Quote:
Posted By CatherineS3 on 05/10/2016 7:13 AM
The NC Planned Community Act states one of the powers of owners' associations is "After notice and an opportunity to be heard, impose reasonable fines or suspend privileges or services provided by the association (except rights of access to lots) for reasonable periods for the violations of the declaration, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the association."
Actually, NC § 47F-3-102 specifies that "Unless the articles of incorporation or the declaration expressly provides to the contrary, the association may: (12) After notice and an opportunity to be heard, impose reasonable fines or suspend privileges or services provided by the association (except rights of access to lots) for reasonable periods for violations of the declaration, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the association;"
Lately, some courts are taking a stricter interpretation of the CC&Rs and applying standard contract law to that document. What this basically means is that if the document is silent on an issue (creating rules & regulations for example) then this shows intent not to grant such authority.
In Virginia, the cases that reference this interpretation actually not only dealt with rules and regulations but the authority to impose fines. These cases are:
Unit Owners Ass'n of Buildamerica v. Gillman Fairfax County Redevelopment and Housing Authority v. Shadowood Condominium Association, et al. I've attached the Samir R. Farran, et al. v. Olde Belhaven Towne Owners Association ruling (as my link doesn't appear to work anymore). I also had to split the ruling into two parts to meet the forums size limit (200K) for attachments
The key argument in all of those cases is that the Association exceeded it's authority (aka
ultra vires)
Since Association authority actually comes from the CC&Rs and since neither the Articles of Incorporation nor the Bylaws may be in conflict with the CC&Rs, having the authority to create rules and regulations in those documents, may be interpreted by the courts as actually being in conflict. Due to this interpretation, and again referencing Virginia, many legislatures are adopting statutes that grant such authority to the Association (as the CC&Rs may not be in conflict with State statutes).
Also See:
Due Process Changes in Virginia