💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Please help. I'm seeking some advice, knowledge and good ol' information for my current problem. If anyone out there has had this problem, please let me know how you solved it, or at the very least tempered it.
I took over as President of our HOA in March of this year, and the rest of our board took over in January. The president position was unfilled for a couple of months. Anywhoo.. since taking over as the new board members, we have received a constant barrage of emails(3-5/day) , phone calls, putting down our managers, stating he pays their salary, etc regarding we are "not doing our job" in looking for violations in the community, getting to a broken down fence and so on. Even going as far as billing us $15 for him shoveling his own snow (this happening when we decided not to have snow removal come out due to being in the middle of contracts, and the snow was melting faster than we could clear it. Again... to say the least it's been frustrating. He hasn't given us a chance to be a good board. We have tried are hardest to make clear and fair decisions based on our CCR's and Guidelines, even seeking legal advice for the snow removal bill and a second demand to walk with our management company to look for violations. We made our decision based upon the advice we got, and after several lengthy discussions. Now, he has requested a hearing for the "denial" of his snow removal bill AND has distributed among the homeowners a letter, putting us down as a board, lying about what we're doing and not doing, and setting up a private meeting that we, as the board, are not allowed to attend.

Right now, we do not feel he has the right to a hearing over a decision we made to not pay his bill. Advice please?
And we, among other things, were pretty upset that he'd hand deliver a letter with such lies in it. We're hoping the homeowners see thru it, but what would you do?
We have been working very hard to turn around our community from when he was presiding over it, but he feels WE are the ones in the wrong and are continuing to trash our neighborhood. As many of you know, we can issue violation letters and it still does not make someone clean up, or pull weeds. These are things he cannot see.

Please please,I seek some knowledgeable advice. Thank you. (this is the short version of all that has been going on, please be advised)
DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
We ignore our ex-pres except when he sends records requests that we are required by law to fulfill. Otherwise we have just stopped responding to him entirely. Ours is not quite as bad as yours, but he does complain regularly and widely. Since the rest of the board was re-elected by a huge margin and he was voted out, it seems that most homeowners have had a enough of him too, he doesn't seem to have quite the following that he thinks he has.

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Christine,

I'm of the understanding that the complaints, calls, emails, etc. are all from one individual.

This individual wants a hearing before the Board.

You, as a member of the Board, need to allow that to happen. It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree with the reason for the hearing. The process is that members have a right to be heard.

My advice for the hearing:

1) Plan a date for the hearing.
2) Do not make a decision at the hearing, do not be combative, don't give any answer at the meeting. Simply allow the individual to have their say. Nobody should offer an opinion at that hearing if what is being said is right, wrong or indifferent.
3) After the member has had their say, thank them for the information and simply say that the board will take the matter under advisement and, in order to allow everyone to fully consider the points the individual made that you, as President, will ask the Board to make a decision at the next meeting.
4) Carry on with the meeting.

In the letter you will write the individual, regardless if they are there for the decision or not, specify at the end of the letter that this was the Boards decision. If they disagree with decisions of the Board, they are free to volunteer and, if elected, be part of the decision process.

My advice for the rumors:

Make sure that your newsletters tell the story of what the Board has done. List the multiple (even tiny things) that the Board has accomplished. At the annual meeting, produce a written Presidents report as a handout summarizing everything that was done over the last year.

If you keep the membership informed, the members can make informed decisions.
If you do not keep the membership informed, the members will make decisions based on what they have heard (regardless if what they heard was the truth or not).
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:

Thank you both for your advice, I am taking note of all of this and trying to be more informed about our decision. I think he deserves a hearing also since it is the process of the HOA, but the two other board members are not in agreement to this. They feel we have given him the time to voice his concern and disagreement with our decision and that a hearing is not going to solve anything. He just doesn't want to comply with something that he feels is wrong in his OWN opinion, not factual. Whether it is or not, he does not like our decision and will continue to fight.

Any suggestions about if we grant him this hearing, and he continues to not like our decision? I mean, where does it actually stop? Or does it?

Thank you again, both of you for your input. I really appreciate it!
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
The other board members are probably right, the hearing likely won't solve anything. However, that is the process.

Expecting there will be no change in the decision, he will likely not appreciate your decision.

What happens then is up to him.
He can live with it.
He can grumble about it.
He can gather support and vote the Board out.
He can consult with an attorney for any legal options.

What you have now is what many on here refer to as the CCO (chief complaining officer).

The board has a duty to look at each complaint and respond.
Yes, this will take time and the President is typically the one that has to be the point of contact.
However, if the phone calls or emails become abusive, you should then have the association attorney write a cease and desist letter.

To stop the calls, simply ask that he places all issues in writing. This provides a paper trail for everyone.
Explain that he may call but only if it's an emergency (and then define what is considered an emergency (example: tree falls on his home).
Explain that writing ensures that the Board gets the issue from his perspective, vs. being paraphrased by a third party (you).

Over time, they will stop.

We had a member start complaining about several issues.
We investigated each one and when valid acted, when invalid cited the covenant or statute that made it invalid.
Over time, they finally quit.

CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
Instead of fighting him, get him involved. Acknowledge his "complaints" and his "efforts" as a previous Prez. Get him on board with you by asking his advice and asking for a historical prospective POV.

If his complaint is about the color of the trees, ask him what did his board think about the color of trees etc.

As a previous prez myself, the hardest thing for me to watch was the new board trying to make decisions on matters that the association had been fighting all along. So the mistakes were repeated again. And again. If they had asked that simple question they would have saved themselves from quite a bit of the angst.

If it's a prez that the current board feels was terrible, shady or any other type of crap, then you put your biggest and brightest smile on your face and STILL ask him or her regardless.
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
As much as I appreciate your approach, we have done that also. We honestly think he has a ton of knowledge to share, but this is the problem: He doesn't WISH to share it that way. He wants us to come to him, like when he was president and makes statements like " when I was president, I would never do it that way", holding on to information like a prize we need to pry from him. I think it's a control thing honestly. He was NOT the best president at all., alot of things got put off, grass died, things left in disrepair for several years, people moving out of the community and loads of complaints. But now that he is off the board, he feels everything we are doing is WRONG, WRONG... and we can do no right.

I think I mentioned this also, but he even went from home to home, handing out a flyer to try gather people on his side that were furious with the current board, holding a private meeting last week that the board was not allowed to attend. Two other people showed up for it, so it obviously didn't go his way. But that's the kind of person he is. He even went as far as showing up on a residents doorstep, after he thought for sure she would have been at his "meeting". He confronted her, making her very uncomfortable. By the way, we have sent all types of harassment, or rude behavior issues to legal, to keep a clear record of it all.
We try to get him involved in a productive way, but he doesn't want that. He wants to be in charge, period. And if the things aren't done his way, he sends rude emails, putting us down, calling us idiots.
I think we're all frustrated with him, but we keep trying to be cordial and professional. We keep hoping he'll come around one of these days, and see that we are not the enemy. (which by the way, he has mentioned to several residents that we are the enemy now)
We ARE actually getting things done in our community and have made great strides at bringing our residents together as of late. I guess we just keep trucking on, that's all that can be done.

NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Good advice from others. Won't repeat it.

Going to focus my comments on the non-payment of $15 which is apparently what he wants to appeal.

The essence of the financial relationship is as follows:

Covenants require the homeowners to pay for services that the HOA must provide. Even if the HOA doesn't provide the services, the homeowner cannot withhold payment.

That description of the relationship is pretty much universal. Nothing about the HOA paying a homeowner for services not provided.

He has a right to sue the HOA for not clearing the snow.

But there's no right in the HOA covenants to self-appoint yourself as a vendor to the HOA. Selecting HOA vendors falls within the authority of the board, not the individual homeowners.

Covenants usually give the HOA the right to do work on a unit and bill the unit owner for the cost. But that's a one-way street only. Nothing in your docs will say otherwise.

Question: If a vendor wanted to challenge the HOA's decision not to pay an invoice, would there be any obligation to hold a meeting? Don't think so.

So no matter how frustrating, I don't think it makes much difference if you grant him a hearing or not - If the issue he puts in writing to you explaining what he wants to appeal is the payment of the $15, you could easily decide that what he wants to appeal is beyond the scope of the HOA-homeowner relationship.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Let me get this straight. . ."he has the right to sue the HOA for not clearing the snow" ?? We are not required to clear his driveway, so how is he in the right to expect us to pay him $15 for his own shoveling of his own driveway? Please explain that to me, I'd love to hear the reasoning.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChristineD2 on 06/08/2016 8:57 AM
Let me get this straight. . ."he has the right to sue the HOA for not clearing the snow" ?? We are not required to clear his driveway, so how is he in the right to expect us to pay him $15 for his own shoveling of his own driveway? Please explain that to me, I'd love to hear the reasoning.

Anyone can sue anyone else for just about anything. Access to our judicial system is available to everyone.

From what you originally posted, the HOA had an obligation to clear the snow. In his mind, that wasn't done. He did it himself. He has "standing" to sue in court. That's the technical answer.

The common sense answer is that he would be a fool to sue because he would lose. But people sue over some really crazy things.

But now you have changed the facts a bit. Now you're saying that he wants the $15 for shoveling his driveway which the association had no obligation to clear.

Now none of his $15 claim makes any sense under this second set of facts.

Hope I've answered your question to your satisfaction.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
So... his latest escapades, has made our new landscape company send us a termination letter. Our expresident has turned them into Dept of Ag...and our Water District. I don't blame our company for not wanting to deal with nag nag nag from him. He is out of control!!! HELP
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
So... his latest escapades, has made our new landscape company send us a termination letter. Our expresident has turned them into Dept of Ag...and our Water District. I don't blame our company for not wanting to deal with nag nag nag from him. He is out of control!!! HELP
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChristineD2 on 06/21/2016 12:27 PM
So... his latest escapades, has made our new landscape company send us a termination letter. Our expresident has turned them into Dept of Ag...and our Water District. I don't blame our company for not wanting to deal with nag nag nag from him. He is out of control!!! HELP


Did either the Dept of Ag or the Water District find any violations on the part of the landscape company?

If not, then your remedy is a lawsuit for intentional interference in a contract. (Yes, that is a recognized tort claim.) Watch him pucker up when the process server shows up on his doorstep with a summons and complaint. Do not forget to seek a permanent injunction to prevent from interfering with other HOA contracts.

Your association has tolerated far more from this idiot than it ever should have. It is time to end it once and for all. Do it.

BTW, in AZ one element of criminal harassment is to file at least two unfounded complaints with public bodies. You might want to see if there is anything similar in Colorado.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
At this point, I agree with Larry and the Board needs to step things up by involving an attorney.
You can't prevent him from contacting government agencies to file complaints against companies.
However, you can serve him an injunction preventing him from talking directly to the contractors.

It would also be good to find out if the agency found any violations or not.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 06/21/2016 2:35 PM
At this point, I agree with Larry and the Board needs to step things up by involving an attorney.
You can't prevent him from contacting government agencies to file complaints against companies.
However, you can serve him an injunction preventing him from talking directly to the contractors.

It would also be good to find out if the agency found any violations or not.


You can enjoin a person from making complaints to government agencies if the underlying purpose is to disrupt the operations of the HOA.

In this case, the landscaper seemed to know that the ex-president was the source of complaints to multiple agencies. The ex-president was making no secret of his role as Chief Complaining Officer. Since there was no known direct contract between the landscaper and the ex-president, his motive was clearly to harass the contractor into terminating his relationship with the HOA. Now that he has tasted success, he will continue this tactic until the HOA drags his butt into court.
DonnaC13 (Alabama)
Posts: 2
Posted:
Great advice, TimB4. I have recently taken on the position as secretary on our board, and already have heard complaints, rumors, etc. regarding all sorts of issues with our current board from previews board members. I've just joined this site, and it looks to me like it will very useful.
DonnaC13 (Alabama)
Posts: 2
Posted:
previous, not previews
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Thank you all so very much!! Great advice. I am in communication with our counsel regarding this matter, now it seems all I need is the information from Dept of Ag and our Water District to see if anything was found. I'm not sure if I am privy to this, but I'm going to attempt it.

thank you all again... I am loving this forum and the knowledge you all provide.

Christine
LarryC7 (Michigan)
Posts: 1
Posted:
Christine D2,
I was in a similar situation, though not as bad, on my first election to our Condo Board to replace a long term previous president who could not let go. Your biggest clue is that yours tried to call a private meeting and only 2 people showed up. These people with big mouths and low performance (grass unkempt, etc.) are far less popular than they think they are. Our Board has given the old guy the absolute minimum of our required attention -- you will find that you are actually required to give him VERY LITTLE attention!
Meanwhile we quietly went about doing a better job on the property's appearance, hiring a top level property management company, and documenting for the co-owners our responsible approach to gradually improving the Association's financial situation. After 4 years of much better kept lawns and no more of the previous incessant dramas, our 100 co-owners are thoroughly on our side, and the old guy with his few buddies and his mental health issues are silent. I am a big believer in long-term polite non-response to the complainers whose driving need is for attention. Good luck, I believe you will find that you have a lot more legal authority (and immunity!) than you may think.
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Here he goes again! Please help, you all were so great at giving me awesome advice. Our expresident has now filed a small claims lawsuit against the HOA for the snow removal bill he billed us back in Spring for $15. We declined it at the beginning, under the advisement of our counsel, he requested a board hearing. Per our CCR's, we had 180 days to set something. We ended up sending him notice that we would hear him after the board meeting coming up in October. This was within our 180 days. He has declined, saying we are out of time. So... my biggest question is, Should our counsel represent us at the small claims hearing? I think so, but our treasurer does not. He feels it's a waste of money when I feel it's a waste if we don't use them. I am not an attorney, he is not..and I feel this is why we retain counsel. Please let me know what you think, thank you!!

Christine
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Christine,

You are now fighting an issue on principal and precedence vs. the actual debt.

Fighting for principal is typically expensive.

You know what your budget is, we do not. Expect the case to cost you $5,000 as a minimum if you use an attorney.
The problem without using an attorney is the possibility of saying something you didn't intend and the lack of knowledge of the statutes.
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Thank you. I appreciate your outlook on this situation. I am definitley weighing our options carefully.

Christine
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChristineD2 on 08/23/2016 6:57 AM
Here he goes again! Please help, you all were so great at giving me awesome advice. Our expresident has now filed a small claims lawsuit against the HOA for the snow removal bill he billed us back in Spring for $15. We declined it at the beginning, under the advisement of our counsel, he requested a board hearing. Per our CCR's, we had 180 days to set something. We ended up sending him notice that we would hear him after the board meeting coming up in October. This was within our 180 days. He has declined, saying we are out of time. So... my biggest question is, Should our counsel represent us at the small claims hearing? I think so, but our treasurer does not. He feels it's a waste of money when I feel it's a waste if we don't use them. I am not an attorney, he is not..and I feel this is why we retain counsel. Please let me know what you think, thank you!!

Christine

Christine, some states require corporations to use an attorney in court, even small claims court. You will have to do some research of the Colorado court rules to find out whether Colorado is one of them.

Is the member (the ex-president) using an attorney? If not, then I would propose to the rest of the board that the HOA not hire an attorney for now. If neither the judge nor plaintiff say anything about not using an attorney, then go forward with your arguments pro se. Why? Because if the HOA loses in small claims court, then I expect the judge would award $15 and possibly the cost of filing. You can look up the filing costs, but I imagine that all told this will cost the HOA maybe $250 and some labor by the board. If you use an attorney, I expect this will cost the HOA much more. There's a good chance the small claims court will award the ex-president only $15. So now he gets a lesson in stingi-ness (on a few levels): It cost him more to take this to court than he won. Plus the labor, time delays and emotional drainage on him.

If the member (the ex-president) is using an attorney, report back here.

Your board does want to fight this, lest more members start second-guessing the board's valid judgment and sue for snow removal services.

The ex-president has a complaint of failure to follow the covenants. You indicate your gov docs have provision for hearings of complaints of violations of the gov doces. Agreeing to hear him after the board meeting in October is quite a long delay. It seems discourteous to me. This is particularly so since it can snow in October (September) and you all need some light shed on this issue. Your HOA is within your rights, but I think delaying like this adds fuel to the fire. Two cents.
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
So here's where we stand as of right now. And side note, I really appreciate everyone's advice and comments, they really do help in making some informed decisions.

After discussing the lawsuit with the other board members, we received an email from our ExPres, offering to mediate this. He refused to meet with the board to discuss it further, but now wants to mediate. We informed our counsel of the lawsuit, our stance on it and that now he is offering mediation. He advised us, that if our decision was not to pay for his own removal of snow on that particular day, we should not take mediation. Mediation is for compromise, to which we all understand. We discussed it in detail, looking at all possible outcomes. In all honesty. . .we argued, and were not united on this. We have declined mediation, because we do not feel we can offer him money for something the CCR's do not cover. That would indeed set precedence for others to then bill us for removal of snow that is NOT covered in our obligations as the HOA. We offered ExPres a meeting in front of the board again, stating that if he can show us new evidence of why the HOA should be obligated to pay we would reconsider, but if nothing new can be provided to us in proof, we would not be changing our decision. We have heard nothing from him.

Counsel is going to be representing the HOA in the court hearing and we are now preparing a response. We all unanimously feel it is a waste of money, but in the same breath feel that we are not in fault for the cost of defending ourselves. Please don't take that wrong everyone, I am a firm believer in making moves to work things out without going to court and building costs on both ends, but I feel we have attempted to resolve this and nothing is working.

Quick Question (and maybe I asked this way back when): If it were you, and a resident questioned any type of covenant, and whether it was a past board member or not, .. would you simply have shown them the covenant and asked them to read it?
It is with this question, that I regret some of the ways this was handled. But ..a Board determines their line of actions, not ONE single member. I went with what the consensus wanted.

JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Christine have you had enough of this yet? And if so why do you continue to,play his game. Imwould send him an email stating the board will no longer respond to his emails. Because he has you dancing around like a fool.

Now as to his $15 small claims court complaint in my view the advice not to use a lawyer is foolish. If not just who do you plan to have represent your interests? During my 29 years of service on our board I would never allow myself or another member of the board to represent us in court.

Saving money just might result in this blowing up in your face. There is a reason lawyers attend law school.

My suggestion speak to your lawyer about filing a counterclaim for abuse of process. This being when an individual uses the legal system not for its intended purpose of administering justice but rather to annoy, disturb or harm the other party.

To sue seeking $15 seems on its face a waste of the court's time. This along with copies of his emails critizicing the board could prove his complaint is motivated by a desire to do harm to the board and the community. If you file a counterclaim you can seek legal fees.

I would also draft a letter to each owner detailing his ongoing efforts. Including copies of his emails, copies of the invoices from your attorney, copies of his complaint seeking $15. In life sometimes you need to fight fire with MORE fire.

We had a resident ding-dong file 3 small claims court complaints. Pure delusional nonsense. I instructed our lawyer to file counterclaims which they were not to happy with. In the end his 3 complaints were dismissed before I sat down and the court awarded us $3,000 in legal fees.

Sort of makes filing more complaints less attractive for the ding-dong.

Play time is over. Let the lawyer handle this and any future "complaints" or nonsense from this fool. And for God's sake skip playing nice with him.
Some idiots don't respond to nice or pleasantness. Just a swift kick in the behind and the knowledge neighbors and residents all are aware of his nonsense and especially the unnecessary cost being brought on to the community.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Bravo, Jon!
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Jon and I seldom agree but this time he is on the right track.

Turn this over to your attorney and bury this pest under a pile of discovery requests that he is not prepared for. In most states attorney fees are recoverable when the matter arises from a contract. Most states also have provisions for penalizing those who file frivolous or unfounded lawsuits; your attorney is in a far better position to bring such a claim.

AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
ChristineD2, can you clarify a few things?

1.
In your May 25 post you wrote that the reason the HOA did not clear the snow is because it was between contracts and the snow was melting faster than the HOA could clear it. Then on June 8 you changed the reason the HOA did not clear the snow. You wrote, "We are not required to clear his driveway, so how is he in the right to expect us to pay him $15 for his own shoveling of his own driveway?"

What do your HOA's covenants say with regard to snow removal?

2.
Is the ex-President using an attorney or not?

With regards to your latest question: If I were on the Board, I would ask the member to cite the covenant that she or he claimed the HOA was violating and put her or his complaint in writing, per a set format the Board had established. If it was a matter of interpretation of covenants, I would hope the Board would say as much to the complainant. After one more round of exchanges and without any new information, I would inform the member that the board and manager responded to the original complaint and have nothing further to say on it. Then I would ask the board and manager to ignore further communications on this particular issue.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
If the HOA lawyer is now responding on behalf of the board ALL communication of any kind should be ended with the plaintiff.
This should be the board's stance going forward.

He filed a complaint, the lawyer will respond GOODBYE.

Any effort should be drafting a newsletter to the owners highlighting ding-dong's behavior. Special delivery would be made to the two fools who attended his specially called meeting.

And when the court's decision is rendered I would consider sending a copy to each owner.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChristineD2 on 08/30/2016 11:15 AM

Quick Question (and maybe I asked this way back when): If it were you, and a resident questioned any type of covenant, and whether it was a past board member or not, .. would you simply have shown them the covenant and asked them to read it?
It is with this question, that I regret some of the ways this was handled. But ..a Board determines their line of actions, not ONE single member. I went with what the consensus wanted.

I would have invited the individual to the Board meeting to discuss it.

Decision wise, I agree with you and would have provided the citation of the covenant in the response along with any applicable statutes.

I also agree with John regarding the attorney.
Have the attorney inform the individual that they are now representing the Association on this issue and all communications about this issue are to be directed to him/her.
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AugustinD on 08/30/2016 5:22 PM
ChristineD2, can you clarify a few things?

1.
In your May 25 post you wrote that the reason the HOA did not clear the snow is because it was between contracts and the snow was melting faster than the HOA could clear it. Then on June 8 you changed the reason the HOA did not clear the snow. You wrote, "We are not required to clear his driveway, so how is he in the right to expect us to pay him $15 for his own shoveling of his own driveway?"

What do your HOA's covenants say with regard to snow removal?

2.
Is the ex-President using an attorney or not?

Yes, you are correct, we were in between contracts at the time of the late season snow fall. We DO contract w/a vendor to remove snow, but it's always been at our discretion if we feel that it needs to be removed on light fall days/and if the budget is close to being empty. AND yes, you are again correct, that I did state it's not in our covenants.
I'm not sure how to make this clear in a message format. We have contracted with a snow removal company every year for the past 10 years to do snow removal from our roads, sidewalks and sometimes driveways...always at the discretion of the boards. This is not a requirement in our CCR's, but we have done it since it comes with the "package contract". Our CCR's basically say that the Association is obligated to remove snow from the common roads, and sidewalks only. Private drives and walkways are the responsibility of the homeowner.
We have discussed this now two times with our counsel and it has been affirmed that due to it being a private contract with the snow removal company, and that we did not remove from ANY of the residents driveways that particular day, that we are not treating him any different. If we had cleared everyone elses, and not his ...then we may be held responsible. But we made a choice. Could we have called a company to come in on an emergent option? Yes.. we could have called some company. We just did not feel it was needed that day. Gosh, I feel like I'm talking in circles. Sorry if this comes across clear as mud, lol.

Secondly, we have not been notified that the ExPres is retaining counsel. We have now made a decision. Our board meeting was just this last week and we are letting our counsel handle this situation from now on. He's got some great ideas and insight from previous experience to be able to handle this. I am confident this will be resolved shortly. AND. ..we have made our residents more aware at our last meeting also, that snow removal is NOT required in our community on private drives and walkways. Some people knew this because they have read their governing documents, some were not. I believe this will be brought up again at the Annual Homeowners meeting, to make sure we are all on the same page as to what we are doing moving into the Winter season.

Okay.. . gotta get to work, hope I haven't confused the heck out of all of you. I really appreciate this site and all the advice, insight and opinions of all of you. It has helped a ton!!!

Thank you!!
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Thank you for clarifying, ChristineD2. It's a shame this ex-President does not read the governing documents. I agree the HOA is likely to prevail.

Since presently this ex-President is pro se, I am not hopeful for an award of attorney's fees to pay for the HOA attorney's defense of the HOA. Where I am judges are generous to pro se folks, especially in small claims court. The generosity is part of the "access to justice" movement begun some decades ago. If the ex-president becomes a frequent flyer in small claims courts, with his nonsense claims against the HOA, then in my experience a judge will be more likely to penalize him with the costs of the HOA attorney.
ND (PA)
Posts: 792
Posted:
I haven't been following this closely, but moving forward, I think your Board needs to be maintaining only what it is required to maintain per the CCRs. And you need to make that clear to all residents (not just those that attend the meetings) what will be occurring, so everyone is on the same page moving forward.

There seems to be a precedent set where snow was being removed from driveways. It's hard to tell how often that was done or how many storms or years in a row. Given that snow was removed from driveways in the past, there is some expectation from residents that it will be done in the future. Individual residents don't know when/if money runs out to do the snow clearing. And you can't have people questioning whether or not it will be done at any given time.

Also, I think by doing snow removal on private property, you're unnecessarily taking on risk. If driveways, property, landscaping is damaged, the HOA may be liable for damages.
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Just an update, cause I know you ALL want to know, haha. We did go to court, he agreed to dismiss his argument for $15, if we agreed to this, this and this, "he supplied a list". Of course our attorney looked it all over, talked with me and we said no to everything except where he was asking to work on communication. I agree it could have been handled better, and in hindsight, i think the majority of issues were between him and the now resigned treasurer.
BUT... hold on to your horses. This pain is still in our side, every day, every meeting, every thing.
I need advice please.

This former president of the HOA not only emails us hundreds of times a week, but he continues to bring up issues that are closed at our board meetings, and at our homeowners meeting. He has pushed and demanded to know pertinent information about a homeowners foreclosure, demanding to be told what we are doing about a "expired tag" car in our neighborhood, going as far as to say that I am not capable to make decisions about violations and otherwise.
We give him answers and he refuses to take them and keeps emailing, pushing, demanding he will go to the Management company to view documents. Trust me, we are not hiding information from him, other than personal, private homeowner info.
He won't consider anything closed.
I am going crazy here. Please please give me some advice on how to deal with it, how do you deal with a rude, demanding homeowner that will not take the Boards word, instead keeps going on and on. And I mean on and on.
I admittedly know that taking on his position would lead to some calls, some emails and some answers that people will not all agree on. But as long as the Board is following the CCR's, our policies and Colorado law, do we really have to continue this engagement with him?

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
While I don't now how this works, we've seen advice before about blocking him from your emails.

What do you mean he brings up issues that are "closed" at open meetings? Executive session stuff?

If your board feels he's disrupting your meetings, ask him to leave. OR, your board can make some sort of procedural rule that no Onwers may speak more than 2-3 times during the open forum portion of your meeting.

Say, wait a minutes: Does your Board permit Owners to speak throughout your board meetings? Or only at a designated time?
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
PS, Christine: we do have rules of, let's say, decorum for sour open board meetings. One of them ids that no owner may criticize directors, committee members, our property manager at an open meeting.

Another is that maintenance requests must go through the proper channels. Here, it would be submitting a work order. No one may bring them up at our open board meetings.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
You've done all you can do and now it's time to let the guy stew in his own juices. He took the association to court and probably agreed to dismissed because it may have dawned on him that he would lose (I suppose the $15 covered parking and maybe a sandwich for his trouble?)

At this point, I would acknowledge receipt of his emails, but nothing more - don't respond to his demands at all. In fact, if he keeps bringing up the same old nonsense, I might skip the acknowledgement altogether because any response from you will keep this going. He can come to board meetings, but if he gets disruptive, don't be afraid to ask him to leave (and call police if he will not listen). If he starts getting personal to the point he's coming to board members' homes using their personal emails and/or calling them with this nonsense, keep a record of it - eventually (perhaps sooner) you may have grounds to sue him for harassment.

Not to delve deeply into the man's business, but have you spoken to his wife or family about his behavior? If he's this nutty at home, there may be something else going on and the family may need to speak to his doctor - not to dive too deeply into the man's business, but if he really is emailing you "hundreds" of messages a week, you may be looking at someone with an emotional/mental health issue.


If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 03/08/2017 11:21 AM
While I don't now how this works, we've seen advice before about blocking him from your emails.

What do you mean he brings up issues that are "closed" at open meetings? Executive session stuff?

If your board feels he's disrupting your meetings, ask him to leave. OR, your board can make some sort of procedural rule that no Onwers may speak more than 2-3 times during the open forum portion of your meeting.

Say, wait a minutes: Does your Board permit Owners to speak throughout your board meetings? Or only at a designated time?

When I say he brings up "closed" matters, I mean...He will ask, for example about why so much was spent on irrigation last year. We have answered him with what we know. He continues to bring that up. We have told him that the discussion regarding irrigation is a closed matter. There is nothing new to add to the discussion., nothing has changed. He does this with just about everything, no joke. If he doesn't like the answer or agree with it, he brings it up again and again.
As far as meeting decorum, we do have rules and we have printed them, outlined them to all residents in regards to time allowed, when to speak and if disruptive: we have the right to ask him to stop and if he does not, we can adjourn the meeting or ask him to leave the meeting.
I wish all of you could be a fly on the wall. No one is as aggravating as he is, or just plain rude. He talks over people, talks when not given the floor by the Board, and will bring up topics that are not on the agenda. Which we were told, that he can't bring up unless it's on the agenda.
It doesn't seem make a difference what we do. We tell him time and time again that he can't just talk over people or argue something that is closed, or speak rudely to any of us, but it does not matter, he does it any way.
Can you tell I'm frustrated? lol
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChristineD2 on 03/09/2017 12:24 PM
Posted By KerryL1 on 03/08/2017 11:21 AM
While I don't now how this works, we've seen advice before about blocking him from your emails.

What do you mean he brings up issues that are "closed" at open meetings? Executive session stuff?

If your board feels he's disrupting your meetings, ask him to leave. OR, your board can make some sort of procedural rule that no Onwers may speak more than 2-3 times during the open forum portion of your meeting.

Say, wait a minutes: Does your Board permit Owners to speak throughout your board meetings? Or only at a designated time?


When I say he brings up "closed" matters, I mean...He will ask, for example about why so much was spent on irrigation last year. We have answered him with what we know. He continues to bring that up. We have told him that the discussion regarding irrigation is a closed matter. There is nothing new to add to the discussion., nothing has changed. He does this with just about everything, no joke. If he doesn't like the answer or agree with it, he brings it up again and again.
As far as meeting decorum, we do have rules and we have printed them, outlined them to all residents in regards to time allowed, when to speak and if disruptive: we have the right to ask him to stop and if he does not, we can adjourn the meeting or ask him to leave the meeting.
I wish all of you could be a fly on the wall. No one is as aggravating as he is, or just plain rude. He talks over people, talks when not given the floor by the Board, and will bring up topics that are not on the agenda. Which we were told, that he can't bring up unless it's on the agenda.
It doesn't seem make a difference what we do. We tell him time and time again that he can't just talk over people or argue something that is closed, or speak rudely to any of us, but it does not matter, he does it any way.
Can you tell I'm frustrated? lol

ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SheliaH on 03/08/2017 12:47 PM
If he starts getting personal to the point he's coming to board members' homes using their personal emails and/or calling them with this nonsense, keep a record of it - eventually (perhaps sooner) you may have grounds to sue him for harassment.

Not to delve deeply into the man's business, but have you spoken to his wife or family about his behavior? If he's this nutty at home, there may be something else going on and the family may need to speak to his doctor - not to dive too deeply into the man's business, but if he really is emailing you "hundreds" of messages a week, you may be looking at someone with an emotional/mental health issue.


In regards to him contacting homeowners, he has gone as far as twice now writing up his own letter to all the residents and disbursing them home to home. Residents get so frustrated with him too. He even set up his own meeting, for all the residents, not including the Board, to discuss how miserable we are. Two people showed and thought it was ridiculous.
We honestly can't imagine why he is this way, if it's us or just any Board.
As far as his family, he is single, retired military and lives alone. I have had good times with him, when i served as his Vice, but I tell you, if it's not his way, it's complaint after complaint. Ugg
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChristineD2 . . . This former president of the HOA not only emails us hundreds of times a week, but he continues to bring up issues that are closed at our board meetings, and at our homeowners meeting. . . . I am going crazy here. . . . But as long as the Board is following the CCR's, our policies and Colorado law, do we really have to continue this engagement with him ?

Christine D2 Col 20 years ago a zealous condo owner here did a LOT of damage to our jurisdiction's Open Book parable for condo transparency. She logged 1800 official records disclosure requests before a civil judge put her on a meter. She had been effectively shutting down almost all governance with her "interrogatories" .

Respectfully, your torturer has every lawful right to a speed & number & thoroughness of response no less nor greater than any other individual owner. But not more. Without a judicial restraint order I am also not sure how wise it would be to unilaterally try to tell him you are throttling him totally or infringing legitimate disclosuring.

But I would suggest this. Derived from the number of owner/stakeholders consider establishing a policy for equal non-emergency access response & recognize that some of his inputs may be legitimate alerts.

Sequence responding to his non-emergency inputs so as to not exceed what your policy defensibly legitimizes for any other owner.

Or try to get a judicial restraint/ modification order. The alternatives aren't pleasant.
SeanM8 (Florida)
Posts: 4
Posted:
ChristineD2, I just read the history on this thread about your issues with past board member. I've been in a similar situation for past 2 1/2 years but it was the president of our HOA that started harassing us. We bought the vacant lot adjacent to us on an online auction and got it for 1/3rd of previous owner. Several people in neighborhood also expressed interest in buying it but wee unaware of it being sold. The bank was just liquidating the properties they had foreclosed on and used an online auction company to sell them. It was owned by RBC bank which was acquired by PNC Bank. It took about a year for all RBC's deeds to get transferred to PNC and there was no notice when the bank owned properties were going to be sold. I had a friend who is a real estate broker and he looked weekly to see if it was listed or not. Out of the blue he called me and said the property was for sale, it was a 10 day, closed bid auction, highest bidder wins. I won over the other 2 bidders, lol. Not a single person in the neighborhood even knew it was back on the market. That's when everything started going downhill. I had been mowing and keeping up the vacant lot even before I owned it. It wasn't long before I started getting letters from HOA management company and law firm. We got nasty letters, fines, and constant harassment weekly for 6 months and we paid all their BS fines. They fined us $1,300 for planting a 3' Avacado tree at the back of the lot, you couldn't even see it from the road. They filed a lawsuit against us and placed a lien on my property because I didn't have approval from "architectural review committee", they also said lot was unkept and unsightly but had no pictures to prove this. There were 4 other vacant lots that looked way worse than mine and I did have pictures to prove this and filed countersuit against HOA. The judge immediately threw their case out and dismissed the charges or claims against us but our countersuit remained, trying to get back the BS fines, fees, and nonsense attorney fees we had paid in past 18 months. The HOA had already spent close to $50k in attorneys fees and wanted to keep coming after us. I get along with everyone, I never try to pick a fight. But if you keep pushing, you will get one. I spent 6 months talking to neighbors and gathering information, learning as much as I could about the board members. It turned out, the president, treasurer and secretary had been on the board, uncontested, for the last 12 years! They had rewritten all the bylaws, given landscaping contracts to spouses and after looking through past 5 years of detailed financial reports, they are all corrupt and mismanaging our money. When I look at the dues "collected" vs what is on balance sheet, there is $25-30k unaccounted for in a single year. The HOA management company has an "office supply" company that charges us $900 for ink, $80 for delivering tissues, lol. It's crazy how people feel this is ok to do. My neighbor told me to go to our sheriffs department website and search our treasurers name, sonI did. Holy crap, his mug shot was the funniest looking photo ID ever seen, looked like they yanked him out of bed in the middle of the night. After he had thrown roofing nails in my driveway and given me an my wife 9 flat tires, I printed his mugshot and taped it to every mailbox, at the guardhouse and on the gates, I made sure everyone knew who was handling their money. He has taken over $70k just in past 3 years. I've had to hire 2 attorneys fighting the HOA's law firm and have spent close to $25k of my own money but have gotten the entire board removed, it took over a year to get them voted out but the neighborhood says the mugshot stunt is what got the current president to run and oust the previous one as well as the treasurer and 2 other board members just resigned. I didn't realize the treasurer was actually taking money then, that's is a recent finding but HOA management company is just as or more crooked than the old board members.
My point is, hang in there, stay the course. HOA's need good, honest people like yourself who are willing to take the thankless job, put in the time and effort to create a harmonious community and refer that past president's complaints to your HOA management company, I wouldn't even talk to him.
One of the main reasons for having an HOA management company is so that neighbors are not pitted against each other and put in situations that will create tension. I will never understand why a neighbor "wants" to create problems and fight with other neighbors, if they are that unhappy, they need to move out.
But since we have a completely different board now, new blood, they are creating social committees and trying to bring everyone together instead of driving around the island twice a day on a moped to document complaints on as many people as possible, the only winners before were the attorneys and crooked board members. I would suggest requesting a backup copy of your Quickbooks if you don't al have one and moving to a new management company and seek out new bids on contracts. You never know who's nephew or son in law is providing current services.
SeanM8 (Florida)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Another note, tell your HOA attorney about the constant harassment. He should be able to get him to stop, even if it takes legal steps. If the attorney sides with you, you could keep him, if he does nothing for you, then he may favor previous president and I'd get rid of him. Our HOA attorney gets an incredible amount of money from both HOA and residents, he has a long standing history and relationship with past president that we ousted that goes back more than a decade and there is no way we will keep him on long term. We are not a large community, we only have around 50 residents, so for the attorneys getting $25-30k year is absurd. The HOA management company immediatley sends complaints and collections to him, he has a list a week before they are even due, its a racket.
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
SeanM8, what a history. Do you think the 2.5 years of your life spent in conflict with these miserable incompetents and criminals, and the $25k or so you have spent, was worth it? Did you ever try to run for the board yourself? (I am not writing the latter to be snotty. More that, when push comes to shove, and the choice is between a couple years of conflict, $25k in legal expenses, and harassment by at least one criminal, I would prefer to get on the board, though only if I could be assured like-minded people were also on the board.)
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SeanM8 on 03/12/2017 9:37 AM
Another note, tell your HOA attorney about the constant harassment. He should be able to get him to stop, even if it takes legal steps. If the attorney sides with you, you could keep him, if he does nothing for you, then he may favor previous president and I'd get rid of him. Our HOA attorney gets an incredible amount of money from both HOA and residents, he has a long standing history and relationship with past president that we ousted that goes back more than a decade and there is no way we will keep him on long term. We are not a large community, we only have around 50 residents, so for the attorneys getting $25-30k year is absurd. The HOA management company immediatley sends complaints and collections to him, he has a list a week before they are even due, its a racket.

My HOA's former attorney was exactly like the corrupt one you describe. It is sickening for such attorneys to make HOA members' assessments a large part of the attorneys' bread and butter. My HOA also had a board turnover a couple months ago, in the latest annual election. Unfortunately the new HOA attorney that was hired (counter to my vote) promises to be as incompetent as the former HOA attorney. He's doing a long written opinion (read: billable hours) on common-element-tree-roots-consuming-sewer-pipes that should have been resolved in a phone call. It's been over three weeks, and several residents with claims against the HOA have been waiting over 1.5 years to get this resolved. (Update on another thread, dedicated to nuisance tree roots, coming soon.)
SeanM8 (Florida)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Trust me, both me and my wife thought about running last year but the mess it was in, it's going to take a lot of time for whoever gets elected. The new president is young, likeminded like the majority of young families, not a retired, bored old man from NY or trust fund baby from Chicago, lol. That's fairly specific. I have 22 employees and trying to run my own business, I just don't have the time, the attorneys working for me I have known for a long time and will take these guys to the cleaners, all I want is my money back, the rest will go back into the HOA reserves. It's crazy how both the previous board members, HOA management company and law firm has taken so much money from us, and some of it is criminal. I'm fairly sure the treasurer can't give himself no bid contracts for landscaping, mulch and tree trimming for an area less than 10,000 sq ft. To the tune of $25k yr when there are 2 other companies providing the same service as well. It's all a shell game, the way they move money around from account to account, classify them wrong and no one ever even looks at the detailed expenses. 3 yrs ago they spent $16k on holiday lighting between 2 different companies, I only have seen one company here the 5 yrs I've lived here. I am selling the vacant lot now and looking to buy some acreage outside of town to build on with no HOA. As much as I like the "safe" feeling I get here, it's not worth the constant headaches and harassment we've had and the amount of money we have had to spend to fight it. But I want to make sure the past board members that were writing themselves checks for $5-10k to be reimbursed for "lights" or pressure washing, trimming a tree, are never able to serve on a board again.
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
So, for all of you keeping up with this loooooooong thread that seems a never ended argument for why I'm going crazy. Our narrow minded ex president has continued his journey, and even after being served with a letter from our attorney, basically telling him what he can and cannot do as a homeowner, he has continued to post letters on homeowners doors, this time with a copy of the attorneys letter stating: "this is what you get for trying to communicate with the Board". To which, I roll my eyes in attempts to stay sane and know deep down that 99% of our residents know what kind of nut job he is and throw it in the garbage. It's been mentally exhausting to say the least. The constant barrage of emails, complaints, and don't get me going on the MULTIPLE assumptions that we, the Board, are not doing our job. We have been advised not to respond, unless it's an emergency, and to stay clear of him drawing us in, because ultimately he is a bully that feeds off the argument.
To our surprise, and I don't know why, he has now resorted to putting "violation" letters on residents doors, that HE feels are in violation of a community standard. Yes.. he did. One in particular notified the Board and we assured them that no violation was issued and they were within their right for the "violation" he was stating in his letter. We feel this has totally crossed the line. We understand that every homeowner has the right to report a violation, but to the board and we will handle it and investigate. Please let me know your thoughts. We have informed our attorney, yes. . .and he has a direction he would like to go, but the Board ultimately would love to get this guy shut up.
I hate to say that, because I am all for every resident having a voice, but when it is routinely undermining the Board's actions and decisions, there has to be a line. Right?
I feel that our Board has tried everything, from asking him to be a part of things..on a committee, to returning all his emails effeciently(at first), to treating him just like everyone else, fairly and respectfully. We have given him his fair shake. What to do now, where to go? Thanks everyone.
DouglasM6 (Arizona)
Posts: 724
Posted:
I would send out, put on every door, a letter explaining the process for filing a complaint. If you don't have a policy in place for this, write one and have the Board vote on it. You can include the policy in your letter to the residents as well, and ask that everyone please ignore any other documents. Important to send it to the problem resident as well.
ChristineD2 (Colorado)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Thank you, I love that approach!!
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChristineD2 on 08/03/2017 10:52 AM

To our surprise, and I don't know why, he has now resorted to putting "violation" letters on residents doors, that HE feels are in violation of a community standard. Yes.. he did. One in particular notified the Board and we assured them that no violation was issued and they were within their right for the "violation" he was stating in his letter. We feel this has totally crossed the line. We understand that every homeowner has the right to report a violation, but to the board and we will handle it and investigate. Please let me know your thoughts. We have informed our attorney, yes. . .and he has a direction he would like to go, but the Board ultimately would love to get this guy shut up.

This guy is acting "ultra vires," meaning he is speaking for the corporation when he has no legal authority to do so. Document as many as possible of these "violation notices" this guy has given to members. I would hope the attorney is planning a cease and desist letter in this vein immediately. Since the guy is also harassing residents, I think the board has a huge obligation to put a stop to it a.s.a.p.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here