Quote:
Posted By GenoS on 08/01/2015 2:29 PM
Interesting stuff. The crack about Dodd-Frank I found most interesting of all. I suppose those whose business it is to re-inflate Housing Bubble 2.0 would be the first to whine that the new regulations are onerous. Cry me a river. Other than that, the factual information is good, Shiela, thank you for that at least.
Wow, really? You must not watch much financial news Deno. Do you even know what is in Dodd-Frank? You and I are blessed to have the opportunity to be homeowners. But the Committee for Financial Services in the House summarized it best here:
http://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=399392
There are millions of hard working Americans that want to buy, but this (intractable) legislation paralyzed many. I suspect if it were your home being refinanced where you were going to save $300 a month and your appraiser (from another state because you could not select that individual) made a gross mistake, but after correcting the mistake still wouldn't amend the value accordingly, you wouldn't say a word? Even when your only option was to walk away from your locked rate at 3.5% and the market is now over 4%? Even the president acknowledged the over-reach when he issued an Executive Order lowering the FHA insurance earlier this year. The stories are many and all over the web, but to give a taste:
Here are six borrowers who were denied a mortgage:
1. 27% LTV. A couple with a 780 FICO score who wanted a $300K loan on a $1.1 million house and would have $300K in reserves after closing, but whose verifiable income was only 30% above the proposed mortgage payment.
2. 801 credit score. Newly retired couple with fantastic 801 credit score, $1 million in retirement accounts, and $400,000 in savings after they were going to put down $350,000 on a $550,000 home purchase, but whose Social Security income was less than double the proposed mortgage payment.
3. Affluent business owner. Owners of a small retail business who were turning the business over to their children to manage, with the intent of collecting dividend income; who had $500K in cash savings and wanted a 50% LTV.
4. Relocating borrower. A US citizen who has been working overseas takes a job in the US, has a 700 FICO, 20% down payment, and plenty of reserves, but cannot produce a W-2 because he do not exist in the country in which he was working and hasn't started his new job yet.
5. New employee. A prospective borrower qualified in every way except she had only been in her current job for five months and had worked in the family business previously where she did not get a W-2.
6. Loan = 15% of applicant's assets. A retiree who wanted a 50% LTV and had assets six times the proposed loan amount was turned down and eventually paid cash.
So, next time why not ask questions instead of insinuating all I am concerned about is the Almighty buck? We have an entire block of Americans in serious housing trouble, again, and these folks have excellent credit and had nothing to do with the foreclosure/short sale fiasco. I am the first to agree, controls were needed, but it was taken way too far. This legislation is slowly eliminating the community bank. I know this too painfully well as my most recent favorite employer bank threw their hands up, it was too expensive to stay in and a subsequent regional bank was purchased by a much larger bank, one I would never work for. Are you aware community banks have declined by 41% and at least one Fed Bank is placing a chunk of blame on this legislation? Even more disturbing, community banks are not even attempting to start anew. Here's some more facts for you:
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/12/10/study-rental-housingmoreunaffordablethaneverbefore.html
http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/244573
A former industry colleague wrote this (opinion piece) paper why this legislation is hurting us is written by Dave Hirshman:
http://www.gazettextra.com/20150723/con_dodd_frank_is_hurting_consumers_and_the_economy_it_needs_a_complete_overhaul
If you really want to read up on this, there's a working paper, a simple Google will bring up, "How Small Banks are Fairing Since Dodd-Frank. If you get a 105 page document, originated at George Mason University, that is the correct document. Bye-bye to the small bank.