💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Hello all,

Question;

I'm in Florida. My association has formed a fining committee. They are attempting to fine me for something that was installed on my property by the previous owner. They claim the object was hidden from view and is now not hidden so it must be removed within 30 days, otherwise I will be accessed a $100 per day fine up to $1000 and then they are threatening to sue me to collect. The object is useful and I cannot remove it without expense that may exceed the fine cap.

I could wait for them to come after me and try to drag me to court but there is a chance they could win or I could call their bluff and bet they won't sue as they only have $1500 per YEAR allocated for attorney's fees in the budget.

This may be an unusual question, but what if I was to just send them a check for $1000 up front and keep the object on my property in exactly the same location? I bet nobody has ever done this. The statutory cap in FL is $1000, so if I was to pay then what other recourse would they have?
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
Regarding what other recourse they might have, I think that would depend on the wording of the governing docs. We had a situation where a window AC unit was visible from the street and that was against the rules. The owner allowed the shrubs to grow high enough so it couldn't be seen from the street and the problem went away.

Perhaps you could re-hide whatever eyesore they don't like? They could fine you $100 a day up to $1,000, you pay the $1,000, and they start fining you again next month. After a few rounds of that they could - depending on the wording of your docs - obtain a court order to make you remove it anyway. They you'd be out several thousands in fines plus the HOA's legal costs and still not have whatever the thing is.

Try to comply. The fining mechanism is meant to cure violations and I don't think you're going to ultimately prevail by trying to dance around the fines.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
MG,

In your previous thread you stated that you were a renter and not the owner. Is this still the case?

If you are still a renter, the issue isn't with you it's between the Association and the owner.

MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 11/11/2015 8:09 PM
MG,

In your previous thread you stated that you were a renter and not the owner. Is this still the case?

If you are still a renter, the issue isn't with you it's between the Association and the owner.


No, that thread is from 2011. I moved and purchased a property.
MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GenoS on 11/11/2015 6:57 PM
Regarding what other recourse they might have, I think that would depend on the wording of the governing docs. We had a situation where a window AC unit was visible from the street and that was against the rules. The owner allowed the shrubs to grow high enough so it couldn't be seen from the street and the problem went away.

Perhaps you could re-hide whatever eyesore they don't like? They could fine you $100 a day up to $1,000, you pay the $1,000, and they start fining you again next month. After a few rounds of that they could - depending on the wording of your docs - obtain a court order to make you remove it anyway. They you'd be out several thousands in fines plus the HOA's legal costs and still not have whatever the thing is.

Try to comply. The fining mechanism is meant to cure violations and I don't think you're going to ultimately prevail by trying to dance around the fines.

I have tried to work with them to re-hide what they don't like but they are unwilling to negotiate.

Governing docs do not specify fining procedure, that's why I'm referencing state law. Governing docs also do not provide for a fining committee.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
They do need to create a Fining Schedule and distribute it to all owners. If not, then fining is a bit less effective. HOA's documents usually do state they can fine but lack definition and terms. That is why the Fine Schedule is needed so everyone understands the violation and payment for such actions. Nothing says paying the fine and keeping the violation isn't an option unless they document it. Otherwise the HOA should have the power to remove the violation and send you a bill. Which is much stronger option than fining. Fining is like speeding tickets.

You may also want to find out what legal steps they can take for unpaid fines. Can they sue or lien? That is the question...With Florida crazy rules, I can't tell you.

Former HOA President
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GenoS on 11/11/2015 6:57 PM
They could fine you $100 a day up to $1,000, you pay the $1,000, and they start fining you again next month. After a few rounds of that they could - depending on the wording of your docs - obtain a court order to make you remove it anyway. They you'd be out several thousands in fines plus the HOA's legal costs and still not have whatever the thing is.


Geno makes a good argument for not paying the fine, although that was not his intent.

If you pay the fine the HOA will just start fining all over again. If you do not pay, their $1,000 max fine remains standing as a barrier to additional fines.

The association is unlikely to sue given their limited legal budget. Even if they were to sue, there is no guarantee that they would win.
MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 11/11/2015 9:10 PM
They do need to create a Fining Schedule and distribute it to all owners. If not, then fining is a bit less effective. HOA's documents usually do state they can fine but lack definition and terms. That is why the Fine Schedule is needed so everyone understands the violation and payment for such actions. Nothing says paying the fine and keeping the violation isn't an option unless they document it. Otherwise the HOA should have the power to remove the violation and send you a bill. Which is much stronger option than fining. Fining is like speeding tickets.

You may also want to find out what legal steps they can take for unpaid fines. Can they sue or lien? That is the question...With Florida crazy rules, I can't tell you.

FL law does not allow a lien on single family housing. Their only option would be to sue me to collect, but chances are that it would cost more for them to sue then the $1000 fine and it would empty their entire budget.

No fining schedule was ever made and they do not have the power to remove the object and send me a bill.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
MG

What is the object?

Paying a fine does not make a violation go away.
DonD9 (Wisconsin)
Posts: 4
Posted:
You live in an association that has rules. You knew that when you moved there. Save yourself and your association a lot of headaches and abide by the rules and remove the object.
CarolF (Florida)
Posts: 435
Posted:
MG5 - In FL a single family HOA can file a lien on your property for $1000 for accrued fines. A condominium association can not.
See 720.305(2)
(2) The association may levy reasonable fines. A fine may not exceed $100 per violation against any member or any member’s tenant, guest, or invitee for the failure of the owner of the parcel or its occupant, licensee, or invitee to comply with any provision of the declaration, the association bylaws, or reasonable rules of the association unless otherwise provided in the governing documents. A fine may be levied by the board for each day of a continuing violation, with a single notice and opportunity for hearing, except that the fine may not exceed $1,000 in the aggregate unless otherwise provided in the governing documents. A fine of less than $1,000 may not become a lien against a parcel. In any action to recover a fine, the prevailing party is entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs from the nonprevailing party as determined by the court.
(a) An association may suspend, for a reasonable period of time, the right of a member, or a member’s tenant, guest, or invitee, to use common areas and facilities for the failure of the owner of the parcel or its occupant, licensee, or invitee to comply with any provision of the declaration, the association bylaws, or reasonable rules of the association. This paragraph does not apply to that portion of common areas used to provide access or utility services to the parcel. A suspension may not prohibit an owner or tenant of a parcel from having vehicular and pedestrian ingress to and egress from the parcel, including, but not limited to, the right to park.
(b) A fine or suspension may not be imposed by the board of administration without at least 14 days’ notice to the person sought to be fined or suspended and an opportunity for a hearing before a committee of at least three members appointed by the board who are not officers, directors, or employees of the association, or the spouse, parent, child, brother, or sister of an officer, director, or employee. If the committee, by majority vote, does not approve a proposed fine or suspension, it may not be imposed. The role of the committee is limited to determining whether to confirm or reject the fine or suspension levied by the board. If the board of administration imposes a fine or suspension, the association must provide written notice of such fine or suspension by mail or hand delivery to the parcel owner and, if applicable, to any tenant, licensee, or invitee of the parcel owner.
(3) If a member is more than 90 days delinquent in paying any fee, fine, or other monetary obligation due to the association, the association may suspend the rights of the member, or the member’s tenant, guest, or invitee, to use common areas and facilities until the fee, fine, or other monetary obligation is paid in full. This subsection does not apply to that portion of common areas used to provide access or utility services to the parcel. A suspension may not prohibit an owner or tenant of a parcel from having vehicular and pedestrian ingress to and egress from the parcel, including, but not limited to, the right to park. The notice and hearing requirements under subsection (2) do not apply to a suspension imposed under this subsection.
(4) An association may suspend the voting rights of a parcel or member for the nonpayment of any fee, fine, or other monetary obligation due to the association that is more than 90 days delinquent. A voting interest or consent right allocated to a parcel or member which has been suspended by the association shall be subtracted from the total number of voting interests in the association, which shall be reduced by the number of suspended voting interests when calculating the total percentage or number of all voting interests available to take or approve any action, and the suspended voting interests shall not be considered for any purpose, including, but not limited to, the percentage or number of voting interests necessary to constitute a quorum, the percentage or number of voting interests required to conduct an election, or the percentage or number of voting interests required to approve an action under this chapter or pursuant to the governing documents. The notice and hearing requirements under subsection (2) do not apply to a suspension imposed under this subsection. The suspension ends upon full payment of all obligations currently due or overdue to the association.
(5) All suspensions imposed pursuant to subsection (3) or subsection (4) must be approved at a properly noticed board meeting. Upon approval, the association must notify the parcel owner and, if applicable, the parcel’s occupant, licensee, or invitee by mail or hand delivery.
(6) The suspensions permitted by paragraph (2)(a) and subsections (3) and (4) apply to a member and, when appropriate, the member’s tenants, guests, or invitees, even if the delinquency or failure that resulted in the suspension arose from less than all of the multiple parcels owned by a member.
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MG5 on 11/11/2015 8:26 PM
Governing docs do not specify fining procedure, that's why I'm referencing state law. Governing docs also do not provide for a fining committee.

Gotcha. My own HOA's docs are also silent on fines. The original intent of their enforcement provisions boils down to a large self-help paragraph in the CCRs which basically says, "Owners will comply with the rules and restrictions and if they don't fix a violation the HOA will fix it for them and then bill the owner for it. If the owner doesn't pay then the HOA will go to court where it shall have the right to also recover attorney fees." The word "fine" does not appear in any of our docs.

Nevertheless, current and past board members have told me that they believe the board can levy fines since FS 720.305(2) says, "The association may levy reasonable fines. A fine may not exceed $100 per violation against any member...".

I maintain FS 720.305(2) only allows HOAs to levy fines IF their governing documents authorize it, and that since ours don't talk about fines at all then there can be none unless and until our docs are amended.

The whole question is academic here, though, since long time owners and residents have told me they've been here for 15 years and nobody was ever fined for anything in that time.
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MG5 on 11/12/2015 8:12 AM
FL law does not allow a lien on single family housing. Their only option would be to sue me to collect, but chances are that it would cost more for them to sue then the $1000 fine and it would empty their entire budget.

No fining schedule was ever made and they do not have the power to remove the object and send me a bill.

Be very very careful. Florida law most definitely allows an HOA to put a lien on single family housing.

I tend to agree with you (though I'm no lawyer) that they don't posess the right to levy a fine in the first place.
AllisonD (Florida)
Posts: 449
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MG5 on 11/11/2015 5:11 PM
Hello all,

Question;

I'm in Florida. My association has formed a fining committee. They are attempting to fine me for something that was installed on my property by the previous owner. They claim the object was hidden from view and is now not hidden so it must be removed within 30 days, otherwise I will be accessed a $100 per day fine up to $1000 and then they are threatening to sue me to collect. The object is useful and I cannot remove it without expense that may exceed the fine cap.

I could wait for them to come after me and try to drag me to court but there is a chance they could win or I could call their bluff and bet they won't sue as they only have $1500 per YEAR allocated for attorney's fees in the budget.

This may be an unusual question, but what if I was to just send them a check for $1000 up front and keep the object on my property in exactly the same location? I bet nobody has ever done this. The statutory cap in FL is $1000, so if I was to pay then what other recourse would they have?

The board voted to fine you but per Fl Statute 720.305 (2b), the fining committee is formed to approve or not approve the fine. This is a technicality but did it occur this way? You should have been able to appear before the fining committee and plead your case. Additionally, your documents may contain a provision that delineates the way dues payments are applied, for example; dues may first be applied to outstanding fines and then what is left over goes towards dues. If that occurs, you may find yourself owing dues money instead of fine money.
MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AllisonD on 11/12/2015 6:01 PM
Posted By MG5 on 11/11/2015 5:11 PM
Hello all,

Question;

I'm in Florida. My association has formed a fining committee. They are attempting to fine me for something that was installed on my property by the previous owner. They claim the object was hidden from view and is now not hidden so it must be removed within 30 days, otherwise I will be accessed a $100 per day fine up to $1000 and then they are threatening to sue me to collect. The object is useful and I cannot remove it without expense that may exceed the fine cap.

I could wait for them to come after me and try to drag me to court but there is a chance they could win or I could call their bluff and bet they won't sue as they only have $1500 per YEAR allocated for attorney's fees in the budget.

This may be an unusual question, but what if I was to just send them a check for $1000 up front and keep the object on my property in exactly the same location? I bet nobody has ever done this. The statutory cap in FL is $1000, so if I was to pay then what other recourse would they have?


The board voted to fine you but per Fl Statute 720.305 (2b), the fining committee is formed to approve or not approve the fine. This is a technicality but did it occur this way? You should have been able to appear before the fining committee and plead your case. Additionally, your documents may contain a provision that delineates the way dues payments are applied, for example; dues may first be applied to outstanding fines and then what is left over goes towards dues. If that occurs, you may find yourself owing dues money instead of fine money.

I went in front of the committee of 3 non board members and the property manager. The manager (who works for the management company) gave me a list of the reasons why the object had to be removed and said you have 30 days to remove it before we start fining you. When I asked a question I was cut off and shut down. There was no hearing. It was a dictation.

This appears to be a violation in itself
720.305
"(b) A fine or suspension may not be imposed by the board of administration without at least 14 days’ notice to the person sought to be fined or suspended and an opportunity for a hearing before a committee of at least three members appointed by the board who are not officers, directors, or employees of the association, or the spouse, parent, child, brother, or sister of an officer, director, or employee. If the committee, by majority vote, does not approve a proposed fine or suspension, it may not be imposed. The role of the committee is limited to determining whether to confirm or reject the fine or suspension levied by the board. If the board of administration imposes a fine or suspension, the association must provide written notice of such fine or suspension by mail or hand delivery to the parcel owner and, if applicable, to any tenant, licensee, or invitee of the parcel owner."

By the property manager being present at the meeting and guiding the committee to a decision this violated state law, correct? She is a employee.

There was also no majority vote or any vote of any type.

And the meeting was not limited to determining if the fine should be approved or denied, it was just a list of reasons why the object needs to be removed.
MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GenoS on 11/12/2015 1:57 PM
Posted By MG5 on 11/11/2015 8:26 PM
Governing docs do not specify fining procedure, that's why I'm referencing state law. Governing docs also do not provide for a fining committee.

Gotcha. My own HOA's docs are also silent on fines. The original intent of their enforcement provisions boils down to a large self-help paragraph in the CCRs which basically says, "Owners will comply with the rules and restrictions and if they don't fix a violation the HOA will fix it for them and then bill the owner for it. If the owner doesn't pay then the HOA will go to court where it shall have the right to also recover attorney fees." The word "fine" does not appear in any of our docs.

Nevertheless, current and past board members have told me that they believe the board can levy fines since FS 720.305(2) says, "The association may levy reasonable fines. A fine may not exceed $100 per violation against any member...".

I maintain FS 720.305(2) only allows HOAs to levy fines IF their governing documents authorize it, and that since ours don't talk about fines at all then there can be none unless and until our docs are amended.

The whole question is academic here, though, since long time owners and residents have told me they've been here for 15 years and nobody was ever fined for anything in that time.

Re-reading my docs reveal that there is no mention of fining or any power set aside for the HOA to fine. It does specify that if a court case should come about that the winning party has the right to collect all attorney's fees but this applies to all disputes.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MG5 on 11/12/2015 8:07 PM

By the property manager being present at the meeting and guiding the committee to a decision this violated state law, correct? She is a employee.

You would be incorrect, in my opinion.

The PM was acting as the witness against you.
It's a shame that the fining committee failed to run the meeting. But the PM was not a member of the committee.

An argument can be made that you didn't have an opportunity to be heard, but that argument may simply require that a new hearing be held, not that the issue be overturned in your favor. Hence, the outcome may be the same.

Quote:
Posted By MG5 on 11/12/2015 8:07 PM

There was also no majority vote or any vote of any type.

Ask for a copy of the minutes of the meeting.
I suspect, it will show a vote occurred.

What is unknown is if the vote occurred prior to or after you were in front of the committee.

Quote:
Posted By MG5 on 11/12/2015 8:07 PM

And the meeting was not limited to determining if the fine should be approved or denied, it was just a list of reasons why the object needs to be removed.

Based on the version you provided of the meeting, I would tend to agree with you.
However, it may be easier to simply remove the object.

Another option (which should have been done prior to the hearing) would be to:

a) contact the previous owner to see if they had approval or not. If not, consider that you are in violation.

b) review minutes of meetings to see if there is documentation that the structure was approved or not.
If not, you are likely in violation.

MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DonD9 on 11/12/2015 10:26 AM
You live in an association that has rules. You knew that when you moved there. Save yourself and your association a lot of headaches and abide by the rules and remove the object.

If you had read my opening statement, I stated that I didn't create the problem. The object has been in technical violation for 10 years and I've owned the property for 3. Only now is it becoming an issue.
MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 11/12/2015 8:16 PM
Posted By MG5 on 11/12/2015 8:07 PM

By the property manager being present at the meeting and guiding the committee to a decision this violated state law, correct? She is a employee.


You would be incorrect, in my opinion.

The PM was acting as the witness against you.
It's a shame that the fining committee failed to run the meeting. But the PM was not a member of the committee.

An argument can be made that you didn't have an opportunity to be heard, but that argument may simply require that a new hearing be held, not that the issue be overturned in your favor. Hence, the outcome may be the same.

Quote:
Posted By MG5 on 11/12/2015 8:07 PM

There was also no majority vote or any vote of any type.


Ask for a copy of the minutes of the meeting.
I suspect, it will show a vote occurred.

What is unknown is if the vote occurred prior to or after you were in front of the committee.

Quote:
Posted By MG5 on 11/12/2015 8:07 PM

And the meeting was not limited to determining if the fine should be approved or denied, it was just a list of reasons why the object needs to be removed.


Based on the version you provided of the meeting, I would tend to agree with you.
However, it may be easier to simply remove the object.

Another option (which should have been done prior to the hearing) would be to:

a) contact the previous owner to see if they had approval or not. If not, consider that you are in violation.

b) review minutes of meetings to see if there is documentation that the structure was approved or not.
If not, you are likely in violation.


I have access to all the meeting's notes for the last 10 years online and a vote never occurred.

Previous owner never sought permission to install the object but they never went after him for it either.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MG5 on 11/12/2015 8:30 PM

Previous owner never sought permission to install the object but they never went after him for it either.

Well, as you pointed out, the issue was previously hidden from view (although you don't say what occurred, bushes trimmed,tree removed, etc., to place the structure within view).

Unlike VA, FL does not have a requirement I'm aware of that the Association be bound to any disclosure statement. Therefore, the fact that prior approval was not sought and the Association didn't pursue any enforcement because they were unaware of the change does not cancel each other out.

Bottom line is that you have an unapproved change that the Association is now aware of.

It sucks, but like the last person holding a counterfeit bill is out the money, it appears that you are the one who must deal with the violation.

If you know where the previous owner is, and if they indicated that there were no violations on the property, then you may have a cause of action against them to satisfy your damages (the cost for removal).

It sucks that the Association isn't willing to work with you.
Unfortunately, some Associations are that way and that is what you purchased into.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I say if the HOA wants it removed just allow them access to remove it. No fines. Simply let the HOA do their job in removing the violation they have a right to do. However, will warn you that the HOA could charge you the removal costs they incur. Which may be a cheaper option than paying fines. Don't know your objection of not doing it yourself.

Remember suing your HOA is suing yourself and your neighbors... So I would take that in consideration before proceeding down that route....

Former HOA President
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 11/13/2015 8:00 AM
Remember suing your HOA is suing yourself and your neighbors... So I would take that in consideration before proceeding down that route....

In Florida, if you sue and win you are suing your neighbors but not yourself. Florida law exempts a prevailing homeowner plaintiff from any legal costs incurred by the HOA in defending the action.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
But who is paying the dues to cover the lawsuits or the costs of the HOA lawsuit? Your dues... So your paying for your own lawsuit "win". Basically, it allows you to not have to participate in any special assessments levied against the rest of the owners if one is needed to pay off the "Win". Which is a good thing as you can't liened for not paying that special assessment. In other states, that is not necessarily the case. If you sue and the HOA has to assess the membership $100 in special assessment, you still have to pay that special assessment or be subject to a lien/lawsuit for it.

A HOA is ONLY funded by it's membership for it's membership. Suing it is using part of your dues money to cover such items. Even if it is written off as an insurance claim. It puts the HOA at risk of losing insurance or raising the cost of it. Do you really "win" in a lawsuit? Considering the court is also only allowed to make one "Whole" in any losses not a profit...

Former HOA President
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
MG

I keep asking what is the object and you seem to ignore the request.

I am of the belief it is something that the Covenants specifically say is banned (window AC, shed, etc.) yet you are hanging your hat on they never addressed it before.

You did not help your case when you said something was hiding it before and it just became exposed thus you made their case in that had they seen it, they would have addressed it.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Look up "doctrine of laches, MG5. Could be the board waited too long to try to cure this violation.
MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 11/13/2015 3:44 PM
MG

I keep asking what is the object and you seem to ignore the request.

I am of the belief it is something that the Covenants specifically say is banned (window AC, shed, etc.) yet you are hanging your hat on they never addressed it before.

You did not help your case when you said something was hiding it before and it just became exposed thus you made their case in that had they seen it, they would have addressed it.


The objective is for me to keep the object. The object is their for a purpose and not just to be there. Without going into to much detail as to what it is, yes the object is prohibited in the docs.

The issue I have is that the previous owner installed the object without permission and the board has been sending me notices (but never him) for the past 2 years trying to dance around the fact that they want it removed. At first they said shield it, so I did. Then they said remove it again, so I shielded it further. Then they said move it to the backyard and so on.....they would never give me a clear answer as to what they wanted and I was unwilling to spend money to have them come back the next month to tell me it was not up to their standards.
MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GenoS on 11/12/2015 2:22 PM
Posted By MG5 on 11/12/2015 8:12 AM
FL law does not allow a lien on single family housing. Their only option would be to sue me to collect, but chances are that it would cost more for them to sue then the $1000 fine and it would empty their entire budget.

No fining schedule was ever made and they do not have the power to remove the object and send me a bill.

Be very very careful. Florida law most definitely allows an HOA to put a lien on single family housing.

I tend to agree with you (though I'm no lawyer) that they don't posess the right to levy a fine in the first place.

Can we go back to this. While I may now agree that they can lien....it looks like the cutoff is $999.99 for no lien....I'm now questioning the ability to fine as its not specified or the word fine even mentioned in any of the docs.

Is there any case history showing where boards have lost in court over not having the ability to fine?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MG5 on 11/13/2015 5:24 PM

The object is their for a purpose and not just to be there. Without going into to much detail as to what it is, yes the object is prohibited in the docs.

Then the Association will likely win if they choose to take the issue to court.
MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 11/14/2015 4:42 AM
Posted By MG5 on 11/13/2015 5:24 PM

The object is their for a purpose and not just to be there. Without going into to much detail as to what it is, yes the object is prohibited in the docs.


Then the Association will likely win if they choose to take the issue to court.

What if they don't have the ability to fine as its not stated in the docs?
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MG5 on 11/14/2015 8:23 AM
Posted By TimB4 on 11/14/2015 4:42 AM
Posted By MG5 on 11/13/2015 5:24 PM

The object is their for a purpose and not just to be there. Without going into to much detail as to what it is, yes the object is prohibited in the docs.


Then the Association will likely win if they choose to take the issue to court.


What if they don't have the ability to fine as its not stated in the docs?

They don't have to fine. They can simply take the issue to court and seek an injunction to force you to take the unapproved and prohibited item down. They may then also be able to seek a judicial order for you to pay their legal fees and court costs.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 11/14/2015 9:15 AM
Posted By MG5 on 11/14/2015 8:23 AM
Posted By TimB4 on 11/14/2015 4:42 AM
Posted By MG5 on 11/13/2015 5:24 PM

The object is their for a purpose and not just to be there. Without going into to much detail as to what it is, yes the object is prohibited in the docs.


Then the Association will likely win if they choose to take the issue to court.


What if they don't have the ability to fine as its not stated in the docs?


They don't have to fine. They can simply take the issue to court and seek an injunction to force you to take the unapproved and prohibited item down. They may then also be able to seek a judicial order for you to pay their legal fees and court costs.

MG

Were I on the BOD I would suggest we ask you to remove it. If you do not remove it, we fine you. If you still do not remove it, we haul you off to court.

Ask yourself is this worth fighting?

Also as a renter (2011) you posted issues with a BOD. Is this the same association? Are you always going to have "troubles" with a BOD?

GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MG5 on 11/13/2015 5:33 PM
Can we go back to this. While I may now agree that they can lien....it looks like the cutoff is $999.99 for no lien....I'm now questioning the ability to fine as its not specified or the word fine even mentioned in any of the docs.

Is there any case history showing where boards have lost in court over not having the ability to fine?

Unfortunately for the layman, legal research online is not as easy as looking up public records. It requires a lot more legwork such as visiting a law library to look up past decisions. You can find decisions of some owner vs. HOA cases online but there's no open database available that's free to use.

Based on a similar situation here in my HOA (where the docs don't mention fines at all) here's how I think it would go. A lawyer might tell you differently. The HOA, following the procedure set forth in FS 720, would issue a fine. You refuse to pay. After a while the HOA puts a lien on your property. Now the ball would be in your court as far as challenging the lien. At that point you'd need an attorney's assistance. You could technically go it alone in court without a lawyer, but you're practically guaranteed to lose if you do that. If you prevail in court and get the lien removed then you could most likely have your own attorney fees and court costs reimbursed by the HOA.

There is really no HOA law police department in Florida. If all the above happened, there will not be a court-issued proclamation that says, "THOU SHALT NOT FINE BECAUSE YOUR DOCUMENTS DO NOT ALLOW THEM", the board will be forced to hang in public view. There will be nothing, other than a precedent, to stop them in the future from trying the same thing all over again. Every time the board tries to overstep their authority they will have to be called out on it anew.
AllisonD (Florida)
Posts: 449
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MG5 on 11/13/2015 5:24 PM
Posted By JohnC46 on 11/13/2015 3:44 PM
MG

I keep asking what is the object and you seem to ignore the request.

I am of the belief it is something that the Covenants specifically say is banned (window AC, shed, etc.) yet you are hanging your hat on they never addressed it before.

You did not help your case when you said something was hiding it before and it just became exposed thus you made their case in that had they seen it, they would have addressed it.



The objective is for me to keep the object. The object is their for a purpose and not just to be there. Without going into to much detail as to what it is, yes the object is prohibited in the docs.

The issue I have is that the previous owner installed the object without permission and the board has been sending me notices (but never him) for the past 2 years trying to dance around the fact that they want it removed. At first they said shield it, so I did. Then they said remove it again, so I shielded it further. Then they said move it to the backyard and so on.....they would never give me a clear answer as to what they wanted and I was unwilling to spend money to have them come back the next month to tell me it was not up to their standards.

How do you know that the previous owner did not get any notices? Did that info come from the previous homeowner or the HOA? You obviously knew the item was present when you purchased the house; did you know at that time that the item was not allowed?

They have been sending you notices for 2 years, since you purchased the house. They have preserved their right to hold your feet to the fire. They can say since it was hidden, they did not know about the violation until after you moved in. Your choices now seem to be to ask them for a variance and determine what exactly must you do to keep the item that will make them happy or remove the item. If you chose not to remove the item, then you will have to determine by your governing docs, what they can do to you punitive or restorative, to make you comply. They may be able to fine you, they may be able to come onto the property and cure the violation, or they may be able to both. Rules have little value without a way to enforce them.

MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 11/14/2015 9:33 AM
Posted By TimB4 on 11/14/2015 9:15 AM
Posted By MG5 on 11/14/2015 8:23 AM
Posted By TimB4 on 11/14/2015 4:42 AM
Posted By MG5 on 11/13/2015 5:24 PM

The object is their for a purpose and not just to be there. Without going into to much detail as to what it is, yes the object is prohibited in the docs.


Then the Association will likely win if they choose to take the issue to court.


What if they don't have the ability to fine as its not stated in the docs?


They don't have to fine. They can simply take the issue to court and seek an injunction to force you to take the unapproved and prohibited item down. They may then also be able to seek a judicial order for you to pay their legal fees and court costs.


MG

Were I on the BOD I would suggest we ask you to remove it. If you do not remove it, we fine you. If you still do not remove it, we haul you off to court.

Ask yourself is this worth fighting?

Also as a renter (2011) you posted issues with a BOD. Is this the same association? Are you always going to have "troubles" with a BOD?


as I mentioned prior the 2011 thread has nothing to do with this thread. Different HOA.
PaulM22 (Florida)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Maybe I should start a new thread, but does anyone have an HOA "fining" schedule which is considered reasonable.
I am on the Board of an HOA with 67 houses built between 2008 an 2011 in Florida where the values range from $180K to $230K. Most residents are "fastidious" about the look of their property .... but we have a several that act like they live in a trailer park and ignore notices of covenant violations so we are going to start levying fines pursuant to Florida law.

When I do a search for "fines" on this forum, I do find many discussions including schedules for amounts but not amounts per type of violation. We want to be reasonable and avoid rapid stacking of daily fines for the same offense. We plan to send one "courtesy notice" .... then a "pre-fine" notice that gives violators 15 to 30 days to correct the violation and follow all appeals to a "fines committee" as required by law. For substandard yards (meaning little grass and almost pure weeds (we have four of them) we just ask for a plan of action and follow through. One resident is working diligently and the other three are "getting away with murder."

I note that most HOA's use a graduated schedule such as $25 for the first offense, $50 for the second, and the $100 legal maximum for the third. But I don't find much about different types of violations and their level of severity .... for fist offense:

Trash & recycle bins in plain view $25
Clutter on lawn: $25
Substandard yard: $25
Unkempt lawn (tall weeds, untrimmed bushes: $50
Home in disrepair $50

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

JerryD5 (Colorado)
Posts: 218
Posted:
Paul, that is how our fine schedule is (it is by policy written by our association lawyer and in accordance with our state laws)

1. Violation is noted by the property manager or complaint by another homeowner (requires pictures and the PM investigates the violation)

2. Courtesy letter sent to the homeowner with a 10-day requirement to fix the violation or face a possible fine

3. After the 10th day, a 2nd letter is sent out saying that the violation is still there and a hearing will be scheduled unless the violation is remedied.

4 A hearing is held and board decision sent via mail. It includes another 10-days to fix and whether if they incurred a fine; first fine is $25

5. Still not fixed after 10 days? Fine goes to $50 (homeowner can request a hearing on the imposed fine)

6. Still not fixed after another 10 days? Fine goes to $100

$100 is our maximum fine amount. If they haven't paid their fine the HOA can initiate lien proceedings.

We have only had 1 homeowner go to the max fine. They had 2 hearings before they finally paid their fines (total of $75). We waived the $100 fine because they were finally willing to correct their issue(s).

Total amount of time of the entire process: 3 or 4 months

PaulM22 (Florida)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JerryD5 on 12/03/2015 2:28 PM
Paul, that is how our fine schedule is (it is by policy written by our association lawyer and in accordance with our state laws)

1. Violation is noted by the property manager or complaint by another homeowner (requires pictures and the PM investigates the violation)

2. Courtesy letter sent to the homeowner with a 10-day requirement to fix the violation or face a possible fine

3. After the 10th day, a 2nd letter is sent out saying that the violation is still there and a hearing will be scheduled unless the violation is remedied.

4 A hearing is held and board decision sent via mail. It includes another 10-days to fix and whether if they incurred a fine; first fine is $25

5. Still not fixed after 10 days? Fine goes to $50 (homeowner can request a hearing on the imposed fine)

6. Still not fixed after another 10 days? Fine goes to $100

$100 is our maximum fine amount. If they haven't paid their fine the HOA can initiate lien proceedings.

We have only had 1 homeowner go to the max fine. They had 2 hearings before they finally paid their fines (total of $75). We waived the $100 fine because they were finally willing to correct their issue(s).

Total amount of time of the entire process: 3 or 4 months


Thanks JerryD5, that is exactly the kind of information I was hoping for.
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
Paul, Jerry's advice is excellent overall. Watch out for #4, however. In Florida a fine levied by the board has to be subsequently approved by a fining committee. If the committee does not approve the fine then it doesn't happen.
MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
continuing on my original post;

if I'm on direct debit for monthly dues, can the HOA withdraw fines from my checking account without my authorization?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
MG

I do know of cases were dues paid were applied to fines thus leaving dues unpaid or partially paid and the HOA filed liens based on unpaid dues. More than one way to skin a cat.

CAn this happen if FL or to you I do not know.
AllisonD (Florida)
Posts: 449
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 12/05/2015 5:32 AM
MG

I do know of cases were dues paid were applied to fines thus leaving dues unpaid or partially paid and the HOA filed liens based on unpaid dues. More than one way to skin a cat.

CAn this happen if FL or to you I do not know.

Yes this can happen when your documents say money collected first goes towards paying fines before being applied to dues.
BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GenoS on 11/12/2015 1:57 PM
Posted By MG5 on 11/11/2015 8:26 PM
Governing docs do not specify fining procedure, that's why I'm referencing state law. Governing docs also do not provide for a fining committee.

Gotcha. My own HOA's docs are also silent on fines. The original intent of their enforcement provisions boils down to a large self-help paragraph in the CCRs which basically says, "Owners will comply with the rules and restrictions and if they don't fix a violation the HOA will fix it for them and then bill the owner for it. If the owner doesn't pay then the HOA will go to court where it shall have the right to also recover attorney fees." The word "fine" does not appear in any of our docs.

Nevertheless, current and past board members have told me that they believe the board can levy fines since FS 720.305(2) says, "The association may levy reasonable fines. A fine may not exceed $100 per violation against any member...".

I maintain FS 720.305(2) only allows HOAs to levy fines IF their governing documents authorize it, and that since ours don't talk about fines at all then there can be none unless and until our docs are amended.

The whole question is academic here, though, since long time owners and residents have told me they've been here for 15 years and nobody was ever fined for anything in that time.

I could be wrong but I think the key word here is "reasonable". In my opinion a fine of $100.00 a day is unreasonable.
BonnieG1 (Nebraska)
Posts: 1,186
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BonnieG1 on 12/05/2015 2:35 PM
Posted By GenoS on 11/12/2015 1:57 PM
Posted By MG5 on 11/11/2015 8:26 PM
Governing docs do not specify fining procedure, that's why I'm referencing state law. Governing docs also do not provide for a fining committee.

Gotcha. My own HOA's docs are also silent on fines. The original intent of their enforcement provisions boils down to a large self-help paragraph in the CCRs which basically says, "Owners will comply with the rules and restrictions and if they don't fix a violation the HOA will fix it for them and then bill the owner for it. If the owner doesn't pay then the HOA will go to court where it shall have the right to also recover attorney fees." The word "fine" does not appear in any of our docs.

Nevertheless, current and past board members have told me that they believe the board can levy fines since FS 720.305(2) says, "The association may levy reasonable fines. A fine may not exceed $100 per violation against any member...".

I maintain FS 720.305(2) only allows HOAs to levy fines IF their governing documents authorize it, and that since ours don't talk about fines at all then there can be none unless and until our docs are amended.

The whole question is academic here, though, since long time owners and residents have told me they've been here for 15 years and nobody was ever fined for anything in that time.


I could be wrong but I think the key word here is "reasonable". In my opinion a fine of $100.00 a day is unreasonable.

Also all owners don't know when we fine a person. We try to be as private as possible about any fines assessed to any owner.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
I think MG is looking to go toe to toe with his BOD. I think what is in MG's mind is so fine me, I will pay it and keep whatever it is he wants to keep.

I could be wrong.
AnneB4 (Florida)
Posts: 19
Posted:
Actually fines don't have to be approved by the fining committee, only if the homeowner wants the hearing, which would occur after they are fined. If they don't want or don't attend a scheduled hearing, the fine remains.
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AnneB4 on 12/05/2015 6:02 PM
Actually fines don't have to be approved by the fining committee, only if the homeowner wants the hearing, which would occur after they are fined. If they don't want or don't attend a scheduled hearing, the fine remains.

That's not how I read it, Anne. The person to be fined must get a 14-day notice and "an opportunity for a hearing before a committee of at least three members appointed by the board...". Whether or not the owner avails him or herself of the opportunity to appear at the hearing, the fining committee still has to approve or reject the proposed fine.
MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AllisonD on 12/05/2015 9:26 AM
Posted By JohnC46 on 12/05/2015 5:32 AM
MG

I do know of cases were dues paid were applied to fines thus leaving dues unpaid or partially paid and the HOA filed liens based on unpaid dues. More than one way to skin a cat.

CAn this happen if FL or to you I do not know.


Yes this can happen when your documents say money collected first goes towards paying fines before being applied to dues.

The documents don't allow for fining.

So can they charge $100 per day or a one time charge of $1000 to my bank account without my authorization?
AnneB4 (Florida)
Posts: 19
Posted:
According to our PM, the committee only has to do "something" if the homeowner requests a hearing. All of our fines are consistent, $100 a day once the waiting period has passed. If the homeowner doesn't request the hearing, there is no reason to reject the fine. If our PM is wrong, then we may have some problems.
PitA
Posts: 1,416
Posted:
The OP is in violation of the Covenant / Contract.

The OP is unhappy with said fact.

The OP is twisting and squirming in an attempt to escape the contract.

After the HOA, Inc. stops fining and brings suit in court of law the OP possibly will be bankrupt and lose the home.

But, the OP would not have removed or remedied the violation as that would be too simplistic.

MG5 (Florida)
Posts: 39
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PitA on 12/06/2015 11:42 AM
The OP is in violation of the Covenant / Contract.

The OP is unhappy with said fact.

The OP is twisting and squirming in an attempt to escape the contract.

After the HOA, Inc. stops fining and brings suit in court of law the OP possibly will be bankrupt and lose the home.

But, the OP would not have removed or remedied the violation as that would be too simplistic.


Missed the entire point of the thread.....

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here