💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KrystalA (Iowa)
Posts: 60
Posted:
Wow, just had a great convo with a vendor and sadly my gut was right in that out PM set this company up for failure. I have shared the information I got from the gentleman with two of our board memebers. There are two others and one will not hear what i have to say - as she loves our current pm and would probably take a bullit for her. The other...I can't read.

We have caught her in a number of lies and the sad part on all of this is she thinks I am on her side...i wanted to be, but when she sets up vendors to fail at the expense of homeowners - just to keep her buddies employed...i can't do that.

so, what would you recommend...just flat give her a 30 day notice? get a letter from the vendor to back up what he told me as proof of incompetence? do a community survey and let the homeowers have a say?

KevinK5 (California)
Posts: 64
Posted:
Check your contract.
Least risk is probably to cancel at the time of contract renewal. You probably have an annual auto-renew agreement that can be cancelled with 30 or 60 day notice before the renewal date. Cancelling at any other time can get you into legal hassles.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
If you are certain the PM is acting not in the best interest of the property then they have to go.

My first concern would be WHO will replace them?

You would need to find a replacement BEFORE you let your current PM go.

When does their contract come up for renewal?

You could either wait till then if that time is close and then opt to not renew or your your option to give notice according to the requirements of your contract.

Read your contract carefully and make sure you have a full understanding of the requirements to release the PM.

You should find a relacement to make as smooth a transition as possible.

Getting rid of your PM is not difficult finding a decent replacement would be the hard part.

But you need to prepare for both before you do anything.
NormanG (Arizona)
Posts: 38
Posted:
So many acronyms... A new one.. PM.. What is a PM?
RobertG (Arizona)
Posts: 505
Posted:
Does the PM work for a management company or directly for the HOA. If the PM is an employee of the MC, then you can't just fire the PM. However, you can, and should, have a discussion withe MC on what is working and not working for your HOA.
CharlesB5 (Colorado)
Posts: 11
Posted:
Replying to NormanG....

"PM" is Property Manager. Sometimes you will see the term "PMC"-- Property Management Company.
KrystalA (Iowa)
Posts: 60
Posted:
A couple of us have already been contacing other associations to see who they have and how they like them, So we are already getting the ball rolling. The contract is 30/60 30 days with cause and 60 without cause.

Right now we just want to get as much info as we can like copies of work orders, contracts, etc. Long story short, we are concerned we won't get everything we are entitled to.

Thanks!!!
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
You should prepare for the worst and hope for the best.

We fired a former MC and then were forced to go to court to collect all our records and documents in a long and costly fight.

When you show someone the door they can and do become less then cooperative in transitioning to the new MC. Hard feelings cause bad behavior in some cases.

Perhaps you could find a local CAI chapter and ask around for MC that might serve your property in a better way.

The more effort you make now might reduce the need to make another change down the road.

Good luck.

RobertG (Arizona)
Posts: 505
Posted:
Also, one thing that I heard about that seems to make sense. See if you can find a MC that does NOT do your financials. Then when the property is managed badly, you don't have to go through the financial fiasco of setting up new bank accounts, getting new payment lock boxes or stopping surepay deposits.

I know of a HOA that changed MC and they lost about $38,000 in assessment collection in 6 months due to poor planing of changing over coupon payment books and bad Internet automatic payments. This was out of a monthly income of about $40,000 assessment.
KrystalA (Iowa)
Posts: 60
Posted:
Thanks for all the feedback. My new next hurdle is a president that wants one person motion for her dismissal and me to second - and not tell other board members this is going to happen - that i have a huge issue with...while sooner than later is best to get rid of them, there are certian things i believe need to get lined up...

why did i get on the board LOL
TomK2 (Ohio)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Krystal Before you do anything "READ" your contract. It will tell you when you can terminate. You do not need to explain why you are terminating the contract. If the PMC is not proforming the way you want, OUT THEY GO! Lets face it the PM works for the Board. Unless you have a very large HOA I would not use a PMC. I for one am very leary of PMC. In Norhern Ohio a PMC got away with over a Million from four HOA! PMC are getting a very bad reputation and you have to check on everything they do. If you don't the HOA will lose!
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Why do you think the Boards didn't take precautions to prevent the theft of over a million dollars? Board's need to learn to run the HOA as a business. There are ignorant Boards which need to be educated to prevent theft among other things. If you read my attached Management Agreement perhaps it will help structure a better Agreement in the future. No Board should just blindly accept a MC Agreement. Write the Agreement the way the Board wants it. And be very specific on details as well as covering every key element required of all contracts.
📎 Attachments (1):

⏸ Downloads temporarily unavailable

📝1628394153171.doc(41 KB)
DougY (Washington)
Posts: 6
Posted:
As a PM, I am sorry you are having issues. The best way to transition is to gather as much info and documentation before they know you are switching, so they can't hide anything. Perhaps you can use this process of gathering information and confirming your suspicions, to confront the current PM with the stuff they are doing wrong and perhaps build a court case if you should need to.
JM2 (Oregon)
Posts: 439
Posted:
Hi Krystal:

Check out your yellow pages, your local CAI chapter, etc. on management companies (your local CAI chpater should have a service provider page). Talk to your vendors (that you trust) or your lawyer regarding other management companies in the area.

Most management companies do have preferred vendors. When I did portfolio management of HOA's, there were four landscapers that I always invited to walk through a community and then asked for a bid on the work; we knew that each one was reliable and would give good service (or they wouldn't stay on our list).

You might want to talk to your PM's boss about your concerns. It could be a problem with one manager and not the company as a whole...or you could get reinforcement for changing companies.

J. Patrick Moore, CMCA
KrystalA (Iowa)
Posts: 60
Posted:
Oh i completely understand prefered vendors, and if they did a good job, it wouldn't be an issue, but sadly they do a half arsed job (won't clear sidewalks of snow, take their time as they get paid by the hour, and frankly just seem to not care about our property.

sadly, the pm is the only employee - the pm started their own company when the one she was with decided to close its doors (very long story) and a board member signed her contract without a full board vote.

Its going to be hard to do this as its not personal, its business...and she will be hurt by it....but my hands are tied...she burnt a lot of bridges with owners.
Jadedone4 (Virginia)
Posts: 495
Posted:
Krystal, I believe that your situation is a bad one, and one that you "inherited." If the contract was entered into "illegally" by one boardmember, without full board vote/approval, that was a way out of the contract right there. I am sure that one could argue "ratification by performance," (your board "accepted" the contract and allowed work to be performed, despite the improper signatures), but you also must weigh the fact that the current PM, should and did know that the signature and entering into the contract was not board approved.

Under normal circumstances I would hesitate stating this, particularly in a forum with MC's, but what occured in your situation (IMHO) was typical of abusive interactions. Your PM knew that the presentation of the contract was not appropriate (invalid signature), and continued on, ignoring this fact. Your "rogue" boardmember entered into that contract aware that he/she did not have full board approvals/vote. What occurs in these types of situaions, is that there must be a "bad guy" to come in and correct the wayward action. And in some situations, MC's will take advantage of board, and community ignorance of contract terms and conditions - to their benefit. Not all MC's operate in such a manner - but it does exist.

As most posters here have stated, look to your contract for "termination clauses." Educate the other boardmembers of what the community's rights and options are at this time in addressing a non-satifactory performing contractor. Address the issues with the PM, as is appropriate with and under your contract terms and conditions. It would be my assumption that if you have termination for clause, or even termination without cause, provisions in the contract - that they are conditional. A lot of contracts are drafted without full "balance" between the parties - and that can be huge problem for one when performance is an issue. If you have "cure" provisions included, then you must give the PM the opportunity to effect change. That can be a frustrating process - as you are still paying for the PM's services during that time, and likely you are already disappointed by the actions which lead up to this event.

Take from this situation the lesson that contracts must be reviewed properly, and even if you are the lone boardmember, you must require that certain provisions/language be included in them, which protects the community. Most PM's and other contractors may balk at altering their contracts, as they have had them reviewed/drafted, to protect their interests. That is not always a bad thing, just a reality in today's litigious world, that contractors feel is important to have those protections. It is when you have contractors who refuse to negotiate terms and conditions in contracts, that creates issues. If you have the same rules flowing to/from parties in a contract, there is balance. If there are one set of conditions for one party, and another for the other = headaches. You provide service, I pay you - if service is not performed, I don't pay you. A honest handshake and good customer service are fast becoming items for the museum of history at the Smithsonian

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here