💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
I will try to keep tis short and to the point. Our development in a condo/townehome development of 40 homes, three priviate streets. No parking on the street allowed. For several months now one of the board members have parked cars on the street (son and girlfriend who now live with him). One of the homeowners have been taking pictures of his parking in the street and sending to MC and MC sending to me President of Board to report to the board. I have done so. This has infuriated the board member.

The board member says he has no other place to park because everyone takes up the visitors spaces (which they do). One car is in the garage and two on his driveway. Only one is suppose to park in a cutout but we have many residents that refuse to park in the driveway. He said he does not want to enforce parking rules/bylaws any longer and has one other board member agreeing with him.

Can the Board not enforce the bylaws/rules and regs? My understanding of the duty of a board member and I have been one for almost 9 years is that is what our duty is. Can a board member just refuse to not follow the rules and remain on the board? We cannot continue sending warning letters & fines to residents but not the board member!!!

thanks for any advice you can give me.

SueW6 (Michigan)
Posts: 814
Posted:
Our local police dept. will ticket cars parked in the road.

Does your local police ever go thru your complex?
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
Yes, but they won't ticket vehicles parked in the street because we own the roads, not the town. The only time they will step in is when a vehicle is not registered or the registration has expired.

Maureen
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Whether the police can help or not, the director may NOT break the rules that other must follow!

You must call him to hearing like any other owner and take the steps outlined in your documents about fines, etc.

do you bylaws have an article which states that in order to keep serving on the board, the director must be in "good standing," which means up to date on assessments and with no outstanding violations.

Well, we don't have that article either, but it's in our proposed revision. Owners could vote to recall the violating director.

How many are on your board? The director who agrees with the violator should be told that s/he must equally enforce your governing documents and not play favorites. Your CC&Rs probably has a clause that states a duty of the Board is to enforce the governing docs. If they do not, individual Owners may through the courts, which I'm sure you do not want. Their only option is to change your bylaws or convents following the right procedures.

Meantime, is there a way to set up your visitor parking so that certain individuals don't horde spaces? Have limits on days a car may stay, or???
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
since the board member does not want to abide by the rules, he wants the board not to send letters or fine residents for parking violations. You can't pick and chose which bylaws/rules you are going to enforce and so far one board member agrees. I sent an email stating that if these board members do not want to enforce the bylaws/convenants then I want it in writing and it to be documented. There are five board members. 2 are in agreement. Have not heard from the other 2. .

Our Management company sent out an email stating that residents have been fined and asked me to send him my emails when the violations were reported!!! He is adding fuel to the fire. he would like it if he didn't have to send violation letters, less work for him to do and he doesn't do that much as it is.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Maureen,

A Board may certainly decide what area of the Bylaws they will focus on. This may mean that some rules/regs won't be enforced. This can change from Board to Board. Therefore, it's actually best to simply change the rules vs. choosing not to enforce.

When a Board does enforce any rule/covenant, they must do so equally.

Therefore, if you are going to enforce parking restrictions on one, you must enforce on all.
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
The board is meeting on parking in February. Should the board member who is breaking the rules, due to his own circumstances changing and he now has five vehicles on property abstain from voting on limiting vehicles that a unit can park on property. He does not have the developments best interest in mind. Just his own. Our attorney is researching whether the Board has authority on this decision or we need to have our membership vote.

thoughts?
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
I see the conflict. But IMO a non-vote can only happen in one of two ways.
1. the offender voluntarily abstains.
2. the other board members vote to block the offender from voting because of the obvious conflict.
If neither of these two things happen, I think you might be stuck with whatever happens.

One of the tricky issues with an abstention is whether the offender should be allowed to participate in the pre-vote discussion at all. Even without voting, there is still the possibility of influencing others. Tricky stuff here in PA - where there is no statutory obligation to hold open meetings.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
PitA
Posts: 1,416
Posted:
MaureenM1,

You are free to enforce any restrictions found in the Covenant yourself.

There do exist courts of law.

However, it is much easier to 'pawn off' the enforcement and sit back and complain.

? Why have YOU not run for a position on the BOD ?

! I am sure that your neighbors would be thrilled to have a parking enforcement agent as a director !

AugustinT
Posts: 15
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 01/26/2016 3:11 PM
The board is meeting on parking in February. Should the board member who is breaking the rules, due to his own circumstances changing and he now has five vehicles on property abstain from voting on limiting vehicles that a unit can park on property. He does not have the developments best interest in mind. Just his own. Our attorney is researching whether the Board has authority on this decision or we need to have our membership vote.

thoughts?

Which of the governing documents prohibits parking on the street? Is it Rules & Regulations, Bylaws, or CC&Rs? What does the applicable governing document say about amending it? Amendment procedures may also be in the Declaration.

You say you have an attorney looking into this, but it really pays to do one's own homework, if possible. This will help uou to understand these situations and be able to tell members, "I am quoting from Bylaw 3.7 (or Rule so-and-so, etc.) here... "

The governing documents are a contract. They bind all the members together, because mostly they keep all on the same page, literally and figuratively.

If the governing documents permit a board vote to change the rule, then the board member with the five vehicles has no conflict of interest here. He need not abstain, and a vote to make him abstain would be illegal. He thinks all people should be able to park on the street. It does not matter that he happens to have this need himself. To some, it's in the interests of all to remove this rule. To others, it's not. Reasonable people will disagree. The situation is no different from a City Councilor voting on whether to permit re-zoning of an acre of land in her or his district: That City Councilor is allowed to vote in a manner that favors her or his district, and her or his property values, and is against other districts' property values.

The overriding point is that the director here, and the City Councilor, are not running a dictatorship. It takes a majority vote to win approval of whatever is proposed (within the requirements of the law).

A conflict of interest happens when an elected official stands to benefit but for the greater part, no one else does. Here, this director would benefit, but so would anyone else who needs more parking space and so wants to allow street parking. If the director owned a landscaping company and the company had bid on a contract with the HOA, then the director must abstain.

Furthermore if the proposed rule is approved, then the members have a recourse: Throw the directors who voted for the rule change out in the next election. Then change the rule back.
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
I have been a board member since 2007 and President since 2009 to present.
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
I have been on the board since 2007 and Board President since 2009 to present. 9 years!!
NinaR (Florida)
Posts: 26
Posted:
My neighborhood has 132 townhomes and 34 parking spaces (1 in 4 homes has access to visitor parking) so it's not ample parking. We had residents using our visitor spaces all the time, and a previous board created 3rd vehicle "exception" passes. It was a mess! We have cleaned it up somewhat. It's tight, but better than when I got onto the BOD.
Here is how it works:
1)If you have a 3rd vehicle (and a true necessity) you can ask for an exception pass. Meaning, that you can't have 2 drivers in a house and a 3rd car as a collection piece.
2)The maximum number of exception passes allowed for the neighborhood is 11. After that people are told they go on a waiting list. No household can have more than one exception pass.
The next item is what I want to introduce this year:
3) For the wear and tear to the visitor spaces, the people holding the exception pass pays monthly for the space. The money collected goes to the paving fund for repairs.

If I may suggest something. When I first came onto the BOD, we had all visitor spaces used by residents ALL the time. They had a volunteer "parking committee"...long story short, the system did not work. We changed it by mailing the new rules to all homeowners.
1) All cars had to be registered with the MC. They got a decal to display in the windshield.
2) Visitor spaces are for visitors ONLY. If a random tow comes through and sees a resident in a visitor space, they are towed. They are towed for blocking the sidewalk too (it's against all City, County and Federal laws in the USA.
3)If a vehicle is parked without a visitor pass displayed clearly, they are towed. Our passes are good for 3 days, 3 nights. If you need an extension, call MC.
4)No street parking. Again, they are towed. Tapping someone's wallet gets their attention. We cleaned the place up within a month. Renters said they weren't told anything. Our response was that your homeowner is responsible for giving you information. They were taking the $200. tow fee out of next month's rent.

In my area, there was a neighborhood where people parked on the street, against their bylaws. Someone called 911. The fire trucks and paramedics could not get to the house. They had to stay at the gate and run in because of street parking. The patient passed away. The family sued the County for a slow response time. The County countered and sued the HOA for allowing street parking thereby blocking access. The County won and the HOA is broke. DO NOT ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN TO YOU.
And finally! In FL you are now required to sign an affidavit saying that you understand that as a board member, you will uphold the CC&R. Maybe you can get something like this going in your neighborhood even though you may not have to. It gives people a sense of responsibility. As President, you must lead the clean-up campaign. Those rules are there to keep your property values up.
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
thank you for your response. These are all very good ideas. Board members upholding the bylaws and enforcing them is the biggest obstacle in my development. I am the President of a five person board. One board member violates the rules and doesn't want to enforce the parking rules which makes it difficult for our property manager.

I have instructed on PM to send violation letters to any resident (including Board members) who violate the rules.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaureenM1 on 01/30/2016 6:51 AM

I am the President of a five person board. One board member violates the rules and doesn't want to enforce the parking rules which makes it difficult for our property manager.

However, such a decision would be that of the whole board.
If the other 4 believe that the rules should be enforced, it doesn't matter what this individual wants to do. The Board makes decisions by majority voting.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here