💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

PatriciaL1 (California)
Posts: 78
Posted:
Our HOA is made up of several townhomes. All utilities, electrical, gas, water, sewer serve each unit independently. We share only a common area behind the homes. Some homes have balconies, some have decks, others have small enclosed back yards. We are getting ready to redo our CC&Rs. I have heard discussion that our HOA "looks like" a PUD, not an HOA. I have some questions:

1. Is a PUD simply a type of HOA (which makes me think we are currently defined as a CID)?

2. What are the advantages to our HOA to be redefined as a PUD?

3. Is redefining us as a PUD possible? Realistic?

Thanks.

RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Patricia

There are different types of HOA's. They would be defined as different types of ownership, 1) Condos, PUD. If you grant deed list your property as a "unit", they you would be considered a condo, if your grant deed list your property in terms of a "lot" you would generally be considered a PUD. HOA's are CID's (Common Interest Development).

A townhouse is not a form of ownership. Your CCR's generally will say XYZ Townhomes Homeowners Association. Your individual legal description will be listed as a "unit".

PUD would not apply to you in today's terms, unless possibly you were part of a master association consisting of sub associations. Today, designation of the different types of HOA's in California is all over the place.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
PUD = Planned Unit Development
A Planned Unit Development (PUD) is a community of homes that could look like single family residences, townhomes or condos, and can include both residential and commercial units

CID = Common Interest Development
A type of housing, composed of individually owned units, such as condominiums, townhouses, or single-family homes, that share ownership of common areas, such as swimming pools, landscaping, and parking

Since you are in California, you may find the following helpful:

CID Menu page from Davis-Stirling website

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
As Tim points out, Patricia, visit davis-stirling.com for answers to your question. the first thing you'll see is that there is specific legislation that covers all Common Interest Developments (CIDs) where incorporated or not.

Next, are you sure there are no other common area elements that all of you are responsible? Let's say roads, or an entry monument or curbs or sidewalks?

Richard knows a lot more about the Name of projects, but I suspect that for purposes of your CC&Rs it may not matter.

Has your Board asked your HOA attorney your questions?
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PatriciaL1 on 12/20/2015 6:10 PM
Our HOA is made up of several townhomes. All utilities, electrical, gas, water, sewer serve each unit independently. We share only a common area behind the homes. Some homes have balconies, some have decks, others have small enclosed back yards. We are getting ready to redo our CC&Rs. I have heard discussion that our HOA "looks like" a PUD, not an HOA. I have some questions:

1. Is a PUD simply a type of HOA (which makes me think we are currently defined as a CID)?

2. What are the advantages to our HOA to be redefined as a PUD?

3. Is redefining us as a PUD possible? Realistic?

Thanks.

Section 4200 of D-S states: "This act applies and a common interest development is created whenever a separate interest coupled with an interest in the common area or membership in the association is, or has been, conveyed, provided all of the following are recorded:
(a) A declaration.
(b) A condominium plan, if any exists.
(c) A final map or parcel map, if Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410) of Title 7 of the Government Code requires the
recording of either a final map or parcel map for the common interest development."

So under CA law, a CID was formed when your docs were recorded. Makes no difference if you call it a PUD or anything else.

The Homeowners Association (HOA) manages the CID. The CID covers all varieties of ownership, including PUDs.

So IMO, no real value in trying to redefine anything. Just follow the statute.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
NpS kindly did the research, Patrica, and the last line sums it up:

"So IMO, no real value in trying to redefine anything. Just follow the statute."

I guess another question to you is why do some think the descriptor (POA, PUD, etc.) matters?
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 12/21/2015 12:48 PM
NpS kindly did the research, Patrica, and the last line sums it up:

"So IMO, no real value in trying to redefine anything. Just follow the statute."

I guess another question to you is why do some think the descriptor (POA, PUD, etc.) matters?

Patricia

There are many what-a-be- attorneys on this site. It does matter that the right set of CCRs were enacted for your type of property. I have seen cases where there are mismatches..

But, don't take my word for it.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RichardP13 on 12/21/2015 1:32 PM
It does matter that the right set of CCRs were enacted for your type of property. I have seen cases where there are mismatches..

So Richard, in a townhouse community with limited common space and no amenities, can you explain how a PUD designation would make any difference to the re-write of the CC&Rs?

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 12/21/2015 4:16 PM
Posted By RichardP13 on 12/21/2015 1:32 PM
It does matter that the right set of CCRs were enacted for your type of property. I have seen cases where there are mismatches..

So Richard, in a townhouse community with limited common space and no amenities, can you explain how a PUD designation would make any difference to the re-write of the CC&Rs?

The most important aspect of re-stating your governing docs, especially the CCRs is that the responsibilities of both the Association and the homeowner are clearly and properly defined. More importantly, that the insurance requirements are clearly and properly defined.

Common interest is not only defined as swimming pools, rec rooms, private roads, but something important like common walls, common roofs, and common plumbing, etc.

PUD designation really means nothing. One size does not fit all.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RichardP13 on 12/21/2015 5:28 PM
PUD designation really means nothing.

That is the point I was making to Patricia. Thanks for confirming.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Yes, Richard. This is the pint NpS is making to Patricia, at t least the way I read him.
PatriciaL1 (California)
Posts: 78
Posted:
Liability, responsibility, these are some of the reasons I wanted to understand the difference.

For example, our homes have balconies, some on the third floor. The HOA is responsible for those balconies. Yet they can be impossible to reach without getting scaffolding, etc. and that would be just to inspect, let alone replace, repair or maintain.

Another thing is the sewer systems. They are getting older and beginning to fail, one by one. As they only serve on unit it just seemed to me that they should be the responsibility of the homeowner, rather than the HOA.

I was under the impression that as a PUD more things would fall onto the homeowner, and since so many of these things serve on unit alone it made sense to me that it would be that way. If this is the case, then it would make a significant difference.

In addition our budget is small enough that it will be impossible to fix very many balconies and / or sewers per year. Everything is getting older, everything needs just a little more work. Would I rather pay higher dues in the hopes that the HOA might get to my balcony this year - or - pay less, save my money and fix my balcony on my own?

Yes, we do share sidewalks, interior landscaping and lighting, and a six car parking lot. But no swimming pool, no tennis court, no gym, rec room, no security, no extra amenities.

Thank you.

PatriciaL1 (California)
Posts: 78
Posted:
Liability, responsibility, these are some of the reasons I wanted to understand the difference.

For example, our homes have balconies, some on the third floor. The HOA is responsible for those balconies. Yet they can be impossible to reach without getting scaffolding, etc. and that would be just to inspect, let alone replace, repair or maintain.

Another thing is the sewer systems. They are getting older and beginning to fail, one by one. As they only serve on unit it just seemed to me that they should be the responsibility of the homeowner, rather than the HOA.

I was under the impression that as a PUD more things would fall onto the homeowner, and since so many of these things serve on unit alone it made sense to me that it would be that way. If this is the case, then it would make a significant difference.

In addition our budget is small enough that it will be impossible to fix very many balconies and / or sewers per year. Everything is getting older, everything needs just a little more work. Would I rather pay higher dues in the hopes that the HOA might get to my balcony this year - or - pay less, save my money and fix my balcony on my own?

Yes, we do share sidewalks, interior landscaping and lighting, and a six car parking lot. But no swimming pool, no tennis court, no gym, rec room, no security, no extra amenities.

Thank you.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PatriciaL1 on 12/22/2015 7:20 AM

Another thing is the sewer systems. They are getting older and beginning to fail, one by one. As they only serve on unit it just seemed to me that they should be the responsibility of the homeowner, rather than the HOA.

Typically, the owner is responsible for the sewer line from the house to the main line. The sewer company or Association is responsible for the main line and other interconnects between main lines.

For water supplies, the owner is typically responsible from the meter to the house and all piping/fixtures within the house.

Your CC&Rs should be specific on who is responsible for what. If it is not, expect challenges if you try to have individual owners pay.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PatriciaL1 on 12/22/2015 7:20 AM

I was under the impression that as a PUD more things would fall onto the homeowner, and since so many of these things serve on unit alone it made sense to me that it would be that way. If this is the case, then it would make a significant difference.

It won't matter if your classified as a PUD or a CID.
The language in the CC&Rs will be what matters as this is the contract everyone agreed to abide by.

Quote:
Posted By PatriciaL1 on 12/22/2015 7:20 AM

In addition our budget is small enough that it will be impossible to fix very many balconies and / or sewers per year.

When was your last Reserve Study done?
Are the reserve funds fully funded or partially funded (based on that study)?

If you're not setting enough money aside in Reserves, expect special assessments, deferred maintenance/repairs or a combination of both in your future.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Whatever your CID is called, as others pointed out, all that matters is what's in your governing documents with respects to responsibility, liability, etc.

So, perhaps your CC&Rs state that owners are responsible for the sewer to the street. If not, that's probably something you want to change when you rewrite your CC&Rs.

What is the wording in your documents, CC&Rs, I guess, about those balconies.

Our balconies, for instance, are exclusive use common areas. We're a high rise condo and we owners are responsible for painting the interior of them, keeping them clean, replacing the tiles on their floors. BUT the HOA is responsible for painting or replacing their rails if ever needed. Our HOA is responsible for the underpayments under the tile when it deteriorates. But any work that will be needed can be done by going through the unit or using a ladder from the balcony below to access under the tiles if/when every needed.

So if your HOA, Patricia, is responsible for certain aspects of your balcony, then your HOA would need to pay for the scaffolding.

Are you saying, Patricia, that your HOA has not been paying into a reserves account for all of your common area elements?

NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
In your rewrite of your docs, you could transfer responsibility for the balconies to the individual owners.

In our townhouse community, our HOA is responsible for sewer lines under the street. The individual owners are responsible for the sewer lines from the curb to the house. If your current docs don't have that kind of distinction, you could change those responsibilities in the re-write.

As all have said, it's not the PUD or CID designation that matters. If you want to make changes, you need to make changes in the details.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PatriciaL1 on 12/22/2015 7:20 AM
In addition our budget is small enough that it will be impossible to fix very many balconies and / or sewers per year. Everything is getting older, everything needs just a little more work. Would I rather pay higher dues in the hopes that the HOA might get to my balcony this year - or - pay less, save my money and fix my balcony on my own?

That argument sounds familiar. It reflects a stunning lack of agency on the part of a board. When you begin to hear, "We don't have enough in the budget to fix that," the appropriate response is, "Well whose fault is that?"

If it's something that falls under the association's responsibility then the association has an obligation to maintain, repair or replace it. The association has no power to push that cost off onto the individual owners.

Directors have to make tough decisions from time to time and setting assessments below what's needed is evidence that the directors, past and present, aren't doing their jobs. It sounds like special assessments or borrowing the money will be in your association's immediate future, Patricia. If my balcony needed to be replaced and the choice was wait for the association to drag their feet because they "don't have enough money" or to fix it myself, I think I would endeavor to enforce the contract.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Patricia

It sounds like what you want to do is ignore Reserves, keep assessments low, and put more responsibility on individual owners. Cheap is as cheap does.
PatriciaL1 (California)
Posts: 78
Posted:
I am actually the newbie on the Board. I joined when nobody else would. The long standing VP didn't like when I asked questions, specifically when I asked for multiple bids for projects. I questioned how the maintenance was being done. For example, one fifth (really more like one eighth) of the buildings would get painted each year instead of just painting all of them or at least half. Seemed like a more expensive way to do it. He got fed up with me and resigned. Made a big scene with all the other homeowners. Whatever.

I am still learning more about the history of the buildings. I get the sense that a lot of work was deferred. Where did the money go? Not into the reserve account anyway. We have had reserve studies, of course. I think they are conservative in their estimates of the work to be done. We are definitely not fully funded, but up since I took office, approximately 30%. It is true, a special assessment or a loan might be in our future. Dues are already pretty high, perhaps due to years of deferred work, dunno.

I am not trying to do things cheap. I am trying to be realistic. (For example, it becomes more complex when owners ask for some changes, like putting glass fronts to their balconies. The HOA can't afford to glass front 150 balconies, but a single homeowner might want to do the three in front of their home. Eventually the same money spent, but the homeowner might feel as if the moeny from their pocket actually went to their house. Again, dunno.)

We are due for a CC&R rewrite this year. I don't even know if we would have enough of a vote to make any changes anyway. I completely agree, it is in the details and things needs to be spelled out as precisely as possible.

I am just a simple Board member doing the best I can.

Thanks.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Patricia

I am assuming you have 150 units in your townhome community. I also hope you have a management company running the day-to-day affairs of the community. In your situation, a good management company would be worth their weight in gold and money well spent.

Here are just a few reasons:

1) You mentioned that you were painting only a portion each year and you felt it was better to do them all at once, or maybe half. Financially, it may make perfect sense to do a portion each year. This would/should also be included in your reserve study. A good manager should be able to put together a workable financial plan to pay for the long term projects within your association.

2) You need either your manager (if any) to closely review your expenses to see where costs can be trimmed and redistributed to reserves. Hopefully your Accounts Receivable (delinquencies) are well managed and under control. Can monies be saved with your utilities, vendor contracts, security (if any).

3) An outsider should review your governing docs to make sure they work for you TODAY. Realize that making some of the changes you have mentioned will require approval of the mortgage holders. There are proper ways to do this. If working with a legal firm to rewrite your docs, MAKE SURE they have a proven and verifiable track record of getting them approved. Also realize that it will take approximately $10K to have them completely done. This would include legal fees and printing and postage costs, as well as election material costs.

4) While trying to turn certain things over to homeowners to pay, it will have stiff opposition from owners, especially long time owners that have been paying into reserves and not seeing the benefits. In turning over certain items, such as balconies, you may slowly lose the continuity that attracted people to the complex in the first place.

5) Are your dues in line with comparable neighboring communities.

Just a couple of things to consider.
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PatriciaL1 on 12/22/2015 6:59 PM
I am actually the newbie on the Board. I joined when nobody else would. The long standing VP didn't like when I asked questions, specifically when I asked for multiple bids for projects. I questioned how the maintenance was being done. For example, one fifth (really more like one eighth) of the buildings would get painted each year instead of just painting all of them or at least half. Seemed like a more expensive way to do it. He got fed up with me and resigned. Made a big scene with all the other homeowners. Whatever.
...
I am just a simple Board member doing the best I can.

My take on this is if your questions make long-sitting directors nervous or uncomfortable then you're doing something right.
PatriciaL1 (California)
Posts: 78
Posted:
We are only 50 units - (some have 3 and four balconies - some balconies are decorative, not even accessible by the resident)

We have a good management company. Our PM is quite involved, and this is a change. The previously mentioned Board member would not allow her to have any input, ran things the way he wanted. The new Board insisting that we get her involved, "do things the right way" was partially the cause of his resignation. No guilt here.

With our PM involved the new Board has reviewed all contracts, utilities, delinquencies, etc. We have managed to save tremendous amounts of money. So we are on the right track. But I have been hearing that historically money was not well spent and that is why the homes were relatively neglected. Not enough was left in the reserves to do all the painting, or even half, so units were painted 4 - 6 per year. Seven years later, several remain unpainted. I think we can dip into our reserves a bit, use some of the money we saved elsewhere and finish off the rest of the units - save up the money - and then do at least half the units at one time in a few years. And so on with other maintenance items.

I think our governing documents don't work in today's world. For example, issues like mold, solar panels, are not even addressed. Twenty years since the last update makes this a perfect time to redo them and make them fit our current needs. Great idea of checking the make sure the legal firm has a proven and verifiable record of getting them approved. Thank you for that! (We anticipated at least $10K)

Changing responsibilities will definitely be an uphill battle - perhaps a break in dues will help. Our dues are not exorbitant, but they are high. Other communities with the same sues offer many amenities - pools, security, water, cable, rec rooms, gyms, none of which we have. Some homeowners have told me they would like glass fronts on their balconies (something our budget would never be able to afford) while other's of course have argued against any changes. Not sure where the majority lies. A survey before CC&R redo will probably help guide.

Not an easy position. But definitely one worth exploring.

Thanks
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
It's great, Patricia, that you're taking such a positive interest in your HOA! Sounds like your PM is doing well too!

One thing that catches my eye is that your've saved a lot of money. I assume this is in reserves accounts, right?

It is permissible to use finds form one reserves component's line item to, say, fund the painting project. Your reserves are really just one big pot of money. But, wait...isn't painting the exteriors on your reserves study list? If not, where is it? Operating budget??

Yes, our CC&Rs are 15 y.o. and, of course also don't deal with mold and owners' responsibilities are not spelled out well enough. Our CC&Rs also do not permit anyone to change the appearance of our balconies and I'm sure no revision would permit it either. Do yours?

But if somehow your owners, learned from a survey, perhaps, DO want to permit class balcony fronts, then they should, imo, pay for them themselves! And, also imo, such installation would need to be approved by your Arc. comm. so that you have uniform and more important, safe work.

We're 200+ units and the estimate to rewrite our CC&Rs is about $5,000 + mailings, so maybe with 50 units yours wouldn't be $10,000.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here