💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KathyC5 (Michigan)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Our HOA in Michigan has been self managed since the 1970s. Our "ancient" Master Deed and Bylaws clearly define the ceilings in each co-owner's condo unit as being a general common element. My attorney reviewed our documents and confirmed that ceilings are a general common element. Also, I believe this may be a customary way to define ceilings when one condo is "stacked" on top of another condo (there are 92 units here, half are 1st floor and half are 2nd floor).

In the past, damage to a 1st floor unit caused by water from a 2nd floor unit has never been handled by the Association as damage to a common element. They have always expected the two co-owners to settle the matter between themselves. My 1st floor unit has water damage from the unit upstairs, including bathroom ceiling mold, but the current owner of the 2nd floor condo was not the owner when the water leak first evidenced itself. (The prior owner defaulted on their mortgage.) I did not learn of the full extent of the damage until my rental tenants recently vacated. I have not filed a claim with my insurance company because my insurance would not be responsible for repair of a general common element.

The Association is refusing to repair my ceiling and they will not file a claim with their insurance company. The Association's attorney has advised the Board of Director's that where our documents specify "the ceiling of each unit", it really means only the ceiling of the units on the 2nd floor. Short of a law suit which I've been told will only make the lawyers rich, do I have any recourse here? I don't have the deep pockets to sue. And, even though I feel that I'm in the right, there is no 100% guarantee that I'll win. I also hesitate to initiate any repair myself because it can become very costly due of the mold. Does anyone have suggestions for a way out of this situation? Well perhaps suggestions other than declaring the water and mold damage and selling the condo below market value which I'm already researching.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Kathy

I am not nor do I play a lawyer.

Typically the damage to each unit is covered by that unit's insurance and then the insurance companies will subrogate to settle it between themselves. If there is damage in the space between the two units then this is common space and the associations insurance company will get involved.

In your case there could be 3 insurance companies. Yours, the upstairs unit, and the association.

I know you do not want to hear this but in your case, I suggest calling your insurance company in immediately.

KathyC5 (Michigan)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Thank you, John.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
I agree with John's advice. You should have made a claim as soon as you were made aware of the damage.

Seems to me the ownership history of the unit above matters little. Just how long was this leakage allowed to continue?

And has the cause of the leak been determined?

We have similar layouts on our property and who not make a claim against our master policy to cover damages that the two unit owners failed to address.

See,s to me you wish to avoid holding thevownercofcthe unit upstairs responsible and would rather the HOA cover these costs when in fact they have no responsibility.

I would suggest you contact your insurance agent. Let them do their job settling this matter.

Just how long has this been allowed to drag on? And the leak was addressed or continues?
KathyC5 (Michigan)
Posts: 9
Posted:
You're right Jon; I'd prefer not to hold the owner of the upstairs unit responsible. Let's call the gentleman Mr. U. He's owned the condo for over 3 years but never moved in and has kept it vacant. He may not even have purchased insurance for it; I haven't asked him yet because I was focused on the "general common element" aspect of this situation.

The cause of the leak can't be determined with 100% accuracy while my ceiling is in place. But Mr. U's plumber may have recently identified the source during his second investigatory visit. The plumber discovered that a "hot water shower valve stem" didn't have a washer. A building inspector whom I hired confirmed that the ceiling mold is currently dormant so the leak is not happening now.

Prior to Mr. U buying the condo, my tenants showed me some water damage and mold and I agreed to let them make a cosmetic repair. I believe this was after the bank foreclosure. Obviously I am somewhat to blame for not taking action at that time but I felt I had good reason. In hindsight, I should have ended their month to month lease and addressed the mold remediation problem then. I elected to let them stay, not for financial gain (they were paying half the "going" rental rate) but because I wanted to help them get a start in life. They had two preschool children, bad credit and were attempting to buy their first home. Looking back, I made a bad decision as the condo's owner but a good decision, I think, in some other respects.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Kathy,

Put a claim in with your insurance company.

Give them the name and contact for the unit upstairs and the Association.

You ceiling will be repaired.
The Insurance companies will fight amongst themselves over who pays.
You can get on with life.

This is why you pay for the insurance.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KathyC5 on 09/09/2015 5:04 PM
You're right Jon; I'd prefer not to hold the owner of the upstairs unit responsible. Let's call the gentleman Mr. U. He's owned the condo for over 3 years but never moved in and has kept it vacant. He may not even have purchased insurance for it; I haven't asked him yet because I was focused on the "general common element" aspect of this situation.

The cause of the leak can't be determined with 100% accuracy while my ceiling is in place. But Mr. U's plumber may have recently identified the source during his second investigatory visit. The plumber discovered that a "hot water shower valve stem" didn't have a washer. A building inspector whom I hired confirmed that the ceiling mold is currently dormant so the leak is not happening now.

Prior to Mr. U buying the condo, my tenants showed me some water damage and mold and I agreed to let them make a cosmetic repair. I believe this was after the bank foreclosure. Obviously I am somewhat to blame for not taking action at that time but I felt I had good reason. In hindsight, I should have ended their month to month lease and addressed the mold remediation problem then. I elected to let them stay, not for financial gain (they were paying half the "going" rental rate) but because I wanted to help them get a start in life. They had two preschool children, bad credit and were attempting to buy their first home. Looking back, I made a bad decision as the condo's owner but a good decision, I think, in some other respects.

Not that difficult to read between the lines from your prior posts.

Not trying to be harsh here but your handling of this matter makes no sense. The unit upstairs had a plumbing issue. As a result damage was done to your unit. You understood the policy of the board to have unit owners handle such situations.

Now you don't seem willing to hold the responsible party responsible but rather you would prefer the HOA assume the cost of repairs the HOA played no role in.

Whether the owner upstairs has insurance should have never been your concern. And I get the sense this has been allowed to drag on for sometime allowing for back and forth with the HOA and even having your attorney review documents in the hope somehow the HOA will pay to repair damage caused by a plumbing leak inside a privately owned unit.

Now here's the $24,000 question. Do you have insurance coverage in place? If so I would call them immediately and hope they will entertain a claim being filed despite all of these delays and distractions.

SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Home insurance is not like car insurance. Typically, you only want to make a home insurance claim when its super expensive. They could easily double your rates when it comes up for renewal.

Get an estimate for the work, then decide (financially) if its worth it or not to get your insurance company involved.
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
KathyC5,

You posted:
“The Association's attorney has advised the Board of Director's that where our documents specify "the ceiling of each unit", it really means only the ceiling of the units on the 2nd floor.”

You also wrote that:
“My attorney reviewed our documents and confirmed that ceilings are a general common element.”

It appears that you have two (2) different interpretations.

Would you be willing to post the exact words from your Master Deed and Bylaws and/or Documents that define the boundaries of a Condominium Unit?

Thank you.
KathyC5 (Michigan)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Tim, your opinion is appreciated. And yes, I do need to "get on with life".

Jon, yes I do have insurance. And yes I have NOT handled this situation well. However, kindly keep in mind that the water damage occurred prior to Mr. U's ownership. The Board's unwritten policy was to have unit owners handle these situations; however, this is contrary to the unambiguous provisions of our Master Deed and Bylaws which mandate that the Association repair common elements and recoup costs from the person who damaged them or from their insurance. While the law may hold Mr. U responsible, it just doesn't seem right to me.

Steve, I'll probably sell the condo so doubled rates aren't a factor for me. Getting an estimate for mold remediation is problematical and unlike getting an estimate for car repairs. It's difficult to even know who to get an estimate from until several hundred dollars has been paid to have a remediation protocol prepared. This is because not all contractors are licensed to do remediation over 100 square feet and mold may extend down into walls and behind tub tiles. You don't generally know the extent until repairs begin.

Ellie, will post a reply to your question soon.
KathyC5 (Michigan)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Ellie, the text below refers to apartments but these condos were built to be condos and the complex is not a conversion from an apartment complex. Also note that Exhibit A mentioned below refers to the By-Laws

From Master Deed:

4. The apartments, including the number, boundaries, dimensions, area and volume of each apartment are described more particularly in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. The buildings are lettered "A" through "F" and the apartments are numbered in series "1 through 92".

5. The general common elements and the limited common elements, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto are as follows:

(A) General common elements:

1. The land described in paragraph 2, including parking facilities (except as provided in clause (b) below) driveways and side walks.

2. All transmission lines wherever located in the project for gas, water, electricity, sewer, telephone or other utility which services more than one apartment shall be a general common element.

3. The foundations, main walls (including windows, outer doors and chimneys therein) roofs, basement floors and upper most ceiling in each apartment, as described in Exhibit "A".

Also from Master Deed:

6. (A) The apartments in each building of the Condominium are completely described in the Condominium Subdivision Plan and Site Plan as surveyed by Basney & Smith, Inc. and attached hereto as Exhibit "B". Each apartment shall include all that space contained within certain horizontal plains designated and delimited by "X" and "Y" coordinate lines and certain vertical plains designated and delimited by "Z" coordinate lines less any common elements contained therein. In determining dimentions, each apartment shall be measured from interior finished unpainted surfaces of the main walls and ceiling and from the interior surface of the finished subfloor.

Ellie, there are no other condo unit boundaries specified in Exhibit A and no definitions of "upper most ceiling" or "ceiling". My attorney told me that "upper most ceiling" was most likely used to differentiate if from any dropped ceiling installed by an owner. Exhibit B is the subdivision plan drawings that were recorded with the county. The individual units shown are quite small and the drawings have even tinier text and numbers on them that relate to the survey lines.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Kathy I'm sorry but this situation gets more difficult to understand as we get more information.

The owner upstairs has owned the unit for 3 years. The damage occurred PRIOR to his ownership. So this has been ongoing for 3+ years?

Now the owner upstairs has a plumber come in a find a missing washer that might be the source? Then you have had a mold remediation contractor examine the condition of your unit but in the meantime you have never filed a claim with your own insurance.

My opinion your interpretation of the governing documents fails to address damage caused due to the actions or inactions of others.

If the building burned to the ground then in that case the HOA would cover the cost to replace and repair. You have a plumbing leak caused somehow by the upstairs unit in my view NOT the responsibility of the HOA to cover those costs.

Your insurance company should have been allowed to settle this matter when it occurred. Not 3 years or more after the fact.

Believe it or not this is a common and easily settled situation. No need for you to have contacted lawyers, contractors, HOA boards, or whomever else.

My concern will your insurance carrier honor such a claim from what occurred years ago?
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
Steve, I'll probably sell the condo so doubled rates aren't a factor for me.


Again, home insurance isn't like car insurance. The rate follows the house, not the owner. So if pay $1000 year and it jumps to $2000 year, the person your selling the house to will get an estimate for insurance before getting a mortgage and the deal might fall through. Or you will have to drop the price in order to make it a better deal for them. So yes, it will probably affect you, even if your selling.

I've never seen a home insurance policy cover anything past 1 year from the date of damage. This is based on the companies policy and state law. You let too much time pass to make a claim.
EllieD (Vermont)
Posts: 446
Posted:
KathyC5,

Thank you for posting words from your Master Deed.

1. The words under (A)(3) “upper most ceiling in each apartment” are clear and typical. The word “each” apartment (Unit) certainly specifies that the upper bound of a Condo Unit is the uppermost ceiling of “each” Condo – whether or not a Condo Unit is a lower unit or an upper unit. So it is hard to understand why the Association’s Attorney would state “it really means only the ceiling of the units on the 2nd floor”.

Do you know if the Association has that interpretation in writing?

2. The words from Section 6.(A) also help. Again rather typical. And again the usage of the word “each” - so applies to ALL Condo Units, and reference to “all that space contained within certain horizontal plains” adds to understanding.

3. From Section 6.(A) the words: “each apartment shall be measured from interior finished unpainted surfaces of the main walls and ceiling and from the interior surface of the finished subfloor.

Wording similar to my Association’s. Again specifying “each” apartment (Unit). And most important, the definition of the Unit boundary as: “the interior finished unpainted surfaces of the ceiling”.

Since the interior "surface" is the boundary, the actual ceiling plasterboard is not part of the Condo Unit, and so is not owned by the Condo Owner. Also the Condo Owner does not own any of the building structure behind, above, the ceiling plasterboard.

Since those elements are NOT defined as part of the Condo Unit, and are behind the boundary of the Condo Unit, those elements can only be Common.

4. Re the Common ceiling plasterboard, and Association responsibility: Without knowing more, I agree, assuming of course, that neither Condo Owner, upper or lower, did anything to cause the leak and/or make it worse.

As others have pointed out, when the leak was first noticed, when it was reported, what has, or has not been done, in the interim, needs also to be taken into consideration. Also the very real possibility that if the leak had been repaired, when discovered, that there would be “no mold" to contend with now.

5. Like yours, my Condo Association is self-managed, has apartment type buildings, with first floor and second floor Condo Units, with Unit Boundaries defined similar. If it were my Association, as soon as the Board “heard” there was a leak, such as you describe, our Association Plumber would have immediately been called to investigate. Once the source of the leak became known, decisions would then be made as to whom is responsible for the cost of repair.

6. Re your Master Deed (A)2. All transmission lines wherever located in the project for gas, water, electricity, sewer, telephone or other utility which services more than one apartment shall be a general common element.

This is an important sentence, because it defines a water line which services more than one apartment as a common element.

7. Over the years we have had a number of “strange” first floor ceiling leaks that were NOT caused by anything in, or from, the above upstairs Condo Unit.

If your leak was due to a "hot water shower valve stem that didn't have a washer” in the upstairs Condo Unit, then of course, it was from the upstairs Condo Unit.

But – and just food or thought - we had a ceiling leak in one of our first floor Condo Units. The Plumber could find nothing in the second floor Condo Unit above, that could be the cause. After he cut out an area of the first floor ceiling “to look”, he found that a solder joint in the water line that supplied water to BOTH of the Units, upper and lower, had corroded and was leaking.

So clearly it was now Association Responsibility only, as the water line was a Common Element.

8. My Association, in addition to Apartment Buildings, also has a number of two (2) story Townhouse Buildings. When referring to the Townhouse Condo Units, the upper boundary is the uppermost second floor ceiling.

I wonder if your Association Attorney might not have read your “specific” Master Deed, and or, assumed Townhouse Units, rather than stacked Condo Apartment Units.
KathyC5 (Michigan)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Jon, yes the damage occurred prior to Mr. U's ownership but the leak itself has not been ongoing because he never used his bathtub because he's kept the condo vacant. He sporadically does improvements to the floors, kitchen, painting etc. and updated his tub hardware recently but had not taken out the trash so the plumber was able to inspect the old valve stems and washers.

The person I hired to actually confirm for me that there was mold (as I suspected) was a home inspector with past experience in mold remediation. However, he no longer does remediation work and never makes referrals to remediation contractors so he can remain impartial.

Yes Jon, my inaction is a factor here and my decision making was flawed. My background is in medical insurance where the primary carrier usually pays first. I have zero prior experience with a home owner's insurance claim.

Also, as I mentioned earlier, my tenants with preschool children wouldn't have been able to live in the unit while bathroom repairs were being made and didn't have the resources to live elsewhere, even on a temporary short term basis. They now own their first home and their recent move has prompted me to address the bathroom situation which I've come to realize I should have addressed sooner.
KathyC5 (Michigan)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Steve, I did not know that home insurance "follows the house". Thank you for taking the time to make me aware of that fact.
KathyC5 (Michigan)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Ellie, I'm sad to say that I'm absolutely positive that the Association's attorney knows that these are all stacked condo units. He's been our attorney for 40 years and has actually been revising our Master Deed and Bylaws for over two years although the Board has yet to see any of his work product. I'm not sad for me so much as for other owners who promptly report similar damage in the future. They will get no help from the Board and, as you know, most people don't take the time to read and understand the Master Deed and Bylaws themselves. Frankly, even I didn't focus in on those specific portions of our documents until it affected me directly.

I've lived here for 40 years and have volunteered uncounted hours as a Board member during that time. My last term ended in June. I'm fairly certain that the Association has their attorney's interpretation in writing. However, I understand that it may not be shared with me because the Board is divided over how much to divulge. I've been told that the Board will send me a letter in response to my to my written request for assistance; I guess I'll find out then what they think I need to know.

Ellee, in your example of the corroded solder joint, our Board would authorize the Association's help if the joint was in a water line that serviced the 2nd floor and 1st floor units. But they would only help if the joint failure was at the point where the 2nd floor line joined the 1st floor line or below that point. You're very fortunate to have an Association Plumber, we don't even have a handyman.

Thank you so much for taking the time to reply Ellie.
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
I'm very unsure whether a long-existing water leak that causes damage will be covered by insurance.

First - the landlord should inspect the rental property.

Second - the tenant should notify the owner in any event.

Third - the damage is willful because someone allowed it to happen and it isn't an accident

Fourth - The failure to inspect and the tenant failure to report was double negligence, thus "victimizing" the HOA (and its policy)

See how the insurance company gets off the hook?

Repair your ceiling and move on w/ life. You'll worry over it more than it's worth.

HINT: I had a tenant allow an in-floor water leak from a "pinhole" in my pipe to rot the living room floor, collapsing it. Filed insurance. Got rejected and suggested I sue the tenant (yeah, right). She was negligent....I was negligent for not inspecting.

Sorry for your maintenance issue on the investment property. I've been there.
KathyC5 (Michigan)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Thank you for your comments, Kelly. Since I last posted I did file an insurance claim and my insurance carrier authorized payment for painting the bathroom ceiling (the amount approved falls within my $250 deductible). The insurance adjustor reviewed my Master Deed and Bylaws and came to the obvious conclusion that the ceiling itself is not my responsibility.

I've discovered that my HOA's insurance has a "no-control" clause that covers damage caused by any act or neglect of any occupant when such acts or neglect are not within the control of the HOA. However, while the Board has informed me that they've determined that the 2nd floor owner is responsible, the Board refuses to become further involved.

I did get one helpful tip from my insurance adjustor that may be useful to everyone reading this thread. He said condo owners should always buy their individual insurance from the same insurance company that the HOA uses for the "master" policy.

I sympathize with your difficulties, Kelly. I hope you have better luck in finding responsible tenants in the future.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here