KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Hello everyone, I need your advice or at least opinions.
I've suspected for quite a while that the majority of homeowners (H/Os) in our urban twin high rise towers have been paying too much in dues. Eight %, then, have been paying too little. the 92% are in what's called in our CC&Rs a "special benefit area." No H/Os among the 8% are on the board.
The reason this has persisted is because our CC&Rs do not specify how much in dues or for what items each area should pay. Instead, we must review our original Dept. of Real Estate (DRE, now BRE) documents to learn this. They were prepared by the developer's first mgmt. Co (MC) and are a nightmare to comprehend. There are some very obvious errors that we have cleaned up. But various MCs and even our previous GC have made the errors worse because they misunderstood the documents.
A third area is the commercial owner, who has two "lots" divided into several suites. It's owned by our developer who turned control over to the Owners back in '01. He, per our bylaws has a permanent seat on our board of 7. That area too has been underpaying since the beginning for many reserve items and an expensive operating budget item. According to their DRE budget, they must contribute their small % of square footage to "the Base," which comprises all residential condos.
so...we have three operating budgets and there reserves accounts, plus the % of certain items that the comm. Owner must pay to the Board. (We also, btw, have a sq. ft. variable whereby condos are assessed a bit more, based on their sf, for gas, insurance and water).
We finally have engaged our general counsel to clean up this mess (which I hope encourages us to rewrite our CC&Rs).
Some directors feel very badly that the 8% of owners' dues will increase by just under 20% of their current dues. I do too. But I feel badly that the majority has been overpaying for more than 14 years. To me, we must ethically and morally correct this injustice. And, depending on our attorney's opinions, we might need to correct the errors for legal reasons too.
One question we've asked him is if he opines the way we think he will that we spread the pain to the 8% over a couple of years. But that approach continues the injustice to the 92% to some extent.
Any thoughts to help me think about this possible BIG dues increase for the 8%?
I've suspected for quite a while that the majority of homeowners (H/Os) in our urban twin high rise towers have been paying too much in dues. Eight %, then, have been paying too little. the 92% are in what's called in our CC&Rs a "special benefit area." No H/Os among the 8% are on the board.
The reason this has persisted is because our CC&Rs do not specify how much in dues or for what items each area should pay. Instead, we must review our original Dept. of Real Estate (DRE, now BRE) documents to learn this. They were prepared by the developer's first mgmt. Co (MC) and are a nightmare to comprehend. There are some very obvious errors that we have cleaned up. But various MCs and even our previous GC have made the errors worse because they misunderstood the documents.
A third area is the commercial owner, who has two "lots" divided into several suites. It's owned by our developer who turned control over to the Owners back in '01. He, per our bylaws has a permanent seat on our board of 7. That area too has been underpaying since the beginning for many reserve items and an expensive operating budget item. According to their DRE budget, they must contribute their small % of square footage to "the Base," which comprises all residential condos.
so...we have three operating budgets and there reserves accounts, plus the % of certain items that the comm. Owner must pay to the Board. (We also, btw, have a sq. ft. variable whereby condos are assessed a bit more, based on their sf, for gas, insurance and water).
We finally have engaged our general counsel to clean up this mess (which I hope encourages us to rewrite our CC&Rs).
Some directors feel very badly that the 8% of owners' dues will increase by just under 20% of their current dues. I do too. But I feel badly that the majority has been overpaying for more than 14 years. To me, we must ethically and morally correct this injustice. And, depending on our attorney's opinions, we might need to correct the errors for legal reasons too.
One question we've asked him is if he opines the way we think he will that we spread the pain to the 8% over a couple of years. But that approach continues the injustice to the 92% to some extent.
Any thoughts to help me think about this possible BIG dues increase for the 8%?