering may be a significant burden, depending on CD3's income.

Upfront how much extra water consumption can CD3 establish & from whom is a duty owed ? By comparison to previous summers' water consumption data ? Not surprising if that gets kicked around . . . And how much water was prudently "enough" ? A contract hold back from the allegedly mis-judging landscaper ?
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:

I'd be curious to compare the cost of the water versus the cost of simply pulling up the tree and planting a new tree if this is truly a dire situation. However, wanting reimbursement for unauthorized water access to does NOT reflect on your commitment to being an excellent community member. They are separate.

The HOA was CLEARLY in the wrong for this and I'm glad they're simply holding their end of the bargain.

By the way, never reduce your rent payment and tell your landlord to "chase money" owed. You handled this well.
MarkM31 (Washington)
Posts: 351
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KellyM3 on 06/21/2016 10:55 AM

I'd be curious to compare the cost of the water versus the cost of simply pulling up the tree and planting a new tree if this is truly a dire situation. However, wanting reimbursement for unauthorized water access to does NOT reflect on your commitment to being an excellent community member. They are separate.

The HOA was CLEARLY in the wrong for this and I'm glad they're simply holding their end of the bargain.

By the way, never reduce your rent payment and tell your landlord to "chase money" owed. You handled this well.

Agree with everything, except that water is likely much cheaper than replacing the tree, but it shouldn't matter, that is a cost that should solely be the responsibility of the landscaper.

John seems bent on ad hominem attacks on the OP
Posted By JonD1 on 06/21/2016 8:08 AM
. I have to wonder if this less than cooperative, demanding, never satisfied attitude might be part of it.

JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:

"We are about to renew our 3rd year lease in this great little community and wish to continue living here however our HOA does not seem to care much for us."

This from the OP's first post. Mark in your quote you left the most important part out.

So the OP has lived in this "great little community" managed by the same HOA board the OP now finds fault with for 3 years. And it would seem for some strange reason the OP feels disliked by the HOA (board). I have to wonder why?

Maybe these difficulties began before last Friday? When the water issues arose?

I still agree with the HOA the back and forth caused by the OP on such a small matter which could have been resolved with just a bit of cooperation rather than digging your heals in and making demands was ridiculous.

I wonder how this latest episode will affect the HOA's feelings towards the OP? Hard to guess...........
CD3 (Idaho)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JonD1 on 06/21/2016 1:44 PM

"We are about to renew our 3rd year lease in this great little community and wish to continue living here however our HOA does not seem to care much for us."

This from the OP's first post. Mark in your quote you left the most important part out.

So the OP has lived in this "great little community" managed by the same HOA board the OP now finds fault with for 3 years. And it would seem for some strange reason the OP feels disliked by the HOA (board). I have to wonder why?

Maybe these difficulties began before last Friday? When the water issues arose?

I still agree with the HOA the back and forth caused by the OP on such a small matter which could have been resolved with just a bit of cooperation rather than digging your heals in and making demands was ridiculous.

I wonder how this latest episode will affect the HOA's feelings towards the OP? Hard to guess...........

I consider a great little community because in the time I have lived here I have gained great neighbors, With that said I have only met maybe 10% of the community, just the surrounding ones. It really is a beautiful gated place that we enjoy living in and is in a convenient location. When we walk about the area to enjoy our facilities and perks we have never had a bad encounter. I have been interested in buying a home here since we moved here.

The only other direct encounter I had before this was shortly after we moved in. I received a phone call from a gentleman that said he was a representative for the HOA and was going to ask me to join a meeting to discuss the replacement of the fence in my back yard that borders the community. I simply told him I would be glad to join (I was new so I thought it would be a good time to meet the board members) however I am not an owner I am just her new tenant. He was not rude to me and apologized for the mix up but sated that only owners could attend. I told him I understood. After this I asked him when they plan on replacing the fence so I know when to expect it, his response was that the HOA will not discuss homeowner matters with tenants. This was a simple conversation and ended just fine, but it did give me the barrier feeling between myself and the HOA.

I did have an indirect encounter last winter when I used a neighborhood social site (similar to Facebook, build a profile with your address and you will be linked to the social network inside the community, everyone is on it including renters and it is not moderated by the HOA) I created a post with pictures asking if anyone knew this car that was backing out of my driveway early that morning. I got a response from this exact person stating that they are the president of the HOA and any concerns should be emailed to the HOA as they do not always see posts on the social site. This encounter was just fine and gave me the impression if there is a problem, ask them or let them know.

The part I am stuck on is the “cooperation” part. When I first saw the water on I had no problem with it. Hey, they think the tree needs water, go for it, no problem. 6 hours later when I came back it was still on and my yard was standing water. I had no problem with the HOA and felt it was OK to email them as they have said to do so before. I was not at all upset with them as I did not think they were responsible, I did want them to understand that I was not thrilled about the lawn service carelessness of the water usage. I ASKED them if I could lock my facet if this is how they use my water on Fridays when I am gone. I did not know if this was an ongoing practice every Friday because I am usually at my other home, I wanted to state the concern of cost at this time as well. When the president responded they had a very good reason why the water was on, the lawn service had a mistake and the solution is to flush the tree for the next 48-72 hours and to discuss the reimbursement with my homeowner/manager. Great, no problem and I will continue to flush the tree because I don’t want it to die. There must have already been an agreement between the HOA and the homeowner to cover the cost and somehow it will come back to me, obviously the correct course of action, my note must have not made it to me.

I informed my management company of the situation and explained my concern of the bill. They responded at the end of Friday saying they support me in perusing reimbursement from the lawn company. At this time I see there has been a drop in communication between the HOA and property manager because if they had previous agreement then he would have told me it will be handled. But tomorrow is the day of the community garage sale, I can talk to a homeowner and make sure the HOA has plans to reimburse the community. I continued to let the water run through the night. I think it was about noon Saturday when we took a walk in the community to find some neighbors to talk to. In the end we found that the homeowners we talked to were not informed of the tree problem or any plans of reimbursement. They even turned off one of their neighbors water because they were out of town, reeled up their hose that was going to another property, and left the one in their yard. Most of the oak trees had no water running to them so either there was no hose available or the owners did not participate in this flushing. Now I am concerned that the water I have been listening to running all night might actually become my bill, I shut off my water and take my managers advice early and start perusing the cost. I emailed the HOA that authorized the water usage and told them that until the cost is discussed the water will stay off. I was upset and felt it was unorganized because notifications were nowhere to be found and the cost has not even been discussed with homeowners. I felt it was unfair because the lucky donators were chosen by not if you had a tree in your yard but if you had a hose outside, the more hoses you had outside the more you donate. My management company is closed on the weekends so I was on my own until Monday. Since the bill is in my name, my management told me to pursue, the discussion of cost was nowhere to be found, I took the only action I had available and shut off my water before the water damage was done by the time my managers would handle it on Monday. Yes, I did DEMAND a meeting to discuss the cost because the bill is in my name. The longer this went on the more damage the tree would get or the more money it would cost me, I wanted to get down to the bottom of it. Once they cut me off and would not talk to me is when I stopped cooperating with them.

As you can see the HOA reply gave me the impression that they just did not like me. Maybe because this pesky little renter stood up to them.
As for the outdoor outlets yes I did stick my foot in my mouth, I threw that in there because it was open outdoors and can be used without my knowledge just like my water. I did not know they use the outlets to power their tools, I have never been here when they come around. It couldn't consume that much anyway. My other property has 3.5 acres of grass and I am extremely thankful I do not have to take care of this lawn too, but it is paid for and not a gift.

As for the no time to have a board meeting I have to ask: I measured the flow rate at 4 gallons per minute is what they were using, not quite wide open but close. 4x60x72= 17,280 gallons of water over 3 days. There are roughly 20 oak trees that are marked, resulting in a possible usage of 345,600 gallons of water used of the community during this time. Would you not consult your fellow board members first before taking it upon yourself to authorize this magnitude use of water? The president must have consulted because the final email response had and ending of “The Board of Directors at (community)”
CD3 (Idaho)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Oh and I added a sprinkler head to disperse the water a little more evenly than an open hose, might help with consumption.
ChristineL1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 9
Posted:
CD3, it sounds like you did everything right. Don't bother responding to Jon and his attacks. You sound like a lovely neighbor. Your HOA representatives sound as if they have some issues to work out, though. lol

I hope all is well and you can move on. Don't waste anymore time trying to defend yourself here... it's not necessary.
CD3 (Idaho)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Thank you guys for the support. I am actually glad John was willing to voice his input and stand his ground, like I said I am here to try understand the entire scenario from both point of views. I feel John had the same point of view as my current HOA so I am glad I was able to converse with him and get more detail on why they might have taken action like they did. He had good points such as the house fire, I can easily see in the email traffic how I may have given the wrong impression on helping the community in dire need. I see that I could have taken a different tone in my emails and was a little fired up and could give the HOA the wrong impression. The only thing left that is bothering me is the 24/7 for 2-3 days... I would have hoped someone on the board explained this oxymoron to the president.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChristineL1 on 06/21/2016 7:22 PM
CD3, it sounds like you did everything right. Don't bother responding to Jon and his attacks. You sound like a lovely neighbor. Your HOA representatives sound as if they have some issues to work out, though. lol

I hope all is well and you can move on. Don't waste anymore time trying to defend yourself here... it's not necessary.

I am sorry you are incapable of ne'er standing the difference between attacks and reality.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CD3 on 06/21/2016 8:11 PM
Thank you guys for the support. I am actually glad John was willing to voice his input and stand his ground, like I said I am here to try understand the entire scenario from both point of views. I feel John had the same point of view as my current HOA so I am glad I was able to converse with him and get more detail on why they might have taken action like they did. He had good points such as the house fire, I can easily see in the email traffic how I may have given the wrong impression on helping the community in dire need. I see that I could have taken a different tone in my emails and was a little fired up and could give the HOA the wrong impression. The only thing left that is bothering me is the 24/7 for 2-3 days... I would have hoped someone on the board explained this oxymoron to the president.

CD

As a tenant you have no standing as a member of the HOA. The board response tried to explain that to you. You chose to ignore that reality.

What you declared to be disrespect was the board trying to handle a complicated situation made more difficult by responses such as yours.

Using your hose and water was not close to the end of your world. Nor was it a violation of your rights. As you claimed. It was an attempt to prevent further damage to these trees.

And as you now seem to comprehend your handling left much to be desired. You have no right to demand someone meet with you to explain or satisfy your
Concerns or to secure YOUR approval.

And your announcement that your external electric is no longer to be used without your permission was unrelated, childish and to quote you " put you foot in your mouth." Will you be notifying the HOA that they can disregard that nonsense?

I have served on our board for 29 years. This was an unfortunate situation that could have been made easier
with cooperation and assistance you went out of your way to provide neither.

And I would suggest you hold off estimating the costs or usage till such time as you are billed. Then you can work with facts not guesses.

And your critique of the more than likely elected board president is in fact meaningless and unimportant as again you are not a member of the board, HOA and as a non-member have not real input into how or why things are done and if they are done to your satisfaction.

I sense you have cultivated an attitude of conflict between you and the HOA board. And that you are searching for disagreements with which you can express your feelings of being less than because you are a tenant. On the one hand you praise the community and property where you live and on the other hand you question, insult and make more difficult the job of the very same people who manage the affairs of this same property. You praise your neighbors while failing to understand those same neighbors include the volunteer members of the board.

My guess would be more effort has been required, more time needed to address this whole tree issue by the members of this board. Along with the "normal" responsibilities they shoulder which you and the other residents simply get to enjoy. In my view your role was to complicate this matter even further. Which was unfortunate. In the end it now appears whatever cost to you will be covered so you have lost nothing out of pocket. Nor were you disrespected or your rights violated. But you did inject conflict and unnecessary demands when none was needed.

Hell they do yard work around your home and plug their power tools into your outlets. And you flew off the handle demanding they first obtain your permission. Just how drastic and unnecessary was that?

My Father would say " if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem". In my view you were part of the problem. Not a mountain in the real world more like an ant hill....
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JonD1 on 06/21/2016 8:51 PM
Posted By CD3 on 06/21/2016 8:11 PM
Thank you guys for the support. I am actually glad John was willing to voice his input and stand his ground, like I said I am here to try understand the entire scenario from both point of views. I feel John had the same point of view as my current HOA so I am glad I was able to converse with him and get more detail on why they might have taken action like they did. He had good points such as the house fire, I can easily see in the email traffic how I may have given the wrong impression on helping the community in dire need. I see that I could have taken a different tone in my emails and was a little fired up and could give the HOA the wrong impression. The only thing left that is bothering me is the 24/7 for 2-3 days... I would have hoped someone on the board explained this oxymoron to the president.


CD

As a tenant you have no standing as a member of the HOA. The board response tried to explain that to you. You chose to ignore that reality.

What you declared to be disrespect was the board trying to handle a complicated situation made more difficult by responses such as yours.

Using your hose and water was not close to the end of your world. Nor was it a violation of your rights. As you claimed. It was an attempt to prevent further damage to these trees.

And as you now seem to comprehend your handling left much to be desired. You have no right to demand someone meet with you to explain or satisfy your
Concerns or to secure YOUR approval.

And your announcement that your external electric is no longer to be used without your permission was unrelated, childish and to quote you " put you foot in your mouth." Will you be notifying the HOA that they can disregard that nonsense?

I have served on our board for 29 years. This was an unfortunate situation that could have been made easier
with cooperation and assistance you went out of your way to provide neither.

And I would suggest you hold off estimating the costs or usage till such time as you are billed. Then you can work with facts not guesses.

And your critique of the more than likely elected board president is in fact meaningless and unimportant as again you are not a member of the board, HOA and as a non-member have not real input into how or why things are done and if they are done to your satisfaction.

I sense you have cultivated an attitude of conflict between you and the HOA board. And that you are searching for disagreements with which you can express your feelings of being less than because you are a tenant. On the one hand you praise the community and property where you live and on the other hand you question, insult and make more difficult the job of the very same people who manage the affairs of this same property. You praise your neighbors while failing to understand those same neighbors include the volunteer members of the board.

My guess would be more effort has been required, more time needed to address this whole tree issue by the members of this board. Along with the "normal" responsibilities they shoulder which you and the other residents simply get to enjoy. In my view your role was to complicate this matter even further. Which was unfortunate. In the end it now appears whatever cost to you will be covered so you have lost nothing out of pocket. Nor were you disrespected or your rights violated. But you did inject conflict and unnecessary demands when none was needed.

Hell they do yard work around your home and plug their power tools into your outlets. And you flew off the handle demanding they first obtain your permission. Just how drastic and unnecessary was that?

My Father would say " if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem". In my view you were part of the problem. Not a mountain in the real world more like an ant hill....

CD

I think Jon summed it up pretty well.

BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
Respectfully, do such comments encourage tenants to contribute to positive outcomes ?

A separate issue is whether or not they are even valid as to the specifics of CD3 Idaho.

CD3 may have a tough time getting any offset from anyone at all for water he will apparently be billed for. Not the least will be that the Board may refuse it even to resident owners - much less to a group without either vote nor equity - and may consider there is no liability at all.

An incentive to deny water nor more next time . . .
ChesterB
Posts: 63
Posted:
Big difference in a one time watering of a tree to watering it over 3 days. Water is an expensive utility in some locations. I agree with some posters that the situation was poorly handled. I don't understand the vitriol over being a renter. The renter is paying for the water. He should be reimbursed for it.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChesterB on 06/22/2016 10:47 AM
Big difference in a one time watering of a tree to watering it over 3 days. Water is an expensive utility in some locations. I agree with some posters that the situation was poorly handled. I don't understand the vitriol over being a renter. The renter is paying for the water. He should be reimbursed for it.

I think many of us agreed the HOA handled it poorly and the OP should be reimbursed for the water usage. That said, as a renter they do not have the same rights and privileges of an owner no matter how hard they try to.
ChesterB
Posts: 63
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 06/22/2016 12:15 PM
Posted By ChesterB on 06/22/2016 10:47 AM
Big difference in a one time watering of a tree to watering it over 3 days. Water is an expensive utility in some locations. I agree with some posters that the situation was poorly handled. I don't understand the vitriol over being a renter. The renter is paying for the water. He should be reimbursed for it.


I think many of us agreed the HOA handled it poorly and the OP should be reimbursed for the water usage. That said, as a renter they do not have the same rights and privileges of an owner no matter how hard they try to.

Agreed. What point are you making here? My point was cost of the water. The renter should not have to absorb that cost. If a one time watering so be it, over 3 days is not making a "mountain out of an ant hill."
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChesterB on 06/22/2016 12:24 PM
Posted By JohnC46 on 06/22/2016 12:15 PM
Posted By ChesterB on 06/22/2016 10:47 AM
Big difference in a one time watering of a tree to watering it over 3 days. Water is an expensive utility in some locations. I agree with some posters that the situation was poorly handled. I don't understand the vitriol over being a renter. The renter is paying for the water. He should be reimbursed for it.


I think many of us agreed the HOA handled it poorly and the OP should be reimbursed for the water usage. That said, as a renter they do not have the same rights and privileges of an owner no matter how hard they try to.


Agreed. What point are you making here? My point was cost of the water. The renter should not have to absorb that cost. If a one time watering so be it, over 3 days is not making a "mountain out of an ant hill."

Chester or Banks as your only claim to fame regarding HOAs is the fact yours sued you what point were you trying to make?

No one suggested the tenant should cover the water cost. But thanks for adding your usual insight to the conversation. Did you bother to read this thread?

The OP is a tenant with now contractual relationship with the HOA. Nor do they have the right to demand, question or critique the members of the board elected by the unit owners. Those owners making up the HOA.

The OP went out of their way to cause confrontation when cooperation was requested. Including the ridiculous demand the landscaper's obtain their permission before using their electrical outlets to do yard work around their property.

Now as someone who never has nor ever will actually serve on a board seems impossible for you to EVER consider a board member's point of view.

Anyone with an issue with their HOA gets your blind support. Time and time again. And in this case your point was the OP not pay for the water.
Who suggested anything else? Is that really all you have to offer? Guess so.

Not to worry another crazy train will be pulling in at some point and your front row seat will be waiting for you while you claim the engineer has a different perspective that should be valued. And then you change your account to avoid any further valuable perspective from this same individual from finding you.
Jumped off that train pretty quick.
Maybe if you ever sat on a board you and others might understand why people who waste the board's time are not appreciated much. But for you not likely.
ChesterB
Posts: 63
Posted:
The OP has the right to question and critique anyone he wants to just as you or I have the right to post our opinions on this site. It doesn't matter if I've never served on an HOA board. I have served on a board that oversaw the running of local daycare centers. The health and wellbeing of young children I deem to be far more important than your HOA board member claim to fame.

I don't know why you let my opinions upset you so much. Since you have made it so obvious what you think of my posts, just don't read them.

I changed my posting name because Troy was sending multiple emails in a short period of time clogging up my email inbox. Pardon me if there was a different method to stop that. I didn't know what that was at the time, but Tim shared that knowledge with me.

Have a nice evening Jon. - Chester (formally Banks)
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Chester (Banks) this is a site for those who serve on HOA boards or volunteer their time in community service. You do neither.

You were sued by your own HOA and show a clear bias against HOA boards in any and all communities
with little if any real knowledge or understanding as to the actual facts.

Your service on the daycare board has little real value on this site other than your simpleminded attempt to puff up your own
resume. Has this board service of yours mellowed the negative feelings your neighbors and HOA board members still feel towards you?
So like me they were not all that impressed.

Your posts don't upset me I just want it to be clear exactly who and what you are. And how your being sued has affected your
opinions and viewpoints to the point you can see nothing else.

ChesterB
Posts: 63
Posted:
Jon, You have made it abundantly clear who you are.
MarkM31 (Washington)
Posts: 351
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JonD1 on 06/22/2016 7:06 PM
Chester (Banks) this is a site for those who serve on HOA boards or volunteer their time in community service.


I don't think so, I think this is a place for members of a HOA
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkM31 on 06/24/2016 11:59 AM
Posted By JonD1 on 06/22/2016 7:06 PM
Chester (Banks) this is a site for those who serve on HOA boards or volunteer their time in community service.



I don't think so, I think this is a place for members of a HOA

Then perhaps you should read the header in YELLOW at the top of the page.

This by those responsible for this site.

I can find no mention of HOA members.

Perhaps you can.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
I am fairly confident that this site is for both those who have/are serving on the Board/Committees and the members that make up the Association. I base this on the forums posting rules which state:

Topics from individual homeowners, who are not acting as association volunteers, may be addressed if the person has come here to learn in a positive way.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
"This is a positive place for community association leaders to share ideas and learn. This forum is for community association Boards, Committees, Volunteers & HOA Professionals to discuss topics concerning their association duties."

So simply quoting the same posting rules you now go to my opinion would be the purpose of this forum is rather clear.

Your supporting quote includes the word "may" with specific qualifiers as to the purpose of a member posting here. I don't find whining, moaning, pitching hissy fits or proposing the total destruction of all HOAs to be included in what HOA members "may" do.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JonD1 on 06/25/2016 7:13 AM

So simply quoting the same posting rules you now go to my opinion would be the purpose of this forum is rather clear.

Yes, but per my section, all are welcome providing that they are here with a willingness to learn in a positive way.

Heck, I came here because I had an issue with my Association.
I was not serving at the time but wanted to resolve the issue (even if it required going to court).
The regular posters on this site asked a lot of hard questions and some even took the Associations position. In hind sight, I see that both perspectives had merit and it helped me better address my issue and other issues I discovered in the process.

JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 06/25/2016 8:51 AM
Posted By JonD1 on 06/25/2016 7:13 AM

So simply quoting the same posting rules you now go to my opinion would be the purpose of this forum is rather clear.


Yes, but per my section, all are welcome providing that they are here with a willingness to learn in a positive way.

Heck, I came here because I had an issue with my Association.
I was not serving at the time but wanted to resolve the issue (even if it required going to court).
The regular posters on this site asked a lot of hard questions and some even took the Associations position. In hind sight, I see that both perspectives had merit and it helped me better address my issue and other issues I discovered in the process.


Tim

I have never hesitated to offer advice to HOA members who come to this site with a real desire to learn and understand. You can review my posts over the years to verify. Hell, I might have given you an opinion or two when you arrived. And I have no issue with those sort of visitors. Nor should they be prevented from posting.

What I do have issue with are those who arrive not to understand but in some cases to preach their version of HOA life. To criticize usually with a very broad stroke every HOA in existence. To explain how things should be done when in most cases they have never actually done anything.

Those who claim to know what is impossible when myself and several others who post here have done exactly that!

To be honest Tim you have exhibited the patience of a saint with such folks on many occasions. You have approached discussions from ever side possible and in the end nothing in the mind of the poster would change. I on the other hand, lack that level of patience. When people suggest they plan to smack down members of the board, take their homes, insult any and every board member that serves, and act at a level of warfare rather than a level of civil disagreement, I have nor desire any patience on those occasions. People in the end show you who and what they are. At that point it is up to you to treat them accordingly.

Perhaps, my years working in the construction industry in the NY metro area has led me to be limited in the area of patience. In those days I had a job to do and little time to discuss, convince, or enlighten those who might differ in opinion. I worked in a world of direct, short, and brutally honest verbal exchange. We got no points for making everyone feel good or that everyone's opinion mattered. We did not operate under a democracy. One gentleman I worked with once expressed the following" If I need your opinion I will beat it out of you." So there was little delightful banter back and forth till everyone had their say.
To be honest it would seem you get more done that way.

That would explain to me the qualifier provided in the posting rules for HOA members for this site. If you come here for a productive purpose fine. If you come hear to have your opinions verified or supported blindly well then no. If you come here to push how things should be done if only you ruled the world then no. If you come here in the hopes someone else will heal your wounds by fighting their HOA after you can't do it somewhere you live well then no.

The lunatics you mentioned that have been banned were in most cases NOT board members. They were also not interested in serving the best interests of their communities. They were in most cases on ego trips to convince themselves how much they thought they knew, how much they were going to change and how ignorant we all were for not understanding their brilliance. In most cases in the end they accomplished nothing.

Myself, I have nor desire any patience for such fools. Nor do I place much value on their opinions, thoughts, claims or BS.

Have a nice weekend Tim.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here