Quote:
Posted By DorrinndaF on 12/13/2015 5:47 AM
we are currently being sued by a home owner regarding a fence issue - its complicated. Do we have a requirement to inform our insurance about the ongoing litigation?
Good advices above.
Even where an insurable risk has little "obvious" application to your association's contracted insurance coverage, I don't see why the association would be WORSE off by putting its insurer confidentially on written notice that 'allegations' & adverse legal claim have been received.
The policy may specifically require such else grounds to deny any triggered duty to defend or duty to indemnify.
This & other Forums show that many self-managed associations do not have skillsets or disregard Board members who competently do, or are too cheap to hire such until making a lot of critical mistakes.
". . regarding a fence issue. . " opens a wide door. An insurer's 'duty to defend' under a policy in many jurisdictions is triggered or exempted merely by the subject matter of wrongdoing alleged whether true or not; it may be independent of a duty to indemnify or underwrite some portion of awards against the insured.
It is NOT a 'fortuitous' risk if there is an attempt to 'throw something against the wall' with Plan B being "Don't worry; our insurer will defend us & indemnify us if we are wrong, no matter what". Non-fortuitous risks agreed by the insurer, had better be specifically contracted within a policy or an insurer may only defend or maybe even refuse to defend in some jurisdictions.
The wording of the policy & its coverage is something the association needs to understand with competent legal advice.