πŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account β†’

⚑ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

NiaR (North Carolina)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Hello everyone. I am seeking recommendations to represent the interest of the residents and challenge my builder's rejection of a voluntary community survey I plan to give to residents at a community meeting this weekend. My community has about 125 condo units contructed and cleard space for another 150 units. Needless to say our builder is still in control of the BOD. I apologize in advance for the long post but I wanted to be sure to put the challenges in context. Thank you.

Survey question:
Please rate your satisfaction with the following (1-10)
- Your condo
- Community Amenities (pool)
- Responsiveness (Board of directors, HOA, MgmtCompany)
- Speed to resolve (issues, complaints, requests)
- Landscaping/condo exterior
- Overall condition/appearance of the community.

Board response
Delete #2 – If the survey results indicated that homeowners wanted improvements then this would require an increase in the dues. Should have homeowners have concerns about the items in this block then they need to contact "Builder" (for their condo) or "the mgmt co" and we will address the issue accordingly.

Survey Question:
Please rank from 1-6 the topics you are most interested in learning about in your community communications.
- Timeline, site plan, sold/vacancies, sales prices etc community development.
- Clarity and Reminders of HOA rules and regulations.
- Board meeting minutes
- Community Financials (budget planning, expense management)
- Social Activities
- Service Provider resources/recomendations (handyman, pet sitters, house cleaners etc.)

Board response:
#4 – Remove Timeline, site plan, etc.; Board Minutes; Community Financials. The NC Non-Profit Act allows homeowners to review the records (minutes and financials) of the HOA; however, there is a process for reviewing. This implies that we will distribute these docs on a regular basis.

Survey Questions:
Please rate you satisfaction with the enforcement of the follwing violations (1-10)
- trash compactor/disposal
- Illegal Parking
- Pet Waste clean-up
- Noise Disturbances
- List other violation
- overall satisfaction with enforcement of community rules/regulations.

How often would you like to recieve community updates?
- monthly
- quarterly
- annually

Board response:
#5 – Leave β€œHow often would you ….” and remove the satisfaction with enforcement block. The Board has a set policy on enforcing the violations. Unless the homeowners understand the policy then they will naturally reply unsatisfied and their comments will not alter this procedure. The Board is charged with this responsibility and how it is enforced is at the discretion of the Board.

Survey Question:
How often would you like for us to get your feedback via survey?
- monthly
- quarterly
- annually

Board response:
#7 – Remove. "Builder" is not in favor of surveys and this question implies that there will be periodic surveys.

Each resident who completes the survey will be entered in the drawing for a $100 Home Depot Gift Card.
NOTE: the Builder has only budgeted $150 for Community Meetings. The gave me $100 for food and I used my own money to purchase the gift card.

Board response:
Remove β€œIf you would like to be entered……”. The CFO for "builder" has discouraged the use of gift cards by "Builder" for several reasons. "Builder" appreciates your willingness to purchase this gift card; however, they ask that you discontinue this practice in the future as it appears that "Builder" is not willing to make contributions to community. Plus, it violates their policy. Since we acknowledged the gift card in the flyer, the Board will allow it for this party.
πŸ“Ž Attachments (1):

⏸ Downloads temporarily unavailable

πŸ“„165205725671.pdf(114 KB)
MikeS1
Posts: 668
Posted:
They gave you $100 for food and you bought a gift card? ...on whose authority?
What is your real question or goal here?
MikeS1
Posts: 668
Posted:
What is your position with the Board? or are you on one of the committees?
NiaR (North Carolina)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Hello Mike S. I hope all is well. Good to know you are a member of this great site.

As everyone knows the residents are the "checks and balances" in determining the effectiveness and quality of the BOD,mangement co. and HOA. The answers to these survey questions allow us to better understand what we need to start, stop and continue. As you may well know Mike, the "builder" surveys target the new home owner not the more seasoned resident.

I welcome any and all solutions that consider the interests of everyone involved.
JM2 (Oregon)
Posts: 439
Posted:
Hi Nia:

I'm curious about your motivation behind the survey... I can see where the builder (who is in control until turnover) would not like the survey, as you wrote it.

If you have particular concerns, you might want to take them to the Board/Management to see if they can get resolved. If they can't, then talking to people who are concerned and getting a group of people to go to management/board would make sense. This feels more like a "fishing expedition."

I've managed HOA's, pre- and post-turnover. I think it would generally be more effective to work with the manager to resolve issues. In the meantime, get prepared for turnover (CAI has an excellent resource on going through turnover) and begin working on the issues that the Board will face once turnover happens (such as: is the budget realistic? Getting an engineering firm to check for construction defects... etc...).

J. Patrick Moore, CMCA
NiaR (North Carolina)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JM2 on 06/05/2007 11:37 AM
Hi Nia:

I'm curious about your motivation behind the survey... I can see where the builder (who is in control until turnover) would not like the survey, as you wrote it.
The motivations remains the same: what should we start, stop and continue. I am considering the interest of everyone involved. The survey questions are soliciting feedback on "how well we are controlling"

If you have particular concerns, you might want to take them to the Board/Management to see if they can get resolved. If they can't, then talking to people who are concerned and getting a group of people to go to management/board would make sense. This feels more like a "fishing expedition."
Thats just it J. Patrick Moore. Before we began "resolving" we need to substantiate and clearly identify opportunities to improve. Industry experts suggest surveys might reveal unknown problems/concerns, however BOD should not be reluctant to undertake surveys for these reasons. I am seeking solutions that help us get closer to the perceptions of the greater community not just the extremes.

I've managed HOA's, pre- and post-turnover. I think it would generally be more effective to work with the manager to resolve issues. In the meantime, get prepared for turnover (CAI has an excellent resource on going through turnover) and begin working on the issues that the Board will face once turnover happens (such as: is the budget realistic? Getting an engineering firm to check for construction defects... etc...). Given the "turnover" is not in the near future the focus is balancing the needs of the seasoned residents and those to come. As you know the builder leans on the side of frugality and does not support any preparation activity that incurs a cost (hiring engineers, assessments etc). Any recommendations?

J. Patrick Moore, CMCA

PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
Nia: Not sure what your goal is, especially in view of your post's subject line: 'Builder Railroading.'

I do not see how the builder is 'railroading' you. The builder/developer does have responsibility for control of the community he has built until a certain percentage of lots are sold, then it (control) is turned over to the residents of the association.

It seems the builder still is in control at this point, and for you to initiate a survey to gain an understanding from new residents who have perhaps just moved into their units, IMO is very premature.

It would be wise to wait until the builder is no longer the one in 'power'. Once a Board and Committees are elected from the resident population, your efforts would certainly be useful to get the association up and running in the best possible way.

If I have misunderstood that the builder is still involved, then I apologize. Please explain further.
DavidW5 (North Carolina)
Posts: 565
Posted:
Nia,

I disagree with many of the responses here advising you to wait or to modify the survey. You did not surrender your rights as a US citizen when you moved into a condo. You have the right to survey the other residents on any subjects you wish and the builder has no say in the matter (as I understand it you are NOT using builder or association funds, correct?)

Be aware that many posters here are associated with management companies and may not be too concerned about your individual rights.

Dave
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DavidW5 on 06/05/2007 7:14 PM
Be aware that many posters here are associated with management companies and may not be too concerned about your individual rights. Dave

Dave, I take issue with you. Why do you think I post here other than to help individuals. I believe what posters are saying is that surveys will not sway the Developer. So it is best to wait on doing surverys until action can be taken by the homeowners. The Developer is not railroading; they are protecting their investment.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
Nia: Roger is correct. I would strongly advise you hold off in your efforts. Not sure why you want to conduct a survey at this time; you have really not explained the purpose or what your personal motive is. You haven't answered some of the questions asked of you.

You may be stirring the pot prematurely and the results could give you a soiled reputation which is ABSOLUTELY not a good thing for community living. Just a thought to proceed on the side of caution.
hoatalk (California)
Posts: 603
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DavidW5 on 06/05/2007 7:14 PM
Nia,

Be aware that many posters here are associated with management companies and may not be too concerned about your individual rights.

Dave

Dave, Your comment above about management companies is inappropriate and not welcome on this forum. You cannot make such a general comment about a whole profession, at least not here.

Here we have all different types of members, the vast majority of which are actual HOA board members. The people that take the time to post here do so to help others and comments like yours above DISCOURAGE those people from posting answers. Their expert advice has helped thousands of communities here so far and is very much appreciated by HOATalk and its members.

Please keep this in mind: Most of the members here are Board members looking for answers. The few professionals that take their valuable time to post here are providing those expert answers our members need. We should all be appreciative that they will give away their professional advice.

HOATalk.com, A free service of Community123.com
Provider of Upscale Community Websites
CLICK HERE to get a FREE trial community website
*See legal notice below (end of page)
NiaR (North Carolina)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Thank you all who have taken time to respond. I agree with HOA Talk that the way in which people respond can encourage or discourage people from posting. The tone I set by using the word "railroading" in the subject line was an uneeded representation of my frustration and may have encouraged the harsh tones of those who questioned my motivation and my title which left me feeling discouraged about getting non-bias advice that equally considers and represents the interest of the Builder AND THE RESIDENTS. To DavidW5's point: "The Builder is protecting THEIR investment." Which I expect, but, not at the expense of the residents. My motivation is not personal. It is in response to repeated actions of BOD/mgmt co. inconsistent and selective responsiveness, lack of follow-through, selective and convenient adherence to BOD guidelines and policy. Some residents have expressed concern to me and I have observed this behavior as the sole resident Board member. I was nominated and elected by residents who expect me to represent their interest by addressing issues that can potentially compromise THEIR investment and quality of living in our community. I am in a incredible challenging role and have no plans to let my fellow residents down.

If there is anyone out there who can help me come of with balanced solutions that promotes the interests of EVERYONE involved and holds EVERYONE accountable for responsible action I welcome your thoughts.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Nia, since you apparently already know about "repeated actions of BOD/mgmt co. inconsistent and selective responsiveness, lack of follow-through, selective and convenient adherence to BOD guidelines and policy", than rather than a survey what is in order is a letter to them all listing the specific complaints and suggested changes desired. This letter could also be copied to owners and request the Board respond to all owners.

With regard to your statement " "The Builder is protecting THEIR investment." Which I expect, but, not at the expense of the residents", what you expect and what you get may be two different things. But it is worth a try if you wish to expend the time and effort. Good Luck.
NiaR (North Carolina)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Roger, Thank you for offering a viable course of action.

What, if any, steps/considerations should I take to ensure I am in compliance of my BOD position and what things should I avoid?

PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
Nia: Since the builder/developer of your community is still in control (and actually only half-way finished building) he is able to set up a Board with directors of his own choosing. It would seem from your posts that you are the community resident on the Builder's Board at this time.

He is also able to contract with a property manager (of his choosing) to oversee association issues for him. Please realize the management company that the builder has in place at this time is paid by the builder and reports to the builder.

At this juncture, your best recourse is to carefully review your covenant documents which will detail the developer's role prior to the association turnover to residents; also, review your state's 'Planned Community Act' (access from Community Associations Network in yellow to the right of this screen).

The developer does have responsibility to the buyers of his units in the association and his role and responsibilities are stated in your covenant. If he is not fulfilling that which the covenant and the state says he must do, then he must make 'things' right and comply according to the covenant document he himself has officially recorded.

Be challenged, at this time, to devote your energy to learning about your own community's documents: Declaration, Bylaws and how they follow (or don't follow..?) the state law. Once you are informed appropriately, you can move forward with confidence to have the builder/prop.manager address your/resident concerns. Good Luck. Keep us posted.

MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
I see nothing wrong with this survey, and as a communication professional I take offense at the "edits" that were requested by the "board."

The board clearly does not understand the function or purpose of a survey. For some reason they think that because a question is asked, it "implies" some future intention on their part.

I, personally, would distribute the survey as written, but with ONE key edit, I would make sure that the recipients know and understand the survey came from ME, the representative they selected, and not from the "builder." (by the way, the board's encasing builder in quotes is particularly annoying and reeks of persisent intention to keep the relationship any BUT on a personal level.)

It's clear that no matter how the survey is written, neither the board, the "builder" nor the MC will pay any attention to the results anyway. But I would find it very helpful in focusing my own priorities for current and/or future direction from the residents.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
Nia, what is the purpose of the Builder-Board to hold a community meeting and what do you, as the resident on the Board, hope to accomplish?
NiaR (North Carolina)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Michele, thank you so much for your point of view.(sarcasm free) :-) Yes, I am trying to better understand the needs of my fellow residents and this survey was an attempt to do so. I will keep your recommendation in mind.

BTW - "builder" was my way of editing to protect the name of the developer. All other word are verbatim.

Like many resident Board members I am learning as I go and trying to focus my actions to avoid some of the challenges BOD's face once the community is turned over by the Developer and facilitate balanced solutions while under the control of the Developer.

I welcome additional recommendations on how to assess the collective needs of the residents in my community to help focus our efforts.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Nia, thanks for clearing the "builder" thing up for me.

At any rate, if you can afford it, I would still urge you to promote the survey. I would just make it clear that it did not come from them, since they obviously have little interest in what the residents think or want.
NiaR (North Carolina)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Michele, I am assuming it is within my legal rights as a resident to collect this information for my own knowledge.

I have looked through my rules & reg's and did not see any provision or policy that states otherwise.

To your point, they are not interested in the solicitation or outcome of this survey.

Considering their $100 monetary contribution for food expenses and the fact that they printed the flyer I created announcing the meeting, does that mitigate my legal right to modify the purpose and initiator of the survey as you suggested and solicit my fellow resident to complete it?

I just want to be sure that these actions are not illegal.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
First of all, you are a member of the association, just as are all the other residents. If any one resident wanted to take the time and energy to send the others a survey, or even just "hello" notes or whatever, then they are perfectly free to do that. The residents will either ignore or answer/respond as they wish.

I'm not sure exactly what the flyer states what the purpose of the meeting is. When is the meeting, by the way? What is the length of the meeting supposed to be? Where is it being held? What do the builder and board think you are supposed to accomplish? What do they want YOU to do for them at the meeting?

If you are not representing the survey as THEIR (the builder/board) survey, but rather as an information gathering TOOL for YOU to do the job they (the residents) voted you in to do, then there should be no conflict.

Do you plan on distributing the survey before the meeting? Do you plan on the residents filling it out there? Are they required to sign it? Or is it strictly confidential?

JM2 (Oregon)
Posts: 439
Posted:
Hi Nia:

I re-read your posting and some of the responses. I can understand where the builder is coming from on some of the Board responses; it doesn't look like the builder is trying to be unreasonable, and in fact, is in some instances, trying to avoid setting false expectations for the residents.

If the enforcement procedures are not adequate in your view, you may want to review the procedures and suggest improvements to the current policy.

Generally, there would be a fee charged to produce the financials for residents to review, whether that is in time involved, or cost to reproduce them (or possibly both) since it takes up management company resources.

Some of the issues (pet waste, for instance) tend to be long-term difficulties in communities that are due to inadequate owners/residents, rather than inadequate enforcement. Irresponsible pet owners will always be around; noisy parties are generally dealt with through police rather than HOA resources on an immediate basis.

The developer is wearing two hats; one as builder who is trying to make a profit, the other as the head of the Board of Directors, trying to please owners and enforce the covenants. I haven't yet worked with a builder who really wanted to make the residents angry, and sometimes the builders would rather be "nice" than enforce the covenants (and post- turnover, a lot of boards are the same way, generally with less than desireable long-term results). While you are on the board in your present position, it would be wise to review policies of the board; propose changes where needed, while understanding that some of the changes might not be made at this time; and help to prepare the community for turnover - in part by forming committees (if that's possible) to help develop leadership in the community that will be willing and competent to step forward and be elected to the board at turnover. In the meantime, also observe the management company, to see if you would recommend keeping them in place, once turnover is accomplished. Some management companies can do the dance between working for developers and working for the communities post-turnover, but not all accomplish it well.

Another thing to prepare for, once turnover is accomplished, is a building envelope study, to look for any construction defects. It's a big issue any more, builders shudder at the issue so you might not want to bring it up to the board; but consider that this is something that is strongly recommended, in order to make sure that the association's legal rights are preserved. Your local CAI chapter may have some people who could be good resources; you might also check out the CAI online bookstore for resources as well.

Best of luck!

J. Patrick Moore, CMCA
NiaR (North Carolina)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Thanks for clarifying Michele. I am learning that corporate bureaucracy and HOA bureaucracy are quite different. :-)

I attached the flyer for your reference. It was established early on that this would be a community meet & greet and that I would leverage the forum to survey the residents. I created the agenda,objectives and the survey. The BOD (developer) and the management co elected not to be in attendance from the beginning.

The meeting is this Saturday. If I decide to solicit feedback for the survey I am sure I will leverage different approaches to collect the data before, on the day of and after.

I have a lot to consider and appreciate your input.
πŸ“Ž Attachments (1):

⏸ Downloads temporarily unavailable

πŸ“167173397671.doc(20 KB)
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Okay, that flyer shows that this meeting is about as generic as generic can be. I would simply produce the survey as you intended. If the board wants a survey tailored for its OWN point of view, it can do that on its own. They are supporting the meet and greet, feedback, and other things, so if they opt not to participate with a feedback mechanism of their own, so be it. Again, though, I would make it clear this is your survey to be used by you.

I reject the notion that is implied by both the board and other posters that survey questions set up some sort of "expectation" by the respondents.

The only expectation people have when they fill out surveys is that their opinion is heard.

What the board and others may be antsy about is the actual bringing up of topics. When management wants to bury its head on issues, it pretends they don't exist. Management often fears simply mentioning the issues to the people will make visible the "invisible." The problem with that line of thinking is that just because management doesn't want to discuss certain issues, doesn't mean they aren't on peoples' minds.

I ran into this mentality all the time with executives in the corporate world. When we were to prepare employee satisfaction surveys, they tried to prevent us from asking questions about various topics that they wanted to keep quiet about. Bad move. Never works. and in the end a survey is just that. A survey, not a policy creator. Though you could make an argument that policy COULD be created based on the results and analysis of some surveys.

At any rate, again, let those attending know that you drafted the survey, not "management" and you will use their responses to shape your priorities going forward.

Also, one more comment for JM3 and others. The survey is a snapshot of what's on peoples' minds. It's not intended to communicate to them what they can't or shouldn't be asking about or even to communicate answers to their questions or concerns ahead of their asking. It is simply a method of collecting what some of their concerns and priorities are.

The time to make the "answers", such as " Generally, there would be a fee charged to produce the financials for residents to review, whether that is in time involved, or cost to reproduce them (or possibly both) since it takes up management company resources. " is when the survey producer prepares a follow up document addressing the analysis, including specific questions or concerns that were raised.

It's simply information gathering, not information disseminating. Besides, sometimes you might be surprised at the answers. You THINK you know how MOST people will respond to the type of job you are doing about, say, enforcement, but when the survey is processed you discover that the majority actually feel enforcement is on target. Often we hear from the loudspeakers and just as often they may not actually speak for the community as a whole.

MD
NiaR (North Carolina)
Posts: 13
Posted:
I concur Michele. I knew there was a flip side to this coin. I am wearing 2 hats as well and will consider all the advice offered.

Thank you all!
RobertG (Arizona)
Posts: 505
Posted:
If I understand your intent, then I would add one footnote to the flyer that the Meet and Greet is not sponsored by the HOA, board or xxxx Builder.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Robert, that's not necessary. Besides, the Meet and Greet is. That's what they gave her the $100 for and their entitled to that acknowledgment. But the survey is entirely separate from a meet and greet and is in reality a tool for her to do her job. It doesn't matter when or how she presents the survey to them. The meeting is NOT for the purpose of the survey, it's for the meet and greet.

DavidW5 (North Carolina)
Posts: 565
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By hoatalk on 06/06/2007 7:18 AM
Posted By DavidW5 on 06/05/2007 7:14 PM
Nia,

Dave


Dave, Your comment above about management companies is inappropriate and not welcome on this forum. You cannot make such a general comment about a whole profession, at least not here. {/quote]

I stated my opinion based on what I have read here. Are you saying that you are going to censor posts on this forum because you disagree with an opinion being expressed? If so, I think the usefulness of this forum as a place to exchange ideas will be at an end.

Dave

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • βœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • βœ“ Share your experience
  • βœ“ Get expert advice
  • βœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account β†’

⚑ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here