💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

PamW4 (Missouri)
Posts: 5
Posted:
I really need help! Our HOA is in Missouri. Our current pool is not going to last another year. We have already voted down a new pool 1.5 years ago and now its up for vote again.
We only have 144 houses. The pool cost is $236,172 our HOA wants to put an $80,000 down and charge all residents $1,100. They brought no other offers to the board. This is it or nothing at all. The current pool is basic. The new one is a water park with a shade structure for $42,000
Residents voting no are livid. They feel that the board did not act in their best interests. They did not look at the economic impact on families.
My question is, is there a law that states how much a HOA can spend on anything beyond their annual income? They also plan on taking a loan out for amount that they dont receive from residents who refuse to pay.
We want a pool! any help on this issue would really help
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Pam,

Among your options is to organize a meeting of the members to vote on a more reasonable pool.

FredS7 (Arizona)
Posts: 927
Posted:
> Among your options is to organize a meeting of the members to vote on a more reasonable pool.

It's not clear from the OP what exactly the "vote" is. Probably it is a formal vote by mail or similar to approve a special assessment.

If this is the case- any vote at an owner-organized meeting would only be advisory.

Probably the right way to deal with this is to lobby to get owners to vote down the special assessment. (If, of course, this is the wish of enough of the owners).
DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PamW4 on 08/07/2015 6:12 AM

My question is, is there a law that states how much a HOA can spend on anything beyond their annual income?

I don't think most states have laws that limit HOA expenditures, although some might. More commonly, your HOA governing documents (by-laws, CCRs, Deed restrictions, etc.) will spell out any limits on dues increases and special assessments. Have you read those docs to see?

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,062
Posted:
Pam,

I know of no statute addressing that question.
Therefore, you will need to review your governing documents to see how budgets and special assessments are adopted.

As for this being the only option, it's typical for any Board to solicit bids, review proposals and only bring one option to the membership. If this isn't what you believe should be done, you should gather support and get elected to the Board so you are part of that decision making process.

This might not be what you wanted to hear.

I hope it helps,

Tim
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Did anyone else gets bids and present them to the board? It sounds like there is enough apathy in your HOA to let whoever submitted a bid to get it. Otherwise, in our HOA we have a 3 bid minimum on all contracts. Anyone can submit a bid to the board to vote on. We take the best 3 and vote on them.

So it sounds like if you all want another option then some of you have to make an effort to bring some bids to the table. Otherwise if you do not supply an answer to your issue, one will be appointed to you by the board.

Former HOA President
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
PAM

Typically any borrowing, debt, etc. must be approved by a majority of owners. It can get tricks as to what a majority is but with debt, it is often at least 2/3rds of all (I say all) owners must approve. The answer will be in your own association docs.

Assuming 2/3rds did approve but you do not then your recourse would be to recall the BOD, put new people in their place and cancel the deal.

Has your association voted on the debt?

GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
If you had a pool reserve fund this wouldn't be a problem.

I second the call for more information about the vote. PamW4's post sounds like she's against splurging on a fancy new pool, but then the very last line sounds like she's in favor of it. I'm confused.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Pam, I would suggest you look to your CC&R's to see if there is a limit to what "Capital Improvements" the Board can make to the property without homeowner approval. (Ours written in the early 90's sets the limit for our Board at two thousand dollars.) While the Board probably has the power (check local listings) to repair or replace the pool and to set a special assessment to pay for it, they possibly don't have the power to add all the bells & whistles to it without homeowner approval.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Two years ago, we were in a similar situation - we'd closed our pool in 2009 because of money issues and as time went on and the pool remained closed (no one complained), it because more of an eyesore. By the time we did our reserve study in 2012, it was clear that to reopen the thing would be extremely expensive and there wasn't anything for it in reserves, so a special assessment would be necessary.

We sent the homeowners a detailed letter explaining the issues and the options - replace the pool (very, very expensive), fix the pool (very expensive) or close it altogether and fill in the hole (relatively cheap, given the other options.) We then threw in the numbers as to how much it would cost to run a full season, noting all of this would mean an increase in assessments (which will happen anyway, but some things jack up the fees more than others).
Because of the mind-blowing apathy of our community, it took another year and a half to gather enough votes to make a decision, but in the end everyone voted it down.

So, you want a pool and it sounds like you feel this particular one is too expensive. If the homeowners are voting on this again, it would seem all you and like-minded owners have to do is vote the thing down and start over again. This time, I'd suggest the board commission a special committee where interested homeowners (like you) could do some research on various pools, their costs and what it would cost to run a season and maintain it (this will impact your reserves after all). Come with several options and make a recommendation to the Board. Or, the Board can put all the options before the community (preferably no more than three) and put it to a vote.

The options should include the numbers and how this would impact assessments or if a special assessment would be necessary. You may think $1100 per homeowner is expensive and it is, but you also have to think long term as well as other community needs. Perhaps the community no longer wants a pool and if it does, they have to be willing to pay for it. You want a pool - how much are you willing to pay to have one?

Personally, I wouldn't get a loan for this - when I was our HOA's treasurer, I used to stress us avoiding loans whenever possible because loans mean high interest rates and assessments would have to be increased beyond our 5% maximum per year in order to pay routine expenses, fund reserves AND make the loan payments. If we must get a loan, I said, I'd rather it be for something more practical like new roofs for our townhomes.

By the way, there probably isn't any law that says HOAs can or can't spend beyond its means - frankly it shouldn't be necessary to legislate this because it should be a matter of common sense. Then again, consider how everyone overspends, from the government on down to Joe Taxpayer (although he might not admit it), one shouldn't be surprised.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
PamW4 (Missouri)
Posts: 5
Posted:
thanks for the help on this issue. We are now voting on this. I know that the HOA had lower bids come in. They basically told the contractor that they did not want a basic pool. They wanted more. I am going to read through the by laws again and see what we can do. I feel they are being deceptive
FredS7 (Arizona)
Posts: 927
Posted:
You still haven't explained exactly what the "vote" is. THIS is what you need to understand and act on. As before, I am guessing this is a vote required when a special assessment is required. Not enough votes in favor = no pool contract for now.

THEN you can consider how to influence the board to choose a different option.

PamW4 (Missouri)
Posts: 5
Posted:
This is a vote to replace a pool that can't be fixed. a special assessment. They decided that water jets, a shade structure for 42,000,larger pool, stamped concreat,kid pool, zero entry would be the best for all residents.
We were not given choices. IN Missouri if I read the non profit corporation correct it states that they can not borrow more than 25% of the net worth.
We have 144 houses. The HOA is placing 80,000 down and each house is required to pay 1,100 by Oct 15th 2015. Due to the fact that they know that some residents can't pay, they decided with out another vote to get a loan from a bank.
We got ballets and have to vote by the 15th of this month. When I looked at the ballet I noticed it didn't state how many votes they had to have for the decision. It states 51% in our HOA but again its possibly a law in MO that it has to state it in writing. I know for a fact that they did receive more bids. They were lower and just for the replacement of the pool.
We need a new pool! But does the HOA have the right to replace it with a water park and extra structures? Take out a loan with out a vote and place liens on those who can't pay. We want to shut this vote down and fast. I have a lot of people backing me. If anyone knows how to do this in Missouri please let me know!!
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Hi Pam

For starters, what is the net worth of your association? On your Association's Balance Sheet, the Net Worth should be identified as "Fund Balance." Typically, 2 Fund Balances will be provided - one for the Operating fund and one for the Reserve/Replacement fund.


Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
FredS7 (Arizona)
Posts: 927
Posted:
> But does the HOA have the right to replace it with a water park and extra structures?

The board has the right to put this before the association for a vote. Every owner has the right to vote for or against.

It is not realistic to offer options. Say 51% is needed to approve. Offer four options, and none get 51%. Do it again and get the same result.

You voted in the board (collectively) to seek bids and make a selection. The check on their power is the requirement for a vote for special assessments. Stop looking for an external law or rule and deal with the circumstance you are in. Lobby for a no vote, then get people to come to the next meeting to speak for a more modest replacement.

By the way- WAS there no discussion at a board meeting, and no opportunity for comment?
ND (PA)
Posts: 792
Posted:
You asked about state laws . . . I don't know the state laws in Missouri, so you need to find those and read them yourself to see the capital expense-related language. There could be some language in your HOA documents as well, so you need to read and understand those. Regardless, it seems to me that your Board is operating foolishly if there is strong opposition to the direction they are going and they are still plowing ahead.

And I disagree with some of these comments and with how some HOAs seem to function.

Being on the Board doesn't give the Board Members carte blanche to do what they please with other people's money. Without 100% owner agreement (which will rarely happen), I personally would find it impossible to extravagantly spend other peoples' money and force them to pay now (for a capital improvement) and into the future with higher dues (for waterpark maintenance and replacement) just because I may be permitted to do so by the documents.

If your Board was/is performing their fiduciary duty to the entire association, then you would have the proper reserve funding already set aside for a new pool that is an appropriate replacement for your current pool. If that doesn't exist, perhaps that needs to be the first question to the Board which might put a stop to the foolishness.

People bought into your neighborhood knowing a pool existed. And that pool was operated and maintained with money from your monthly/yearly assessments. Money from the assessments should have also gone into the reserve account for eventual replacement of the pool. People did not buy in to your neighborhood expecting installation of and required payment for a waterpark. Without 100% owner agreement, I don't see how anyone could feel justified in spending that money.

If it is somehow decided that the money will be spent on this waterpark, then any cost over and above existing operation and replacement costs could come from some type of user fee. This user fee could be charged to those who use the pool. Those who do not use the pool won't pay any more than they do right now.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
This was pulled from the CCRs of an HOA in Kansas City, Missouri

The association may levy a special assessment for a period not to exceed two (2) years, for the purpose of providing emergency funding, construction or reconstruction of common property elements or other purpose, at any time it deems necessary, on an affirmative vote of three-fourths of the owners present at a special meeting called for said purpose with notice to all owners mailed not more than 60 and not less than 70 days prior to said meeting.

Said notice shall advise owners of the time and place for the meeting, the purpose of the meeting, and the amount of special assessment being proposed.

Very possible and probable you have the same language in your CCRs.
PamW4 (Missouri)
Posts: 5
Posted:
Thanks for all the help!
I have been the driving force for the no vote on the water park. all 8 of my neighbors are NO on this subject. I posted my comments on our web site called Next Door. One of the board members deleted all of our comments. Oh well. The vote will be on Thursday night. One of the board members contacted me tonight. I am the one going to audit the count. That should make the pool commitee happy. Now the HOA is saying that if this doesn't pass they are going to fill in the pool and let it go. That isn't their choice! We are going to fight this. It's not that we don't want a pool we can't afford a water park.
It says in the by laws that it's 51% to pass. And if you don't pay they will add $20 a month to the bill.
This issue has divided the subdivision. Infact some are saying the board is bullying them into voting.
Again thanks for the help
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PamW4 on 08/10/2015 7:39 PM
Thanks for all the help!
I have been the driving force for the no vote on the water park. all 8 of my neighbors are NO on this subject. I posted my comments on our web site called Next Door. One of the board members deleted all of our comments. Oh well. The vote will be on Thursday night. One of the board members contacted me tonight. I am the one going to audit the count. That should make the pool commitee happy. Now the HOA is saying that if this doesn't pass they are going to fill in the pool and let it go. That isn't their choice! We are going to fight this. It's not that we don't want a pool we can't afford a water park.
It says in the by laws that it's 51% to pass. And if you don't pay they will add $20 a month to the bill.
This issue has divided the subdivision. Infact some are saying the board is bullying them into voting.
Again thanks for the help

Our community has a Nextdoor page and we also have a Board member that deletes posts they don't like.
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
PamW4, if you'll excuse my saying, your opposition to the plan sounds like it lacks focus. The main reason the ballots don't say how many votes are needed is because the actual number isn't known in advance. For example, if you have a quorum of 30% then at least 44 ballots will be needed for a quorum, and then a simple majority of those, as few as 23, would be enough to approve the special assessment. If more than 44 ballots are received then the number will be different.

You say you have "a lot" of people backing you. How many exactly? Do you even know? 8 isn't going to get it done. Did you distribute any informational material opposing the SA to the other owners (NextDoor doesn't count)? You could also organize a recall of board members who are in favor of the plan. Probably too late for that now. You could organize for a recall of board members any time, in fact, before a contract is signed with the contractors. Are you preparing for that?

Good luck to you, it does sound like an extravagant pool upgrade. I'd probably be against it too. I'm getting the feeling, however, that you waited until the last minute and are just now finding out you haven't done nearly enough homework to prepare for this vote.

Are you knocking on doors every day leading up to the vote?
PamW4 (Missouri)
Posts: 5
Posted:
The vote started on July 28th. Yes I have gone door to door, called people,had a meeting, and posted this to our web site.
The 8 people in my street have helped too. So with all of this going on the questions of the signature on the ballot came up along with others. I know for a fact that the HOA did not even look at bids that were for a basic pool because we did research and called pool companies on our own.
The main point that Im hearing from all the no votes is that the HOA did not have the best interests of the home owners.
Now we are looking for anything else we can do to shut down the vote.
Again thanks to everyone for the help
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
You said that the HOA could not borrow more than 25% or net worth.

Quote:
Posted By NpS on 08/10/2015 7:12 AM
Hi Pam

For starters, what is the net worth of your association? On your Association's Balance Sheet, the Net Worth should be identified as "Fund Balance." Typically, 2 Fund Balances will be provided - one for the Operating fund and one for the Reserve/Replacement fund.



Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
GreggT (Florida)
Posts: 77
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PamW4 on 08/11/2015 5:44 AM
The vote started on July 28th. Yes I have gone door to door, called people,had a meeting, and posted this to our web site.
The 8 people in my street have helped too. So with all of this going on the questions of the signature on the ballot came up along with others. I know for a fact that the HOA did not even look at bids that were for a basic pool because we did research and called pool companies on our own.
The main point that Im hearing from all the no votes is that the HOA did not have the best interests of the home owners.
Now we are looking for anything else we can do to shut down the vote.
Again thanks to everyone for the help

Sounds like you have nothing to worry about then with all those no votes.
What the HOA is doing is pretty typical, I'm sure they got numerous bids and opinions on what to do before submitting it to the owners. The reason there is only one choice is if there was several the vote would be split between the choices and the required percentage never would be obtained.
Your complaint sounds familiar as we heard the same thing when we changed colors of our condo complex. We offered two choices, leave it like it was or change it as presented. If we left it like it was it would have been $55,000 more expensive. Some owners were livid we did not offer more choices but when we tried to get input and assistance from our owners it was like listening for a pin to drop.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here