💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

AdamW (California)
Posts: 6
Posted:
As a new board member coming in to a financially starved HOA I have asked the management company to supply me with copies of the contracts with five vendors (and the last time they went to bid because all vendors have been in the HOA for over 5 years), itemized receipts for a particular maintenance companies work done in a months time (10K total in April), a copy of a certain locksmiths contractors license that went to bid (because I cannot find it online and the management company swears the locksmith is licensed to do the work), and an itemized receipt for signs installed in the HOA.

They will not give me anything I have requested. They have instructed me that I HAVE TO sign two 'Code Of Ethics' forms first, even though when I first joined the forms were optional to sign. I am also told by the management company that I have to go through the President of the board to ask for any documents. But I have called the president of the board twice and e-mailed and have NO replies.

Does AB1098 & Section 1365 apply to myself being a board member, or just owners. Keep in mind, I am NOT an owner. Our By Laws do not state a board member has to be an owner.

So not being an owner, what rights do I have for inspecting all the above items?

Thanks in advance.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
AdamW: why are you addressing this situation alone as a Board member and not the entire Board of members consulting with the mgmt. company? The mgmt. company's contract is with the Board on behalf of the assn. as a whole.

The fact that the President has not responded to you leads me to wonder what else is going on?
RobertG (Arizona)
Posts: 505
Posted:
What state do you live in? In some states, the amount of documents that MUST be released to a homeowner is well defined, in what time-frame, and how much it will cost. That might give you some leverage.
KellyC3 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Some HOA documents dont allow "non owners" to view financial records. Why if you are not a resident are you coming into the Board?
RobertG (Arizona)
Posts: 505
Posted:
Sorry, I missed the non-owner statement. I don't think a non-owner has many rights. It is really up to the board.
JudithC (Virginia)
Posts: 253
Posted:
We can have non-owner board members also. We always considered them a full member of the board and entitled to all such documents as you are requesting. In my experience it is not unusual for some board members to look into things more thoroughly than others, some are just asleep, and many don't care about the "nitty gritty" of contracting. It would concern me that the management company is refusing this request, particularly if they and all the other board members were there when the contracts were let. I wonder if the non-stock corporation act would shed light on whether you are entitled to the documents.
Jadedone4 (Virginia)
Posts: 495
Posted:
"Normally" (and how often is that), as a new boardmember you are given a "boardmember packet" by the MC. I made the disclaimer of "normally" for a reason. As to the "authority" that you have to request, or of the MC to turn down your request - if you have access to the governing documents, not only will you find your "rights" as the "non-owner" boardmember, but usually (again along with "normally") you will also find the "conditions" for which you or any other owner can request doc's. Also, check your state code/laws on disclosures, they may not speak specifically to "non-members" but they may address members, and the rights of access of boardmembers.
GloriaM (North Carolina)
Posts: 829
Posted:
Any Owner in an HOA can request corporate documents. State to State laws differ, however if an Owner wants to view them, they can make an appointment with the MC or the "holder" of the records. If the Owner wants them in paper format, then the MC or person with the records has the right to charge a fee to retrieve, copy and mail those records. Therefore it would be up to that person to pay that fee, or go to the office to view the records.
AdamW (California)
Posts: 6
Posted:
PaulM:

I am addressing the situation alone due to the fact that the board president and secretary have been on the board for over three years each and they DO NOTHING but upset owners that attend meetings. The other two board members are not very outgoing and do not press forward to ask for certain things. That is why I feel I am in this alone. These two other board members feel I am coming on too strong. I feel there is alot going on I don't know about. We have not had an independent audit done in over 8 years. Our budget and financial matters are always looked at by the MC's CPA. And furthermore if you were to attend our meetings, you would find that the management compnay pretty much runs the meetings! The more monthly meeting I attend, the angrier I get!
AdamW (California)
Posts: 6
Posted:
RobertG:

I live in California. AB1098 helps my case, but it states "owners".

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
I don't think a non-owner has many rights. It is really up to the board.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I am not an owner, but I am on the board! What do you think my rights are? Should I team up with an owner? (There are plenty that want these documents as well)
AdamW (California)
Posts: 6
Posted:
KellyC3:

I don't see anything in our documents that don't allow "non owners" to view documents, but they do not say we can either.

I lived in the HOA as a renter for over three years and all that time I heard rumors from quite a few owners that funny things were going on. Then I began to see it for myself. (Certain vendors related to the MC and jobs being done half way and never completed, etc.) I have a relationship with plenty of the 276 condo owners, and I was elected from a "privately formed committee of change" to be the one they all voted for to get on the board to make changes, or atleast see whats going on behind the scenes. I lived in the HOA when I was elected, but have since moved out. I want to stick with this and get all the "dirty laundry" aired out!
AdamW (California)
Posts: 6
Posted:
GloriaM:

The question I have is: Do I have any rights to request these documents as a "non owner", BUT a current board member??

Seems to me if the HOA would allow me to be elected as a board member, then I am allowed to see any such documents.
RobertG (Arizona)
Posts: 505
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AdamW on 06/20/2007 7:08 PM
KellyC3:

I don't see anything in our documents that don't allow "non owners" to view documents, but they do not say we can either.

I lived in the HOA as a renter for over three years and all that time I heard rumors from quite a few owners that funny things were going on. Then I began to see it for myself. (Certain vendors related to the MC and jobs being done half way and never completed, etc.) I have a relationship with plenty of the 276 condo owners, and I was elected from a "privately formed committee of change" to be the one they all voted for to get on the board to make changes, or atleast see whats going on behind the scenes. I lived in the HOA when I was elected, but have since moved out. I want to stick with this and get all the "dirty laundry" aired out!

I am just surprised that your bylaws would allow a non-owner to be a board member. I do think that non-owners could be an officer, like pres, vp, sec, treas. Can you quote the bylaws on what constitutes who can be a board member? I am really curious.

Also, remember, there may exist state rules that trump your bylaws. For example, many states have Corporation laws which trump bylaws, especially in who has rights for information.
AdamW (California)
Posts: 6
Posted:
By-Laws for our HOA....

"Section 5.1 - The board shall consist of five (5) directors who need not be members."

RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
The reason many By-laws do not require Board members to be members is because the Developer writes the By-laws and places their non owner friends on the Board. So I think this is the norm for most original By-laws.
RobertG (Arizona)
Posts: 505
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RogerB on 06/21/2007 6:57 AM
The reason many By-laws do not require Board members to be members is because the Developer writes the By-laws and places their non owner friends on the Board. So I think this is the norm for most original By-laws.

Ours states
"Until the termination of the Declarant Control Period, the directors need not be Members of the Association. After the termination of the Declarant Control Period, all directors must be Members of the Association."

I just don't see why anyone would really want to have non-members allowed as board members. I can understand getting advice from outsiders, but not for voting on what needs to be done. Just my view.
BobM5 (California)
Posts: 34
Posted:
The solution is simmple: Have a cooperative owner request the documents.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
AdamW: as a non-owner in the community, but as a non-owner Board member, I see no reason why the mgmt. company will not give you copies of the contracts you have requested. However, they have stipulated they will give them WHEN you sign two Code of Ethics forms. I don't know what this form is, however, I can understand why there may be a privacy and confidential clause that you would have to agree to as a non-owner.

Also, are you an elected Board member by the community residents or appointed by the Declarant?

GloriaM (North Carolina)
Posts: 829
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AdamW on 06/20/2007 7:13 PM
GloriaM:

The question I have is: Do I have any rights to request these documents as a "non owner", BUT a current board member??

Seems to me if the HOA would allow me to be elected as a board member, then I am allowed to see any such documents.

IMO I feel the same way as many posters. Not only do I run a MC but I also own in an HOA, I do not manage my HOA, just as a point of info. I feel that a board member should have a vested interest in the HOA. I am not a fan of a non owner becoming a board member. However, as Roger pointed out, the reason documents are filed that a non owner can serve is not only the appointment from the developer of board members during his reign, is also many HOA's find it difficult to get Owners to volunteer to serve. Therefore in a case where the Owners don't step up to the plate to volunteer, the HOA could elect outsiders to perform this duty (for free).

That said Adam, if you were duly elected in accordance with the governing documents and you are a board member you have the right to the corporate documents. You may be hitting a wall from the members and PM because you are an "outsider" of sorts. But legally, you are a board member and the PM must open the documents to you.
RobertG (Arizona)
Posts: 505
Posted:
Gloria -
you stated "But legally, you are a board member and the PM must open the documents to you."

I don't mean to pick on you, but I have seen many people make statements like this without any reference to an authority that authorizes the "must" part of the statement. We have several board members who make statements like "this is a closed meeting because I say so" without any backup authority.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
AdamW: You have been asked many questions to assist us in addressing your situation and to make your position clearer.

You are requesting documents on your own, apart from the rest of the Board. You state, '...these two other board members feel I am coming on too strong. I feel there is alot going on I don't know about...' You have been asked to go through the President to get what you want. I think this is acceptable process for a non-owner board member.

I am at a loss to understand why you would want to continue to be an 'offsite board member', since 1) you are a non-owner; 2) you used to live in the HOA but moved out...

Why do you not wish to abid by the mgmt company's request to sign the Code of Ethics form? Challenge them to what they are asking of you, and see if you get what you want...

I would think the other board members would align themselves in the cause to receive copies of receipts/contracts. It is the Board's fudiciary responsibility to approve expenses to be paid, and for the mgmt. company to take their cue from the Board.

GloriaM (North Carolina)
Posts: 829
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RobertG on 06/21/2007 10:43 AM
Gloria -
you stated "But legally, you are a board member and the PM must open the documents to you."

I don't mean to pick on you, but I have seen many people make statements like this without any reference to an authority that authorizes the "must" part of the statement. We have several board members who make statements like "this is a closed meeting because I say so" without any backup authority.

Robert:

Ask any corporate attorney, and an HOA is a corporation; the members have a right to the corporate documents. If the state in which an HOA is formed has a Planned Community Act, the Act would also have a provision with regards to documents.

As to any board stating that this is a closed meeting, "because I say so." Again because laws differ from state to state, and as we have seen AZ all meetings must be open, NC allows for portions of a meeting to be closed due to personal information being shared. That being said Robert what state are you in that your board would make such a ridiculous statement?
RobertG (Arizona)
Posts: 505
Posted:
Gloria
two comments.

You have come much closer to what I was trying to say. You are now getting more accurate authorities that dictate what must be done with documents. However, I would argue, that just because a corporate attorney makes a statement, it is still his/her opinion. However, if you were to give the actual statue from law, then you would be giving the authority. I am sure that is really what you know, my point is that too many (not necessarily you) make blanket statements of opinion with no actual stated authority given. Too many people are willing to blindly believe and not question the speaker.

I am in AZ and know the open meeting laws of the state well. There is a long discussion about exactly what happened with the board member just stating that because she said it was so, then it must be so.
JudithC (Virginia)
Posts: 253
Posted:
I do not agree that all requests for documents must go through the board president. One wonders why the other members of the board do not have these documents already if they have been there and have been diligent in their actions. I am not sure what these ethics forms are about and do not know the reason for the objection to them -- maybe they say the only way you can read them is blindfolded!

As far as why Adam wants to serve on the board, I think he said why. It might not resonate with everyone, but it appears he feels an obligation to those that helped elect him. He ran for it, he was elected, and now he should quit?

Thanks, Gloria, for adding your comments. It makes sense to me if you are on the board you should not be a "second class citizen" because of your ownership status. I can imagine circumstances where outside directors would be just the ticket for the association. They might have expertise that the homeowner members don't.

GloriaM (North Carolina)
Posts: 829
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RobertG on 06/21/2007 11:53 AM
Gloria
two comments.

You have come much closer to what I was trying to say. You are now getting more accurate authorities that dictate what must be done with documents. However, I would argue, that just because a corporate attorney makes a statement, it is still his/her opinion. However, if you were to give the actual statue from law, then you would be giving the authority. I am sure that is really what you know, my point is that too many (not necessarily you) make blanket statements of opinion with no actual stated authority given. Too many people are willing to blindly believe and not question the speaker.

I am in AZ and know the open meeting laws of the state well. There is a long discussion about exactly what happened with the board member just stating that because she said it was so, then it must be so.

Robert:

I will quote then NC Planned Community Act Chapter 47F which only applies to HOA's within this state for the authority you asked for:

47F-3-118. Association Records. (a) Tha association shall keep financial records sufficiently detailed to enable the association to comply with this Chapter. All financial records and other records, including records of meetings of the association and executive board, shall be made reasonably available for examination by any Lot Owner and the Lot Owner's authorized agents as required in the bylaws and Chapter 55A of the General Statutues.

I hope that helps.
RobertG (Arizona)
Posts: 505
Posted:
Gloria, I am not sure if you understood my point. Please ignore this if you do.

I was not asking you to tell me what the authority is. I am saying that when someone makes a definitive statement as you did, then it would be much better if you gave the authority that substantiated that statement. Thus, if you would have added the quote you did from the NC statue in the post with the statement that documents must be given, that would have been ideal.

Make sense?
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Robert, it makes sense. It would make even more sense --- IF --- you wish to hire Gloria as a professional consultant

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here