Quote:
Posted By JackieW3 on 04/05/2016 4:25 PM
Below is the policy.
a) Animals shall not be kept in any Unit or any part of the Building in which the Unit is a part, nor on any patios or balconies or upon any Common Elements or other part of the Condominium, EXCEPT that dogs (other than Pit Bulls and Rottweilers) and cats and other common domesticated household pets not to exceed two (2) in number, may be kept by Unit Owners within each Unit Owner's respective Unit, but shall not be maintained for breeding purposes.
JackieW Fla :
1 Respectfully, what you describe as a "policy' actually does read like some form of formal governance document eg from a Declaration, By-law or (house) Rule. Not from a mere best practice policy.
2- Respectfully, its best construction seems to be that whether there are one, ten or a thousand owners on title, no more than 2 dogs ( except pits & Rotts )total may be harboured within a unit.
Yes it doesn't say that only such exception is reserved for whichever portion of multiple ownership is in "residency" nor whether "residency' is attempted defined within the source document whatever it is.
Attempting instead to directly link whichever dog(s) to an occupant owner sounds "reasonable" in case it becomes necessary to commence some form of legal claim or removal process. Otherwise every NON-dog owning multiple owner would get dragged along for the liability ride, but service to merely one may constitute service to the whole bunch.
3- What happens incidentally if management actions a provision rightfully to submit proof of licensing, up to date vaccinations, kennel club registrations etc ? Would each dog have to be cited multiple ownership on each such document ? Gets complex . . .