Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 02/09/2016 2:28 PM
Like it or not, the Association should investigate all alleged complaints of violations.
If the violations exist, then enforcement action should be taken.
If the violation does not exist, the complainer should be informed that the Association investigated and that the issue is not a violation (give reasons why if possible).
When I read your post Tim, I immediately thought of an ex-board member who knows better than anyone else how things should run and how we should spend our time and resources. It's not uncommon for him to send a 1-, 2-, 3-, or 4-page email identifying all the recent deficiencies in his immediate neighbors and in our contractors' on-site personnel. Most of our current board members don't read past his first paragraph.
We have put him on notice that we will not consider anything he writes if he doesn't stop his vicious personal attacks.
I was never on the board with him. But folks who were said that board meetings (not open in PA) turned into screaming matches that could last for an hour or more.
He bullied prior boards into wasting money with our attorney to chase down issues that no one but he cared about.
Now that I'm on the board, he started calling me personally every time a homeowner's contractor or the HOA's contractors start before 8am. His attitude is that if he is disturbed, he's going to make damn sure that I am too.
My position when I first encountered his rants against the world was simple - We'll listen to him (if he's respectful), but we are not going to let him set the agenda for the board. Nor are we going to reply to everything he writes or complains about. We have other things to deal with.
I agree that every complaint needs to be evaluated if it comes from a homeowner who makes one or two complaints against one or two individuals. But if a person is going to throw a laundry list of complaints and attacks all at once, I'm not sure that the same standards should apply.
Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.