💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
We have a mentally challenged married couple renting a unit from the man's father. Our documents state that owners/residents are not to cause extra expense for the Association or other owners. Our documents also state we are to be frees of excessive noise. That is not the exact wording but it is the meaning. I have heard from the people who live close to this couple that they holler at each other in the night.

This couple is filthy and I don't mean their unit is cluttered, I mean filthy. She has left many presents of urine and some of bowel movement that needed to be cleaned. The last straw for me was when there was bowel movement in one of the dryers after they washed.

Her father-in-law has arranged for her to be on the PACE program which is a program to help people live in their own home. But this has not prevented her from leaving messes all over.

We are planning on charging the owner (the man's father) for some of the most recent cleaning we will be charged for. Our cleaning crew has not been charging every time they cleaned as they use our machine and supplies.

The owner told me that his son and his son's wife were able to alone without help. Which he had to know was not true. I should have had him sign something, but in my wildest dreams, I never imagined anyone could be so filthy. Sometimes the extremely offensive odor from their unit permeates to the hall.

The sooner I can get them out of here the happier I will be.

The lease agreement does have the three clauses in it that we require. one of the clauses states that if the tenants break the rules, they have broken the lease.

I have asked people who complain about this couple to either leave a message on my phone which will go to e-mail which I can save or to write a note and give to me so that I can scan and save the complaint.
But some people want me to do something about it but will not help me document.

Has anyone here had a problem like this? We have some people whose units are extremely cluttered but at least they keep the mess in their unit(s).
AllisonD (Florida)
Posts: 449
Posted:
Bonnie, you have written about this couple before. They clearly are not able to live independently. The Pace program is not working or not working well enough at this point. This is a health hazard that you now know about and are obligated to keep your residents save from this hazard. This is a sticky situation however, because they have a disability and if it was me, I would call the association attorney and get them out. They need to be in an assisted living facility. Their father is taking the easy way out. He should sell the apartment and use the money for their care. YOU are not responsible for their care.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Bonnie,

Although you are probably right about how the excrement got into the dryer, you have no proof. I'm sorry, but without proof there is little the Association can do.

As Allison has pointed out, this isn't the first posting you have made about this couple.

It's clear, and has now been stated, that you want them out.
If you want them out that badly, start contacting the appropriate authorities and build a case for it.

BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AllisonD on 04/04/2016 3:04 PM
Bonnie, you have written about this couple before. They clearly are not able to live independently. The Pace program is not working or not working well enough at this point. This is a health hazard that you now know about and are obligated to keep your residents save from this hazard. This is a sticky situation however, because they have a disability and if it was me, I would call the association attorney and get them out. They need to be in an assisted living facility. Their father is taking the easy way out. He should sell the apartment and use the money for their care. YOU are not responsible for their care.

There is a lawyer who is working on this. I agree they need to be in an assisted living facility and the father is taking the easy way out. Yes I agree we are not responsible for their care. When they moved in the father told me he wanted them to be closer to him so that he could keep an eye on them. At that time I did not know where they were living before they came here. I later found that they were living in a high rise not far from here and suspected that they were asked to leave the high rise. Which according to their neighbor who knows someone living in the high rise is exactly what happened. They were asked to leave.

As for the dryer, they had left their clothes in the dryer so no one had used the dryer after they used it. And since she had left bowel movement presents before it stands to reason the bowel movement was from their clothes.

I don't know why bowel movement was not found in a washing machine.

I have seen her many many times with wet slacks. Maybe I should ask if I could take a picture. I just thought of that and don't know if it is a good idea or not. Probably not.
BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 04/04/2016 3:24 PM
Bonnie,

Although you are probably right about how the excrement got into the dryer, you have no proof. I'm sorry, but without proof there is little the Association can do.

As Allison has pointed out, this isn't the first posting you have made about this couple.

It's clear, and has now been stated, that you want them out.
If you want them out that badly, start contacting the appropriate authorities and build a case for it.


I have started to build a case for getting them out. My main problem now is that people verbally complain to me when there is a problem but will not either leave a message on my home phone which will got to my email which I can save or write a signed not that I can scan and save.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Contact the association attorney and start the eviction machine.

Make a note of everyone who has ever told you anything about this couple. They can be subpoenaed and deposed whether they wish to be witnesses or not. Make notes of what you have seen personally. Gather up all the invoices for cleaning up after them. Eviction is a civil matter and the standard of proof will be preponderance of evidence, not evidence of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Does anyone really think Dad is going to spend thousands to hire an attorney so he can keep his demented children pooping in the dryer? The couple you describe belong in an assisted living facility, which your condo complex is not. This couple is a walking health hazard and I cannot imagine a judge ruling that they have some sort of right to subject the other residents to their droppings.

AllisonD (Florida)
Posts: 449
Posted:
The Department of Children and Families or whatever the agency is called in your state that handles child abuse cases probably handles these kinds of cases as well. These folks should not be left on their own. They are being neglected by the father, because although he claims he wants to be nearby, he does not want them living with him, which is where they should be. So absent a father who is willing to take responsibility for his child, a state agency should be called to step in and put them in a home that will meet their needs. Send out an email blast or knock on doors and let your residents know you are working on resolving this situation. The proof you are looking for will be provided by the agency that responds to your hotline call. You will provide them plenty of information that will help them make their decision.
BanksS
Posts: 403
Posted:
is it the HOA lawyer working on this? If it.is, I would give he or she a call and express the urgency of the situation. See what the lawyer recommends first. Let the lawyer handle it but certainly provide information to the lawyer.

I sympathize with you, your neighbors and these folks, but your condos are not the place for this couple. I would refrain from taking a picture. If it comes down to it, you may want to call family services as was suggested but go with the lawyer,s recommendation first.
GeorgeR8 (Arizona)
Posts: 182
Posted:
We had a similar situation with 2 old people who could no longer live alone. I called adult protective services. They started getting changes made. The people are still there but they now have 2 of their children stopping every day. A health aide comes daily. A visiting nurse and physical therapist each come twice a week.

I realize that you need them out, that paid help isn't going to do much for you. I would start with adult protective services. If they make loud noise I would call the police. I would bill the father for whatever expense you incurred.
MarkM31 (Washington)
Posts: 351
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BonnieG1 on 04/04/2016 2:47 PM

The lease agreement does have the three clauses in it that we require. one of the clauses states that if the tenants break the rules, they have broken the lease.
.

How does this affect you? The lease contract is between the renters and the landlord, so you and the HOA have no enforcemnt power over a contract you are not party to.

MarkM31 (Washington)
Posts: 351
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 04/04/2016 3:49 PM
Contact the association attorney and start the eviction machine.


How can the HOA evict anybody?
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkM31 on 04/04/2016 8:04 PM
Posted By LarryB13 on 04/04/2016 3:49 PM
Contact the association attorney and start the eviction machine.

How can the HOA evict anybody?


Technically, it would not be an eviction, per se. It would be a temporary restraining order with the subsequent preliminary and permanent injunctions requiring the tenants to vacate the premises immediately due to the threat of irreparable harm caused by random deposits of human poop and pee in both public and private portions of the complex.

The courts have held that a condo association has the same duties regarding safety of the occupants as does a traditional landlord. See
Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Ass'n., (1986) 42 Cal.3d 490, which cited these cases:
Kwaitkowski v. Superior Trading Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 324, 328 [176 Cal.Rptr. 494];
O'Hara v. Western Seven Trees Corp., supra, 75 Cal.App.3d 798, 802-803;
Kline v. 1500 Massachusetts Avenue Apartment Corp. (1970) 141 App.D.C. 370 [439 F.2d 477, 480-481, 43 A.L.R.3d 311];
Scott v. Watson (1976) 278 Md. 160 [359 A.2d 548, 552].

In Frances T., the court found that the association has a duty to protect it's residents from known threats. "[S]ince only the landlord is in the position to secure common areas, he has a duty to protect against types of crimes of which he has notice and which are likely to recur if the common areas are not secure. ..."

In this present Case of the Serial Poopers, the "crimes" are acts against public health, welfare, and safety. (God, I hope you do not wish to argue that they have some sort of right to crap wherever they wish.) The association has the duty to terminate the problem and the most reasonable means to do that would be to remove the offending tenants from the premises.

PitA
Posts: 1,416
Posted:
There is a lawyer who is working on this.


? Then why do you think we can help ?

! We are not there in person to hold your hand !

My only suggestion would be to install cameras in the laundry area to document their 'movements'.



pun intended
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 04/04/2016 9:17 PM
In Frances T., the court found that the association has a duty to protect it's residents from known threats. "[S]ince only the landlord is in the position to secure common areas, he has a duty to protect against types of crimes of which he has notice and which are likely to recur if the common areas are not secure. ..."

In this present Case of the Serial Poopers, the "crimes" are acts against public health, welfare, and safety. (God, I hope you do not wish to argue that they have some sort of right to crap wherever they wish.) The association has the duty to terminate the problem and the most reasonable means to do that would be to remove the offending tenants from the premises.

The nature of the "crimes" in the cases you cited were arson, battery, rape, etc. where there was a history of criminal behavior in the community.

Show me the statute that says pooping in dryers constitutes such a crime.

Clearly the behavior is offensive. But is it a crime that police will arrest someone for?


Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
MichelleK5 (New York)
Posts: 161
Posted:
I think contacting Adult Protective Services, or the Department of Health (whichever agency handles this) is the best way to go.
This couple needs help first and foremost.

Have you spoken with the father about this incident?
MichelleK5 (New York)
Posts: 161
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PitA on 04/05/2016 4:52 AM
There is a lawyer who is working on this.


? Then why do you think we can help ?

! We are not there in person to hold your hand !

My only suggestion would be to install cameras in the laundry area to document their 'movements'.



pun intended

I lol'd
PitA
Posts: 1,416
Posted:
Bonnie is ALWAYS humorous
BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MichelleK5 on 04/05/2016 6:35 AM
I think contacting Adult Protective Services, or the Department of Health (whichever agency handles this) is the best way to go.
This couple needs help first and foremost.

Have you spoken with the father about this incident?

I have not spoken to the father about this specific incident. I am waiting on the new lease agreement he said he was going to give us after going to court to get permission to raise the rent. He his son's guardian and conservator. His son's wife is currently her own person. The man's father would have had to sign to allow his son to marry this woman.

The board has sent him a couple of letters informing him of problems prior to this. We did tell him in one of the letters that he would be charged for any extra expense to the Association caused by his daughter-in-law's lack of bladder and/or bowel control. Since our cleaning crew has been cleaning the messes without charging us until recently we did not have a bill to give the father. We will bill him for some recent clean up caused by his tenants.

At an closed meeting with the father, we were told according to someone the father talked to the wife is allowed to live in as much of a mess as she wants to live it. Upon hearing this almost everyone at the meeting gasped. The rest of us don't want to live around her messes.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 04/05/2016 5:14 AM
Show me the statute that says pooping in dryers constitutes such a crime.

Clearly the behavior is offensive. But is it a crime that police will arrest someone for?


Go poop on the sidewalk in front of your local police station and see what happens.

In my state, pooping in the dryers would fall under the umbrella of ARS
13-2908. Criminal nuisance; classification
A. A person commits criminal nuisance:
1. If, by conduct either unlawful in itself or unreasonable under the circumstances, such person recklessly creates or maintains a condition which endangers the safety or health of others.
2. By knowingly conducting or maintaining any premises, place or resort where persons gather for purposes of engaging in unlawful conduct.
B. Criminal nuisance is a class 3 misdemeanor.

Having spent a bit of time in recent years in Pennsylvania, I suspect that there is no corresponding statute there. I always watched where I stepped in Philadelphia.

It might also be covered by ARS
13-2917. Public nuisance; abatement; classification
A. It is a public nuisance, and is no less a nuisance because the extent of the annoyance or damage inflicted is unequal, for anything:
1. To be injurious to health, indecent, offensive to the senses or an obstruction to the free use of property that interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property by an entire community or neighborhood or by a considerable number of persons.
. . .
D. Any person who knowingly maintains or commits a public nuisance or who knowingly fails or refuses to perform any legal duty relating to the removal of a public nuisance is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BonnieG1 on 04/05/2016 1:17 PM

[The owner of the unit is] his son's guardian and conservator. His son's wife is currently her own person. The man's father would have had to sign to allow his son to marry this woman.

At an closed meeting with the father, we were told according to someone the father talked to the wife is allowed to live in as much of a mess as she wants to live it. Upon hearing this almost everyone at the meeting gasped. The rest of us don't want to live around her messes.


If the father is the court-appointed guardian for his mentally disabled son, the father might be in breach of his fiduciary duties to the court by allowing his son to live in a state of filth. Nothing will happen until someone makes the court aware of the problem.

NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 04/05/2016 2:01 PM
Having spent a bit of time in recent years in Pennsylvania, I suspect that there is no corresponding statute there. I always watched where I stepped in Philadelphia.

If you've only been here once or twice, not a problem. But watch out for that turd time.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
The good answers & advice here have been provided previously to Bonnie on the same issue: filth in the common areas. Or, noxious odors coming from the unit. So I won't bother repeating my previous replies.

In this batch, I like Larry's the best.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LarryB13 on 04/05/2016 2:01 PM
Go poop on the sidewalk in front of your local police station and see what happens.

I agree that if the HOA put the poopy drier on the sidewalk in front of the police station, they might be arrested. But that's not even close to the situation here.

This is a situation that could involve a department of mental health and/or a department of health and human services - Both would probably advocate on behalf of the tenants. It's very possible that the HOA would be ineffective even if they tried to take action.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BonnieG1 on 04/04/2016 2:47 PM
We have a mentally challenged married couple renting a unit from the man's father. . . . But some people want me to do something about it but will not help me document. . . . Has anyone here had a problem like this? We have some people whose units are extremely cluttered but at least they keep the mess in their unit(s).

Bonnie G1 Nebraska :

1- Respectfully I think you haven't said what your attorney has told your Board to do nor what evidences to collect / demands to make of the owner etc . . .

If the owner/decision makers for the pair decide to dig their feet in, you will need to listen extra patiently to that attorney's advice. Inadvertently letting a buildup of pressure directly onto the occupants, may not be a good idea.

Try checking out Nebraska's Fair Housing Act http://www.neoc.ne.gov/HousingLawText.html.

Section 20-302 provides that state policy targets discrimination "in the enjoyment of housing". Section 20-319 roughly defines & illegalizes discrimination on the basis of handicap in housing services or facilities.

It defines discrimination to include :" (b) A refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services when such accommodations may be necessary to afford the handicapped person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling" ( In my own jurisdiction this has been expressed to tolerate degrees of rule-breaking to the point of undue hardship ). Hygienic risks & materially disruptive noises might exceed the limit of undue hardship.

2 - If what you cite as clutter ( within some units ) is actually hoarding, respectfully you should consider the fire safety aspects/ press for inspection & remedial orders by fire authorities. Unfortunately that sometimes "rebounds".
BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BobD4 on 04/05/2016 7:23 PM
Posted By BonnieG1 on 04/04/2016 2:47 PM
We have a mentally challenged married couple renting a unit from the man's father. . . . But some people want me to do something about it but will not help me document. . . . Has anyone here had a problem like this? We have some people whose units are extremely cluttered but at least they keep the mess in their unit(s).


Bonnie G1 Nebraska :

1- Respectfully I think you haven't said what your attorney has told your Board to do nor what evidences to collect / demands to make of the owner etc . . .

If the owner/decision makers for the pair decide to dig their feet in, you will need to listen extra patiently to that attorney's advice. Inadvertently letting a buildup of pressure directly onto the occupants, may not be a good idea.

Try checking out Nebraska's Fair Housing Act http://www.neoc.ne.gov/HousingLawText.html.

Section 20-302 provides that state policy targets discrimination "in the enjoyment of housing". Section 20-319 roughly defines & illegalizes discrimination on the basis of handicap in housing services or facilities.

It defines discrimination to include :" (b) A refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services when such accommodations may be necessary to afford the handicapped person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling" ( In my own jurisdiction this has been expressed to tolerate degrees of rule-breaking to the point of undue hardship ). Hygienic risks & materially disruptive noises might exceed the limit of undue hardship.

2 - If what you cite as clutter ( within some units ) is actually hoarding, respectfully you should consider the fire safety aspects/ press for inspection & remedial orders by fire authorities. Unfortunately that sometimes "rebounds".

Thank you, This is the best advise yet I have had. This is the reason I post on this site. I will certainly check the resources you have mentioned.
The lawyer is studying our documents and I will give the lawyer the new lease agreement as soon as we get it. I am assuming the lawyer is also reviewing the Fair Housing Act.

Some people have mentioned to me we should not let mentally handicapped people move in to the building. I did tell them we can not discriminate due to disability. One owner made the statement we are discriminating against the other owners by allowing them to stay here.

I also mention a lady who is mentally handicapped who has lived here for years and does not give us any problem.
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
Bonnie G1 (Neb)
1 - You're quite welcome.

2 - Finding the US Fair Housing Act should not be too tough.

One interesting resource I noticed was a 2005 study "Discrimination against persons with Disabilities : Testing guidance for practitioners US Dept Housing & Urban Development"
http://communityassociations.net/discrimination-persons-disabilities-fha-report-guidelines/

I am unsure if this analysis is applied to condos & HOA communities ( Its counterpart is applied to such in my jurisdiction ). Hopefully others will clarify here.

From the 2005 :

"2.6 Reasonable Accommodation
Both the Fair Housing Act and Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act require a
housing provider to make reasonable accommodation to enable a person with a disability to use and enjoy housing. . . . Under the Act, reasonable accommodation must be made to rules, policies, practices, or services, when needed for an individual to fully utilize the housing"

3 The Nebraska Fair Housing Act contains a BIG zinger lacking in my jurisdiction's Rights Tribunal adjudications & maybe many others:

"Nebraska Section 20-341. Attorney's fees and costs; when allowed. " . . .the hearing officer or the court, as the case may be, may allow the prevailing party, other than the state, reasonable attorney's fees and costs. The state shall be liable for such fees and costs to the same extent as private person."

not in my jurisdcition
BanksS
Posts: 403
Posted:
Sounds like this couple would benefit from a group home for mentally challenged adults. I worked in one briefly and these folks have all kinds of support for their challenges. I worked the evening shift and fixed their supper, did laundry, gave out Meds, helped with bathing. You know everyday tasks of living. It was a large home with about 6 residents both males and females. Some of them even had day jobs. But there were many community resources for them. Their health issues were closely monitored as well.

You could check through your local public health department if there are such group homes in your community. Or put it on the father and have him investigate this option.
BanksS
Posts: 403
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BanksS on 04/06/2016 6:49 PM
Sounds like this couple would benefit from a group home for mentally challenged adults. I worked in one briefly and these folks have all kinds of support for their challenges. I worked the evening shift and fixed their supper, did laundry, gave out Meds, helped with bathing. You know everyday tasks of living. It was a large home with about 6 residents both males and females. Some of them even had day jobs. But there were many community resources for them. Their health issues were closely monitored as well.

You could check through your local public health department if there are such group homes in your community. Or put it on the father and have him investigate this option.

Shame on me for my very poor choice of words when I said males and females like they were some subhuman species. I should have said men and women.

My point is many communities have support for these situations. One just has to begin by contacting some agencies which I'm not putting that responsibility on Bonnie but the father of the man in the couple. Perhaps Bonnie's role would be to suggest it.
RobertC14 (Colorado)
Posts: 78
Posted:
look into Easter Seals supportive housing, they generally run half way houses or as you and other have stated full blown assisted living facility. one of the things i would be doing (if it hasn't been mentioned already) is putting up security camera's in the common area's to gather evidence that it is in fact them causing the damage. i don't know what your layout is like but that is certainly an option.

RobertC14

Booger 2016

"I'm not a democrat or a republican, I'm a common sense Progressive"

Classic Hits 1630 AM 88.7 FM
http://www.facebook.com/classichits1630am

http://classichits1630am.wix.com/index
RobertC14 (Colorado)
Posts: 78
Posted:
also a call to adult protective services might get some action on this as well.

RobertC14

Booger 2016

"I'm not a democrat or a republican, I'm a common sense Progressive"

Classic Hits 1630 AM 88.7 FM
http://www.facebook.com/classichits1630am

http://classichits1630am.wix.com/index
PitA
Posts: 1,416
Posted:
There is NO, repeat NO, anti-discrimination legislation permitting public defecation.

Nor defecation in a common clothes dryer.

SHHEEEEEESH
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
Personally I have usually found it sorta tight fit to use a clothes dryer as a toilet.

For those with challenges facing an angry condo board, one respectfully has to remember that the FACTUALS may be decided NOT by commenters here, but by one or more Rights adjudicators.

The adjudicator(s) may have 'bees in bonnet' about 'constructive' or maybe 'side-effect' discrimination caused or contributed by applying rules to those able to bring their disabiilty /whatever into a legislated category entitled to "accommodation to the point of undue hardship" or howsoever phrased jurisdiction by jurisdiction.

And Nebraska it turns out apparently may award legal costs to do just that. . .

And so "Hocus Pocus !"

An adjudicator with minimal legal training or a degree in sociology or a legal background only in family law, decides that the poop could have been planted by conspirators.

"Who knows how many used the dryer before the accused pair ? Maybe its toxic hate, like the board President who dared to shriek about waterproof diapers in the pool ?"

Or the co-op here recently hit for $30 K in awards payable to the target of hate postings held under-responded. Guess at least $100 K in co-op defence costs.

Should be interesting how BonnieG's group's lawyer handles this . .
PitA
Posts: 1,416
Posted:
The ONLY solution would be:

Security cameras to track movements.

Or 24/7 guards.

Or, to heck with the HOA and its' busy-body wanna be god managers / directors.

? Is there a police report ?

? Were there witnesses ?

? Do other persons have access to dryer ?

? Any teen-agers or other punks ever around ?

? Have any actual reports to proper authorities been made ?
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
BonnieG1 Neb : and such proof could lead to one more question for BonnieG1's group's lawyer :

"Does Nebraska law empower a judicial order - granted to a HOA/condo corporation - to expel a unit occupant from occupancy ?" ( not an ownership stripping order; not a landlord's eviction process )

Awaiting implementation ( in my jurisdiction's condo law changes ) is an occupancy-stripping power to become available to a judge where a condo corporation can persuade of serious health or safety dangers justifying such occupancy-stripping order against a unit occupant.

It is not an ownership stripping order. ( Think about the property & civil rights issues of being able to own but stripped of occupancy rights ).

This judicial power is described within an Oppression Remedy section. It is subordinated to a landlord-sought eviction process under conventional tenancy law here. It is silent as to constructive discrimination Rights issues & duty to exempt to the point of undue hardship. There will eventually be huge opportunity for lawyers to profit (from fighting some applications) over property & civil rights.

Perhaps such an occupancy-stripping power is already within the Nebraska judicial tool box or is on the way . . .

MichelleK5 (New York)
Posts: 161
Posted:
When you say defecating, do you mean they're throwing clothes with poop into the dryer, or is she somehow using the dryer as a toilet?

Was talking with my husband about this over the weekend, and we were both confused.
PitA
Posts: 1,416
Posted:
....however, the bowels only move when the dryer is actually rotating....

THEN, and ONLY then, do they become movement
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
. . . some will go to any lengths to get their poop washed & dried. Do they iron it too ?

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here