💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JeffreyB (Florida)
Posts: 11
Posted:
Thanks to everyone who has responded to my original "right of entry" posting. Of all the things that the HOA has to do, entering a neighbor's property without permission and performing work is the most worrysome event that I can forsee. There are just so many things that can go wrong! I mean someone could get hurt or worse. Plus, we are only 50 homes so this guy knows where we live!! I have tried my hardest to talk our Board out of this, but you know how it goes that a few people get mad, they only read what they want to see in the DOCS, they want action and they want it now! We haven't even taken the step to sit down and talk with the homeowner about a possible compromise. And let me tell you, we are talking about a full landscape replacement. He put down a combination of rocks and planters a eliminated his grass alltogether. Now I know it does not match the rest of the community, and I know residents are upset, but the guy keeps it very neat, we have never had any other problem with him, he seems like a nice fellow, and we are talking several thousand dollars to change this back. But I can see the tides turning. The Board is probably going to vote against
me and we will be calling the bulldozzers! I am very nervous about this. I just don't think that we have done enough, or that we have done the right steps to get to this point. The homeowner must be anticipating this because he has put up a "no tresspassing" sign on his property. The storm is on the horrizon. Is there anything I can do to convince my fellow BOD's to step back and take a deep breath before proceeding? I went to the City to see if they could help and to my supprise they liked the guys yard and sugested that we change our DOCS to allow this "water friendly" landscaping!! But the Board is of one mind and they seem to be after this guy. Maybe it's a credibility thing. I checked the Florida Laws and there is a "meadiation" part in there for disputes but we haven't done that. And I know we should have a court order but does that mean we go to court with the homeowner and discuss this or is it just the BOD goes and gets the order and we show up with a sherrif on the guys lot one day? No matter how it goes down, I am just against this and think there must be another way. I am very nervous about right of entry!!
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
JeffreyB: I see that this post is a follow-up to your recent post on 'ARB problem' in which the unit owner fulfilled all from his end but the Board dropped the ball big-time, and now the Board wants the owner to change back at the owner's expense! You are correct to be concerned about right-of-entry. This is serious business and the Board is clearly setting themselves up for a law suit.

Would the Board be open to speaking to an attorney about the situation and getting a professional's viewpoint on what, if any, recourse the Board has. The Board should certainly entertain a professional's counsel in this situation. They can't be so headstrong as to think they can go forward just to 'prove their point'???

Do you have a Prop.Mgr. for the community? If so, they, no doubt, have access to legal advice on the assn's behalf, and at the assn's cost. If the Board is determined to bring legal action against this unit owner, they are actually using the assn's funds to gloss over their own mistake/s and will not be
acting in their fudiciary responsibility--meaning not spending the assn. funds wisely. Check out your docs on 'that'--I believe they can be removed because of their wrong intent and actions. A petition may even be in the works as we post....
DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
Jeffrey -
I would say that you have good cause to be nervous. Probably the first thing that you should do is ensure your objections are noted by name in any minutes from meetings where votes were taken on this issue. That way if the Board does proceed and ends up in hot water, you should at least have some amount of protection.

BTW: I thought Florida had something in the laws that prohibited HOAs from not allowing xeriscaping?
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Jeffrey, those Board members are setting themselves up for major personal problems and expenses if they do not have a court order. Any responsible attorney will tell your Board to forget it. And no reasonable judge would ever find in favor of the Board. You could also contact your insurance company, explain the circumstances, and request a letter from them concerning the possibility of not having coverage to cover legal expenses for the Board or the other party.

If the other Board members vote to procede I would demand the minutes show I was opposed to the motion. And I would also submit my resignation from the Board stating my reason as this foolish irresponsible wrongdoing by the Board.
HaroldS1 (Arizona)
Posts: 314
Posted:
Such clauses are declared null and void as against the public policy of this state.

(4) Homeowners' association documents, including declarations of covenants, articles of incorporation, or bylaws, entered after October 1, 2001, may not prohibit any property owner from implementing Xeriscape or Florida-friendly landscape, as defined in s. 373.185(1), on his or her land.

The above quote is from Florida statue 720-3075. It would seem this applys only for declarations filed after Oct 1, 2001. When were yours filed?

However, this board violated their own CC&Rs by not denying this landscape change request in a timely manner. They are letting themselves wide open for a lawsuit by pursuing this action. Roger gave good advice for you to document your objection and then resign. I doubt your insurance company would fund their defense in this lawsuit. I don't think you ever mentioned: Were these board members the same ones who didn't deny the request a few years ago? Harold
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Jeffrey:

wow...I missed the original post until now. Your board has nothing to stand on, nothing. The homeowner was completely legal with what he did and your board or arch committee dropped the ball and now has to live with it.

I would strongly opposed any action and would be sure if I were you that your minutes reflect this. As someone suggested if they decide to go along with it I would submit a resignation with this as the reasoning.

Good luck!
TracyT (Maryland)
Posts: 228
Posted:
"Any responsible attorney will tell your Board to forget it. And no reasonable judge would ever find in favor of the Board."

Well I'd better hope for reasonable Judge. Our HOA attorney is letting our BOD spend the association $ dispite our request is allowable per the CC&R, we submitted the vote they wanted with our petitions, a vote passed to allow our project, we've requested mediation/arbitration and most recently the HOA attorney (like the BOD) changed documented history and facts. I guess there's just no talk with some people.

Good luck. T
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Tracy, I apologize but I just can't follow your post at all. I have no idea what you just said.

However, to the original poster, your BOD is setting itself up for a huge legal and financial loss. Good luck to you.
TracyT (Maryland)
Posts: 228
Posted:
Good thing I don't claim to be a good typist I reviewed and it seemed ok but I guess I think faster than I type or read - I hate when that happens!

I was trying to underscoring the fact that its very difficult for one person to try talk sense into a small group of others who have "power" and just want to be right at any cost.

Roger's response was funny to me [personally - due to my own HOA situation] because he said any responsibile attorney would advise against legal action. But saddly, there are unresponsible attorney's who will encourage such action.

I hope that's clearer.

T
BradD2 (Florida)
Posts: 418
Posted:
Jeffrey, you might want to warn your HOA about something in Florida, Xeriscapes.

Florida Statute 720.3075.4 says:
(4) Homeowners' association documents, including declarations of covenants, articles of incorporation, or bylaws, entered after October 1, 2001, may not prohibit any property owner from implementing Xeriscape or Florida-friendly landscape, as defined in s. 373.185(1), on his or her land.

Florida Statute 373.185.1 says:
(1) As used in this section, the term:

(a) "Local government" means any county or municipality of the state.

(b) "Xeriscape" or "Florida-friendly landscape" means quality landscapes that conserve water and protect the environment and are adaptable to local conditions and which are drought tolerant. The principles of Xeriscape include planning and design, appropriate choice of plants, soil analysis which may include the use of solid waste compost, efficient irrigation, practical use of turf, appropriate use of mulches, and proper maintenance.


Removing a lawn and replacing it with something that does not use a much or any water is permitted in Florida. In particular if the HOA was formed after October 1st. An HOA in our area that is 20 years old but updated their documents was ruled against when they took an owner to court. The judge had ruled against the Association before on other matters and perhaps he was just looking for someway to side with the Owner but he ruled against the Association. He said since they had recorded changes in how they can fine people and those changes were entered in 2003 or 2004 that they could not violate this.

I am afraid your board (and if you have a lawyer) aren't doing enough research before they act; they seem to think they are the final authorities.
MikeS1
Posts: 668
Posted:
We may have to go in and strip a pink (yes pink!) deck in the near future, but all this is being handled by an attorney with an architectual lien, and court order. The contractor might have to be escorted by the sherrif as well. This is complicated and I recommend an attorney.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TracyT on 06/18/2007 2:44 PM
Roger's response was funny to me [personally - due to my own HOA situation] because he said any responsibile attorney would advise against legal action. But saddly, there are unresponsible attorney's who will encourage such action. T

Tracy, I am sorry to here about your situation. There are unreasonable Boards and some like to exert unreasonable power. Too bad they failed to work with you to resolve this matter in a more reasonable manner.

Regarding my use of "responsible attorney", I have supervised attorneys and sadly am aware of the wide range in the quality of their expertise and ethics. We need to realize that attorneys first priority is to make money. Their second priority is to win at all cost (their client's). I have even met one, who at a lower priority, also considered justice
TracyT (Maryland)
Posts: 228
Posted:
Aw gee Roger, thanks for your kind sentiments.

P.S. I'm not a very good speller either

T

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here