JamesC32 (California)
Posts: 20
Posts: 20
Posted:
I am an owner and recently elected Board member of a self managed complex (65 units)
I am frustrated with how the landscaping of our complex is being handled, and have spoken with other owners about this issue. Even though many people would like to see a change in how things are being done, they are reluctant to approach the board because of a history of being bullied, marginalized or otherwise meant to feel they should not be giving feedback to the Board about issues.
My current idea is to speak with owners directly and try to get their anonymous.. feedback, and then take that information to the Board. Having tried to break the insular nature of this Board before, I expect to get pushback about being out of line in having spoken with other owners. It is likely they will have a negative reaction to the topic solely based on the fact that I talked to owners 'without the Board's permission'
One of the techniques this Board uses is giving minimal information to owners about decision making, and consistently creating an atmosphere where many owners have given up giving feedback or suggestions to the Board.
I'm interested if anyone has any good ideas about responding to the very well established assumption that Board members work only within the board, and that it is somehow disloyal or troublemaking to have regular discussions with owners who are not on the Board. There is an additional issue of the person who does landscaping being a Board member; this person is quite defensive and not above exhibiting an obvious conflict of interest when any suggestion is made about changing her contract to reflect the kind of landscaping work owners would like to see happen.
I am frustrated with how the landscaping of our complex is being handled, and have spoken with other owners about this issue. Even though many people would like to see a change in how things are being done, they are reluctant to approach the board because of a history of being bullied, marginalized or otherwise meant to feel they should not be giving feedback to the Board about issues.
My current idea is to speak with owners directly and try to get their anonymous.. feedback, and then take that information to the Board. Having tried to break the insular nature of this Board before, I expect to get pushback about being out of line in having spoken with other owners. It is likely they will have a negative reaction to the topic solely based on the fact that I talked to owners 'without the Board's permission'
One of the techniques this Board uses is giving minimal information to owners about decision making, and consistently creating an atmosphere where many owners have given up giving feedback or suggestions to the Board.
I'm interested if anyone has any good ideas about responding to the very well established assumption that Board members work only within the board, and that it is somehow disloyal or troublemaking to have regular discussions with owners who are not on the Board. There is an additional issue of the person who does landscaping being a Board member; this person is quite defensive and not above exhibiting an obvious conflict of interest when any suggestion is made about changing her contract to reflect the kind of landscaping work owners would like to see happen.