💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

CatherineS3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 31
Posted:
Our CCR's do not address fines for violation of the covenants. The docs only state "(we) shall have the right to proceed at law or in equity to compel a compliance to the terms hereof or to prevent the violation or breach in any event." The NC Planned Community Act states one of the powers of owners' associations is "After notice and an opportunity to be heard, impose reasonable fines or suspend privileges or services provided by the association (except rights of access to lots) for reasonable periods for the violations of the declaration, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the association." Our question is: can we impose fines for violations based on what is written in the Act without having it written in our CCR's?
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
A good way to find out how communities within North Carolina handle fines is do a google search for homeowner associations in North Carolina. Make sure you pick the right type of HOA, condo or PUD. Then look for that associations rules and regulations.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
§ 47F-1-102. Applicability.
(a) This Chapter applies to all planned communities created within this State on or after January 1, 1999, except as otherwise provided in this section.
(b) This Chapter does not apply to a planned community created within this State on or after January 1, 1999:
(1) Which contains no more than 20 lots (including all lots which may be added or created by the exercise of development rights) unless the declaration provides or is amended to provide that this Chapter does apply to that planned community; ...
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, ... , G.S. 47F-3-107.1 (Procedures for fines and suspension of planned community privileges or services), ... apply to all planned communities created in this State before January 1, 1999, unless the articles of incorporation or the declaration expressly provides to the contrary ... .
(d) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and (c) of this section, any planned community created prior to January 1, 1999, may elect to make the provisions of this Chapter applicable to it by amending its declaration ... .

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CatherineS3 on 05/10/2016 7:13 AM

The NC Planned Community Act states one of the powers of owners' associations is "After notice and an opportunity to be heard, impose reasonable fines or suspend privileges or services provided by the association (except rights of access to lots) for reasonable periods for the violations of the declaration, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the association."

Actually, NC § 47F-3-102 specifies that "Unless the articles of incorporation or the declaration expressly provides to the contrary, the association may: (12) After notice and an opportunity to be heard, impose reasonable fines or suspend privileges or services provided by the association (except rights of access to lots) for reasonable periods for violations of the declaration, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the association;"

Lately, some courts are taking a stricter interpretation of the CC&Rs and applying standard contract law to that document. What this basically means is that if the document is silent on an issue (creating rules & regulations for example) then this shows intent not to grant such authority.

In Virginia, the cases that reference this interpretation actually not only dealt with rules and regulations but the authority to impose fines. These cases are:

Unit Owners Ass'n of Buildamerica v. Gillman
Fairfax County Redevelopment and Housing Authority v. Shadowood Condominium Association, et al.
I've attached the Samir R. Farran, et al. v. Olde Belhaven Towne Owners Association ruling (as my link doesn't appear to work anymore). I also had to split the ruling into two parts to meet the forums size limit (200K) for attachments

The key argument in all of those cases is that the Association exceeded it's authority (aka ultra vires)

Since Association authority actually comes from the CC&Rs and since neither the Articles of Incorporation nor the Bylaws may be in conflict with the CC&Rs, having the authority to create rules and regulations in those documents, may be interpreted by the courts as actually being in conflict. Due to this interpretation, and again referencing Virginia, many legislatures are adopting statutes that grant such authority to the Association (as the CC&Rs may not be in conflict with State statutes).

Also See:

Due Process Changes in Virginia

📎 Attachments (2):

⏸ Downloads temporarily unavailable

📄1510402720971.pdf(147 KB)
📄1510402841254.pdf(161 KB)
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
My impression is that the VA statute does not allow fines unless fines are authorized in the CC&Rs ...
But the SC statute does allow fines unless fines are prohibited in the CC&Rs.

Couldn't find wording in VA statute similar to 47F-3-102. Maybe I missed it.

So I think that to answer the OP's question, 47F-1-102 defines applicability where CC&Rs are silent on fines.


Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
CatherineS3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 31
Posted:
Thank you for so much research and information. Since our CCR's "do not expressly provide to the contrary" because they are "silent" on the issue of fines it appears that we cannot impose fines based on this paragraph in the NC Planned Community Act. Assuming the Act's provision is not applicable to us, and our covenants are silent on the issue of fines, will this restrict our Architectural Review Committee's ability to impose fines for violations of those guidelines as well?
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CatherineS3 on 05/10/2016 10:47 AM
Thank you for so much research and information. Since our CCR's "do not expressly provide to the contrary" because they are "silent" on the issue of fines it appears that we cannot impose fines based on this paragraph in the NC Planned Community Act. Assuming the Act's provision is not applicable to us, and our covenants are silent on the issue of fines, will this restrict our Architectural Review Committee's ability to impose fines for violations of those guidelines as well?


I'm saying the opposite. As I read the statute - Because your CC&Rs "do not expressly provide to the contrary", you CAN impose the fines.

It would be different if you were in Virginia.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
CatherineS3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 31
Posted:
We just found a NC Supreme Court ruling on this very subject http://www.ccfj.net/courtdecNCnofines.html and unfortunately it is not the outcome we were hoping for.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CatherineS3 on 05/10/2016 1:04 PM
We just found a NC Supreme Court ruling on this very subject http://www.ccfj.net/courtdecNCnofines.html and unfortunately it is not the outcome we were hoping for.

Depends when your HOA was formed.

The NC Supreme Court ruling was specifically about an HOA that was formed prior to Jan 1, 1999.

If your HOA was formed after that date, you have the opposite outcome.

See my original post which includes the part of the statute that describes the difference between pre-1999 and post-1999 HOAs.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
NP,

the argument, as I pointed out, is does the document being silent intend to prohibit (as the court said prior to VA enacting their law).
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
I see that the NC case ruling is similar to the VA case ruling.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Yes, but that's only because the HOA was formed before the Act became law in 1999. And that's the situation in the NC court case.

What we don't know is whether the OP's HOA was formed before or after 1.1.99 - which is the dividing line on what version of the law applies.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
CatherineS3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 31
Posted:
Our HOA was formed before 1999.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CatherineS3 on 05/11/2016 5:23 AM
Our HOA was formed before 1999.

Then unfortunately you can't collect fines if you didn't change your docs.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Catherine

NP brings up an interesting point. That is if your docs are changed then maybe fining would be allowed. I believe most HOA's would be willing to change their docs to "punish offenders". Few are against punishing the bad guys.

Might be worth exploring.
CatherineS3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 31
Posted:
I agree. And thank you to all for sharing your opinions, knowledge, and time.
JM16 (North Carolina)
Posts: 24
Posted:
If I may, and my apologies for posting to a 2+ month old thread, but the entire discussion is very relevant as this is also in NC.

In our current docs (formed before 1999), we have a semi-standard section that states:

In the event of a violation {other than the nonpayment of an assessment) by a Lot owner of any of the provisions of the Covenants, these By-Laws or any other rules of the Association, the Association, by direction of its Board of Directors, may notify the Lot owner of such by written notice, sent registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, and if such violation shall continue for a period of ten (10) days from the date of such notice, the Association, through its Board of Directors, shall have the right to treat such violation as an intentional and inexcusable and material breach of the Covenants, the By-Laws, or the rules of the Association, as the case may be, and the Association may then, at its option, have the following elections:

i) an action at law to recover for damages on behalf of the Association or on behalf of an owner.
ii) an action in equity to enforce performance on the part of the Lot owner (s)
(iii) an action in equity for such equitable relief as may be necessary under the circumstances, including injunctive relief.

Reading the other posts, because NC Planned Community Act - 47F doesnt apply fully to HOA's formed prior to 1999, does the association still have the right to fine up to $100 for the violation after the qualifying measures are taken (formal notification x2, hearing etc etc).

The CCR's do not specifically spell out the fine, but it also implies that an action in equity to enforce performance may be taken.

NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Equity involves a NON-financial remedy. Fines are financial remedies.

Can't speak to specifics of NC law, but wouldn't rely on equity to resolve any question about fines.

Hope that helps.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
JM16 (North Carolina)
Posts: 24
Posted:
Appreciate the quick response and clarification!

Came across this from 2014 after the NC Legislature clarified some things in 47F. The previously quoted court ruling was in 2003. This seems to imply that the applicable section of 47F is retroactive to communities formed before 1999 now.

32. Does the Association have the authority to assess charges or fines for
violations by Members? Does the Association have the right to suspend the
right of use of the common elements or common areas in the event of a
violation?

To suspend the right of a Member to vote or otherwise participate in
the Association in the event of a violation?
Both the NC Planned Community Act (NCGS § 47F-3-102(12)) and the NC
Condominium Act (NCGS § 47C-3-102(12)) provide that the association, after
notice and opportunity to be heard, may impose reasonable fines or suspend
privileges or services provided by the association (except rights of access) for
reasonable periods for violations of the declaration, bylaws, and rules and
regulations of the association. The procedures for fines and suspension of
services is further defined in NCGS § 47F-3-107.1 for planned communities and
NCGS § 47C-3-107.1 for condominiums. These two statutes apply retroactively to
older associations.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JM16 on 07/22/2016 12:10 PM
the Association may then, at its option, have the following elections:

i) an action at law to recover for damages on behalf of the Association or on behalf of an owner.
ii) an action in equity to enforce performance on the part of the Lot owner (s)
(iii) an action in equity for such equitable relief as may be necessary under the circumstances, including injunctive relief.

Action at Law:

a judicial proceeding brought by one party against another; one party prosecutes another for a wrong done or for protection of a right or for prevention of a wrong

Action in Equity:

Action in Equity is a proceeding in court of equity that seeks equitable relief, such as an injunction or specific performance, as opposed to damages. Action in equity is also called, ‘action at equity’

Axtion at law or in equity:

An action at law is an action typically for money damages such as a tort (personal injury or medical malpractice action) or breach of contract action. An action in equity seeks a remedy when there is no available remedy at law. For instance, if money damages will not suffice. An example of an equitable action is specific performance in a sale of property or a house. In this action, the plaintiff will ask the court to make the owner go through with the purchase because houses or property are unique.
JM16 (North Carolina)
Posts: 24
Posted:
Thanks again for the definitions!

Did some more reading, specifically on the 2003 ruling of Wise vs Harrington Grove where the NC SC ruled that if the Articles, CCRs, or bylaws did not expressively permit it, it was not implied. It appears that in 2005, the NC Legislature passed 47F-3-102(a) that clarified and expanded the association powers UNLESS expressively denied. This was further clarified in 2009.

From everything I'm reading for communities established after 1/1/1999 items 1-6 and 11-17 are permitted unless the HOA governing documents specifically deny it. Of those:

#12 - After notice and an opportunity to be heard, impose reasonable fines or
suspend privileges or services provided by the association (except rights of
access to lots) for reasonable periods for violations of the declaration,
bylaws, and rules and regulations of the association;

http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/html/AR/CourtAppeals/16_August_2011/10-1159-1.pdf
http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/BySection/Chapter_47F/GS_47F-3-102.pdf
JM16 (North Carolina)
Posts: 24
Posted:
Last update.

We received confirmation from our legal council that despite no mention of fines in our CCRs, the fact that it does not expressively disallow it, combined with the recent additions (2004, 2005, and 2011) modifications to NC 47F Sec 103-2 means that we can fine in accordance to our specified notification AND the NC Planned community acts rules when it comes to enforcement.

Appreciate the conversation and information here!

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Every State is different.
Every County is different.

The exclusion of the allowing or disallowing leaves the issue open to interpretation. Until said interpretations are brought before the courts for a ruling, then the Board is free to use the interpretation they desire.
JoyceR2 (Virginia)
Posts: 156
Posted:
VA allows it. $10.00 daily not to exceed $900.00 for the violations after notice, hearing etc.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JoyceR2 on 08/05/2016 9:39 PM
VA allows it. $10.00 daily not to exceed $900.00 for the violations after notice, hearing etc.

And only if the correct governing document specifies monetary penalties (The CC&Rs for covenant violations and, perhaps, rules/regs for violation of common area use rules). In Fairfax County, the court has only been looking in the CC&Rs for both. In other counties, the courts have ruled differently.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here