💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

FredN (California)
Posts: 87
Posted:
Who here does which one first?

Does everyone have open meetings before ex ses meetings or ex ses meetings before open meetings???

Which way is the preferred way for all here?

Thanks
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Hi Fred

Hope all is well.

Since the actions from executive session must be generally noted in the next open session minutes, if possible I have always recommended that it be held BEFORE the open session or general meeting.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
We conduct our Ex. Sess. (ES) mtngs. immediately before our monthly open meetings. No particular reason except it's easier to predict how long an ES may last. Our open meeting begin at 6pm, but our ES may begin anywhere from 4:30 to 5:30 depending on the business therein.

As you probably know, there's no requirement in CA to hold ES during an open meg., i.e., excuse all Owners and adjourn the open mtg. to ES. And then reconvene the open meeting.

We occasionally hold an ES between the regular dates due to contracts in formation.

Curious why you ask, Fred?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
We did everything in the open. However, at the beginning of the meeting it was exclusive to just the board talking/deciding amongst ourselves. Basically going over the collections report (no names), actions we were taking on collections, and then items needing vote/approval. After that then we would open up the rest of the meeting to discuss spending reports and get feedback on issues we may have voted for/process of approving.

I always felt it was important to keep it all in the open so members could see the process. We also would read any letters submitted to the board out loud. Unless it was a private issue discussed prior, written submissions were also discussed openly. Copies NOT provided but noted receipt in the meeting notes.

This process doesn't work for everybody. It's just how we did it. I kept in mind that the HOA money is NOT my money, it is ALL the member's money. The board is just elected to manage it on the members behalf. So it's best for everyone to have the view on how that happens and is done.

Former HOA President
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
When I was on the board, we didn't have many of these (I can only think of two or three). Most were done after the open meeting, so the property manager could go home. Residents usually left after the resident forum, so in many ways, the entire meeting could have been seen as an executive session (of course it wasn't because we took minutes)

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
SueW6 (Michigan)
Posts: 814
Posted:
Roberts Rules says that a motion must be made to go into executive session. I'd do it when the Ex. topic requires it.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
In Virginia, it's required that the executive session be entered into from an open meeting and exited to an open meeting.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SheliaH on 03/24/2016 9:30 AM

the entire meeting could have been seen as an executive session (of course it wasn't because we took minutes)

Even executive sessions should have minutes.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
In CA, Sue, there's no legal requirement to go into ES from a regular mtg. As you know state laws trump Robert's rules. Moreover, in CA, the ES agenda must be posted for Owners to see 2 days before the ES occurs. The agenda items. of course are veiled, e.g., Hearing for Alleged Rules Violation. Request for payment Plan, etc..
FredN (California)
Posts: 87
Posted:
When the Bylaws state this, can the Board change the order just because??

Thanks

The Board may, with approval of a majority of a quorum of its members, adjourn a meeting and reconvene in executive session to discuss and vote upon personnel matters, litigation in which the Association is or may become involved, and orders of business of a similar nature. The nature of any and all business to be considered in executive session shall be first announced in open session.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Well, Fred, the below CA statute says you may "meet solely in" ES. there's not CA requirement to adjourn form o an open meetings and then reconvene in the open meeting later. When you do that, Owners in attendance must be kicked out of your meeting room OR the Board has to move its materials to another room.

So our Board d chooses to meet in ES before the open meetings.

Civil Code §4935. Executive Session Meetings.

"(a) The board may adjourn to, or meet solely in, executive session to consider litigation, matters relating to the formation of contracts with third parties, member discipline, personnel matters, or to meet with a member, upon the member’s request, regarding the member’s payment of assessments, as specified in Section 5665."

In addition please see the CA notice requirements that I noted in an above post. So....even if your board chooses to adjourn from your open meeting to ES, the topics of ES must be posted 2 days in advance..

But, why do you ask, Fred? Are you on the board? What are you or some other director(s) planning that inspired you to ask about this topic?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:

Based on Kerry's citation, in my opinion, the use of the word "may" indicates that the statute does not override any additional requirements that could be included within your Bylaws. Since your Bylaws include the additional requirements, any executive session should be in compliance with those bylaws and entered into and return to an open meeting.

Realistically, depending on where your board meetings are held, there may be no location for the board to depart to (i.e. a separate room). Therefore, the Board would need to ask the members not part of the ES in attendance to step outside and someone will come get them after the session has ended. Hence, the likely reason to hold an ES prior to or after the open meeting.

I've specified our requirements earlier and they appear to be the same as your bylaws. We meet in a board members home. Hence, we typically hold ES at the end of the meeting. We explain what is happening and members are asked to step outside. However, since we have completed all business on the open meeting agenda (including any new business), the members typically just go home.

If the ES is concerning a member (enforcement issues for example) we hold the session at the meeting (with that individual in attendance) and after the ES, invite them to stay for the rest of the meeting or leave as we would prefer not to have sit through a 90 -120 minute meeting if we didn't have to. Typically, the member leaves after the business they came for is completed.

RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By FredN on 03/25/2016 6:40 AM
When the Bylaws state this, can the Board change the order just because??

Thanks

The Board may, with approval of a majority of a quorum of its members, adjourn a meeting and reconvene in executive session to discuss and vote upon personnel matters, litigation in which the Association is or may become involved, and orders of business of a similar nature. The nature of any and all business to be considered in executive session shall be first announced in open session.

The answer is yes. The language you cited is from "boiler-plate" Bylaws. The problem with the old language, is that agendas are now required for Executive Session meetings, so you just couldn't go into Executive Session in the middle of an Open Session meeting unless it was deemed an emergency OR you posted an agenda beforehand.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Fred's bylaw states:

"The Board may, with approval of a majority of a quorum of its members, adjourn a meeting and reconvene in executive session to discuss and vote upon personnel matters, litigation in which the Association is or may become involved, and orders of business of a similar nature. The nature of any and all business to be considered in executive session shall be first announced in open session."

I agree with Richard. Civil Code supersedes his bylaws because the two-day notice requirement, which is fairly new, became law after Fred's bylaws were written. The statute does not say "Unless otherwise stated in the governing docs." It simply gives boards choices about when to hold ES: whenever they wish.

The statute also does not add "and orders of business of a similar nature." We have a clause in our bylaws "or any matters of a similarly sensitive nature." An old board defined almost everything as "sensitive," keeping votes and discussions secret. the newer boards comply with the restrictions above.

Fred's bylaw also states: "The nature of any and all business to be considered in executive session shall be first announced in open session." The newer law requires two days, so only an emergency matter could be brought up AT the open meeting for discussion in ES that same day..

Once upon a time in our HOA, ES was even held on a different day than the regular meeting because most directors worked and didn't get home til 6pm. To have both would have made for a very long evening for everyone including our PM.

Usually our ES meetings are only 30-45 minutes to go over the status of delinquencies and payment plans. An anomaly occurs next week when we have four alleged violations, a potential legal matter AND a review of our landscaping contract due to dissatisfaction with our current vendor. So, ES will start at 4:30 and the regular mtg. at 6pm. If we can't finish our ES business, we'll adjourn it till after the reg. mtg. and reconvene at that time, probably 7:30-7:45.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Kerry,

I didn't intend to suggest that the agenda wasn't required in order to comply with CA statute.

I was trying to state that since the Bylaws have a qualifier (entered from and return to an open meeting) that the Association has that additional procedure they must follow.

Hence both of these would be required:

Agenda for Open meeting:

Quorum
Approval of past minutes
Executive session for abc
New business
Open Forum
Adjourn

Agenda for ES:

Call to order
Quorum
Discussion on abc
Adjourn to open meeting
FredN (California)
Posts: 87
Posted:
Yes I am on the Board now. The Board always held open then Ex forever, than it changed a few years ago. No one can get anything done around here and than have to make another Ex meeting the week after to try and accomplish something.

When the open is first and Ex after you can accomplish more, except for the fact that people complain about a once a month meeting and having to stay late hours. I say if you cant hang, quit.

Statute is Silent. Frequently, the Davis-Stirling Act is silent on which controls, the statute or the CC&Rs, and you must decide from the general language of the statute which controls. For instance, Civil Code §4800 does not contain any of the language described above, nonetheless, it clearly controls because of its use of the word "shall":

Thanks
FredN (California)
Posts: 87
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 03/25/2016 1:55 PM
Kerry,

I didn't intend to suggest that the agenda wasn't required in order to comply with CA statute.

I was trying to state that since the Bylaws have a qualifier (entered from and return to an open meeting) that the Association has that additional procedure they must follow.

Hence both of these would be required:

Agenda for Open meeting:

Quorum
Approval of past minutes
Executive session for abc
New business
Open Forum
Adjourn

Agenda for ES:

Call to order
Quorum
Discussion on abc
Adjourn to open meeting

Agenda for ES:

Call to order
Quorum
Discussion on abc
Adjourn to open meeting

Agenda for Open meeting:

Quorum
Approval of past minutes
Executive session for abc
New business
Open Forum
Adjourn

This is how we have it posted 4 days in advance and Ex only meetings 2 days.

Update Documents in Black and White language so Boards can decide???

Thanks

FredN (California)
Posts: 87
Posted:
What I am trying to say...

Are the Documents enforceable or not??? or Can the Board do whatever???

What I do not like about the HOA environment is the WE Don't have to Listen but You DO attitude type of behavior.

Thanks
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Fred,

Are the Bylaws enforceable? Yes.
However, it will require legal action.

Additionally, as you have seen on this thread, there are different interpretations on the meaning of the Bylaws (an additional requirement or simply an option). There are also different interpretations on the applicability of CA law (does it eliminate that passage or not). That is the problem. You will find some positive that their interpretation is correct and some that simply aren't sure.

If the Board can not come together on a consensus, you may want to seek a legal opinion on those interpretations. However, be careful on how the question you ask the attorney is phrased (as it can indicate the answer you desire vs getting an unbiased opinion).

I'd suggest something like:

In reading the Statutes and our Bylaws, the Board understands the notice and agenda requirements of the Statutes but the Board has differing opinions if the Bylaws (article, section) initiate a requirement that ES are only to be entered into from an open meeting or if that section of the Bylaws should be considered an option. What would your legal opinion be?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
BTW, if your Board does seek a legal opinion, I'm sure we would all appreciate hearing it.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
As you know, Fred, Tim & I interpret the statute differently.

But I would not spend HOA (your neighbors' $$) funds for an attorney's opinion. Included with our HOA counsel's retainer are unlimited phone calls. Do you have such an arrangement with yours?

Meantime, if I understand you right, the board voted against your wishes. What I don't understand is why you can't "get anything" done around there due to the sequence.

With so many big topics for boards to deal with in HOAs, the sequence of ES & open seems pretty minor. Are there other issues with the Board that are bothering you, Fred?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Fred,

How often do you meet (monthly, quarterly)?

Perhaps you need more meetings or, if the ES is for enforcement issues, a night specifically for that and a night for normal board meeting.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Like tim, Fred, I'd like to know a little more about your HOA: How many directors?

How many regular (open in CA) meetings a year do your bylaws say you must have?

How many homes? Detached? Condos?

Do you have a PM?
FredN (California)
Posts: 87
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 03/26/2016 10:45 AM
Like tim, Fred, I'd like to know a little more about your HOA: How many directors?

How many regular (open in CA) meetings a year do your bylaws say you must have?

How many homes? Detached? Condos?

Do you have a PM?

5 Board Directors, One meeting a month minimum 4 per year. 200 units 3 story run down dump.

Managing Agent, yes.

When you have a Ex meeting before open, you can not walk a 200 unit complex together to discuss issues, there are many, or the meetings over.

I have not said anything yet, just getting all your opinions.

Kerry do have the initials of the firm you use?

Thanks
FredN (California)
Posts: 87
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 03/26/2016 8:34 AM
As you know, Fred, Tim & I interpret the statute differently.

But I would not spend HOA (your neighbors' $$) funds for an attorney's opinion. Included with our HOA counsel's retainer are unlimited phone calls. Do you have such an arrangement with yours?

Meantime, if I understand you right, the board voted against your wishes. What I don't understand is why you can't "get anything" done around there due to the sequence.

With so many big topics for boards to deal with in HOAs, the sequence of ES & open seems pretty minor. Are there other issues with the Board that are bothering you, Fred?

Board infighting, yelling, complaining, arguing, name calling, you name it.
FredN (California)
Posts: 87
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 03/26/2016 8:34 AM

Meantime, if I understand you right, the board voted against your wishes. What I don't understand is why you can't "get anything" done around there due to the sequence.

Racial issues, discrimination,

would you like me to keep going?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By FredN on 03/26/2016 6:35 PM

When you have a Ex meeting before open, you can not walk a 200 unit complex together to discuss issues, there are many, or the meetings over.

Fred,

We don't walk our Development as a group.

We have one person, identified as a Maintenance Officer, who makes a written report to the Board about various issues. When needed, pictures are included with the report. This report is e-mailed to all Board members prior to the meeting (which allows them to review it). At the meeting, any issues are discussed and any recommendations by the Officer are voted on.

If there is a job or issue that the Maintenance Officer needs assistance on, someone steps up and agrees to do the leg work (get bids, oversee the work, etc.). If you have a PM, this is what that person should be doing.

You will always have personality conflicts (regardless of what you call them).
The Board members need to set those conflicts aside and work for the greater good (yep, I understand it's easier said then done at times). If the President can't stop it, someone else needs to step up. Even if they don't take over as President, there is nothing that stops them from taking charge at meetings. For example:

There is a motion on the table, can we please vote on it and move on?
To get us back on track, I believe it would be helpful if ...
This discussion is off topic, can we get back to the issue please, I'd like to finish up and spend time with my family.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Our board doesn't walk the premises either, Fred. We have a Landscape Committee that plans & designs our landscaping, which is about 6,800 sf of raised planters (urban high rise). Our board packet that we directors get several days before open meetings has in it their suggestions, drawing t of the areas they're woking on, etc., some of which need board approval.

Once we directors get our packet, we walk around individually to look at the LC's ideas, etc., and discuss them at the opn mtg. that month.

I'm sorry your HOA seems to be in such poor shape. I imagine that's why you got on the board. Is the PM no help at all? Could her/his MC have a s little seminar for you directors that might help smooth things out?

Do you personally, Fred, have any allies on this board?

Meantime, my interpretation is that your Board may hold ES whenever they wish so long as a majority of the board agrees and the ES's are posted legally. It sounds like you have bigger problems to deal with than that.

Perhaps you want to start a new thread with some specifics. I don't think listing personality problems will aid any of us in advising you. But specify HOA governance issues might work for us.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here