💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

BillC12 (California)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Our community in CA was developed in the 1970's. Each side of the street has a HOA owned 4' easement in from the curb for utilities and/or a sidewalk. Homeowners on one side of the street have no sidewalk and maintain the 4' easement area down to the curb. The opposite side has a 4' wide sidewalk that is maintained by the HOA and was granted a reciprocal easement of use by the developer, for all homeowners, tenants and their guests to and from their homes.

Over the years more and more residents have parked their vehicles in their driveway either with the back tires on the sidewalk or the vehicle hanging over their property line obstructing the pedestrian right of way; causing the pedestrian to step into the common area street to keep walking.

The Board started enforcing the association rule of "no parking on the sidewalk" with warnings leading to fines and the push back has been intense. There is a move afoot by two Board members to somehow rename the sidewalks as something else, like a utility easement, so vehicles can park on a driveway on a residential lot blocking the common area sidewalk completely obstructing the pedestrian right of way.

My question is "what impact reciprocal easements have on maintaining the intended use of the sidewalks for pedestrians?" Any other suggestions/comments on the Boards responsibility to enforce the pedestrian right of way along the common area sidewalks?

Thanks in advance.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Bill,

I have never heard the term "reciprocal easement" before. Is that the term used in the documents that dedicate them? Is yours a gated community or is it open?

The use of an easement is usually determined by the language used in dedicating it. Can you quote the wording of the easement?

If the easement was dedicated as a sidewalk or pedestrian walkway then parking a car across it would defeat the purpose of the easement. In theory, anyone whose lawful use of the sidewalk is obstructed could seek injunctive relief against those who block the sidewalk.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Bill

I cannot see how blocking a sidewalk can or should be allowed. End of story.

In man locales a sidewalk on at least one side of the street is mandated by local government.

BillC12 (California)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Thank you for the reply.

We are an open community with one City street down the middle of the community with a resolution passed by the City making the private streets subject to the CA vehicle code, supported by posted signage.

The as built drawings clearly show detail for a sidewalk on one side of each street, so there is no doubt the 4' wide concrete area is a sidewalk. I agree with your opinion.

From our CC&R's.

Article XII

Additional Provisions

Section 4: Reservation of Easements

Declarant expressly reserves for the benefit of all Properties reciprocal easements of access, ingress and egress for all Owners to and from their respective Lots and over all of the Common Area and Townhouse Common Area. Such easements may be used by Declarant, its successors, purchasers and all Owners, their guests, tenants and invitees, residing on or temporarily visiting the Properties, for pedestrian walkways, vehicular access and such other purposes reasonably necessary for the use and enjoyment of the Common Area and Townhouse Common Area. Any person authorized by the Board of Directors or the Association shall have the right of entry to a Lot in case of any emergency originating in or threatening the Lot or adjacent Lots, whether the Owner is present at that time or not.
BillC12 (California)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Thanks for the reply. I agree blocking the sidewalk is NOT allowed.

The City doesn't require sidewalks on one side of the street in HOA communities built today, but our community was designed, approved and built with sidewalks in the 1970's.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BillC12 on 10/31/2015 1:44 PM
Section 4: Reservation of Easements

Declarant expressly reserves for the benefit of all Properties reciprocal easements of access, ingress and egress for all Owners to and from their respective Lots and over all of the Common Area and Townhouse Common Area. Such easements may be used by Declarant, its successors, purchasers and all Owners, their guests, tenants and invitees, residing on or temporarily visiting the Properties, for pedestrian walkways, vehicular access and such other purposes reasonably necessary for the use and enjoyment of the Common Area and Townhouse Common Area.


This tells part of the story. The other part would most likely be on the plat showing where the features referred to in Section 4 are located.

Once an easement is granted and recorded it is extremely difficult to abandon or modify. See Scalia v. Green at http://caselaw.findlaw.com/az-court-of-appeals/1583568.html

Your board of directors lacks any lawful authority to alter the terms of the easements recorded by the declarant/developer. The board can use any euphemisms they wish to but the easements and their uses remain unchanged and uneffected. Altering the terms of the easements is nearly impossible and may ultimately require a quiet title action, whose outcome would be far from certain.

Since an easement has been granted for the walkways, parking a car across the walkway would defeat the purpose of the easement. The board needs to enforce the rule against parking in the driveways.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
An FYI:
Reciprocal Easement Agreement (REA)


An agreement that:

Provides for the rights and obligations of multiple owners of real property.

Ensures harmony in the development, operations and maintenance of the affected real property.

An REA can be used for commercial or residential real estate. However, REAs are most commonly used for the development and operation of integrated shopping centers. For example, many times an REA is entered into when a developer and one or more major retailers jointly own all, or portions of, the real property to be developed into the shopping center.

The parties should ensure that they record the REA in the county where the real property is located. Once recorded, the contractual obligations in the REA will "run with the land." That is, the owners and all subsequent owners of all or any portion of the shopping center will be subject to the rights and obligations under the REA.
DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 10/31/2015 1:24 PM

I cannot see how blocking a sidewalk can or should be allowed. End of story.

In Florida, and I assume many other places it's against the law to block the sidewalk. There used to be a reality show called "Parking Wars" that followed parking enforcement officers in different cities and they often wrote tickets for people blocking the sidewalk.

There's nothing in our CCRs on the topic, our president was pursuing trying to get that changed so he could tow cars in driveways that were blocking the sidewalk. The rest of the board decided it would be better handled by leaving it up to anyone bothered by this to contact the county sheriff to have the car ticketed.

Have you tried calling your local or city sheriff/police to see if they will ticket? This could get the HOA out of the middle of the situation.

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BillC12 on 10/31/2015 1:44 PM
Thank you for the reply.

We are an open community with one City street down the middle of the community with a resolution passed by the City making the private streets subject to the CA vehicle code, supported by posted signage.

The as built drawings clearly show detail for a sidewalk on one side of each street, so there is no doubt the 4' wide concrete area is a sidewalk. I agree with your opinion.

From our CC&R's.

Article XII

Additional Provisions

Section 4: Reservation of Easements

Declarant expressly reserves for the benefit of all Properties reciprocal easements of access, ingress and egress for all Owners to and from their respective Lots and over all of the Common Area and Townhouse Common Area. Such easements may be used by Declarant, its successors, purchasers and all Owners, their guests, tenants and invitees, residing on or temporarily visiting the Properties, for pedestrian walkways, vehicular access and such other purposes reasonably necessary for the use and enjoyment of the Common Area and Townhouse Common Area. Any person authorized by the Board of Directors or the Association shall have the right of entry to a Lot in case of any emergency originating in or threatening the Lot or adjacent Lots, whether the Owner is present at that time or not.

So basically it is a public street thus subject to local laws. Call the police and ticket those blocking the sidewalk.

Typically HOA's can have tougher restrictions than local laws such as locals allow an 8ft fence but the HOA only allows 4ft fences. HOA rules. Can be the same with street parking. Locals allow it. HOA does not. HOA wins. In the case of local laws saying no blocking sidewalks then the HOA cannot override this.

To make nice I would send a letter saying blocking sidewalks is illegal and the police will be notified of such violations commencing on say 11/15. Give them notice.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here