💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
We have an issue with residents parking in vacant driveway in our development. We had a foreclosure that has recently been purchased and the closing was scheduled for 1/29/16. Residents were parking in the driveway of that unit since the original homeowner moved out (two years ago). Our PM sent letters to these homeowners and fines (one was a homeowner and one was a tenant) and informed them NOT to park in the driveway. The PM recently sent letters to the two residents parking in the driveway that the unit was sold and even today there was a vehicle parked in the driveway from one of the other units!!!

One member of our board feels that "issue" will correct itself when the new owner moves in. This board member is the one who does not want to enforce parking rules, for his own personal convenience. He says we will "get everyone mad" and the development is "no fun" anymore.

When landlord received the letter from our PM his tenant got mad and parked all his vehicles in front of my home in street which is also in violation of declaration. He harassed me by turning the alarm on an off of all his vehicles remotely for over 1/2 hour and idiled all his other vehicles (remotely). I went outside and asked him to move his vehicles from the street and he refused. He started yelling and swearing etc. and threatened me. The police were called by the tenant. They told me I should file a complaint with the magistrate.

I called our PM who contacted his landlord. The landlord says there is no language in our declaration that states that our driveways are "exclusive use" or that they were deeded to each unit by the Declarant so he feels that the only violation his tenant is committing is block the driveway by parking in it????.

I asked our attorney to look into this and although there is documentation regarding our driveways, in our declaration and other documents, there is no specific language stating that the driveways are "exclusive use" to the unit (although implied) or that the driveways were deeded to the unit by the Declarant.

I feel that the Board needs to clarify this so that we don't have residents thinking they can park in driveways that are vacant for any reason. ie a homeowner can be on a business trip, can a resident park in their driveway without permission?

Does anyone have any knowledge on this or advice? thanks
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Maureen,

I see this as a neighbor vs. neighbor issue and NOT an Association issue.

One good thing, by having vehicles parked in the driveway of a vacant home, it gives the impression that the home is not vacant and may minimize vandalize or break-ins on that property.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
We have a house that was vacant for years. Mortgage company foreclosed and acquired title in August. 5 months later nothing has been done. Still no payments.

Do we have any interest in protecting the rights of the new owner? No way.

Are we interested in having fewer cars parked on the street? Absolutely.

Also, as Tim says - makes it look like the house isn't vacant any more.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
The home was closed on 1/29/16 and has an owner. So are saying, if you are on vacation for a week or two you would allow residents to use your driveway?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
When I go on vacation, I actually tell my neighbors how long I will be gone and give permission to one or the other to use my parking spaces if they need it.

I see it as cheap insurance to deter crime (just like having a light on a timer).

My neighbors appreciate the offer and they may or may not exercise that option.

I personally don't care if they use the spaces or not, providing that the spaces are empty when I return.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Oh, The Association doesn't get informed if I go on vacation or not.

If the Association got involved with a private arrangement I made with my neighbor, I would be ticked at the Association for putting their nose into business that doesn't concern them and trying to exceed their authority.

MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
so what would you do if you gave permission for your neighbor to use your driveway and fluid leaked from their vehicle and now the driveway has oil stains on it?

The unit in question... the new homeowner has not given anyone permission to park in his driveway. This was confirmed by our management company.

So when he moves in and there is a vehicle in his driveway should he ring doorbells until he find out who the vehicles belongs to? I would think he would contact our PM.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 01/31/2016 9:34 AM
so what would you do if you gave permission for your neighbor to use your driveway and fluid leaked from their vehicle and now the driveway has oil stains on it?

The unit in question... the new homeowner has not given anyone permission to park in his driveway. This was confirmed by our management company.

So when he moves in and there is a vehicle in his driveway should he ring doorbells until he find out who the vehicles belongs to? I would think he would contact our PM.

Damage is responsibility of person who caused it. Don't see where HOA would want to insert itself in the middle of that conflict.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 01/31/2016 9:34 AM
so what would you do if you gave permission for your neighbor to use your driveway and fluid leaked from their vehicle and now the driveway has oil stains on it?

My neighbor would offer to clean it up.

If they didn't, I would ask my neighbor to clean it up.

If they refused, I would clean it up and never give permission to them again.

Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 01/31/2016 9:34 AM
The unit in question... the new homeowner has not given anyone permission to park in his driveway. This was confirmed by our management company.

In my opinion, this exceeded the Associations responsibility and authority.

If permission wasn't granted, then the individual is trespassing on private property and it's up to the owner of the property to make a complaint to the police.

Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 01/31/2016 9:34 AM

So when he moves in and there is a vehicle in his driveway should he ring doorbells until he find out who the vehicles belongs to? I would think he would contact our PM.

I would think he should contact the police.

Unless your Association has parking passes or has vehicles registered, then the PM should also instruct the individual to contact the police. The police can identify who the vehicle belongs to and the issue can be resolved far more quickly then through the Association.

MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
We are private. The police will not get involved. They were here a month ago for a parking issue and it states in their report that they will not get involved in HOA business unless there is a crime.

This goes back to my original statement...the driveways are not private property. Per our attorney he feels in reading our site plans, documents etc. that the driveways were not deeded to the units, therefore they are exclusive use common elements.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Snow plow equipment dents garage doors and cracks curbs. Stones kicked up by lawnmowers break windows and sliders. Lawnmowers also break vent covers and window well covers. Vehicles leak fluids onto streets.

IMO, the board already has enough of these incidents involving HOA contractors and HOA property - No good reason to look for more.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 01/31/2016 9:46 AM

We are private. The police will not get involved. They were here a month ago for a parking issue and it states in their report that they will not get involved in HOA business unless there is a crime.

But they will get involved in trespassing issues (which is how I would report it).

At the very least, the police would come out and identify who owns the vehicle for the owner.

Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 01/31/2016 9:46 AM

This goes back to my original statement...the driveways are not private property. Per our attorney he feels in reading our site plans, documents etc. that the driveways were not deeded to the units, therefore they are exclusive use common elements.

An argument can be made that exclusive use is the same as private property for this issue.

Maureen,

Parking seems to be a very close issue for you.
Based on your postings, this issue appears to have caused ill impressions of one individual serving on the Board as well.

Living within a townhome development myself, I understand parking issues that are associated with such living. You have had two people reply to you on this thread. Perhaps others will chime in, but those who have already replied have indicated that parking on someones driveway is not (based on the replies) considered an Association issue.

If you desire it to be an association issue, I am sure you will find a way to make it one.

My advice, if you choose to make it an issue, is to do it properly and adopt parking passes along with entering into an agreement with a towing company to provide service. Once towing is performed due to lack of displaying a pass or parking in a space that isn't yours to park in, you will get membership feedback and know if the membership is behind you or not.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Maureen has appointed herself Parking Warden. Be careful.
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
The parking issue exists because 3 units own and park 17 vehicles between them on property. There are 40 homes. 3 roads . I have received many complaints from homeowners regarding these vehicles taking up 8 of the 12 visitor spots on two of our streets.

The homeowners want the Board to limit the number of vehicles each unit can park on property. I am proposing 3. Each unit has a garage and two spaces in their driveways, some have 3 spaces in their driveways.

I agree with the majority of the homeowners and we will have a vote by the membership to amend our declaration (which does not have a restriction on vehicles).

I also have support of the majority of the board. Just one board member is opposed. He is one that parks 5 vehicles on property.

I recently rented a garage space off property for my 3rd vehicle that I don't drive that often so I don't have to deal with my visitors finding a parking space.

We are also in the process of hiring a new management company that will be able to manage our development more efficiently.

Towing in my opinion for a 3 road development is extreme and I would not propose that to the Board.

We also have landlords that limit the amount of vehicles to 3 on their leases and would vote in favor of limiting for all units in our development.

NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Not about finding support for changing the rule Maureen. About finding support for enforcing the rule.

Ok. Let's say you I have 5 vehicles and you change the rule to "only 3". You warn me. I ignore the warning. What are you going to do?


Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
CORRECTION:

Not about finding support for changing the rule Maureen. About finding support for enforcing the rule.

Ok. Let's say I have 5 vehicles and you change the rule to "only 3". You warn me. I ignore the warning. What are you going to do?

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
my idea would be to "grandfather" the vehicles that are already on property and if the 3 vehicle limit is adopted and the declaration is amended by majority vote it would be 3 vehicle limit for all new homeowners and tenants going forth as of the date of the vote or setting an effective date.

Residents would know before they purchase or rent they are limited to 3 vehicles. As I stated in my previous email some of the landlords are already limiting the number of vehicles to 3 before they rent their homes.

We have overflow parking outside both our gates 6 spaces that can be used by residents and ONE visitor space can be used (as needed) garage and driveway is to be used first (that rule is already in place). No one utilizes the spaces outside the gates because they don't want to park and walk, but they are available.

NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 01/31/2016 1:10 PM
The parking issue exists because 3 units own and park 17 vehicles between them on property. There are 40 homes. 3 roads . I have received many complaints from homeowners regarding these vehicles taking up 8 of the 12 visitor spots on two of our streets.

Ok - so you intend to grandfather these folks but restrict new folks. Do you really thinks that's going to go over well?

Also, you still haven't explained what you will do to enforce your new rule against the new people who violate the rule.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 01/31/2016 1:10 PM

Towing in my opinion for a 3 road development is extreme and I would not propose that to the Board.

Then how would you enforce the 3 vehicle rule?

Also, if someone who has 3 vehicles have a guest, does the guest count as one of the three vehicles?

As for the 3 homes with 17 vehicles, that is almost 6 vehicles per lot (which seems like a lot of adult/teenage drivers for a townhome).

If your County/City has a rule on number of unrelated persons living under one roof, you may want to consider having the city investigate those homes.
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
Visitors would not count for the 3 vehicles. We have plenty of visitor parking if residents park in their garages and driveways. The 3 units with the excessive amount of vehicles can park some of their vehicles in the overflow parking. Our rules state only one parking spot (visitor) can be taken after parking in the garage and driveway and then you need to park in the overflow parking. One of the board members created his own parking area near our retention area which is technically street parking which is not allowed any many residents have complained about.

Thankfully two of the units are renters who may eventually be moving out of the development.

The one unit owns a car service and even though he states that he has a building in another town where he parks his vehicles on property. His vehicle registration states 2 but he has 4. He also parks large vans outside the gates.

The other unit owner is a board member. Son's girlfriend moved in and they went from 4 vehicles to 5 (she also had a 6 vehicle) that she parked outside gates. No vehicle registration on file.

The last unit has four vehicles on their vehicle registration, however, they have many of their family members and daughter's boyfriends move into the unit so most times there are 6 to 8 vehicles parked on property from that unit. that is 17 to 18 vehicles for 3 units.

We recently had a blizzard in our area and sent out an eblast asking residents to park in their garages and driveways to make the job easier for our snow removal company. 95 percent cooperated. The residents with the excessive amount of vehicles had no choice but to park in visitors spaces. They were plowed in and had to dig themselves out. The visitor parking spaces are limited due to snow piles. So the residents CAN when they need to park in their driveways and garages, its just more convenient to park in a spot so you don't have to move cars in and out of a the driveway.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
I'm wondering if you know the difference between a rule and the enforcement of the rule.

You have gone on at length about what rules you would put in place and the details of your violators. But not one word about what your association is willing to do to enforce a rule when someone doesn't comply.

I'm getting the impression that you think that if you put out a reasonable rule (from your perspective), people will comply.

Unfortunately, I don't think it works that way.

You have rules today that aren't being followed. And people are angry that your board hasn't done anything to enforce compliance. You might fool yourself into thinking that the new rules will make a difference, but it's all smoke if you don't have a plan of enforcement.


Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
NinaR (Florida)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Maureen, first ask your PM if he/she holds a CAM license. It doesn't sound like it. You may want to change that. Does your lawyer specialize in HOA Law?
I am a board President in FL, We are in a zero lot line community. Driveways are a sort of grey area and I don't recall the term, but they are technically common area, but for the intended use of the owner/occupant. Legally what that means is that if your HOA pressure cleans the sidewalks, you can also have access to driveways. If there is an abandoned car left in the drive of an empty house, you can legally tow it.
In your case, the owner (the bank) should have been notified and asked permission to tow, or let them take care of it.
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 01/31/2016 8:21 AM
. . . I asked our attorney to look into this and although there is documentation regarding our driveways, in our declaration and other documents, there is no specific language stating that the driveways are "exclusive use" to the unit (although implied) or that the driveways were deeded to the unit by the Declarant. . . . I feel that the Board needs to clarify this so that we don't have residents thinking they can park in driveways that are vacant for any reason. . . ie a homeowner can be on a business trip, can a resident park in their driveway without permission ?

MaureenM1(Penn) In retrospect one partial solution might respectfully have been placing one or more heavy but temporary, well marked concrete CURBS ( or bollards ).

But even if consent could have been obtained for such intervention by the association, had it been successful wouldn't it merely shift some of others' mis-parked vehicles into areas of even greater vexation ? And possibly created other problems ?

It's great that somebody cares about the community. But in the bigger picture as raised by others above, respectfully just how far should an association step outside enforcing property or civil rights that are not directly its own or at least somehow required by legislation/governance documents ?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Maureen

It sounds like you have an enforcement, not a Rules & Regulations problem. As NPS said, even with new rules people are going to park as they wish as there is no punishment. Get tough on enforcement now. While I dislike towing, one car towed can speak volumes.
NinaR (Florida)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Towing is a great option. We have one horseshoe shaped street. There are 34 visitor spaces dotted throughout and we have a tow company come through between the hours of midnight and 6AM. Then again at a random time. The tow company has a contract with us to enforce our parking policy and if they tow someone they keep whatever they charge.
Our parking is enforced and they make some money.
I have learned that asking people to be considerate of their neighbors by self regulation does not work, unfortunately. Before we enforced our rules, we had a nice way of doing things, and only about 2 people would comply. So eventually we had to drop the hammer. No problem now!
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 01/31/2016 8:59 AM
Maureen,

I see this as a neighbor vs. neighbor issue and NOT an Association issue.

One good thing, by having vehicles parked in the driveway of a vacant home, it gives the impression that the home is not vacant and may minimize vandalize or break-ins on that property.

BINGO!!!!!!! Not to mention, I've always preferred that people park in empty house driveways over street-side parking in our streets (which is technically a violation but practically a necessity given how the developer built our homes 30 years ago).
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
The new owner came to his home yesterday and found a vehicle parked in the driveway. He found out I was the President and came to my home when I got home from work. I explained to him that no one should be parked in his driveway without his permission and I am very sorry that this was the first impression of our development.

The Board and PM dropped the ball on this one since we have a rule that you cannot park in another homeowners driveway with out their permission.

He was nicer about it than I would have been!!

NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 02/03/2016 3:40 AM
The new owner came to his home yesterday and found a vehicle parked in the driveway. He found out I was the President and came to my home when I got home from work. I explained to him that no one should be parked in his driveway without his permission and I am very sorry that this was the first impression of our development.

The Board and PM dropped the ball on this one since we have a rule that you cannot park in another homeowners driveway with out their permission.

He was nicer about it than I would have been!!

Did he expect you to do something about it when you started the conversation?

Did he expect you to do something about it when you ended the conversation?

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
If the HOA didn't move a muscle for two years and allowed them to park there, the HOA should keep their noses out of it. For many reasons, but as it was stated, it will resolve itself if given the chance and in this instance it's a no brainer that it will take care of itself when the new owners move in.

AS a side note, you should reflect on your own personal reason why this is so important to you now, two years later, are you sure that your concern is coming from the right place or is it coming from your not liking the person who doesn't enforce the parking rules and this is the final straw?

MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
No, he just mentioned it to me. I told him that we tried to stop resident by parking there by sending letters to the residents and fines and they would stop or awhile and start up again. Unfortunately we do not have a full time security person on our payroll.
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
The Board put a rule in place several years ago and it was enforced as much as it could. As I stated in another reply, we don't have a full time security person on our payroll. When it was reported to our PM it was dealt by warning letters and fines.

We have board members that also break the rules. Their excuse for not enforcing parking rules is "that they don't want to make people mad" at the board.

NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 02/03/2016 5:11 AM

Did he expect you to do something about it when you started the conversation?

Did he expect you to do something about it when you ended the conversation?


Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 02/03/2016 2:19 PM
No, he just mentioned it to me. I told him that we tried to stop resident by parking there by sending letters to the residents and fines and they would stop or awhile and start up again. Unfortunately we do not have a full time security person on our payroll.

I assume that your post is in response to my questions. What strikes me is that by handling it the way that you did, you created an expectation in the new owner that it was the board's responsibility. You could have just as easily established the opposite expectation, but you chose not to.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 02/03/2016 2:45 PM
Posted By NpS on 02/03/2016 5:11 AM

Did he expect you to do something about it when you started the conversation?

Did he expect you to do something about it when you ended the conversation?


Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 02/03/2016 2:19 PM
No, he just mentioned it to me. I told him that we tried to stop resident by parking there by sending letters to the residents and fines and they would stop or awhile and start up again. Unfortunately we do not have a full time security person on our payroll.

I assume that your post is in response to my questions. What strikes me is that by handling it the way that you did, you created an expectation in the new owner that it was the board's responsibility. You could have just as easily established the opposite expectation, but you chose not to.

Correct.

A simple, statement along the lines of:

That's lousy. Have you contacted the police about the trespassing?
I suggest you do that as this is not really an Association issue.

Would have placed the responsibility on the parties involved.
However, since Maureen has the opinion it's an Association issue, it was addressed the way it was vs. how others with a different opinion would have addressed the problem.

A clear example that each Board must do what they believe is best for their community.

NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 02/03/2016 4:08 PM
Posted By NpS on 02/03/2016 2:45 PM
Posted By NpS on 02/03/2016 5:11 AM

Did he expect you to do something about it when you started the conversation?

Did he expect you to do something about it when you ended the conversation?


Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 02/03/2016 2:19 PM
No, he just mentioned it to me. I told him that we tried to stop resident by parking there by sending letters to the residents and fines and they would stop or awhile and start up again. Unfortunately we do not have a full time security person on our payroll.

I assume that your post is in response to my questions. What strikes me is that by handling it the way that you did, you created an expectation in the new owner that it was the board's responsibility. You could have just as easily established the opposite expectation, but you chose not to.


Correct.

A simple, statement along the lines of:

That's lousy. Have you contacted the police about the trespassing?
I suggest you do that as this is not really an Association issue.

Would have placed the responsibility on the parties involved.
However, since Maureen has the opinion it's an Association issue, it was addressed the way it was vs. how others with a different opinion would have addressed the problem.

A clear example that each Board must do what they believe is best for their community.

Agree that the decision of the board should be respected. If the board didn't want to spend the extra money for a security person, then even if I didn't agree with that decision, it's my responsibility as a board member to support that board decision to someone new. More important that the new person knows the perspective of the board than my own personal perspective.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
PitA
Posts: 1,416
Posted:
Quote:


{a} The unit in question... the new homeowner has not given anyone permission to park in his driveway. This was confirmed by our management company.

{b} So when he moves in and there is a vehicle in his driveway should he ring doorbells until he find out who the vehicles belongs to? I would think he would contact our PM.

{a} The new HO may call police and report trespassing/abandoned vehicle.

{b} Call police AND the local towing company - DeFalco is preferred.

In all 50 states one is allowed to remove unauthorized 'stuff' from one's property.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I haven't read this entire thread, but in our urban high rise, the underground parking spaces are deeded to owners, but they are exclusive use common areas, so the HOA can and does make rules about them. One is that only one car & one personal shopping cart can be in each space. Another is that fluid leaks must be cleaned by the owner, or staff will clean them and bill back the Owner after a call to hearing, etc.

When unauthorized cars park in a space, and the resident who has access to it it complains, our security officer will try to locate the car's owners and ask them to move it. If the car owner can't be located, it's up to the unit owner to have it towed.

If a car parks in our circular drive that has entrances to our lobbies for longer than 15 minutes and refuses to move it, our PM could have it towed as this is common area. We have the required signs posted warning of our right to tow.
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
thank you Kerry, this is very helpful and could be adapted to our HOA.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here