💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

SuzieE (California)
Posts: 20
Posted:
Our PM is a joke and it seems even the most routine requests are a huge struggle. We have BOD meetings on a quarterly basis and during our last meeting, the PM only provided financials for 1 month. I am on the board and am the treasurer. When I brought up the fact that we were not provided all the financials, the PM replied "why didn't you tell me". I was somewhat annoyed by the response but this is the least of my problems.....The PM sent an email wanting to schedule our next meeting. My question is: Would it be a reasonable to respond that I won't be able to confirm my attendence of the meeting until AFTER the appropriate financials have been sent to the board? Any suggestions on how to handle this would be greatly appreciated.
ND (PA)
Posts: 792
Posted:
Talk to your other Board Members on replacing the PM if they are not fulfilling the duties you are paying them to perform.

If the PM only provide financials for 1 month; as Treasurer, you should have picked this up right away and requested the rest. The PM's response to you is silly, but if you noticed the issue and never informed them, then that was silly too. I suppose the rest of your Board was silent too.

In this case, why attempt to be difficult and combative? Simply indicate your availability and tell the PM to provide the desired financials when you need them or when their contract says they are to provide them.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Definitely start, Suzie, with reviewing your contract with your PM or Management company. Is the PM responsible for providing financial reports for three months at your quarterly meetings?

And do your bylaws, by chance, say the Board must review the financials at least quarterly?

How many are on the Board and how do they feel about the PM's handling of your finances?

To miss a meeting, though, out of anger at your PM does not seem to be a solution.

(Our contract with our MC says the PM provides them every month at our monthly meetings.)
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
It's ok to ask for the appropriate financials, but irresponsible not to attend meetings. You are a board member and there are other things besides the financials that need to be discussed, so it's your responsibility to be there.

I was treasurer on my Board and we have a few incidents when our reports didn't show up on time. They were supposed to arrive by the 10th of the month, but when they started arriving up a day or two before the meeting, I asked the property manager about it (during an open board meeting) and learned they were late because other departments who provided information for the report were late (she had to review the entire report before it went to the Board).

That was followed by an email to the president of the company (copies to the property manager and the rest of the board). He apologized for the delay, the head of the department that was causing most of the trouble also sent me an email to apologize and it never happened again.

As for you, might I suggest that you talk to whoever is over the property manager, providing recent examples of the problems and ask how the company will respond to ensure these are fixed and don't happen again? Start by discussing your concerns with the rest of the board and go on from there. Personally, I'd ask for an executive session to discuss the matter and then send a letter to the company, copying the property manager so he/she has a chance to explain.

Give the manager time (90 days or so) to correct him/herself and if it doesn't work, ask for a new property manager to be assigned - and if that doesn't work, find another management company.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Suzie

A good PM will email the financial statements on a monthly basis, even if you meet on a quarterly basis.

Civil Code §5500 requires the BOD to review the both the operating and reserve reconciliations, review the bank statements for both accounts, and and income/expense statement for the same period and review both the operating and reserves expense compared to the budget.

It would be appropriate to state to the PM and copy the Board to have the financials in order to prepare for the meeting BEFOREHAND.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
I agree with Richard. Typically a PM Company will send monthly financials. As Treasurer it would be one's job the keep track of them.

Our PM prepares monthly reports that can be over 12 pages long. These reports are electronically sent to each BOD Member. Owners can get "reduced" monthly reports (Profit/Loss, YTD) when they request such. They could get most of the 12 pages (less delinquent list) if they requested so but only one owner ever did request such.
SuzieE (California)
Posts: 20
Posted:
Thanks to everyone for your responses. To clarify, the PM was already requested to provide open contracts before our last meeting and it was already a combatative situation in dealing with the PMs responses and resistence to those requests. I did notice that the financials were missing but this was just another item to add to the list of items Board members had specifically emailed and asked for prior to our meeting.
Also, I wasn't suggesting that I not attend the next meeting without the financials. Currently the PM had emailed the board for our availability in order to schedule and inform the rest of the association on the time and date of our next meeting. I was going to respond that I won't be able to confirm if I can attend until the PM confirms when they can produce and send over the financials. We have a 3 member board and 1 other board member would support this so a board meeting wouldn't be agreed upon until it's confirmed when we would receive the financials. Realistically, there isn't much I can do about the issue because if the PM doesn't email the financials prior to the meeting OR produce them during the meeting, I can't throw her in jail; there's nothing I can do and the PM knows this.
Thanks for your suggestions though, I am going to review the PM contract to see what is stated on this issue.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 09/23/2015 2:47 PM
I agree with Richard. Typically a PM Company will send monthly financials. As Treasurer it would be one's job the keep track of them.

Our PM prepares monthly reports that can be over 12 pages long. These reports are electronically sent to each BOD Member. Owners can get "reduced" monthly reports (Profit/Loss, YTD) when they request such. They could get most of the 12 pages (less delinquent list) if they requested so but only one owner ever did request such.

John

I will trade you, ours are 85 pages or more.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
When you read the contract, Suzie, you'll probably see that your board, we hope, has a "30-day out clause" so that you can fire her or her MC with 30 (maybe 60) days written notice. So your board does have realistic leverage.

So if she's not living up to the terms of the contract, dump her!

Our Board meets next Tuesday and we always we receive all material from our PM 6 days in advance, o I got ours today. With smaller boards and smaller HOAs, fewer days in advance should be OK. but I don't think any board can be expected to make wise decisions if materials are thrust in front of them AT the meeting.

Who posts the notices & agendas of your board meetings 4 days in advance as required by CA law, Suzie? Our PM does. If yours does, she should also send the Board those agendas and the materials needed to deal with them.

Speaking of which, who sets your agenda? The PM? The PM & prez? The entire board?

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Suzie,

YOU are the treasurer.

YOU should be the one creating the financials based on input from the PM.

YOU should have the bank statements and control the check book.

YOU should have copies of all deposit slips.

YOU should perform an occasional (I did one at the 6 month mark) audit of the ledgers just to verify that the PM is performing their duty properly in regard to financials.

YOU should prepare and track the budget.

THIS IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY AS TREASURER.

You may, of course, delegate various tasks. However, the responsibility remains with the Office of the Treasurer.

If these things are not occurring, you should take steps to make them occur or step down as treasurer.

Here is some more info:

Best Practices #4 Financial Operations from the Foundation for Community Association Research

Spotlight on you the Treasurer a handbook by the National Association of Parliamentarians

Responsibilities of the HOA Treasurer Youtube video by Community Association Law Group

Subject: Duties of a new HOA treasurer 2010 thread on this forum

The Board Member Tool Kit; A GUIDE FOR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION VOLUNTEER LEADERS from CAI

Treasurers Guide to Community Association Finances by CA Executive Council of Home Owners

2015
TREASURER’S ACCOUNTING HANDBOOK & PROCEDURES MANUAL
by a CPA firm
From this manual:

Congratulations! By electing you Treasurer of your Association, the membership has demonstrated its confidence in your abilities to lead the Association towards fiscal responsibility and financial stability. Whether you are a seasoned Chief Financial Officer or a layperson that generally has trouble balancing your own checkbook, this manual is designed to give you the tools necessary to do a great job.
LindaS27 (Colorado)
Posts: 236
Posted:
I realize that the Treasurer is the responsible party. But somehow, that's not logical for HOAs.

A lot of board members are full time employees elsewhere and have families, so even if they are knowledgeable in accounting, they usually don't have the time it takes to oversee all the functions of a treasurer. And those that are retired and have time, mostly have never seen a set of financial statements before.

On the other hand, the MC hold themselves out to be professionals, and are being paid to do things properly. In my opinion, they should be the responsible party.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SuzieE on 09/23/2015 12:46 PM
My question is: Would it be a reasonable to respond that I won't be able to confirm my attendence of the meeting until AFTER the appropriate financials have been sent to the board? Any suggestions on how to handle this would be greatly appreciated.

IMO, it would be reasonable to respond that, as Treasurer, you want the meeting scheduled exactly one week after you and the other board members receive the complete financials for the prior 90 day period.

This should typically be sometime between the 15th and the 25th of the month so there is ample time for the grace period and posting of that month's payments.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 09/23/2015 6:48 PM
Suzie,
Congratulations! By electing you Treasurer of your Association, the membership has demonstrated its confidence in your abilities to lead the Association towards fiscal responsibility and financial stability. Whether you are a seasoned Chief Financial Officer or a layperson that generally has trouble balancing your own checkbook, this manual is designed to give you the tools necessary to do a great job.

Tim

You might want to do a survey here on HOAtalk of Treasurers of their HOA's that follow the checklist you laid out. I think you will find VERY few that follow many if any of that list.

In addition, and I know you realize this, but the membership DOESN'T elect the Treasurer, the Board does.

As a PM, the responsibility of running the day to day operations of the HOA have been delegated to the management company they hired. IF, they follow your checklist, it might be in their best interest to self manage.

My .02
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Richard,

I didn't write the quote. It came from a publication.
I used the quote to stress a point - that the publication may be helpful.

As for the list of things, if the Treasurer isn't taking that responsibility, then that individual should step down or the Board should remove them.

Tim
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RichardP13 on 09/23/2015 10:13 PM

As a PM, the responsibility of running the day to day operations of the HOA have been delegated to the management company they hired.

The day to day tasks are one thing. Verifying that those tasks are being done because you are the one responsible to ensure that they are done is common sense (in my opinion).

Lets take a look at the tasks I listed:

YOU should be the one creating the financials based on input from the PM.

The Treasure is the one who is responsible for the financial affairs of the Association. Preparing an income and expense statement is not that much time (using an excel spreadsheet). Even if that task is delegated, the report should go to the Treasurer who looks it over and, if they agree with it, presents it to the Board.

YOU should have the bank statements and control the check book.

This is something I have always advocated. Few, if any, would give full control of their personal finances to a complete stranger. Partial control (investments), perhaps, but not full control. However, many Associations are more than willing to do this with money they are accountable for by having MC or PM have full control.

Anyone may make deposits to an account without being on the signature card.

No problem with having one prepare checks for the Treasurer to sign (providing the Treasure keeps track of the check numbers and ask if any are missing or out of order).

The Association should have full access to their money all the time. They should have the bank statements sent to them and (if necessary, forwarded to the MC/PM). An option, since they have full control of the accounts, is to have access to the bank statements through the Banks online system.

YOU should have copies of all deposit slips.

Our deposit slips are done in duplicate, so providing the copy isn't an issue.
This allows the Treasure to verify that deposits are being made.
An option to this is, since the Association has full control of the Accounts, to utilize the Banks online system which provides the same thing.

YOU should perform an occasional (I did one at the 6 month mark) audit of the ledgers just to verify that the PM is performing their duty properly in regard to financials.

That is what should be done.
Trust but verify.
An option to this would be to spot check some ledgers.

Keep in mind that this is nothing more then you would likely do with within your own business. Verify that the work you requested is being done properly.

YOU should prepare and track the budget.

This, in my opinion, is something that should not be delegated. Unfortunately, many will have the PM/MC do this. This, in my opinion, makes Treasurers complacent and, worst, not have a real clue on what is happening within their Association.

Quote:
Posted By RichardP13 on 09/23/2015 10:13 PM

IF, they follow your checklist, it might be in their best interest to self manage.

Perhaps.
Perhaps simply hire a temp or an independent contractor for bookkeeping duties to assist.

Not wanting to put you out of a job.
However, this is (in my opinion) what should be done.
As I previously posted, what should be done is not always what's required to be done or what is done.

RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Tim

First, let me say I have the utmost respect for you and for all the help you provide daily for people coming to this site.

Self Manage and Professionally Managed are two different entities. Your's works because, as we all see here, you put the time in. In the vast majority of HOA's throughout the U.S. that doesn't happen.

Let me answer some of the questions you identified on the survey.

1) Do you have control of the Association financial accounts?
If professionally managed the operating account will be at the bank the MC has a banking relationship in order to provide, at the lowest cost, all the services that may be required, lockbox, free banking, ACH, online banking access. Per California statues, reserves accounts are in total control of the Association and can be with the bank of their choosing.

2) Do you prepare the financial statements for the meetings?
We prepare the financials for the meetings. Depending on the size of the Association, it can be up to 100 pages. It is quite detailed. I am a firm believer in complete transparency. With the exception of the bank reconciliation, all reports are available as of the the 1st of the month. I also include a customized Financial Summary Report for each Association. All minutes, financial reports for the homeowners and associations rules are on a website built specifically for them.

3) Do you control the check book?
We write the checks out of the operating, only after the Board has reviewed the invoices corresponding to the check and given their authorization. Reserve checks, per California statues, must be signed by two Board members.

4) Do you receive the Bank statements?
Bank statements are included in the monthly financial reports and per California statues MUST be reviewed by the Board on a quarterly basis.

5) Do you have copies of all deposit slips?
All homeowner deposits are done with lockbox. Any payments done through escrow, deposit slips are included with the financials.

6) Who reconciles the bank accounts (you, a PM/MC, employee/temp or an independent contractor)?
All bank accounts, operating and reserve are reconciled with the MC software.

7) Are you self managed or utilize a management company, property manager, employees, temps or independent contractors?

8) Do you keep the individual lot ledgers (or someone else)?
We maintain the individual lot ledgers and are available as part of the general ledger or their separate report.

8a) (for those utilizing an MC/PM or Independent Contractor) Do you verify those ledgers?
In California, any association with income over $75K, an annual review MUST be performed by a CPA. For a few dollars more an audit can be done, but quite frankly, it's a waste of money. If there are serious issues, an HOA would want to spend the money on a forensic audit.

If an Association doesn't want to be involved on a day to day basis with the "chores" you outlined above, then they may vote to hire an MC. They are two programs an MC can provide, full or financial. If they don't want the day to day involvement they may should full service. There are some that like the day to day, but don't want to be involved with the financial aspect, then they may choose financial only. I provide both.

It's hard enough to get warm bodies to become board members and then slotting them into specific roles or officers is something else. Then you get into politics. The best qualified is a new member (outsider) that a board doesn't want them to know what they have done, or it a power grab.

Most here have either lived in one, two or three different associations in their lifetime. I have lived in one, but have been involved in almost 100, so I have a different prospective. I have seen good MC's and I have seen bad MC's. I have seen a few self manage go MC managed and those weren't pretty transitions. I have seen MC managed that wanted total, total control, and we felt it best to felt them go.

Lastly, I recently changed CAI chapters. The difference was night and day. For the past three months, I have been involved with our Educational Committee. Where one chapter had one class held twice a year for Board members, this new one has 2 classes, one with 8 parts and classes are held monthly. Different mindset, which is quite refreshing.
DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LindaS27 on 09/23/2015 8:40 PM
I realize that the Treasurer is the responsible party. But somehow, that's not logical for HOAs.

On the other hand, the MC hold themselves out to be professionals, and are being paid to do things properly. In my opinion, they should be the responsible party.

The MC works for the board, and by extension, the HOA. The board can rely on the MC, but the board is ultimately responsible for running the association, and the treasurer is ultimately responsible for making sure the treasurers defined duties are carried out.

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.
LindaS27 (Colorado)
Posts: 236
Posted:
Douglas,

Yeah, I keep reading a lot of things like that on many of the posts here.

But still, logically, it doesn't make sense that the treasurer can be held responsible if he/she is not even aware of mistakes or shenanigans that are going on with the MC. They are getting paid the big bucks and from what I can see, they do not even try to get things right. They just do what is easiest.

If missing funds comes down to a lawsuit, are you saying that the treasurer would be held liable?
DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LindaS27 on 09/25/2015 2:02 PM
Douglas,

Yeah, I keep reading a lot of things like that on many of the posts here.

But still, logically, it doesn't make sense that the treasurer can be held responsible if he/she is not even aware of mistakes or shenanigans that are going on with the MC. They are getting paid the big bucks and from what I can see, they do not even try to get things right. They just do what is easiest.

If missing funds comes down to a lawsuit, are you saying that the treasurer would be held liable?

I'm not familiar with MCs, since we don't use one. I would not take the job of treasurer, or support someone else as treasurer if I myself or the other person could not adequately oversee anyone who was managing HOA funds. That could include reviewing books myself, or having 3rd party reviews and audits done. The board is elected by the members to fulfill certain duties and responsibilities. They can farm out the grunt work, but they are still responsible. Keep in mind that the board hires the MC, so the MC might be responsible to the board, but the board is responsible to the homeowners who elected them.

This is really no different than any corporation. The board and officers may not be accountants, but they are the ones responsible to the shareholders (or other stakeholders), not Sharon in the Accounting department. They need to have adequate internal controls in place to oversee the people who do oversee the finances.

I'm not a lawyer, but from what I understand, anybody can sue anybody else for just about anything. That obviously doesn't mean they'll prevail, but it can get expensive for everyone involved. That's why I wouldn't serve on a board without adequate D&O insurance.

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Yes, Yes, and Yes.

But, But, and But.

1. The Business Judgment Rule allows the Treas to reasonably rely on an expert.

2. Directors and Officers Insurance protects the Treas from personal claims.

3. Fidelity Insurance protects the Treas re missing money if he acted reasonably.

For every potential liability, there is protection if the Treas acts with reasonable diligence and in good faith.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
My understanding is the same as NpS's.

Our treasurer and entire board, for that matter, relies on our MC & its CPA re:our finances. We directs are aware, tho', that we must parctice due diligence and not rubber stamp everything. We s directors are ultimately responsible.

In our contract with our MC, we're off the hook only if someone with the MC blatantly tries to cheat us, or words to that effect,.
CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
From what you posted, the MC should be your treasurer and I thought that was a fairly common thing when an HOA has a MC running things. If you are the treasurer, you should have complete and unfettered access to your own financials, especially with all being online now. If you don't then why are you treasurer exactly? And that would be the question I would ask the board and the MC. As suggested, check your own documents to see if it does say who is to be treasurer. Ours state that the president is to sign all checks, but that doesn't mean they to have to be the treasurer.

Also, you can now approach the MC and ask him to please detail what your tasks are exactly as the treasurer. He opened the door completely with his asking you why you did not inform him.

Tim is right, the Treasurer is responsible for all of that and if the HOA hires a MC although some of those responsibilities can be turned over the MC, at the end of the day, the office of treasurer is on the hook for any problems. When the crap hit the fan in our HOA, the board was on the hook solely, the MC didn't even need to show up because they weren't officers or board members. (we would have to turn and sue them personally was how it was explained to us)

And although there are a few good ones around, most management companies prefer to have a board and officers that are not completely clear on just what their responsibilities, it gives them all the wiggle room necessary to do as they think is best without worry. And from what you say, yours could be one of them. Good Luck
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 09/25/2015 9:29 PM
In our contract with our MC, we're off the hook only if someone with the MC blatantly tries to cheat us, or words to that effect,.

Word of caution. Your fidelity insurance does not cover your MC, unless you have a rider. Those riders can be quite expensive.

Also, don't rely on the MC's fidelity insurance. Let's say they have $1M in coverage. But if they are managing 50 HOAs, they can easily have access to $10M to $30M of HOA assets. If an employee of the MC embezzles a bit from here and a bit from there, you could be SOL.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
What I'm trying to say, is the Board is responsible, not an officer. I imagine the officer, let's say the treasurer, could be entirely responsible if s/he embezzles or commits other acts of fraud.

Here, our bylaws permit us directors to delegate the management of our Association's pottery an fines to an MC, which we do. We directors receive over 100 pages of financials every month about a week before our Board meeting. Also, a week before the Board mtg., our Finance Committee, chaired by our treasurer, meets. This FC queries the PM about all manner of expenses. The FC recommends to the Board to approve the financials continent upon the year -end audit.

Our current president makes investments into CDs & Money Mkt accounts and she provides her report at the FC mtg.

Among us 7 directors, I believe I'm one of two who scour the financials and email questions about them to our PM.

With three operating and three reserves budgets, plus a construction defect (CD) account it's pretty complicated around here. This month, for instance, I saw a $10,000 "Plumbing" expense from our CD funds that I didn't recall the Board approving. But, asking our PM, it was actually an expense for corroded pipes & fittings (high rise bldg.), which had, indeed, been identified as a CD and we had indeed approved it in a way that was not one $10,000 expenditure but an overall project.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here