💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DonA2 (Arizona)
Posts: 170
Posted:
There are state laws governing open meetings for HOA's here in Arizona. My question is who enforces those? What recourse do members have if the BOD isn't following the law?

And just an fyi, two members still have a year left on the board (three member board) and both survived a recall earlier in the year so can't be recalled again.
MarkM31 (Washington)
Posts: 351
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DonA2 on 11/03/2015 7:01 AM
There are state laws governing open meetings for HOA's here in Arizona. My question is who enforces those? What recourse do members have if the BOD isn't following the law?

The courts enforce the laws. You're not going to get the cops busting down the door to let you in unless a judge orders the police to do so.
DonA2 (Arizona)
Posts: 170
Posted:
Wasn't expecting the cops.

So basically there is an open meeting law, but no enforcement. So basically a worthless law that not a single HOA needs to abide by.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Don,

There are criminal laws and civil laws. The government enforces criminal laws. The parties involved enforce civil laws either through agreements or the courts.

In the case of Associations, it's up to the membership to enforce the laws you speak of.
They may do this by gathering support and recalling, or simply not reelecting, those board members who refuse to abide by the law or by taking the issue before the courts.

MarkM31 (Washington)
Posts: 351
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DonA2 on 11/03/2015 7:51 AM
Wasn't expecting the cops.

So basically there is an open meeting law, but no enforcement. So basically a worthless law that not a single HOA needs to abide by.

That's not what I said.

Tim summed it up well. Baring state by state ombudsmen, the enforcement of CC&Rs is thru the membership at meetings or failing that, through the courts.
DonA2 (Arizona)
Posts: 170
Posted:
So basically, what I am reading, is that not a whole lot can be done for the next year. They aren't up for re-election until then and since both have been recalled and survived, cannot be recalled again for the remainder of their term.
MarkM31 (Washington)
Posts: 351
Posted:
You can hire a lawyer, go to court and compel them to follow the open meetings laws as required.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
What part(s) of the Open Meeting laws are they not enforcing? If you'll tell us, we might be able to come up with ideas to pressure the Board into complying.

Are they, for instance, not notifying embers when they hold board meetings? Or are they not supplying minutes of these meetings to members? Or?

Put another way, if they're meeting in secret, etc., how do you & others even know they're not complying with the laws?
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
So let's see there was an attempt to recall two members of the board. That attempt failed because 1) those pushing for recall did not find enough support
2) those being recalled found enough support to beat the recall effort 3) several combinations of 1 & 2. So if the recall failed in general terms the majority of homeowners did not support the recall. In most cases that is how HOAs function.

And the question now being asked who else beside the owners can now affect change after a majority of owners failed to remove the current board members?

I too have to wonder what violation of the open meeting laws Don now seeks to rectify. And is this a legitimate issue or simply finding issues with those still serving.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Don,

According to past threads, you were elected to the Board in February of 2015.
Are you still on the Board?

If you are, you are in a position to make the changes that need done. Granted, you may not win every issue you try to address but you will/should win some. You can't do it alone, you will need support from other directors. Therefore, it can depend a lot on how things are presented.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
You were/are on the Board, Don? Now I really want to see examples of violations of AZ's Open Meeting Act!
DonA2 (Arizona)
Posts: 170
Posted:
There have been no violations, yet. However, one of our board members is also a board member in a different HOA. That HOA won't notify other Board members or homeowners about meetings.

I'm just trying to find out who enforces the law in case the same starts happening on our board.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
You Owners enforce the law, Don. If your board starts breaking the law, gather support from other Owners to demand to the board that they hold one meetings, provide proper notice & agendas, or whatever!

Are you still on the Board? How many are there on the Board? Is there someone on your board now who wants to make decisions in secrecy behind owners' backs? If not, why are you worried? Do you have a property mgr.?

Your fellow director also is on the board of another HOA. You wrote: "That HOA won't notify other Board members or homeowners about meetings." What do you mean by "that HOA" if it's not he Board itself?
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:

Open Meeting Laws for HOA's confer rights upon homeowners. The general public does not benefit whatsoever from those rights so there is no reason to expect a public agency, such as the Department of Caped Crusaders, to spend public money to enforce private property rights.

DonA2 (Arizona)
Posts: 170
Posted:
I've gotten the information I need. Thanks.

Basically, if the homeowners don't care, there's really not much that can be done. That's kind of what I thought.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
More than likely Don already had his answer just was unwilling to accept it. My assumption Don played some role in the attempt to repel those 2 board members.

Now that the recall effort failed Don is spending his time planning for what ifs, maybes, and just in cases. Sounds to me like Don is leaning slightly to finding fault with this board at any and all costs. If his strongest case is that on another HOA a current board member that serves on both his board and the other in his view violates open meeting laws I can see why the recall effort failed.

Surely, there was more than that.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DonA2 on 11/04/2015 5:52 AM

I'm just trying to find out who enforces the law in case the same starts happening on our board.


Well, the good news is that it hasn't happened and, since you are on the Board, you are in a position to ensure it doesn't happen (even if you need to be the one who volunteers to announce the meetings to the membership).

We plan our meetings 3 or 4 months in advance. Those dates may change, but we can still advertise the meeting dates in time through our newsletter or website.
DonA2 (Arizona)
Posts: 170
Posted:
Just an fyi JonD, I was one of the board members recalled after being on the board for one month.

The reason I'm asking is that we have our annual elections coming up in three weeks. Depending on the outcome, the scenario I posted is very real. So I'm trying to find out information before something happens, rather than waiting until it does happen.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Don

Are you saying you expect an uprising/problems come this years election? From what you say two of you have a year remaining on your terms and the 3rd spot on your BOD is up for election. Upset people (those that tried to recall you) or not, the election of one person for an open spot should be simple.

What problems are you expecting?
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
So, Don, the 3rd director is up for reelection and has competition? Or is retiring?

Can you share with us why there was attempt to recall you & the 2nd director?

Can you please look again at my previous post and reply? Also, how many homes in your HOA?
DonA2 (Arizona)
Posts: 170
Posted:
The other remaining board member is the one who started the recall. And the whole reason was to try to gain control of the community, replace the property management company, landscape company, etc. with people she is associated with. By having two members recalled, she would have been in a position to appoint the remaining board members. Since that didn't happen, there is now the possibility that one of her cronies could be elected to fill the vacant spot.

I'm hoping none of this happens and we continue the way we are going. However, it was pure hell here for almost 6 months with the recall and the aftermath. And knowing how this person runs the other communities she is involved with, not giving notice to the community or other board members is a distinct possibility if the wrong person gets elected. So again, not saying it will happen, but was trying to figure out things ahead of time, just in case.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Don

Are you saying the person who started the recall is not running in the coming election? One way or the other, back/support a person you want for the 3rd spot.

We had a dissenter on our BOD and once they attended a few meetings they soon realized how above board, honest, and looking out for the greater good of the community we were. They soon allied them self with us. Crony or not elected, if you all are doing the best you can, the crony might well become an ally once they see how you operate. If not you still hold a 2 to 1 majority and also you need 2 for a BOD Quorum so one alone can do little harm.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Maybe I'm not reading carefully, Don. There is one vacancy coming up, right? But it's neither you nor the other against who a recall was attempted? So it's "her"?

How is it she can sit on so many other HOA boards? Do none have directors must be Owners And residents?

Again, how many in your HOA? What were the alleged justifications to recall you & the other?

Read your contract with your PM. Many, like ours, says the PM shall not follow board directives that oppose your governing docs or state laws.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Why Don is it necessary for us all to be given drips and drabs of information? You know why not come clean, lay your cards on the table, and simply explain the situation? People have asked you direct questions you ignore them.

So if you now believe the board member who tried to recall you is potentially planning to fill the board with her cronies than you might need to put some effort into informing the owners what you suspect and fear. There is no outside agency willing to do so for you as much as that seems to pain you.

My suggestion try to a little more clear with the details. Try to explain the situation fully. Try not to give just the information others need to from an opinion based on what you believe needs to be told.

This thread has been like pulling teeth.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JonD1 on 11/04/2015 2:32 PM
Why Don is it necessary for us all to be given drips and drabs of information? You know why not come clean, lay your cards on the table, and simply explain the situation? People have asked you direct questions you ignore them.

So if you now believe the board member who tried to recall you is potentially planning to fill the board with her cronies than you might need to put some effort into informing the owners what you suspect and fear. There is no outside agency willing to do so for you as much as that seems to pain you.

My suggestion try to a little more clear with the details. Try to explain the situation fully. Try not to give just the information others need to from an opinion based on what you believe needs to be told.

This thread has been like pulling teeth.


I agree.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Don,

Based on the new information, the solution is simple. Gather support (in the form of proxies) and ensure that "one of the cronies" is not elected to fill that empty seat.
DonA2 (Arizona)
Posts: 170
Posted:
I'm usually at work when I'm reading and posting, so while I'm not trying to excluding information or be short, sometimes due to time constraints, that's how it is coming across.

And I think I said I got my answer some posts ago, so I didn't see the need to continue. Basically it's up to the homeowners to enforce this law. And if they aren't interested, it doesn't appear there is much that can be done.

If more information is needed of me, I'll provide whatever it is anyone wants....

And here is some information requested. Three person board, 300 single family home HOA. Two board members (myself being one) were recalled but survived (two different recall drives...long ugly story), bottom line, neither can be recalled again and both have a year left on their term. Third member was appointed 6 months ago. That position comes up for election in two weeks.

The other board member still on for another year is on the board in at least two other HOA's. All of the communities only require home ownership, not residence.

Anything else that is needed, I'll try to fill in. As I said, I pop in and read when time allows, sorry if I'm not providing information on a timely manner.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Don

I have one question which to me seems important.

Was there a vote taken during the recall process? if so what were the vote totals.

How many voted?
How many voted to recall?
How many voted not to recall?

That in a nutshell tells me who might hold the winning hand....
SharonL4 (Texas)
Posts: 7
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DonA2 on 11/03/2015 7:01 AM
There are state laws governing open meetings for HOA's here in Arizona. My question is who enforces those?

There is a crazy program setup in AZ to try to eliminate costly lawsuits. It is embedded in the Department of Fire & Safety. Using it was blocked for a couple of years while people went to court over whether it had a legal right to be taking care of these disputes. But, it is 'back in business' now and collecting $750 per dispute fees as of 2015 (fees started out at $50). You can read about it here:
http://www.dfbls.az.gov/hoa.aspx

I can tell you that most cases I have seen have gone on to the state Ombudsman. And, you had better have your 'ducks in a row' to win. They usually side with the HOA Board, but if you have really good cause, you can win.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 11/04/2015 4:28 PM
Gather support (in the form of proxies) and ensure that "one of the cronies" is not elected to fill that empty seat.


That won't work; proxies are not allowed in Arizona HOA's. Voting is only by absentee ballot or in-person ballots. After absentee ballots are distributed go door-to-door and solicit support.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Larry's advice looks good and is we would do it in our HOA too. E also wwoud set up a table to invite H/Os to sit down and chat with us about the election. But the HOA's need a space to do that.

Sharon's info looks promising!
SharonL4 (Texas)
Posts: 7
Posted:
Don, There are ways for an absentee homeowner to vote when not in AZ. I know how it is because I have a place in AZ and in TX. You may want to read this section of the law:
http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ars/33/01812.htm
DonA2 (Arizona)
Posts: 170
Posted:
Am well aware of absentee voting, but thanks.

And right now, I am doing what I can do to gather support for the candidate I think would be the best fit for the Board. So hopefully none of any of the about is even an issue.
SharonL4 (Texas)
Posts: 7
Posted:
Hope all works out well for you Don.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
OH, and also, door-to-door is good if the HOA has a high % of owner occupants. We have 58% owner-occupants, and it is difficult to reach the landlords except by US mail, (which, of course is how they get their mail-in ballots).

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here