Discrimination based on property visibility?

Recent solar panel guidelines were communicated to homeowners. I agree that most people wouldn't want solar panels on the front roof of a home in the subdivision. However if the homeowners lot is in such a setting that the front, rear and side can be viewed from a street, isn't this discriminatory?

There are a number of homes that this would apply to. I would guess out of 135, probably 20 would be restricted based on these guidelines.

Any thoughts on if this is allowable?

Specific language provided here: "Solar panels may only be installed on the back roof of the applicant’s home and thus no ground-mounted solar energy systems will be permitted. Solar panels may not be visible from the front of the home or elsewhere from a common street (“common street” in this context does not include the rear alleyways)."

The guidelines were created in March 2016, prior to March, solar panels were not allowed. This would be post-purchase 'new' information.

Nope, just feeling slighted that the opportunity seems to not be available to me and others in similar situation. We had one homeowner push for the change. While the board was initially against the change, after seeking input from the homeowners it was decided to accommodate and provide guidelines for all.

Now "all" appears to be "some".

I am curious about your use of the term "guidelines." Who imposes these guidelines and under what authority?

Normally an association or its board of directors has no authority to unilaterally impose property restrictions. Court rulings have almost universally held that unambiguous restrictions must be stated in the recorded CC&R's otherwise the owner has free use of his property.

I am curious as to who or what prohibited solar panels prior to March, 2016, and why they are now allowed but subject to guidelines?